Archoliogia (gantiana.
THE ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY OF THE CONVENT1JAJ4
BUILDINGS OF THE MONASTERY OF
CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBUItY,
Considered in relation to the Monastic Life and Rules, and drawn
fror n surveys BY THE REV. ROBERT WILLIS, M . A . , F.R.S., ETC. ETC.,
JILOXSONIAN PROFESSOR O F T H E UNIVERSITY O F CAMBRIDGE.
IN Archmological Association
Canterbury 1844, had the pleasure of
reading the actual buildings the Cathedral, which was
volume year. I
then undertook the investigation o f the conventual
was so completed 1847 was enabled to communicate the results, in the form
a lecture the Archmological Institute, at their
monthly meeting on the 5th of March of that year, of
report be fourth Archological Journal, p. I t afterwards
read the Society Antiquaries. B u t avocations
distracting my attention from the subject, I was
for many years unable to find leisure prepare memoir for press.
VII.
~rthreologia . 1298.)
T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
Dormitory does indeed extend to the Green Court;
but the windows are placed so high above its floor
that no person within i t could see what was passing
in that court. From the Dormitory eastward, the Necessarium
of the monastery, with the Prior's gate-tower,
Study, and Gloriet, extend 174 feet i n length, so as
to mask altogether the Infirmary cloister. T h e gatetower
provides the only direct access t o this cloister
from the Green Court, and, with the exception of the
gatehouse, is the only the monastic
group which has a window directly looking into that
court, evidently provided to enable the Prior to observe
it at his pleasure, as his duty was. T h e high wall and
Another high wall appears to have connected the Lardergate
with the west tower of the Necessarium.
I t appears thus that the seclusion from the world of
monastic life was complete.
The monks within and the persons in the court without
other.
The Hospitate buildings of a monastery were erected
parts convent ground, to
the profession or quality of the guests.
For example, the plan of the monastery of St. Gall'
shews three hospitia—one for the reception of distinguished
guests, another for poor travellers and pilgrims,
and a third for monks visiting the monastery.
The first and second are placed to the right and left
common the monastery, being on the same side of the church as the Abbot's
house, and latter on the cloister side next to the farm
buildings. T h e stranger monks are lodged against the
side aile of the church near the Abbot.
Each of the two Hospitia assigned to the two classes
1 Vide my description of it, 'Archreological Journal,' June, 1848, vol. v.
14 THE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF THE
Dormitory does indeed extend to the Green Court ;
but · the windows are placed so high above its floor
that no person within it could see what was passing
in that coul't. From the Dormitory eastward, the Necessarium
of the monastery, with the Prier's gate-tower,
Study, and Gloriet, extend 17 4 feet in length, so as
to mask altogether the Infirmary cloister. The gatetower
provides the only dhect access to this cloister
from the Green Court, and, with the exception of the
Pentise gatehouse, is the only building of the monastic
group which has a window directly looking into that
court, evidently provided to enable the Prior to observe
it at his pleasure, as his duty was. The high wall and
gates complete the south boundary of the court eastward.
Another high wall appears to have connected the Lal'del'gate
with the west tower of the Necessarium.
It appears thus that the seclusion from the world of
the edifices devoted to the monastic life was complete.
The monks within and the persons in the court without
were alike unable to observe each othel'.
The Hospitate buildings of a monastery were erected
in different parts of the convent ground, according to
the profession or quality of the guests.
For example, the plan of the monastery of St. Gall 1
shews three hospitia-one for the reception of distinguished
guests, another for poor travellers and pilg1·ims,
and a third for monks visiting the monastery.
The ffrst and second are placed to the right and left
of the common entrance to the monastery, the former
being on the sall)e side of the church as the Abbot's
house, and latter on the cloister side next to the farm
buildings. The stranger monks are lodged against the
side aile of the chtuch neat the Abbot.
Each of the two Hospitia assigned to the two classes
1 Jlule my description of it, 'Archreologicnl J ou1•nn,l,' J une, 184.8, vol. v.
p. 85.
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 5
of the laity is a complete residence, suited to the habits
of each, the first with a dining-hall, bedrooms, each containing
several beds; also stables and servants' rooms,
building bakehouse, brewhouse,
The each
end, rooms for servants who waited on the pilgrims.
also provided, a cellarium,
a bakehouse, and brewhouse.
The stranger monks were qualified to eat in. the refectory
with the brethren; they are only provided with a
sitting-room and a dormitory.
. T h e Hospitate buildings are represented at Canterbury
in the Norman drawing, in the first place, by the Camera
Vetus and Camera Prioris on the east
and south of the monastic group. These, which were
apparently devoted to the reception of the most distinguished
guests, who were assigned to the Prior, were
their ancient sites, and extending along
I n the separated
from the Prior's group by the intervention of the
mass we kitchen and butteries, employed for the reception of the
guests under his especial charge, and approached by an
especial gatehouse. Lastly, i n the north-west corner
termed Aula purpose
has exactly other examples, the Hospitium o f the paupers and
lower class of pilgrims.
Almonry-yard, where the broken meat and other
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 15
of the laity is a complete residence, suited to the habits
of each, the first with a dining-hall, bedrooms, each containing
several beds; also stables and servants' roonis,
and a separate building with kitchen, bakehouse, brewhouse,
and store-room. The second, for the lower orders,
has a large room in the centre with a dormitory at each
end, and rooms for servants who waited on the pilgrims.
A camera or sitting-room is also provided, and a cellarium,
a bakehouse, and brewhouse.
The stranger monks were qualified to eat in the refectory
with the brethren; they are only provided with a
sitting-room and dormitOTy.
. The Hospitate buildings are represented at Canterbury
in the Norman drawing, in the first place, by the Camera
Vetus Prioris and Nova Camera Prioris on the east
and south of the monastic group. These, which were
• apparently devoted to the reception of the most distinguished
guests, who were assigned to the Prior, were
greatly enlarged in the later times, occupying the ground
surrounding their ancient sites, and extending aloug
the eastern boundary of the Green Court. In the next
place, on the western side of the site, completely sepa-
1·ated from the Prior's group by the intervention of the
entire mass of monastic buildings, ,ve find the Celerer's
hall and lodgings, in the neighbourhood of the convent
kitchen and butteries, employed for the reception of the
guests under his especial charge, and approached by an
especial gatehouse. Lastly, in the north-west corner
of the Green Court, in contact with the outer gate, is the
great Hall, te1·med .A.ula Nova, which, although its purpose
has never been exactly recorded, was, judging by
other examples, the Hospitium of the paupers and
lower class of pilgrims.
Beyond this hall, on the outside of the precinct, was
the Almonry~yard, where the broken meat and other
alms were daily delivered to the poor.
16 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS O F THE
The Hospitia in the monastery we are examining at
Canterbury are all in the form of long ranges of building.
N o records remain to indicate the exact original
distribution of the apartments; but it is well known that
in the middle ages travellers were content to sleep in
chambers containing many beds, and to rest in the day in
long galleries, in which there was space to walk to and
fro for exercise and conversation. F o r private converse,
these galleries had one or more recesses i n their sides.
Haddon Hall and Queen's College, Cambridge, retain
such galleries, of which indeed many other examples remain.
The garden towers and oriels o f the Deanery
furnished such recesses in the original form of the "New,.
Lodgyng," and the tower which projects from the north
face of Chillenden's Chambers, and the oriels o f the
house termed Meist' Homers are also examples; for in
all these structures it is probable that the length of the
building had very few transverse partitions. T h e highpitched
adapted the same may said The Menial buildings have been already enumerated
Thus far I have described the general disposition, as
explained the inscriptions on the Norman drawing.
I consider the actual condition,
or rather the various conditions have
passed through, since I first became acquainted with
them; comparing them with the records, to develope
o f care during the
middle ages, of the neglect, destruction, and cupidity of
the Reformation and Rebellion, and of the meddling ignorance
and indifference of the times approaching our
own.
16 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF T.I:p!}
The Hospitia in the monastery we are examining at
Canterbury are all in the form of long ranges of building.
No records remain to indicate the exact original
distribution of the apartments; but it is well known that
in the middle ages travellers were content to sleep in
chambers containing many beds, and to rest in the day in
long galleries, in which there was space to walk to and
fro for exercise and conversation. For private converse,
these galleries had one or more 1·ecesses in their sides.
Haddon Hall and Queen's College, Cambridge, retain
such galleries, of which indeed many other examples remain.
The garden towers and oriels of the Deanery
furnished such recesses in the original form of the ''New•
Lodgyng," and the tower which projects from the north.
face of Chillenden's Chambers, and the oriels of the
house termed Meist' Homers are also examples; for in
all these structures it is probable that the length of the ·
building had very few transverse partitions. The highpitched
roof of Chillenden's building was adapted for a
dormitory or gallery, and the same may be said of the
roofs of the Cheker building and of the Deanery.
The Menial buildings have been already enumerated
(p. 12, above).
Thus far I have described the geneTal disposition, as
explained by the inscxiptions on the Norman drawing.
I will now consider the buildings in their actual condition,
or rather in the various conditions they have
passed through, since I first became acquainted with
them; comparing them with the reco1·ds, to develope
the successive changes they have undergone through the
periods of reverent care and improvement during the
middle ages, of the neglect, destruction, ancl cupidity of
the Reformation and Rebellion, and of the meddling ignorance
and indifference of the· times approaching our
own.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 7
CHAP. I V.
BUILDINGS BELONGING TO THE MONASTIC L I F E .
1. The Chapter-House.
Beginning with the great Cloister, we find between
the gable-wall of the north transept and the Chapterhouse
a narrow passage or slype (Plate 2, 37), which,
when Lanfranc's short east end of the church was standing,
led, as usual, directly into the cemetery of the
monks at the east of his apse.
The Norman chapter-house was, as will appear below,
rebuilt in later times, and the present one is manifestly
shewn, by the mode of its junction with the small Norman
cloister (0, Fig.. 6, page below) to project
further eastward than the original one, which is represented
in the Norman drawing by a mere gable-wall
rising above the Cloister roof, and furnished with a row
of four windows like those of the Dormitory, of which
A s extending
eastward from this gable is shewn, the building,
were other evidence wanting, might from this alone be
pronounced to have been a short one.
The passage from the Dormitory to the church for
probably the chapter-the party-two
buildings, at such a height that i t would admit the
monks into a gallery constructed in the thickness of the
west gable-wall of the chapter-house over the doorway,
and conduct them by an opposite door into the structure
shewn in the Norman drawing. This appears to
represent the side wall o f sloping ascent, erected
against leading
upwards in continuation of the passage, over the
upper chapel north transept,
VII.
M:ON.ASTERY OF CHRIS'!' CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 17
CRAP. IV.
BUILDINGS BELONGING TO THE MONASTIC LIFE.
1. The Chapter-House.
Beginning with the great Cloister, we find between
the gable-wall of the north transept and the Chapterhouse
a nanow passage or slype (Plate 2, 37), which,
when Lanfranc's short east end of the church was standing,
led, as usual, directly into the cemetery of the
monks at the east of his apse.
The Norman chapter-house was, 8$ will appear below,
rebuilt in later times, and the present one is manifestly
shewn, by the mode of its junction with the small Norman
cloister (0, P, Fig .. 5, page 48, below) to project
further eastward than the original one, which is represented
in the Norman cu:awing by a mere gable-wall
rising above the Cloister rnof, and furnished with a row
of four windows like those of the Dormitory, of which
this gable-wall is the continuation. As no roof extending
eastward from this gable is shewn, the building,
were other evidence wanting, might from this alone be
p1·onounced to have been a short one.
The passage from the Dormitory to the chui·ch for
the nocturnal services was probably provided by a door
into the chapter-house, in the party-wall of the two
buildings, at such a height that it would admit the
monks into a gallery constmcted in the thickness of the
. west gable-wall of the chapter-house over the dool'way,
• and conduct them by an opposite door into the structure
shewn in the Norman drawing. This appears to
1·ep1·esent the side wall of a sloping ascent, erected
again.st the west wall of the transept, and roofed, leading
upwards in continuation of the passage, over the
Cloister roof, and consequently landing the monks on the
pavement of the upper chapel of the nort~ transept,
VOL. VU. C
18 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
dedicated to St. Blaise, which was on a higher level than
the Cloister roof. The vault which carried the floor of
this chapel was pulled down after the murder of Becket,
to enable the altar of his martyrdom to appear to advantage,'
but was standing when the drawing was made.
Possibly the roof of the Chapter-house was pyramidal,
and the small triangle with three windows would represent
a dormer.
The documentary history of the Chapter-house is contained
in the two passages which follow—the first, from
the list of the works of Prior De Estria, (App. No. V.)
repair of the Chapter-house with two new
gable-walls, A.D. 1304-5," 2—the second, from Chillenden's
list (Appendix No. VI.), records the "completion
of the new Chapter-house." 3 The allusion below (p. 46)
to the dangerous state of the Chapter-house in the document
of 1397, from my Arch. l i s t . p. 118, shews
that this latter repair took place after that date.4
The Chapter-house itself fully confirms the written
history. I t is an oblong room, extending without a vestibule
from the eastward, feet length and thirty-five feet in breadth.° I t s lateral walls
are lined with a simple arcade, supported on single
rest on a bench table, and composed of
battlementeil
The east end has a canopied throne the
centre and an arcade of richer character on each side,
triangular The
are 1 2 quint° . Reparacio "1390 . . . Nova capitularis . . . 4 Ang. Sacra 143, also D o m = Capitularem
' s Bristol chapter-feet.
18 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE .
dedicated to St. Blaise, which was on a higher level tlian
the Cloister roof. The vault which carried the floor of
this chapel was pulled down after the murder of Becket,
to enable the altar of his martyrdom to appear to advantage,
1 but was standing when the drawing was made.
Possibly the roof of the Chapter-house was pyramidal,
and the small triangle with three windows would represent
a dormer.
The documentary history of the Chapter-house is contained
in the two passages which follow-the first, from
the list of the works of Prior De Estria, (App. No. V.)
mentions a "repafr of the Chapter-house with two new
gable-walls, A.D. 1304-5," 2-the second, from Chillenden's
list (Appendix No. VI.), records the "completion
of the new Chapter-house."'fhe allusion below (p. 46)
to the dangerous state of the Chapter-house in the document
of 1397, from my Arch. l:Iist, p. 118, shews
that this latter repair took place after that date.4
The Chapter-house itself fully confirms the written
history. It is an oblong room, extending without a vestibule
from the Cloister wall eastward, ninety feet in
length and thirty-five feet in breadth.5 Its lateral walls.
are lined with a simple arcade, supported on single
shafts which rest on a bench table, and composed of
pointed .trefoil arches surmounted by a rich battlementea.
cornice. The east end has a canopied throne in the
centre and an arcade of richer character on each side,
the arches being provided with trianINGS.
------------------ ---------- ---------------
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 4 9
mains of such an arcaded cloister, in front of the Infirmary
(vide Fig. 5 at T, and Fig. 16). T h e arches are
plain, square-edged, o f a single order, only two feet
ten inches in span, and fourteen inches thick, resting
on low shafts, which are alternately single and double.
The capitals are of early Norman character. Some of
the shafts are carved with small spiral flutes, either
continuous, or alternately right and left as in the crypt
column engraved in my Architectural History' (p. 69).
Only six of these arches remain, and they are partly
masked by the piers and buttresses which support the
front wall o f the high building which was erected
subsequently, and will be described below. T h e complete
arcade consisted either o f twelve o r thirteen
arches. B u t the erection of the Prior's chapel, in the
thirteenth century, swept away the southern half of this
eastern alley and half of the southern alley. I n the
Norman drawing only ten arches are given to this east..
ern alley. I n reality the length of the alley is equal to
the west front of the Infirmary, which backs it. B u t
the nature of the drawing made i t impossible for the
draughtsman to exhibit this fact, which was not essential
to his hydraulics.
The north and south arcades are shewn in the same
simple form as the east; the former, which has now left
no traces, except the springing of its boundary-wall at the
east end, and perhaps at the west, is represented with
eighteen arches. The south arcade is partly covered by
the circular tower of the Lavatory, commonly termed the
Baptistery, but shews six arches on each side of it. A s
the eastern alley was certainly never vaulted, it is probable
that, as completed by Lanfranc, a similar construction
was carried along the north and south sides.
But at present the southern alley is occupied, in the
space from the Dormitory to the circular tower, by a
Norman ambulatory, of five open arches on each side,
VOL. V I I . B
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN C.ANTERBUHY. 49
mains of such an al'caded cloister, in front of the Infirmary
( vide Fig. 5 at T, and Fig. 16 ). The arches are
plain, square-edged, of a single order, only two feet
ten inches in span, and fourteen inches thick, resting
on low shafts, which are alternately single and double.
The capitals are of early NOl'man character. Some of
the shafts are carved with small spiral :flutes, either
continuous, or alternately right and left as in the crypt
column engraved in my 'Architectural History' (p. 69).
Only six of these arches 1·emain, and they are partly
masked by the piers and buttresses which support _the
front wall of the high building which was erected
subsequently, and will be described below. The complete
arcade consisted either of twelve or thhteen
arches. But the erection of the Prior's chapel, in the
thirteenth century, swept away the southern half of this
eastern alley and half of the southern alley. In the
Norman drawing only ten arches are given to this easte1n
alley. In reality the length of the alley is equal to
the west front of the Infirmary, which backs it. But
the nature of the drawing made it impossible for the
draughtsman to exhibit this fact, which was not essential
to his hydraulics. •
The north and south al'cades a1·e shewn in the same
simple form as the east; the fo1·mer, which has now left
no traces, except the springing of its boundary~wall at the
east end, and perhaps at the west, is 1·epresented with
eighteen a1·ches. The south arcade is partly covered by
the circular tower of the Lavatory, commonly termed the
Baptistery, but shews six arches on each side of it. .As
the eastern alley was certainly never vaulted, it is pro.bable
that, as completed by Lanfranc, a siniilru: construction
was cauied along the north and south sides.
But at present the southern alley is occupied, in the
space from the Dormitory to the circular tower, by a
Norman ambulato1·y, of five open arches on .each side,
VOL. vrr. E
50 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
resting on compound piers of substantial masonry, vaulted
with transverse arches and groins, and surmounted
by a low upper story or gallery, with Norman windows.
(Figs. 5, 6, 7.) The circular Lavatory tower, which now
stands in front of the fifth arch, was a subsequent erection,
shewn From compartment. vaulted and arcaded ambulatory or passage (N, M,
5), of upper gallery, leads southwards at right angles, to door
in the gable of Ernulf's transept. This door gives access
to the crypt, flight of descending steps within the
thickness of the gable wall. The door is placed as near
possible, enable monks to enter it and pass forward without interfering
with the services at the two crypt altars, which occupied
the apses of the transept, and were dedicated respectively
The span of that arch of the vaulted ambulatory from
which this south branch issues, is considerably greater
the corresponding arches the arcade, severey of the vault, which is square in plan, forms a
crossing, piers are treated i n southern an afterthought. This substantial work was evidently
for passage
south ambulatory the Infirmary the new transeptal chapels in the crypt of Anselm's
also carry second covered passage might be obtained, leading
Dormitory floor This is the choir Conrad, which, being raised upon crypt, is carried to a height of twelve or fourteen feet
the level of cloisters, thus brought the few 50 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
resting on compound piers of substantial masonry, vault•
ed with transverse arches and groins, and surmounted
•by a low upper story 0 1· gallery, with Norman windows.
(Figs. 5, 6, 7.) The circular Lavatory tower, which now
stands in front of the fifth arch, was a subsequent erection,
as shewn below. From the fifth compartment a
vaulted and arcaded ambulatory or passage (N, M, Fig.
5 ), of exactly similar construction, also provided with an
upper gallery, leads southwards at right angles, to a door
in the gable of Ernulf's transept. This door gives access
to the crypt, by a flight of descending steps within the
thickness of the gable wall. The door is placed as near
the western wall of the crypt as possible, to enable the
monks to enter it and pass forward without inteifering
with the setvices at the two crypt altars, which occupied
the apses of the transept, and were dedicated respec~
tively to St. Mary Magdalene and St. Nicholas.
The span of that arch of the vaulted ambulatory from
which this south branch i&s\1es, is considerably greater
than the corresponding arches of the arcade, and that
severey of the vault, which is square in plan, forms a
kind of crossing, the piers of which are treated in a
manner which shews that the southern branch was not
an afterthought. This substantial work was evidently
planned fo1· the purpose of providing a covered passage
from the south ambulatory of the Infu·mary cloister to
the new transepta.l chapels in the crypt of Anselm's
church, which should also. ca1·ry a gallery above, by which
a second covered passage might be obtained, leading
from the Doimitory fl.001· to a door in the north transept
gable. This upper story i~ on the level of the pavement
of the. choir. of Conrad.' vyhich, being raised upon the
crypt, 1s earned to a height of twelve or fourteen · feet
above the level of the cloisters, arid thus brouo-ht to
coincide with the level of the upper gallery by th: help
of a few steps.
Opposite page 50.
iTtoriIplIv*im* ;
6•4 o s t a i r k . : 4 0 ,
521;2 ; 7 " , .74111111ED C ,
I I I
q U M W ,
1 1 1 1
N i m a l a w l
V A M S
Substructure of Prier's Chapel. G r e a t Lavatory Tower. N o r m a n Cloister and Gallery.
F i g . 7 . — E L B VAT I O N O P PA RT O P T H E SOUTH S I D E O r T H E n i - r m m A r t v CLOISTER
pagu 60.
2
,.. ]
Sub~tructure of Prior'e Chapel. Great Lavatory Tower. Norman Cloister and Gallery.
Fig. 7.-ELl!VATlON OF l'AnT OF 'l'JU! SOUTH BIDE 01' !!'KE lNFUtl{AltY Cl,OIS'J'ER
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 5 1
The substantial architecture of the cloister and gallery
just described is sufficiently accounted for the necessity
of providing for the monks a covered access from
the Dormitory to the new choir without descending into
the cloister. T h e vaulting of this part of the cloister
was necessary, to give permanence to the floor of the
passage. T h e style of the architecture is singularly
simple and elegant, but is precisely the same in details
as the crypt of Anselm's work.
But the so-called Baptistery, but really Lavatory, as in
Chillenden's list (vide Appendix No. VI. § 7), is erected
against this cloistered gallery, with straight joints, and
manifestly a subsequent addition in a later style; belonging
to the hydraulic system, and therefore erected about
1160. The Prior's chapel, of which now only the substructure
remains, has obliterated the portion of the
south alley which reached from the Baptistery to the
Infirmary, and prevented us from ascertaining whether
the vaulted cloister was carried beyond the Baptistery
eastward. B u t as there was no need of extending the
upper gallery beyond its present boundary eastward, it
is probable that Lanfranc's southern shed-roofed cloister
was allowed to remain undisturbed in that part in the
manner shewn in my plan (Plate 2, 12).
The west side of this Cloister-garth is occupied, in the
Norman drawing, by a low building erected against the
Dormitory wall, which has a latticed fence in front, and
ornamented dormers on the roof. A door at the south
end gives entrance to it; but no inscription tells of its
purpose. A similar latticed fence divides the cloister
garth into two parts.' The western part is labelled Herb-
1 These palisades, of which another has been described above in the
kitchen-court, are formed of two rows of flat wooden slips, driven into the
ground, so as to slant to right and left, and. form a reticulation. I n Violletle-
Duc's Dictionary, such palisades are said to occur in manuscripts of the
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, and he has given a figure of them. (Art.
ClOtwre, p. 462.)
E2
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 51
The substantial architecture of the cloister and gallery
just described is sufficiently accounted for by the necessity
of providing for the monks a covered access from
the Dormito1·y to the new choir without descending into
the cloister. The vaulting of this part of the cloister
was necessary, to give permanence to the floor of the
passage. The style of the architecture is singularly
simple and elegant, but is precisely the same in details
as the crypt of Anselm's work.
But the so-called Baptistery, but really Lavatory, as in
Chillenden's list ( vide Appendix No. VI. § 7), is erected
against this cloistered gallery, with straight joints, and
manifestly a subsequent addition in a later style; belonging
to the hydraulic system, and therefore erected about
1160. The Prior's chapel, of which now only the substructure
remains, has obliterated the portion of the
south alley which reached from the Baptistery to the
Infirmary, and prevented us from ascertaining whether
the vaulted cloister was carried beyond the Baptistery
eastward. But as there was no need of extending the
upper gallery beyond its present boundaTy eastward, it
is probable that Lanfranc's southern shed-roofed cloister
was allowed to remain undisturbed in that part in the
manner shewn in my plan (Plate 2, 12).
The west side of this Cloister-garth is occupied, in the
Norman drawing, by a low building erected against the_/
Dormito1·y wall, which has a latticed fence in front, and
ornamented do1·mers on the roof. A door at the south
end gives entrance to it; but no inscription tells of its
purpose. A similar latticed fence divides the cloister
garth ~to two parts.1 The western part is labelled He1'o-
1 These palisades, of which another has been described above in the
kitchen-court, are formed of two rows of :flat -wooden slips, driven into the
ground, so as to slant to right and left, and form a roticulation. In Violletle-
Duc's Dictionary, such palisades are said to occur in manuscripts of the
fourteenth and .fifteenth centuries, and he has given a figure of them. (Art.
Oltitwre, p. 462.)
E2
52 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
and in the drawing is filled with small herbs,
omitted in the engraved copy of 1755.
already retained until the building of the present Library various
projections, or toothings, shewn the plans
some of which still remain. These indicate that some
was erected against this of wall, projections confirm
the existence of some monastic office in that place.
The first western arch of the Norman vaulted cloister,
building, is of greater span than the others, as i f intended
to accommodate the abutment of its east wall
against the east pier of the arch.
The Infirmary.
extends eastward the east
wall of the cloister just described, which wall is in fact
its western gable.
the nave of a church, with side aisles, pier arches, and
This drawing, and labelled Domus Infirmorum, hall—literally, House Sick and Infirm
but the distribution document shews that the Dissolution it bore the name of the "Long Hall."
§ Beyond domus Capella Infirmorum, aisles and a clerestory; but internally i t was entirely
the domus Traces
the south To drawing
represented apse.
52 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
arium, and in the drawing is :filled with small herbs,
omitted in the engraved copy of 1755.
The ruined wall of the Dormitory, as aheady described,
retained until the building of the present Library various
broken projections, or toothings, shewn in the plan;
some of which still remain. These indicate that some
building was erected against this part of the wall, of
which the projections indicate partitions, and thus confirm
the existence of some monastic office in that place.
The first western arch of the Norman vaulted cloister,
namely, that which stands against the south end.of this
building, is of greater span than the others, as if in.;.
tended to accommodate the abutment of its east wall
against the east pier of the arch.
6. The I nfirmary.
The Infirmary itself extends eastward from the east
wall of the cloister just described, which wall is in fact
its western gable.
The monastic Infirmary, generally speaking, resembles
the nave of a church, with side aisles, pier arches, and
clerestory windows above. This is clearly shewn in the
Norman drawing, and labelled IJomus Infir-nwrum, or
Infirmary hall-literally, " House of the Sick and Infirm
" ; but the distribution document shews that at
the Dissolution it bore the name of the" Long Hall."
( Vide Appendix No. VIII. § 12.) Beyond this domus is
the Chapel of the infirmary, Oapellainfirmorum, attached
to it as the ·chancel of a church is to its nave, and having
side aisles and a clerestory; but internally it was entirely
separated from the dom,us by a wall rising to its
roof, and having a door in the centre, as at Ely. Traces
of the junction of this wall with the south wall of the
chapel remain. To the eastern extremity of the chapel
is appended a real chancel, which in the Norman drawing
is rep1·esented as a simple ~pse.
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 5 3
At the Dissolution, the Infirmary buildings were ordered
to be pulled down, and the site appropriated to
certain prebendal houses. Fortunately some considerable
portions were found useful in the erection of these
buildings by furnishing ready-made walls and supports,
which economized their construction. B y the help of
these I was enabled, by exploring the interior of the
houses, to plan and draw the details of construction of
the Domus and Capella in 1847.1 B u t in the late demolition
of superfluous houses these remains have been
completely set free from their parasitic additions, and
left standing as picturesque ruins.
The condition of these ruins is that five Norman piers
and arches of the Hall remain on the south side, but of
the clerestory not a fragment is left. I t s south side
aisle wall and roof existed before the above-mentioned
demolition, in which it was unfortunately included, but
will be described below. The complete southern range
of the piers and arches of the Chapel is standing, with
enough of the clerestory to show its proportions and the
form of its windows. The foundations and lower parts of
the south side aisle have been uncovered and allowed to
remain exposed. The chancel, which is square, now exhibits
a large flowing window on the north side, with evidence
of a similar one eastward and southward. But the
fragments of a Norman zigzag window on the south and
north, of a square Norman pilaster at the south-east
angle, and also of two Norman east windows, shew that
this square chancel was built in the latter part of the Norman
style. The apse represented as terminating these
My comparison of the Norman drawing with these remains of the
Infirmary buildings enabled me to prove for the first time that the ruins at
the south-east of the Cathedral at Ely were in reality those of an infirmary
Hall and Chapel, with Kitchen, Table-Hall, etc., similar to those at
Canterbury, and not, as Bentham imagined, the remains of a Saxon church
and convent. I subsequently discovered similar Infirmaries at Peterborough,
Gloucester, and elsewhere.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 53'
At the Dissolution, the ·Infirmary buildings were ordered
to be pulled down, and the site appropriated to
certain p1·ebendal houses. Fortunately some considerable
portions were found useful in the erection of these
buildings by furnishing ready~made walls and supports,
which economized their construction. By the help of
these I was enabled, by exploring the interior of the
houses, to plan and draw the details of construction of
the .Domus and Capella in 1847.1 But in the late demolition
of superfluous houses these remains have been
completely set free from their parasitic additions, and
left standing as picturesque ruins.
. The condition of these .ruins is that five N Ol'man piers
and arches of the Hall remain on the south side, but of
the clerestory not a fragment is left. Its south side
aisle wall and roof existed before the above-mentioned
d.emolition, in which it was unfortunately included, but
will be described below. The complete southern mnge
• of the piers and arches of the Chapel is standing, with
enough of the clerestory to show its proportions and the
form ofits windows. The foundations and lower parts of
the south side aisle have been uncovered and allowed to
remain exposed. The chancel, which is square, now exhibits
a large flowing window on the north side, with evidence
of a similar one eastward and southward. But the
fragments of a Norman zigzag window on the south and
north, of a square Norman pilaster at the south-east
angle, and also of two Norman east windows, shew that
'this square chancel was built in the latter part of the Nor-
. man style. The apse represented as terminating these
1 My comparison of the Norman drawing with these remains of the
Infirmary buildings enabled me to prove for the :fl.rst time that the ruins at
the south-east of the Cathedral at Ely were in reality those of an Infirmary
Rall and Chapel, with Kitchen, Table-Rall, etc., similar to those at
Cante1·bury, and not, as Bentham imagined, the remains of a Saxon church
and convent. I subsequently discovered similar Infirmaries at Peterborough,
Gloucester, and elsewhere.
54 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
Infirmary buildings in the Norman drawing, may have
existed previously, but is more likely to have been inserted
The piers of the hall are plain cylindrical columns
with scolloped capitals, exactly resembling those of the
porch of the North Hall, or Aula and the pier
shallow
plain sunk fillet on the face. The piers of the
on the contrary, a the nook the squareedged
orders, and their capitals are richly carved.'
chancel the Infirmary underwent thorough restoration about the middle of the fourteenth
no historical note remains, and which its Norman character was completely transformed
into the style of that period. A large three-light tracery
window was inserted in the Norman walls on each side,
east end five-light occupying whole breadth. The northern window remains entire;
its opposite, on the south, has only left its western jamb
existence. O f eastern sill, with the seats of its four mullions and portions of
the jambs, remain and shew that it was inserted at the
same time with the others. The wall retains its Norman
quoins, by which we learn that the dimensions of
The jambs of these windows are excessively splayed,
the scoinson arch, outline,
is a segmental arch. Altogether, the inner opening of
the window is about as broad as high, which is not a
The which remains has a mixture of geometrical and flowing
that assimilates i t to the window Anselm's
Chape1,2 recorded 1 In Carter's 'Ancient Architecture,' pl. xxix., these capitals are all represented.
2 Engraved in my Arch. Hist., p. 115. This arch is also a sprawling segmental
pointed arch, and has moldings of the same kind as these windows.
54 THE CONVENTU.AL :BUILDINQS OF THE
Infirmary buildings in the Norman drawing, may have
existed previously, but is more likely to have been insel'ted
as a conventional mode of designating a church.
The piers of the hall are plain cylindrical columns
with scolloped capitals, exactly resembling those of the
porch of the North Hall, or Aula Nova, and the pier
arches are of two square-edged orders formed by a shallow
plain sunk fillet on the face. The piers of the
chapel, on the contrary, are compound, and the arches
have a roll-molding in the nook between the squareedged
orders, and their capitals a1·e richly carved.1
The chancel of the Infirmary Chapel underwent a
thorough restoration about th~ middle of the fourteenth
century, of which no historical note remains, and by
which its Norman character was completely transformed
into the style of that period. A large three-light tracery
window was inserted in the Norman walls on each side,
and at the east end a :five-light window, occupying its
whole breadth. The northern window remains entire;
its opposite, on the south, has only left its western jamb
to testify of its existence. Of the eastern window, the
sill, ·with the seats of its four mullions and portions of
the jambs, remain and shew that it was inserted at the
same time with the others. The wall 1·etains its Norman
quoins, by which we learn that the dimensions of
the chancel were not changed by the works in question.
The jambs of these windows are excessively splayed,
and the scoinson arch, which defines the inner outline,
is a segmental arch. .Altogether, the inner opening of
the window is about as broad as high, which is not a
graceful proportion. The pattern of the tracery of that
which remains has a mixture of geometrical ancl flowing
lines, that assimilates it to the window in Anselm's
Chapel,2 of which the recorded date is 1336.
Cal'ter's Ancic-nt .A.rchil;eoture,' xxh:., oapitnls aro represented.
z Engraved This segmental.
11rol1, I.ins these windows.
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 5 5
same time these changes.
The first recorded additions to the Infirmary are those
of Prior Hathbrande (1338-1370), who built the stone
Hall called " Mensa Magistri Infirmatorii," or Table Hall
VIII.), and also seven adjacent chambers for the infirm.
The walls of this Hall remain, and shew that it stood
northward. The wall of north aisle into one o f the prebendal houses which has escaped
the late destructive changes, retains three windows, of
valuable as being dated. F o r Sommer quotes out of the
treasurer's accounts of the church in 1342 and next
following year the passages given below,' which shew
new chambers the wooden these
chambers, chambers or were relieved
infirmary
has been swept away. W e know the
indicated
by dotted lines (at 9, Pl. 2), on the north side
also necessarium parallelogram Some examples of medieval infirmaries in almshouses
monasteries that retain their ancient 1 Pro of; de novo 96/. prEeter marcas receptas Feretrario nova I t e m
novis cameris 61/. 61.
JIM juxta novas Cl. MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 55·
A new chancel arch was built at the sa.me time with
these changes.
The first recorded additions to t'\l,e Infirmary are those
of Prior Hathbrande (1338-1370), who built the stone
Hall called" Mensa Magistri In:firmatorii," or Table If all
as it was termed at the Reformation (vide Appendix No.
VIII.), and also seven adjacent chambers for the infirm;·
The walls of this Hall remain, and shew that it stood
at the east end of the north aisle of the Infirmary Hall,
projecting northward. The wall of the north aisle is
the south end of the Hall, and the latter, being worked
into one of the prebendal houses which has escaped
the late destructive changes, retains three windows, of
two lights each, with a plain transom and good tracery,
valuable as being dated. For Somner quotes out of the·
treasurer's accounts of the church in 1342 and next
following year the passages given below,1 which shew
that this new Hall with a chamber, in the Infirmary, as
well as other new chambers in the Infirmary, and also
pentises or wooden cloisters, about this Hall and these
chambe1·s, were in course of construction.
The "Table Hall" was the especial Refectory for those
who were able to quit their chambel's Ol' were i:elieved
for a time from the austerities of the cloister.
Every other portion of the north half of these iniirmary
buildings has been swept away. VVe know from the
Norman drawing that its kitchen stood in the position indicated
by dotted lines (at 9, Pl. 2), on the no1·th side
of the hall; also that its necessa.i'ium was placed to the
east of it, as shewn by the dotted parallelogi-am (at 8).
· Some·examples of medireval infi.1:maries in almshouses
or monasteries that retain thefr ancient fittings, as at
Pro nova aula et una Camera do novo factis in firmaria, 96l. 8s. 2d.
pl'reter 20 mn.rcas 1·eceptas a Feretral.'io pro nova camera facienda. Item
pro novis cameris in firmaria et pentisiis circa aula ibidem, 6ll. Is. 6d.
Item pro novo pentisio juxt-a no,•as cameras in firmaria, 6l. 15s. 4d. ob.
56 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
St. Mary's, Chichester, and St. John's, Northampton,'
shew that in later times these side aisles were enclosed
and divided by partitions and floors into separate chambers.
The Infirmary Hall which we are 'examining presented,
in the south side aisle, now destroyed, a most
practice; for two-thirds this aisle, from the west wall eastwards, had been fitted
up as a complete Hostry or Camera for the Subprior before
the fifteenth century, of which I have given the
plans in Figs. 5 and 6.
At the Dissolution, this was assigned to the twelfth
prebend, and by the help of a additional fittings
dwelling-which state i t remained
until the late destruction of superfluous houses.
This dwelling-house, however, had soon been found to '
be too small for a prebendary, and was transferred to a
The mansion
fitted up for him in the great necessarium, on the
I will now describe the medieval fittings of the Subprior's
Camera, observing appropriation and afterwards (bide Plates 2 and 3). I n Chillenden's this is brought up to the south
"Camera Subprioris," then across camera,
Infirmary.2
partly receive than the Norman one and furnish large windows to the
Domestic Battely 96) course name Obituary Aug. served fix
the subprior ; the first Battely's
56 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF ·_THE
St. Mary's, Chichester, and St. John's, N orthampton,1
shew that in later times these side aisles were enclosed
and divided by partitions and floors into separate chambers.
The Infirmary Hall which we are •examining presented,
in the south side aisle, now destroyed, a most
interesting example of this practice; for two-thirds of
this aisle, from the west wall eastwards, had been fitted
up as a complete Hostry or Oame1·a for the Subprior before
the fifteenth century, of which I have given the
plans in Fig·s. 5 and 6.
At the Dissolution, this was assigned to the twelfth
prebend, and by the help of a few additional fittings
converted into a dwelling-house, in which state it r~mained
until the late destruction of superfluous houses.
This dwelling-house, however, had soon been found to ·
be too small for a prebendary, and was transferred to a
minor canon. The twelfth prebendary had a large mansion
fitted up for him in the great necessarium, on the
south side of the Green Court.
. I will now describe the medireval fittings of the Subprior's
Camera, first observing that its appropriation to
that officer is ascertained by help of a description of the
great sewer, repaired by Chillenden, and afterwards by
•
Goldston (1Jide Plates 2 and 3). In Chillenden's list
( sect. 8) this watercourse is brought up to the south
side of the " Camera Su bpriol'is," then across the camera,
and across the great Hall of the In:fi.rmary.2
The pier arches were walled up to enclose the Camera
on the north side, and the south side aisle wall raised or
pa1·tly rebuilt, so as to receive a roof of less inclination
than the Norman one and furnish large .windows to the
chambers.
1 Vide Dollman's ' Domestic Architecture.'
• 2 :Battely (p. 94) first remarked that the coul'se of the aqueduct, described
under Goldston's name in the Obituary (Ang. Sac. p. 148), ser\red to fix
the residence of tho subprior; and tho more minute description of the same
aqueduct in Chillenden's list, now fu-st published, amply confirms J3uttely's
. decision.
•
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 6 7
A dining-hall (B, Fig. 5), thirty feet long, sixteen
wide, and twenty high, with a withdrawing-room (A)
twenty-five feet long to the east, occupied that end of
the house, reaching to the roof.' The hall and withdrawing-
room had large chimney pieces, with molded
four-centred arches and battlemented crests, and were
Perpendicular square-(b, e, h) of two lights and a transom. There were traces
in the east corner of the hall (at f) that seemed to shew
that an oriel window once stood there. A small south
door (g) next to i t led outward, perhaps to a turret
stair. The dining-hall was entered from the nave of
Infirmary Hall, by a richly-four-door at the north-west corner, in the usual position
assigned to hall doors.
Between the west end of the hall and the Infirmary
gable the aisle was divided transversely by a wall T h e separated hall by the usual wooden partition or screen which had a
j) divided into two stories by a floor which gave eight feet
of height to the lower apartments. B y another partition
the north the second or western compartment (F). The south part
first, entered south screen,
contained two rooms (C, 1.)), looking, the one into the
" Gymews," as the old cemetery was termed, the other
into the subvault of the Treasury, and probably employed
as pantries. T h e window, the
same style as the larger ones, was low and adapted to
the height of the floor, so as to shew that the Perpendicular
side-wall of the aisle was erected after the plan
been formed.
apartments fitted in. continuation MONAS~Y OF CHRIST CHURCH m· CANTERBURY. 57
A dining-hall (B, Fig. 5 ), thirty feet long, sixteen
wide, and twenty high, with a withdrawing-1·oom (A)
twenty-five feet long to the east, occupied that end of
the house, reaching to the roof.1 The hall and withchawing-
room had large chimney pieces, with molded
four-centred arches and battlemented crests, and were
lighted by lofty Perpendicular square-headed windows
(b, c, h) of two lights and a transom. There we1·e traces
in the east corner of the hall (at/) that seemed to shew
that an oriel window once stood there. A small south
door (g) next . to it led outward, perhaps to a tunet
stair. The dining-hall was entered from the nave of
the Infirmary Hall, by a richly-molded four-centred
door (k) at the north-west corner, in the usual position
assigned to hall doors.
Between the west end of the hall and the Infirmary
gable the aisle was divided transversely by a wall (m n)
into two compartments. The first, separated from the
hall by the usual wooden partition or screen which had a
door (J) at each extremity, was twenty-two feet long, and
divided into two stories by a floor which gave eight feet
of height to the lower apartments. By another partition
a passage (E) was separated from its north part, through
which the north door of this hall-screen led directly to
the second or western compartment (F). The south part
of the first, entered by the south door of the screen,
contained two rooms (C, D), looking, the one into the
" Gymews," as the old cemetery was termed, the other
into the subvault of the Treasury, and probably employed
as butteries or pantries. The . window, in the
same style as the larger ones, was low and adapted to
the height of the floor, so as to shew that the Perpendicular
side-wall of the aisle was erected after the plan
of these chambers had been formed . .
1 When these apartments were fitted up for the twelfth prebendary, a
floor was constructed in these two rooms in continuation of that of the
western chamber, so as to furnish a second story over the whole with the
exception of the western compartment (F).
58 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF TT47
chamber (A, was and ceiled panelling.
I have indicated the general disposition of the
panelled ceiling i n the Figure. I t was a beautiful
domestic architecture period, and it is greatly to be regretted that i t should
have been sacrificed when the houses were demolished.
I t a handsome broad and a transom externally, close to the Treasury. A
of the window against the Treasury wall. This chamber
reached plain opening
western compartment (which remains to be described.
This compartment, not divided in height by a floor,
which is the gable-wall of the Infirmary, and in that part
I t exception
corner,
in which was a window, and possibly another in the north
This fittings roof, I t was entered a pointed door 1, Fig. 5) from the Infirmary
door in the north-east corner, giving entrance to the
passage above mentioned, which led to the dining-hall,
and another (C, Fig. 6) vertically over it, which opened
to the wainscoted room above. From this i t must be
inferred that the high room we are considering originally
staircase access
to the wainscot chamber at C, to the Prior's chapel at
E, and by a private passage at H, to his own chambers
north, which will be described hereafter.'
Infir-
58 TlIE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF THE
The chamber above (.A, B, C, Fig. 6) was eleven feet
high, completely lined and ceiled with wainscot panelling.
I have indicated the general disposition of the
panelled ceiling in the Figure. lt was a beautiful
specimen of the domestic architecture of Chillenden's
period, and it is greatly to be regretted that it should
have been sacrificed when the houses were demolished.
It had a handsome bl'Oad window (B), with four lights
and .a transom . externally, close to the Treasury. A
four-centred chimney-arch and chimney was placed west
of the window against the Treasury wall. This chamber
was reached through a plain pointed door opening
to the westem compartment (F, Fig. 5, and D, Fig. 6),
which remains to be described.
This compartment; not divided in height by a floor,
was twenty feet long from the eastern wall to the western,
which is the gable-wall of the Infirmary, and in that part
also common to the Prior's chapel. It was covered and
bounded by the Treasury wall on the south, with the exception
of an interval of five feet at the south-west comer,
in which was a window, ancl possibly another in the north
wall which filled up the pier-arch. This room, at the
period of my visits, was stripped of all :fittings from the
ground to the roof, filled with lumber, and in darkness.
It was entered by a pointed door (l, Fig. 5) from the Infirmary
Hall, and its eastern wall had one plain pointed
door (m) in the nort.h-east comer, giving entrance to the
passage above mentioned, which led to the dining~hall,
and another (C, Fig. 6) vertically over it, which opened
to the wainscoted room above. From this it must be
inferred that the high room (D) we are considering originally
contained a staircase and landing, giving access
to the wainscot chamber at C, to the Prior's chapel at
E, and by a private passage at H, to his own chambers
north, which will be described hereafter.1
1 The square openings, E, F, G (Fig. 6), in the west gable of the Infir.
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 5 9
Chillen.den's of " and other conveniences for four chambers in the Firmaria
;" and Archbishop Courtney 1382-96), contemporary
Chillenden, "new the Lodgings and
Kitchen belonging to the Infirmary at his own costs of
1331. 6s. 8d."1
The north aisle of the Infirmary was probably fitted
up with chambers like the south. B u t this aisle and its
appendant Kitchen and offices, with the exception of
the Table Hall, were entirely pulled down at the Dissolution.
7 . The Deportum.
In Chillenden's list of buildings we find "a new place
for the Deportum, with a celarium below." 2
writer on monastic matters, but it occurs in Winchelsey's
clearly to mean the Hall in which the monks were allowed to
licence Such place is known to have been
and Ducange,
Misericordia mean such indulgences,
applies i t also, on the authority of quoted
passages, to the Hall itself which was devoted to the
The Deportum term.
I presume its derivation to be from deportare, which
gable i t and. The H access, staircase
Infirmary
Fig. occupies Battely, 75, 2 Novus 3 Vide Willcins's Concilia; ii. 246, They dated Jan. MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 59
Chillenden's list ( sect. 17) gives an item of" Kitchens
and other conveniences fOl' four chambers in the Firmaria;"
and A.i-chbishop Courtney (1382-96 ), contemporary
with Chillenden, '~ new built the Lodgings and
Kitchen belonging to the Infirmary at his own costs of
133l. 6s. 8d."1
The north aisle of the Infirmary was probably fitted
up with chambers like the south. But this aisle and its
appendant Kitchen and offices, with the exception of
the Table Hall, were entirely pulled down at the Dissolution.
7. The JJeportum.
In Chillenden's list of buildings we find "a new place
for the lJeportum, with a celarium below." 2
The word Deportum is not contained in any modern
writer on monastic matters, but it occurs in Winchelsey's
Statutes, quoted below,3 from which it is clearly shewn
to mean the Hall in which the monks were allowed to
eat flesh and drink freely by especial licence from their
superiors. Such a place is well known to have been
set apart for these indulgences in monasteries; and Ducange,
defining the word Miserioordia to mean such indulgences,
applies it also, on the authority of quoted
passages, to the Hall itself which was devoted to the
purpose. The name lJeportum is, in these Statutes, also
used both for the indulgence and the privileged locality,
and appears to be a local tel'm.
I presume its dedvation to be from deporta're, which
mary were probably the windows of that gable before it was masked by
the Cheker building and Prior's chapel. The passage marked R in Fig. 6
is now a comparatively modern construction, to give access, by a staircase
entered by a door cut through the west front wall of the Infirm11ry
(between V and U, Fig. 5), to the Library, which occupies the Prior's
chapel.
1 Bnttely, p. '75, quoting from the grant of a Chantry.
(§ 16.) "Novus locus pro Deporto cum subtus celario."
• JTide Wilkins's 'Concilia,' vol. ii. p. 241., etc. They are chted J"an.1298.
6 0 T H E ' C O N V E N T U A L HOTEDINGS OF THE
Ducange interprets by tolerare, favere alieui, and by
the old French &porter. B u t Johnson derives the
disport, deporter. Thus
the word is shewn to be a Latinization of an English
expression for a place where the monks might disport
themselves,—a Hall of diversion and relaxation from
As I have no intention of entering into the general
-history monastic economy, shall confine myself to the rules by which this particular
Deportum, beginning fourteenth
century under Winchelsey's Statutes, from the
chapter following extracts.
(Vide Appendix No. IV. for the original text.)
On Refectory " -
" A l l to abstain from eating flesh in enclosure
House, mentioned.
That say, their own Infirmary,—chambers
infirm,—Deportum,—Prior's
Camera,—and Astla Hospitam.
"And because the solace afforded by the Deportam and
of means for the diminution of ordain
are them these they to have
,r Also, DeTortima refreshment
must processions,
solemn Mass, away "Also together
Deporfram 60 THE' CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
Ducange interprets by tolerare, favere aliaui, and by
the old French· de-porter. But Johnson derives the
English word dispm·t, or diversion, from deportB'r. Thus
the word is shewn to be a Latinization of an English
expression for a place where the monks might disport
themselves,-a Hall of diversion and relaxation from
discipline.
As I have no i;ntention of entering into the general
·history of the monastic economy, I shall in this place
confine myself to the rules by which this particular
JJeportum was governed at the beginning of the fourteenth
century under Winchelsey's Statutes, from the
seventh chapter of which I translate the following extracts.
(Vide Appendix No. IV. for the original text.)
The chapter is headed,
" On those who Eat and Drink in the Infirmary or elsewhere
out of the Refectory:"-
. . . . ".A.11 monks are to abstain from eating flesh in the
sight of the laity, as well in the interior as in the exterior enclosure
of the House, excepting, in the places hereinafter mentioned.
That is to say, if they have due permission, they may
partake of flesh for their own pleasure, or for companionship
with others, in the Table Hall of the Infirmary,-in the chambers
of the sick and infirm,-in the Deporftwm,-in the Prior's
Oamuwa,-11nd in the Aula Hospitwm.
".And because the solace afforded by the Deportum and
Table Hall is intended for the refreshment of the brethren, but
by no means for the diminution 0£ their victuals, we ordain
that when eggs are.served out to tliem in tnese retreats, they
are to be allowed the same number that thev are wont to h'a.ve
in the Refectory.
•
cc .Also, those who are admitted to the Deporflwm, for refreshment
and restoration of health must every day attend all processions,
the third great solemn Mass, and Vespers, lest they
should while a.way their time with idle tales and wanton jollity,
as often happens.
".Also they, when eating, and, if they please, drinking together
in the Deporbum or the Table Hall, must, after their meal,
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 6 1
writing, or the repetition of the services or rule, else they will
punished.
"And because the brethren frequently complain that sometimes
decline their Deportum,
four in the are present at the Mass of the Blessed Virgin,
whereas by the approved custom of the Church eight brethren
from the Deportwm ought to be present every day:
"To remove this cause of discontent, the master of the Infirmary
must, every Sunday as usual, inform eight brethren,
as many of the lower as of the upper of each choir, in the order
of priority, that they may take their if they will, in
the next week. A n d if any one of the eight decline to accept
it, he must, notwithstanding his refusal, be present every day
of that week at the mass of the Blessed Mary, and on every
Tuesday at the mass of the Blessed Thomas, together with
those who did accept the Deport win, lest through his .refusal
the solemnity of these masses be diminished."
I t thus appears that as the insupportable tedium of
the masses overbalanced the delights of the Deportum,
the Archbishop hit upon the ingenious device of compelling
the selected monks to attend the masses, but
left them free to decline or accept the indulgences.
No clue is given in the documents to the position of
this Hall of Disport. I t is likely that i t was placed
over the Buttery buildings to the west of the vestibule
of the Refectory, so as to be in convenient juxtaposition
with the passage from the Convent Kitchen. I t s existence
and its rules appear to have hitherto escaped the
notice of every writer on Canterbury.'
In reference to Winchester, Milner (vol. ii. p. 95) remarks that at the
time of the Norman Conquest the monks of St. Swithin's were accustomed
to eat meat in the Refectory; but in consequence of the general reform of
the Benedictine Order by Lanfranc in 1082, Prior Simeon abolished the
use of it on ordinary occasions, allowing it only, according to the tenor of
the rule, to the sick in the Infirmary. I n the year 1300 (vide Aug. Sacra,
t. 1. p. 525), at a general chapter of the order held at Oxford, i t was left
to the superior of each monastery to grant the dispensation in question to
MONASTERY OF CHRIST· CHURCH IN . CANTERBURY. 61
retire to the Choir or Cloister, and apply themselves to reading,
writing, or the repetition of the services or rule, else they will
be severely puni~hed.
".A.nd because the brethren frequently complain that sometimes
twenty of their number in one day decline theh• Depo1·tum,
so that it thus often happens that only three or four being
in the Deportum are present at the Mass of the Blessed Virgin,
whereas by the approved custom of the Church eight brethren
from the Deportum ought to be present every day :
" To remove this cause of discontent, the master of the Infirmary
must, every Sunday as usual, inform eight brethren,
as many of the lower as of the upper of each choir, in the order
of priority, that they may take their Deportum if they will, in
the next week. .A.nd if any one of the eight _decline to accept
it, he must, notwithstanding his refusal, be present every day
of that week at the mass of the Blessed Mary, and on every
Tuesday at the mass of the Blessed. Thomas, together with
those who did accept the De-portum, lest through his -refusal
the solemnity of these masses be diminished."
It thus appears that as the insupportable tedium of
the masses overbalanced the delights of the Deportum,
the Archbishop hit upon the ingenious device of compelling
the selected monks to attend the masses, but
left them free to decline or accept the indulgences.
No clue is given in the documents to the position of
this Hall of Disport. It is likely that it was placed
over the Buttery buildings to the west of the vestibule
of the Refectory, so as to be in convenient juxtaposition
with the passage from the Convent Kitchen. Its existence
and its rules appear to have hitherto escaped the
notice of every writer on Canterbury.1
1 In reference to Winchester, Milner (vol. ii. p. 95) remarks that at the
time of the Norman Conquest the monks of St. Swithin's were accustomed
to eat meat in the Refectory; but in consequence of the general reform of
the Benedictine Order by Lanfranc in 1082, Prior Simeon abolished the
use of it on ordinary occasions, allowing it only, according to the tenor of
the rule, to the sick in the Infirmary. In the year 1300 (vide Ang. Sacra,
t. i. p. 525), at a general chapter of the order held at Ox.ford, it was left
to the superior of each monastery to grant the dispensation in question to
62 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
8. Norman, Gallery, Prior's Chapel, and Library.
The upper Norman gallery (g p n m, Fig. 6), leading
from the Dormitory to the Lavatory and transept, when
was low, Norman windows,
placed one in each severy. B u t amongst the repairs
which were carried on under Prior Chillenden.
are "the passage the church Dormitory, with the repair of the Lavatory there, and
below, a new shaving-house, leaded" (sect. 7).1 A l s o
(sect. 8), "the enclosure on both sides of the cloister as
Prior's' In accordance with these memoranda, the walls of
the outlines of original Norman windows completely walled up. T h e
upper Norman string-course remains, but the walls are
raised' seven feet higher, and provided with high transomed
two-windows, Chillenden's
tracery in the head (vide Fig. 7). Instead of the
four Norman windows, there are but two of the new
between the Dormitory wall and the Lavatory,
and these are placed without respect to the Norman
descend below the Norman buttress
it, discretion; but subject Statutes, Jan. above decision, possible in.
de Ecclesia ad Dormitorium . . . . subtus nova rastura
T h e same work the Obituary is described as Nova
domus rastuirce.. The rastwra
was process periodical
shaving o f the monks: — The Promptorium Parvulorum gives
Rastyr-schavynge Barbitondium." T h e Custumale
Roffensis,' written has rainistrat rastu.
ram." A Glossary same period the Promptorium ' has Raster shavynge Rana."
62 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
8. NormC11J1, Gallery, Prior's Chapel, and Ldb1·a1y.
The upper Norman gallery (q p nm, Fig. 6), leading
from the Dormitory to the Lavatory and transept, when
first built was low, and lighted by small Norman windows,
placed one in each severy. But amongst the repairs
which were carried on under Prior Chillenden
(1390-1411) are" the passage from the church to the
Dormitory, with the repair of the Lavatol'y there, and
below, a new shaving-house, leaded" (sect. 7).1 Also
( sect. 8 ), " the enclosure on both sides of the cloister as
far as the Priox's-' Camera.'"
In accordance with these memoranda, the walls of
the upper passage or gallery retain the outlines of the
original Norman windows completely walled up. The
upper Norman string-course remains, but the walls are
raised· seven feet higher, and provided with high transomed
two-light Perpendicular windows, with Chillenden's
tracery ·in the head (vide Fig. 7). Instead of the
four Norman windows, there ai·e but two of the new
ones between the Dormitory wall and the Lavatory,
and these are placed without respect to the Norman
arches, although they descend below the- Norman buttress
caps.
. the members of it, according to his own discretion ; but this decision was
a subjeot of great and general scandal.
Winchelsey's Statutes, dated 18 Cal. J an. 1298, appear at first sight to
be a consequence of the above decision, but, by a possible confusion in
the date of the general chapter, they are placed nearly two years previous
. to the meeting of that chapter.
1 "Via de Ecclesia ad Dormitorium .... et subtus nova rastu1·a
plumbata." The same work in the Obituary is described as "Nova.
via versus Ecclesiam & subtus domus rastwra. . . . " The word rastu,•a
wns therefore employed as well for a process as for the house which was
devoted to it, which the following quotations shew to relate to the periodical
shaving of the monks: -The 'Promptorium Parvulorum ' gives
"Rnstyr-howse or schavynge house. Barbitondium." The 'Custumale
Roffensia,' w1-itten c. 1320, has " Saponem ministrat fratribus ad rastU:.
1-am." A Glossary of the same period as thQ 'Promptorium.' has " A
:Raster cloth or a sha.vynge cloth. Ra.Ila."
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. ( 3 3
The pier arches o f the Lavatory tower and cylindrical
wall above them, as high as the string-course, remain
untouched, except addition buttresses,
it to bear his addition to the height of the walls. I n
elevation I have omitted all Chillenden's buttresses
excepting the eastern one. T h e upper story, which
contained the Lavatory itself, received high windows
like those of the gallery, and its cylindrical plan was
altered externally to a polygonal one; retaining, however,
at the angles the original Norman buttresses, in
the form of a semi-cylindrical shaft against a flat pilaster,
like those o f apse o f St. Nicholas Caen.
the same manner capital under the corbel table o f the roof. (Vide
Pugin's 'Normandy '). T h e upper termination of those
of the Lavatory are altered to suit the angular form
of the new walls above by capping them with a pyramidal
stone. The whole building is in a very dilapidated
condition. T h e two last buttresses on the
in. Gostling's
engraving, very clumsily constructed, and the
shown Fig. 7.
lower story at first Cloister-garth, excepting on the south, where i t was
bounded by the great Norman arch o f the cloister
against which i t was built, which arch also remained
until Chillenden's time, as will appear below.
The vault of this lower story is a unique and beautiful
I t central carried weight above, the pipes which were conveyed.
drawing, more fully explained
under the head of the water-works (vide Chap. X.).
to the gallery above, we find that the
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 63
The pier arches of the Lavatory tower and cylindrical
wall above them, as high as the string-course, remain
untouched, except by the addition of buttresses,
added by Chillenden to strengthen the tower and enable
it to bear his addition to the height of the walls. In
my elevation I have omitted all Chillenden's buttresses
excepting the eastern one. The upper story, which
contained the Lavatory itself, received high windows
like those of the gallery, and its cylindrical plan was
altered externally to a polygonal one; retaining, however,
at the angles the original Norman buttresses, in
the form of a semi-cyl~drical shaft against a flat pilaster,
like those of the apse of St. Nicholas at Caen.
They were probably finished in the same manner by a
capital under the corbel table of the roof. (Vide
Pugin's 'Normandy'). The upper termination of those
of the Lavatory are altered to suit the angular form
. of the new walls above by capping them with a pyramidal
stone. The whole building is in a very dilapidated
condition. The two last buttresses on the
western half are now of red brickwork, shewn in Gostling'
s engraving, very clumsily constructed, and the
walls bound together at the angles, as shown in Fig. 7 .
.The lower story was at first open on all sides to the
Cloister-garth, excepting on the south, where it was
bounded by the great Norman arch of the cloiste1·
against which it was built, which arch also remained
open until Chillenden's time, as will appear below.
The vault of this lower story is a unique and beautiful
specimen of early rib-vaulting. It springs from a large
hollow central pillar, which carried the weight of the
lavatory cistern above, the pipes for which were conveyed
through the middle of the pillar, as shewn in the
Norman drawing, and as will be more fully explained
under the head of the water~works ( vid-e Chap. X. ).
Returning to the gallery above, we find that the
64 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
effect of his work was to make it lofty in proportion to
its breadth. I t is entered from the Dormitory by a
plain four-centred doorway (at g, Fig. 6), and is about
fourteen feet high and ten feet wide, and has a lowpitched
wooden roof, sustained by slender wooden fourcentred
arched ribs, on long legs, resting on corbels.'
The opening from the gallery to the Lavatory chamber
is a segmental pointed archway, richly molded with
Perpendicular section o f Chillenden's time, and
abutting with a discontinuous impost upon the vertical
are square. The west door (e) o f the Prior's Chapel is
crowded against this opening, being placed as far north
as the dimensions of the gallery would permit, in order
to set i t as near as possible to the centre of the west
wall of the chapel. This difficulty will be understood
by means of the Plan (Fig. 6).
The southern branch the gallery has one of Chillenden's
on each side, shews externally
the walled-Norman windows, resembling every respect the architecture o f the eastern branch
I t (m) in
transept, thus the door The abutted
great south B u t
carried lower part window
as to produce effect interior
To avoid an is thrown_
gallery n) carries a gallery The
This it dry.
64 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
effect of his work was to make it lofty in proportion' to
its breadth. It is entered from the Dormitory by a
plain four-centred doorway (at !l, Fig. 6), and is about
fourteen feet high and ten feet wide, and has a low.:.
pitched wooden roof, sustained by slender wooden fourcentred
arched ribs, on long legs, 1·esting on· corbels.1
The opening (b) from the gallery to the Lavatory chamber
is a segmental pointed archway, richly molded with
the Perpendicular section of Chillenden's time, and
abutting with a discontinuous impost upon the vertical
sides of the high jambs, which are perfectly plain and
square. The west door (c) of the P1·ior's Chapel is
crowded against this opening, being placed as far north
as the dimensions of the gallel'y would permit, in order
to set it as near as possible to the centre of the west
wall of the chapel. This• difficulty will be understood
by means of the Plan (Fig. 6). •
The southern branch of the gallery has one of Chil.:.. ..
lenden's high windows on each side, and shews externally
the walled-up Norman windows, resembling in
ev~ry respect the architecture of the eastern branch
above described. It leads straight to a doorway (m) in
the north transept,- and thus to the north door of the
Cathedral Choir. The Norman roof of the gallery abutted
here against the transept wall below the sill of one
of the two great south windows of that transept. But
when the walls were raised by Chillenden, the new roof
of the gallery, if citrried up to the transept wall, would
have cut off the light from the lower part of this window
so as to produce a disagreeable effect in the interior
of the transept. To avoid this an arch is thro..,,vn
across the gallery (at which ~1'li.es ~ thin gable wall
to receive the gallery roof, at a sufficient distance from
the window to prevent the obstruction of its light. The
1 This gallery owes its preservation to the convenience ii offers of a clry.
shod approach to the church.
OF CHRIST C.H.W.ICH I N CANTERBURY. 6 5
small space of gallery between this arch and the transept
door is flat-roofed at a lower elevation, and a glazed
window is also pierced in the thin gable to give light to
the gallery. A t the south end of the eastern wall pf
the gallery is a door (/) which opens to a long, narrow
passage built against this east wall. Thi s originally
contained a flight of stairs ascending northward to the
old Library, which, as will appear below, was a chamber
extending over the Prior's Chapel, and was entered by
a door at its south-west corner. This narrow staircase
is distinctly shewn in Johnson's plan, engraved by liollar
for the Monasticon (1655), which is my authority for
its existence.
We may, now proceed to the history of the Prior's
Chapel. The Obituary' informs us that Roger de S.
Elphege, Prior from 1258 to 1263, completed a chapel
between the Dormitory and Infirmary, which appears to
have been dedicated to the Virgin Mary. 3 The style of
its substructure shews that i t was begun by his predecessor.
3 This, which is known as the Prior's Chapel,
intended the private use that officer, is
placed on the south side of the Infirmary cloister, between
the Lavatory tower and Infirmary. I t s floor was
gallery, sustained ambulatory This replaced portion of the original south alley which occupied, as
Thus from the great Cloister to the Infirmary was still preserved.
B u t as this new substructure was more than
twice as broad as the old one, the chapel was obtruded
cloister-garth, cover Aug. 140. . " Dorraitorium Infirmariam
bonorifiee perfeeit.'? I t s interior 64 Battely, Tlasted L. hi words :—" Rog'us St hane MONASTERY OF CHRIST _CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 65
small space of gallety between this arch and the transept
door is flat-roofed at a lower elevation, and a glazed
window is also pierced in the thin gable to give light to
the gallery. At the south end of the eastern wall 9£
the gallery is a door (l) which opens to a long, narrow
passage built against this east wall. This originally
contained a flight of ·stairs ascending northward to the
old Library, which, as will appear below, was a chamber
extending over the Prior's Chapel, and was entered by
a door at its south-west corner. This narrow staircase
is distinctly shewu in Johnson's plan, engraved by Hollar
fo1· the Monasticon (1655 ), which is my autho1·ity for
its existence.
We may now proceed to the history of the Prior's
Chapel. The Obituary1 informs us that Roger de S.
Elphege, Prior from 1258 to 1263, completed a chapel
between the Dormitory and Infirmary, which appeai·s to
have been dedicated to the Virgin Mary.2 The style of
its substructme shews that it was begun by his predecessor.
3 This, which is known as the Prior's Chapel,
being intended for the private use of that officer, is
placed on the south side of the Infirmary cloister, between
the Lavatory tower and Infirmary. Its :floor was
on the level of the upper gallery, and was sustained by
an open, vaulted ambulatory below. This 1·eplaced the
portion _of the original south alley which occupied, as
above explained, that position. Thus the covered access
from the great Cloister to· the Infirmary was still preserved.
But as this new substructure was more than
twice as broad as the old one, the chapel was oqtruded
-into the small cloister-garth, so as to cover part of the
1 Ang. Sac. p. 140 .. . . " Capellam inter Dormitorium & Infirmariam
.honorifice perfecit.'? Its interior• dimensions were 64. ft. by 21 ft.
2 Enttely, p. 91.
, 3 Hasted (vol. i. p. 440) says that in several of the windows were these
words:-" R-og'us de s• Elphege dedit bane fenestram."
_
VOL. VII.
F
66 T H E 'CONVENTUAL 131JILDINGS 0 1 ' THE
facade of the Infirmary Hall, diminish the already limited
area, and destroy the symmetry of its form.
Sufficient remains of the substructure of the chapel
exist to shew the architecture of its walls, which were
provided with strong buttresses north and south, o f
which only the foundations remain, and with an unglazed
window between each, as in the cloisters of its
period. The design of this is, however, peculiar, as the
annexed elevation of one severy (Fig. shews. I n this
I have carefully delineated the peculiar disposition of
the masonry, stone for stone. T h e great buttresses
have been long since pulled down, leaving only their
foundations. T h e corbels that supported the vaults
still remain on the inside of the walls. B u t the vault
itself, which sustained the pavement o f the chapel, and
rested on four piers in the middle o f •the space (as
shewn in. the Plan, Fig. 5), was destroyed at the end of
the seventeenth century, when the chapel was pulled
down to the • level of its floor, and the present incongruous
time.'
No trace of the original architecture of the chapel
has been left, the exception door (e, 6), into the
branches,
close to the •Lavatory tower. B u t the style of the whole
must, its date, have been late Early English.
At the east end of the chapel, which is bounded by
the gable wall of the Infirniary, a Perpendicular doorway
(F, Fig. 6) through that wall remains at the north
Another (S), the south wall; leads over a bridge (to the vestibule
These will be explained below.
next to be considered in. relation the
This Library will be pulled down now that the new building on the
site 66 THE -CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF TFlE .
fa~ade of the Infirmary Hall, diminish the already limited
area, and destroy the symmetry of its form.
Sufficient l'einains of the substructure of the chapel
exist to shew the architecture of its walls, which were
provided with strong buttresses north and south, of
which only the foundations remain, and with an unglazed
window between each, as in the cloisters of its
period. The design of this is, however, peculiar, as the•
annexed elevation of one severy (llig. 7) shews. In this
I have carefully delineated the peculiar disposition of
the masonry, stone for stone. The great buttresses
have. been long since pulled down, leaving only thehfoundations.
The corbels that supp01ted the vaults
still Temain on the inside of the walls. But the vault
itself, which sustained the pavement of the chapel, and
Tested on four piers in · the :middle of the space (as
shewn in the ·Plan, Fig. 5 ), was destroyed at the end of
the seventeenth century, ·when the chapel was pulled
down to the :level of its fio0r, and the pre·sent incon ..
gruous Library built of brick, in the style of that time.1
• No trace of the original architecture of the ·chapel
itself has been left, with the exception of the Early
English western door (c, Fig. 6), which opens into the
gallery at the angle between its west and south branches;
close to the ·Lavatory tower. But the style of the whole
must, by its date, have been late Eady English.
At the ·east end of the. chapel, which is bounded by
the gable wall of the Infirmary, a :f>e1·pendicular doorway
(F, Fig. 6) through that wall remains at the north
corner. Another of similar style (S), at the east end of
the south wall, leads over a .bridge (T) to the vestibule
of the Treasury. These doorways, inserted by Chillenden,
will be explained below~ . . • . • .' · •
The next work to be considered in relation to the
1 This Library will be pulled down now tho,t the· new building on the
,aite of the Dormitory is completed.
' • • :
MONASTERY :OF CHRIST CHURCH CANTERB17RY. 6 7
Chapel is the ancient Library, for the Obituary, by recording
that Prior William Selling (1472-94) "adorned
the Library, which is placed over the Prior's Chapel, with
very beautiful carved work,"1 informs us of its connection
with the chapel.
But Godwin relates of Archbishop Chichely (1414-
43), that after spending a large sum in the repair of
the Library of his Cathedral, he bestowed upon it many
excellent books; and Somner, writing in 1640, before
the original chapel was taken down to make way for the
present building, tells us "that over this Chapel is the
Church Library . . . b u i l t by Archbishop Chichely,
and borrowed from the chapel or superadded, to it, the
juniority of the work and the passage to it plainly intimate
so much."'
I t is evident, from Sornner's words, that the difference
of architectural style between the Chapel itself and the
Library was so great, as even to strike the antiquaries of
that time; and we may therefore conclude, that the
original open Early English roof of the Chapel had been
removed on account of decay, in Chichely's time, and
that the opportunity was embraced o f constructing
above i t a chamber for the reception of the monastic
library, after the manner of that period, by substituting
for the high roof a fiat ornamental ceiling, with a floor
above i t for the Library, raising the walls to supply
windows, and covering the whole .with a flattened roof
of the Perpendicular pattern. Such a work would correspond
exactly with the above description quoted from
Soniner.
The access to i t was supplied by the long staircase,
built against the east wall of the Norman gallery, men
tioned above (p. 65).
" Tararium supra Capellam Prioris .situatum perpulerit ccelaturti
adornavit."—Wkarton, Aug. Sac. 145.
2 Battely's Somner,' p. 96.
MONASTERY OF C}p1IST CHURCH ·;IN · C.4NTERBURY. 67'
Chapel is the ancient Library, for the Obituary, by rec
·ol'ding that Pl'ior William Selling (14 72-94) " .adorned
the Library, which is placed over the Prior's Chapel, with
very beautiful carved work," 1 informs us of its con.nee-·
tjon with the chapel.
. But Godwin relates of Archbishop Chichely (1414-
43 ), that after spending a large sum in the repair of
the Library of his Cathedral, he bestowed upon it many
excellent books; and Somner, writing in 1640, before
the original chapel was taken down to make way for the
present building, tells us "that over this Chapel is the
Church Library . . . built by Archbishop Chichely,
and borrowed from the chapel or superadded to it, the
j1=1niori.ty of the work and the passage to it plainly intimate
so much."~
It is evident, from Somner's words, that the difference
of architectural style between the Chapel itself and the
Library was so great, as even to strike the antiquaries of
that time ; and we μiay -therefore conclude, that the
origh1al open Early English roof of the Chapel had been
removed on account of decay, in Chichely's time, .and
that the opportunity was embraced of const1·ucting
above it a chamber for the reception of the monastic
library, after the manner of. tb.~t .period, by substituting
for the high roof a flat ornamental ceiling,· with a floor
above · it for the Library, rai~t;1g the walls to supply
windows, and cover.ing the WP.Ql!3 .with a :flattened roof
of the Perpendicular pattern. Such a work would ·cor.:
respond exactly with the above description quoted from
Soniner. ••
The access to it was supplied by the long staircase,
. built• against the east wall of the Norman gallery, men.:
tioned above (p. 65 ). '
• -1 ";Librarium supra. Capellam Prioris .situa.tum perpulorl\ Ceen on the south
side of the Prior's ChapeP · But in· J ohnson's plan,
already quoted, drawn _when the Prior's Chapel was still
in existence, there is a square building laid down in
the angle between the Norman passage and Chapel, the
foundations of which are still visible ( at L, Fig. 5 ), about
sixteen feet square, which lD.ust. be the substructure of
the closet or oratory in question. The latter (e, Fig. 6)
was entered, of course, from the Prior's Chapel by a
lateral door at.d, and had another door opposite to l~ad
: . 1 _ In Fig. 6, at d, e,f, g, I have .restored this hitherto unnoticed arrangement
in accordance with my explunation of it.
• • . . ·
OF CHRIST CHURCH. CANTERBURY. 7 3
directly to the hagioscopic chamber g by Steps, in a pas
'f A s floor of the recess is only about five feet above that of
the passage, few steps would be required.
After the Reformation, the slits became useless,
and. their external enclosure and passage were allowed
to fall into decay, or destroyed by the Puritans; and
the Prior's Chapel was taken down, and the
present brick Library erected in its stead, about 1700,
the lopg staircase that led from the arched east door
the gallery the ancient Library thrown out use. B u t about 1720 the present
staircase, 1, 2 3 (Plan, Fig, 5), which leads from. the old
chapel cloister under the Library up to this door, and
church, families of the prebendaries and other Cathedral officers
the precinct.' The long landing. 4)
remains,, appears superfluous, is simply the
site of the staircase of the old Library, as already shewn.
mentioned
in the list o f Chillenden's works (Appendix
VI. sect. 8), means the' filling up enough keep off dreary blasts o f that must have annoyed the
and pass
this road from the great Cloister the Infirmary.
Indeed, glazed.
employed open arches
and open tracery used earlier examples. This
cloister, open on espe-
shown of the 1727, a few alterations where The old
plan, but because artist
inserted i t plan, preserve plan, restoration
above.
:MONASTERY OF CHRIST CifCJRCff IN C.AN,TERBURY. 73
directly to the hagioscopic chamber g by steps, in a pas.,.
-sage f running parallel to the Norman passage. As the
:floor of the recess is only about five feet above that of
the passage, few steps would be required.
After the Reformation, the slits became useless·,
and their external enclosure and passage we1·e allowed
to fall into decay, or destroyed by the Puritans; and
when t.he Prior's Chapel was taken down, and th~
present brick Library erected in its stead, about 1700.,
the lop.g stafrcase that led from the arched east door
of the Norman gallery to the ancient Library became
.also thrown out of use. But about 1720 the present
staircase, 1, 2, 3 (Plan, Fig, 5 ),-which leads from the old
chapel cloister under the Library up to this door, and
thus to the chui·ch, was built for the convenience of the
families of the ·prebendaries and other Cathedral officers
dwelling within the precinct.1 The long landing· (4-)
which remains,. and appears superfluous, is simply the
site of the staircase of the old Library, as ahead y shewn.
The enclosure of the cloister under the Chapel, mentioned
in the : list of Chillenden's works (Appendix
No. VI. sect. 8), means the· filling up of the lateral
archways by walls, rising high enough to keep off the
9-reary blasts of wind that must have annoyed th~
,monks, especially the sick and infirm, that had to pass
, along this road from the great Cloister to the Infir:
mary. Indeed, we find that in the later cloisters, glaze\i
tracery was often employed instead of the open arch~
. ~nd open tracery used in the earlier examples. This ·
particular clo~ster, being open on both sides, was espe-
, 1 This staircase is shewn in Dart's plan ofihe Cathedral, 1'127, which is
• copied from Johnson's, with a few alfierations where required. Theola
Library staircase is retained in this plan, but perhaps because the artist
• forgot to erase 'it from Johnson's plan when he inserted the new staircase,
I have inserted it in the ground plan, Fig. 5, to preserve the memory of
·it, but in the first floor plan, Fig. 6, have omitted it, and given the l'eetoration
of the ancient private oratory, etc., described abOV:y means: of ladder.
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 7 7
when first completed, had an entrance from St:Andrew's
chapel cut through the gable. O n the Treasury side it
appears the form of a debased perpendicular
arch, walled up, in the western recess, at X, Fig. 6.,
chapel side i t has pointed arch, within
whinch, under a tympanum, is a debased arch, resting on
two Norman jambs, the whole constructed with stones.
taken from elsewhere.'
presents to view, on each of its sides, two plain Norman
arched recesses, separated by a central pier. Each pier
has on its face a respond-shaft with a carved capital:
the north and south piers are and deeper
than the east and west piers, and rise upwards, interpenetrating
the vault. A semicircular r i b -extends
across the chamber from each capital to its direct
opposite. Also, from each angle o f the chamber, a
rib-arch of the same section extends across the chamber
te its. diagonally opposite angle. These four arches intersect
in the centre of the vault, where they are received
Circular keystone. T h e diagonal as the circular ones, their greater span, are o f elliptical form.
same level, and meeting at their highest point.
,the skeleton transverse sections. This divided by ribs into eight triangular segments,
the each bounded outwards arched recesses The vaultingsurface
each eastern recess, at observed the
as door, completely walled and conjectures, great probability, that Norman described removed this position present one
them cover MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 77°
when first completed, had an entrance from St. 'Andrew's
chapel cut through the gable. On the Treasury side it
now appears in the form of a debased perpendicular
a1·ch, walled up, in the weste1·n recess, at X, Fig. 6;,
On the chapel side it has a late pointed arch, within:
which, under a tympanum, is a debased arch, resting on
two Norman jambs, the whole constructed with stones·
taken from elsewhere.1
I have said that the interior of the Treasury chamber
presents to view, on each of its· sides, two plain No.rman
arched recesses, sepai·ated by· a central pier. Each pier
has on its face a respond-shaft with a carved capital.·
But the north and south piers are wider and deeper
than the east and west piers, and rise upwards, interpenetrating
the vault. A semicircular rib-arch extends
across the chamber from each capital to its direct
opposite. Also, from each angle of the chamber, a
rib-arch of the same section extends across the chamber
to its. diagonally opposite angle. These four arches intersect
in the centre of the vault, where they are received
upon a circular keystone. The diagonal arches spring
from the same level as the circular ones, but, to allow
for their greater span, they are of an elliptical form.
The result is, a group of eight vault-ribs, all rising from
the same level,· and meeting at their highest point.
The .ribs form the skeleton of a dome, square in plan,
but semicircular in its transverse sections. This dome
is divided by its ribs into eight triangular segments,
meeting in the centre, and each bounded outwards by
one of the arched recesses of the wall. The vaultingsuiface
of each segment rests outwards on the extrados
1 In the eastern recess, at Y, Fig. 6, Mr. Faussett has observed the_
traces of ·an earlier breach, as for a doo1·, complete]y walle.d up on both
sides, and conjectures, with great probability, thai the Norrnan jambs
above · described were removed from this position to their present one
when the chambers over the Treasury were built, and the staircase leading
to t-hem from the chapel was placed so as to cov~r this earlier entrance.
78 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
or outer line of the recessed arch of the wall, and laterally
upon the transverse and diagonal semi-arch, which
meet at the crown. The vaulting surface is therefore
concave. A ribbed vault of this kind is termed octopartite,
This noble and unique room i s twenty feet high,
twenty-four wide from east to west, and twenty-two
from north to south. O n the west side its windows
have been obstructed by buildings erected against it,
described below.
the Canterbury group
in which diagonal rib-vaulting appears. The vault of the
pier, from which four arches spring to the middle responds
the outer walls, the whole vault squares of ordinary vaulting with. diagonal ribs (vide
This substructure, crypt
of Conrad's choir, brings the floor of the Vestiarium, or
a church, Ohapel, I t also be observed that the
added about the end of the thirteenth
is easily distinguished on the outside
original rough I t two-Estria's .B u t Andrew's
mortices
surface, original
decorative architecture, which sb.evv that the primitive
of the Treasury was high-pitched and abutted
that wall. T h e floor o f this chamber was
by doraical
and rubbish, so as to obtain surface. The chamber is reached by means of a narrow
as above described, the
Treasury.
78 • THE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF TllE
or outer line of the recessed arch of the wall, and late-·
rally upon the transverse and diagonal semi-arch, which
meet at the crown. The vaulting surface is therefore
concave. A ribbed vault of this kind is termed octo ..
partite, having eight vaulting cells.
• This noble and unique room is twenty feet high,
twenty-four wide from east to west, and twenty-two
from north to south. On the west side its windows
have been obstructed by buildings erected against it,
described below.
• This is the earliest building of the Canterbmy g1·oup
in which diagonal rib-vaulting appears. The vault of the
substructure is also ribbed, but is sustained by a central
pier, from which four arches spring to the middle 1·esponds
of the outer walls, dividing · the whole vault into four
squares of ordinary vaulting with diagonal ribs ( V'ide
Fig. 5). This substructure, corresponding to the crypt
of Com-ad's choir, brings the fioor of the Vestiarium, or
Treasury, to a level with the upper church, the Prior's
chapel, etc.
It must also be obsetved that a chamber above the
Treasury was added about the end of the thirteenth
century, which is easily distinguished on the outside
from the original by its rough walls. It is lighted by
plain two.light windows, of De Est1·ia's time, and ·covered
with a low-pitched roof. But the gable-wall of St. Andrew's
Chapel retains, in this chamber, grooves and mortices
sunk in its smface, and cutting through its originaf
decorative architecture, which shew that the ptimitive
roof of the Treasu1·y was high-pitched and abutted
against that wall. The floor of .this chamber was
formed by filling up the pockets of the great domical
vault with earth and rubbish, so as to obtain a level
surface. The chamber is reached by means of a na:rrow
staircase, constructed as above described, between the·
chapel and Treasmy.
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 7 9
To explain the names given to the Treasury it must
be remarked, that in the middle ages and
Treasury used vestments, but also the valuable ornaments and vessels,
and even money, of the church. "Locus ubi modo
asservantur sed cimeia, thesaurus
pecunice." The officer in charge was Vestiarius, who
similarly had the care of the vestments, ornaments, and
treasures. The Vestiarium, of the Norman drawing had
Treasury
in later ages, and, as Somner tells us, was also
known to former times by the name of Armarium, Armariolum. I t Seeretarium,
and its keeper Saerista. After the dissolution of
the monastery, the chapel of St. Andrew, becoming useless,
for and the old Vestiarium reserved for church records, as
at present. The rooms over the vault of the latter were
Adjoining the west wall of St. Andrew's Chapel and
Treasury, and. Auditorium itself being labelled Auditorium interim. This outer Audit-
corner through the wall to the stair-turret of St. Andrew, and
another (U), which is an ancient transomed door, into
the Treasury or inner Audit-room. A s the stair-turret
is entered from the Cathedral aisle by a door, the outer
room was made accessible from that aisle, and also the
Treasury itself. This outer room has a third door, in its
corner, which is connected the south-. door Chapel as at present, must have been a covered bridge.
The term Auditorium was applied to this chamber
and the Treasury after the dissolution of the Priory,
MONASTERY OF CHRIST OHU.RCH IN CANTERBURY, 7 9
To explain the names given to the Treasury it must
be remarked, that in the middle ages Vestiarium and
Tieas·ury were synonymous terms, for the first is defined
by Ducange to be a place used not only for keeping of
vestments, but also the valuable ornaments and vessels,
and even money, of the church. "Locus ubi non modo
vestes asservantU'r sed etiam cimelia, atque adeo thesau1-us
et pecwnice." The officer in charge was Vestiarius, who
similarly had the care of the vestments, ornaments, and
ti;easures. The Vesticaium of the Norman drawing hacl
obtained, for this reason, the English name of the Treasu1:
1 in later ages, and, as Somner tells us, was also
known .to • forme1· times by the name of A1-nia'i·iwrn, or
Ar1nariolum,,. It was also termed, in other places, Secreta1ium,
and its keeper Saorista. After the dissolution of
the monastery, the chapel of St.Andrew, be-coming useless,
was fitted up as a vestry for- the Dean and Prebendaries,
and the old Vestia1·ium reserved for church records, as
at present. The rooms over the vault of the latter were
also, in Somner's time, employed for this purpose.
Adjoining the west wall of St. Andrew's Chapel and
• the Trea.su1y, a narrow room is shewn in the early plan of
Johnson, and labelled Auclitorium, exterius, the Treasury
itself being labelled Auditoriurn interhw. This outer Audit-
room (V, Fig. 6) has a door in its south comer pierced
thl'ough the wall to the stafr-turret (Z) of St. Andrew, and
another (U), which is an ancient transomed door, into
the Treasury or inner Audit-room. As the stair-turret
is ente,red from the Cathedral aisle by a door, the outer
room was made accessible from that aisle, and also the
Treasury -itself. This outer room has a third door, in its
north comer, which is connected with the south-west
door of the Prior's Chapel by a narrow passage, which
as at present, must have been a covered bridge.
The term A.uditori,um was applied to this chamber
and the Treasm·y after the dissolution of the Priory,
80 T H E CONVENTUAL EUILUNGS OF THE
when they were used. for auditing the accounts of the
Chapter, and capitular business in. general. B u t about
1720, the incongruous Audit-house (J, Fig. 5, and W,
Fig. 6), which now covers the ancient site of the narrow
Auditorium exterius, but extended westward and
northward so as to form a chamber of sufficient capacity
for business, was built. I t is entered by the ancient
way from the Cathedral aisle, but the stair-turret through
which that way passed was 'deprived of the spiral stairs,
and now resembles a dry well. T h e mode of communication
at the north side, by an enclosed or " tubular "
bridge Fig. 6), with the Prior's chapel, was also retained,
that being the Chapter Library, which was convenient
as an anteroom to the Audit-house.
• Under this modern Audit-house is a smaller ancient
substructure (vide H, Fig. 6), in the angle between the
Norman stair-turret and the west wall of the crypt of St.
Andrew's chapel, which is bounded on the north and west
by two open Norman arches. I t is vaulted with narrow;
diagonal, chamfered ribs, much later than the arches.
This structure is fifteen feet wide externally, which exactly
corresponds to the width of Johnson's Auditorium
exterius by his scale. I t also joins the stair-turret of St.
Andrew, in the same manner as in Johnson's plan. But in
length it only reaches to the end of the wall of St. Andrew's
chapel. A similar compartment of vaulting (as
at I, Fig. 5) would have carried i t exactly to the centre
of the west wall of the Treasury, where i t would have
abutted against the central pier o f its subvault. B u t
the present Audit-house extends beyond the older one
westward and northward, as the plan shews. I t can
scarcely be doubted that the Naman substructure we
are considering is part of the foundation of the building
represented by Johnson,' and its only purpose could be
The ribs and vault of this substructure are xauch later than the piers,
and indicate a reconstruction of theloriginal vault.
80 THE CO~TUAL BUILDINGS • O.F THE
when they were used for auditing the accounts of the
Chapter, and capitular business in general. But about
1720, the incongruous Audit-house (J, Fig. 6, and W,
Fig. 6), which now covers the ancient site of the nar:
row .Auditorium exterius, but extended westward and
northward so as to fo1'm a chamber of sufficient capacity
for business, was built. It is entered by the ancient
way from the Cathedral aisle, but the stair-turret through
which that way passed was-deprived of the spiral stairs,
and now resembles a dry well. The mode of communication
at the north side, by an enclosed or "tubular"
bridge (r, Fig. 6 ), with the Prior's chapel, was also retained,
that being the Chapter Lib1·ary, which was convenient
as an anteroom to the Audit-house.
• Under this mode1n Audit-house is a smaller ancient
substructure (vide H, Pig. 6), in the angle between the
Norman stair-turret and the west wall of the crypt of St.
Andrew's chapel, which is bounded on the north and west
by two open Norman arches. It is vaulted ·with nanow,diagon_
al, chamfered ribs, much l ater than the arches.
This structure is fifteen feet wide externally, which exactly
corresponds to the width of J ohnson's AuditO'riurn
extetius by his scale. It also joins the stair-turret of St.
And1·ew, in the same manner as in J ohnson's plan. But in
length it only reaches to the end of the wall of St. Andrew's
chapel. A similar compa1·tment of vaulting (as
at I, Fig. 5) would have carried it e:x.actly to the centre
of the west wall of the Treasury, whei:e it would have
abutted against the central pier of its subvault. But
the present Audit-house extends beyond the olde1· one
:westward and northward, as the plan shews. It can
scarcely be doubted that the N orroan substructure we
a1·e considering is part· of the foundation · of the building .
represented by J ohnson,1 and its only purpose could be
.The ribs and vault of this substructure ll,re much later tbnn the piers,
and indicate o. reconstruction of the\iriginal va.ult.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH TN CANTERBURY. 8 1
to supply a passage from the Cathedral aisle to the
Treasury, which, without this gallery, could only have
been entered by the door already described through the
double wall which separates St. Andrew's chapel from
the Treasury chamber.
The it in with concave corbels. Viewed from the interior of the
Treasury chamber this doorway is evidently seen to have
been an insertion in the wall made after the completion
of that chamber. F o r the upper part of a round-headed
window, like the other windows of the chamber but
walled up, is seen above the great transom stones which
now form the lintel of the doorway.
. The substructure of this ancient vestibule, consisting
open arches, so as. conform position with those of the substructure of the Treasury,
offered no obstruction to the thoroughfare from the
great and small Cloisters to the cemetery of the monks.
But when the modern Audit-house was built, its substructure
northern
passage through the Treasury vaults into the
"gymewes" beyond, as the old cemetery was termed.'
The abovementioned communication from the vestibule
passage tubular
shewn Johnson's the chapel
by the south-eastern door (S); which is an insertion of
century, south-east (1) of Norman gallery, anciently led, the long staircase, to the old Library.
to give access the tubular
bridge. B i n , as a previous door might have
existed, i t gives no clue to the date of this connection
1 Vide Appendix, No. V I I I .
VOL. V I I .
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH JN CANTERBURY. 81
to supply a passage from the Cat11eclral •aisle to the
Treasury, which, without this galle1·y, could only have
been entered by the door already described through the
double wall which separates St. Andrew's chapel from
the Treasury chamber.
Th~ doorway (V, Fig. 6) between it and the Treasury,
which is still iu use, is an ancient square-headed opening,
with concave corbels. • Viewed from the interior of the
Treasw·y chamber this doorway is evidently seen to have
been an insertion in the wall made after the completion
of that chamber. For the upper part of a round-headed
window, like the other windows of the chamber but
walled up, is seen above the great transom stones which
now form the lintel of the doorway.
. The substructure of this ancient vestibule, consisting
of piers with open arches, spaced so as. to conform in
position .with those of the substructure of the Treasury,
offered no obstruction to the thoroughfare from the
g1·eat and small Cloisters to the cemetery of the monks.
But when the modern Audit-house was built, its substructure
introduced more piers in front of .the Treasury,
which evidently made it necessary to remove the northern
half of the ancient substructure, in order to clear a
sufficient passage through the Treasury va;ults into the
Hgymewes" beyo-q.d, as the old cemetery was termed.1
• The abovementioned communication from the vestibule
· to the Prior's chapel by a covered passage or .tubular
bridge, sbewn in Johnson's plan, enters the chapel
by the south-eastern door (S); which is an insertion of
the fifteenth centUI'y, with moldings identical with those
of the south-east door (l) of the ~ oTman gallery, that
anciently led, by the long staircase, to the old Library.
This door was plainly inserted t9 give access to the tubular
bridge. But, as a previous door might have
existed, it gives no clue to the date of this connection
1 JTide 'Distribution Document,' Appendix:,· No. VIμ.
VOL. VU. G
82 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
the chapel supply Prior and direct
own camera, mansion, through 10. Second Dormitory Third Dormitory or
Necessarium.
In Norman the eastern the south boundary of the Curia occupied by a long
Necessarium, purpose.
this portentous edifice were -
sufficient enable me, to site, to,
recover great part of its arrangements and dimensions.
I t was a Norman frontage to the court
155 feet externally. The height of wall from the original base to the A t end transverse wall (a b, Fig. 12) separates ten wide, the north end of The Prior's the west end this Hall joined the great
Dormitory,' frontage at that end is terminated by a square turret
H Z). The Hall was reached from the Dormitory by a
opened a vestibule against the south-west end of the Hall, from
Necessarium Dormitory.
This is an undoubted the are so preserved
possible,
union. Vide I n sketch seen Hall This that aware I t s moldings, delineated in corner of'
show 82 THE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF TIIE
between the chapel and vestibule, which was evidently
arranged to supply the Priol' with a private and direct
passage from his own came1·a, or man.~ion, through his
chapel, to the Cathedral and Treasury.
10. Second JJ01mit01·y and Tlifrd JJm-mitoty or
Neoessarium.
In the Norman drawing we find the eastern half of
the south boundary of the Curia occupied by a long
building, labelled Neoessa1-iurn, a title which sufficiently
explains its pnrpose.
The ruins on the site of this portentous edifice weresufficien
·t to enable me, in my early visits to the site, to.
recover great part of its arrangements and dimensions.
It was a Norman Hall, with a frontage to the court
of 155 feet externally. The height of the wall was
thirty feet from the original base to the top. At the
east end a transverse wa11 (a b, Fig. 12) separates a
passage ten feet wide, which is the north end of the
Prior's Entry. The frontage was still further extended.
eastward by the Norman building which was surmounted
by the Prim's chamber called the Gloriet.
At the we_st ~nd this Ha.11 was joined to the great
Dormitory,1 but projected fifteen feet in advance, and its
frontage at that end is terminated by a square turret
(HZ). The Hall was reached from the Dormitory by a
door, P, in the east wall of the latter, which opened to
a vestibule against the south•west end of the Hall, from
1 In the Norman drawing the Necessai·ium is detached from the Dormi-0
tory. This is an undoubted error; for the ruins are so distinctly preserved
at the point of junction of the two buildings as to leave no possible·,
doubt of the fact of their uni0n. Vide Fig. 11. In this sketch it will be
selln that the gable of the Rall has a window in the form of a vesica
piscis,
with the longest diameter horizontal. This is the only example of such a
window thnt I am aware of. Its moldings, delineated in: the corner of
the engraving, shew it to be Norman.
• • •
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERTIURY. 8 3
F i g . 11 .—REMAINS O N T H I R D A N D F I R S T DORMITORIES•
second door, gave
entrance to the latter, as shewn in my Plan (Fig. 12).
the ancient Gall,' so essential
to cleanliness and health, appears the The dormitory form square passage I t lueerna, plan, to range two parallel lines crossed by others, which shew the
number of cells to have been only nine. The guesthouse,
Abbot's house, bloodletting-
Arch. Journal, 1.
G 2
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 83
~~ - ,,-, 1 . - • • ..;I ~ • -==- .
::..l,,r -
Fig. 11,-ll.EMAINS OJ! THilU) AND FffiST DORMITORIES.
which a second dool', C, in the wall of the Hall, gave
entrance to the latter, as shewn in my Plan (Fig. 12).
In the ancient plan of St. Gall,1 this office, so essential
to cleanliness and health, appears in several parts
of the monastery. The dormitory is provided with one
in the form of a square enclosure, connected to it by a
long passage from the south-eastern corner of the great
building. It has a lucerna, or lamp, marked in a corner
of its plan, opposite to a rnnge of sedilia, indicated by
two parallel lines crossed by others, which shew the
number of cells to have • been only nine. The guesthou,
se, the school, the Abbot's house, the bloodletting7
A1·r-h. J ournnl, vol. i.
G2
84 T U B CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS O F THE
house, the infirmary, and the Novices' convent, are each
carefully provided with these conveniences.
Remains of them may be observed in all monastic
ruins, for they were substantially constructed of masonry
with architectural character, and no attempt was made
to disguise or conceal them. They have usually been
converted or worked into prebendal houses, as at Canterbury,
Worcester,' Durham, etc. I n all cases, a watercourse
was led through them from one end to the other.
This characteristic is a useful guide to distinguish this
particular building in monastic ruins.
• T h e arrangement of the interior of our Hall will be
made more intelligible by quoting the account of the
similar place at the monastery of Durham, preserved in
the Rites of Durham' (p. 72), which ,follows the description
of the. Dorter :—
"Also there was a faire large house and a most decent place,
adjoyninge to the west syde of the said Dorter towardes the
water, for the monnkes and Novices to resort unto, called the
Privies, which was maide with two great° pillers of stone that
did, beare up the whole floore therof.
"And every seate and partition was o f wainscott, close o f
either syde, v-erie decent, so that one of them could not see one
another when they weare in that place.
"There was as many seates of privies on either syde as there
is little wyndowes i n the walls, which wyndowes was to gyve
Ieighte to every one of the said seates.
"Which afterward was walled up to make the howse more
close, and in the height of the west end there was iij fair glass
wyndowes, and i n the southe syde, in the hight over the said
seates is another faire glass wyndovve, which greate wyndowes
doth gyve lighte to all the whole house."
We may now return to Canterbury, and describe the
inner structure of its Neeessarium (vide Section, Fig. 13).
The interior of the Hall was originally 145 feet in length,
'and its breadth 25 feet. A strong, low, longitudinal wall
'Arch. Journal, vol. xx. p. 301.
84 THE CONYENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
house, the infirmary, and the Novices' convent, are each
carefully provided with these conveniences.
Remains of them may be observed in all monastic
ruins, for tbey were substantially constructed of mas01uy
with architectural character, and no attempt was made
to disguise or conceal them. They have usually been
converted or worked into prebendal houses, as at Canterbury,
·vv orcester,1 Durham, etc. In all cases, a watercourse
was led through them from one end to the other.
This characteristic is a useful guide to distinguish this
particular building in monastic ruins.
The arrangement of the interior of our Hall will be
made more intelligible by quoting the account of the
similar·place at the monastery of Durham, preserved in
the 'Rites o~ Durham' (p. 72), ·which .follows the description
of the. Dorter :-
" Also there was a faire large house and a most decent place,
adjoyninge to the west syde of the said Dorter towardes the
water, for the monnkes and Novices to resort unto, called the
Privies, which was maide with two greate pillars of stone that
did beare up the whole £oore therof.
" And every seate and partition was of wainscott, close of
either syde, verie decent, so that one of them could not see one
another when they weare in that place. .
• ". There was as many seates of privies on either syde as there
is little wyndowes . in the walls, which wyndowes was to gyve
leighte to every one of the said seates.
"Which afterward was walled up to make the howse more
close, and in the height of the west end there was iij fair glass
wyndowes, and in the southe syde, in the hight over the said
seates is another faire glass wyndowe, which greate wyndowes
doth gyve lighte to all the whole house."
We may now return to Canterbury, and describe the
inner strncture of itsNecessa'rium (vide Section, :Fig. 13).
The interior of the Hall was originally 145 feet in length,
·and its breadth 25 .feet. A strong, low, longitudinal wall
1 Arch. Journal, vol. xx:. p. 801.
Opposite page 85.
PRIORS
C A M E R A
H A L L
R
M A N S I O N
CHAMBER
UNDER
G L O R I E T
C O U R T
O P E N S P A C E
, f i l 3 , 0 ' 1 7 , /11W,#'- i l # l ' i l J 7 , e
11
TH I RD
S E C O N D D O R M I T O R Y
D O R M I
OR N E C E S S A R I
T O R Y
U M
I K
4 i 1 4 . 1 , " A ,
V E S T I B U L E
f ' • 3 z # , go,z
jAv i I i I ' 1
I t I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I l l _ I l l 1 1 1 1 1 1
/ r i / - ! W M r /
PORCH
DP PRIORS ENTRY. 77.
1,..11r11,1 1 1
0 1 0 2 0 9 0
SCALE FEET
40 5 0
F i g . 1 2 .— P L A N O F SECOND A N D T H I R D DORMITORIES, W I T H ADJACENT B U I L D I N G S .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I PR I ORS
I
I
I CAMERA
I
I
I HA LL
I
I
I OR
I
I MANSION I
I
I
I
I a.
' :w
l
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lr
'T\
~
THIRD
Ofl
0 PEN S P A CE
SECOND D O R MITORY
~ " ,',
R !'' s !
! T
I •1 l l,
: OORMliTORY
: I
• NEC E. SS AR ll UM
• !, . • 't
i l I
l 'I : I
I
I
l
I
10
lh '.
------ l • --------- ------ I J
~
V EST ll:IV L E
8
..
SCALE OF l'EET
Fig. 12.- PLA..'i OP SEC'01'"D A,.',D THffiD DORlIITORIES, WITH ADJACE:-IT BUILDINGS.
40
Oprositc JlB::C 85.
tl
0
::0
~
so
k
014' CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 8 5
(C D) separated the lower part into two portions of unequal
northern seven The the
divisionwall
0 D), a level coinciding, or nearly so, with that of the Dormitory.
The height of the wall from this pavement was
fifteen feet. T h e northern compartment formed a
channel or fosse, which was bridged over by a row of
seats, originally fifty-five i n number. B u t in the thirteenth
(vide leads the to the Infirmary Cloister was constructed under the
floor of the Necessarium Hall, by building the wall a By this alteration five seats were destroyed, reducing
the total number to fifty.
The conversion of this Hall into a Refectory for the
officials of the new foundation at the dissolution, as will
presently appear, explains the entire destruction of the
partitions and seats which belonged to its primitive
A l l these fittings, of stone or
wood, were levelled to a height corresponding with the
floor of the southern half of the room. B u t sufficient
these sustained above the fosse remain in several places to
the present time, to enable the construction of the whole
to be understood.
• A upper lines or horizontal extrados of which correspond
level of the fosse. These arches are eight inches thick, and
nearly two feet asunder; and the series extended from
one end to the other of the Hall. Thus its floor was
provided with a series of narrow, rectangular openings
above the fosse, the distance from the centre of one to
that of the other being two feet seven inches, which is
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 85
(C D) separated the lower part into t1rvo portions· of unequal
breadth, the no1thern seren feet wide, the southern
fourteen feet. The latter was filled with earth for the
greater part of its length, to the height of the divisionwall
(CD), upon which earth the pavement was laid at
a level coinciding, or nearly so, with that of the Dormitory.
The height of the wall from this pavement was
:fifteen feet. The northern compartment formed a
channel or fosse, which was bridged over by a row of
seats, originally fifty-five in number. But in the thirteenth
or following centuries the low passage (vide Fig.
12) or Prior's Entry which leads from the Green Court
to the lnfirmary Cloister was constructed under the
floor of the Necessarium Hall, by building the wall a b.
By this alteration :five seats were destroyed, reducing
the total number to fifty.
The conversion of this Hall into a Refectory for the
officials of the new foundation at the dissolution, as will
presently appear, explains the entire destruction of the
partitions and seats which belonged to its primitive
employment. All these fittings, whether of stone or
wood, were levelled to a height corresponding- with the
floor of the southern half of the room. But sufficient
portions of the masonry by which these partitions were
sustained above the fosse remain in several places to
the present time, to enable the construction of the whole
to be understood.
· A series of thin arches of masonry (A B, Fig. 13), the
upper lin~s or horizontal extrados of which correspond
with the level of the . present floor, cross the upper part
of. the fosse. These arches are eight inches thick, and
nearly two feet asunder ; and the series extended fro~
one·end to the other of the Hall. Thus its floor was
provided with a series of narrow, 1·ectangular openings
a.b ove the fosse ' the distance from the centre of one to • that of the other being two feet seven inches, which is
86 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
three inches wider than that allowed for the stalls of
the choir. T h e length of each opening is contracted at
flat connecting the lateral arches in a manner shewn by the
nine F i g . 1 4 . — S I T I I VAULTS 0 1 , T H I R D DORMITORY.
arches, near the west end original series.
of' prebendal
house, ruins, do others, near the eastern extremity of the series, in the
now assigned to the master of the choristers.
Six in the minor canon's houses, destroyed. in recollection.
distances of these groups shewed that they were
remains series, Hall.'
I t thin bridges partitions
A
I I n indicated places remained examined this dot
to 86 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
three inches wider than that allowed for the stalls of
the choir. The length of each opening is contracted at
the south end by the introduction of a small, fiat vault,
connecting the lateral arches in a manner shewn by the
drawing (Fig. 14), which represents a series of nine of
[-'-$..
:·s-=-==:..--=-?-f\1
·-------- ? ~ =~- ~ - ~-~ ~ -Fig.
14.-SUBVAULTS OF TllffiD DOll.MlTOll.Y.
these arches, near the west end of the original series.•
These were preserved in the cellars of the twelfth prebendal
house, and still remain in the 1·uins, as do eight
others, near the eastern extremity of the series, in the
house now assigned to the master of the choristers.
Six. others, shewn in the plan, remained in the cellars of
the minor canon's houses, destroyed in my recollection.
The distances of these groups shewed that they were
the remains of a continued .series, extending along the
whole north side of the Hall.1
It is manifest that the thin-bridges sustained the partitions
(probably of wood) which separated the cells. A
1 In the Plan, Fig. 12, I have indicated the places of the bridges that
remn.ined when I first examined this structure, by placing a small dot~
. opposite · to each of them.
THIRD DORMITORY. Fig. 13. SRCO•ND DORMITORY.
Opposite page 87.
/
- -----,N
(
l
THnID DOlUIITORY. Fig. 13. SECO)<"D DORlliTORY.
MONASTERY OR CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 8 7
.partition wood, doors, wae carried south wall (0 D Fig. 13) of the fosse,' and the wooden
seats (A) were erected against the north wall, immediately
above the narrow openings, and framed into the
partitions.
The form of the bottom of the fosse (B D) has not
.been ascertained, but must have been concave. I t was
supplied by a running stream, produced by turning the
waste-water and rain-water of the monastery into this
channel (Chap. X. on Waterworks '). The north
wall rests on a series of arches (B), one of which is
shewn in the perspective Sketch (Fig. 11). These were
probably walled up, as one of them, at IT, Fig. 12, is at
present, and another at the west end.'
In the documents, the epithets applied to the name
Dormitory shew that more than one conventual building
bore that name. Thus, in the Obituary, Chillenden
is said to have repaired the Magnum Dormitorium. I n
the decree of Chapter, 1547, i t was ordered that the
Great Dortor be taken down, and the materials employed
in building lodgings for the Petty Canons and
Vicars: in describing the aqueduct repaired by Chillenden,
its course is traced " t o the head of the third
Dormitory, where i t is turned into the aqueduct in
1 The 'Revue Arch4ologique' for 1850 (t. 7, p.117) contains a description;
with engraving, of the ruins of the Abbaye de Maubuisson by M. lierard.
Amongst these are the remains of a Latrine of precisely similar construction.
A n extremely deep fosse is formed partly by high walls and partly
by sinking into the ground. T h e upper part, at the level of the floor, is
covered by a series of parallel, thin bridging-arches, as at Canterbury
(but pointed instead of circular). These are joined by stone slabs (corresponding
to the small vaults in our example), and thus form a fiat, level
floor pierced by parallel slits, over which the seats were placed. B u t no
fragment of construction remains above this floor to show their real form.,
The Latrine is joined to the corner of the Dortoir des Novices, in the
same way as at Canterbury.
a There were twelve of these arches originally, of which the easternmost
was destroyed, when the Prior's entry was made. The piers W,W, X, X,
still remain, and some other intermediate ones still existed in my memory.
l\!ONAST.ERY OF CIDUST CHURCH IN C.ANTERBURY. 87
-long pru:tition of woo~ with · doors, was can1.ed by the
south wall (C D Fig. 13) of the fosse, 1 and the wooden
seats (A) were erected ~o-ainst the north wall, immediately
above the narrow openings, and framed into the
partitions.
The form of the bottom of the fosse (B D) has not
.been ascertained, but must have been concave. It was
supplied by a running stream, produced by turning the
waste-water and rain-water of the monastery into this
channel ( vide Chap. X. on ' Yv aterworks '). The north
wall rests on a se1·ies of arches (B ), one of which is
shewn in the perspective Sketch (Fig. 11). These were
probably walled up, as one of them, at V, Fig. 12, is at
present, and another at the west end.2
•
In the documents, the epithets applied to the name
Dormitory shew that more than one conventual building
bore that name. Thus, in the Obituary, Chillendeu
is said to have repau·ed the Magnum JJorniitorimn. In
the decree of Chapter, 154i, it was ordered that the
G1·eat 1)01•tor be taken down, and the materials em~
ployed in building lodgings for the Petty Canons and
Vicars; in describing the aqueduct repaired by Chillenden,
its course is traced " to the bead of the tliird
JJormitory, where it is turned into the aqueduct in
1 The 'Revue .A.rch6ologique ' for 1850 (t. 7, p. 717) contains a. desc1·iption;
with engraving, of the ruins of the Abba.ye de Maubuisson by M. Hera.rd .
.Amongst these ru:e the remains of a Lat1·ine of precisely similar construction.
.A.n extremely deep fosse is formed partly by high walls and partly
by sinlong into the ground. The upper part, at the level of the floor, is
covered by a. series of parallel, thin bridging-arches, as at Canterbury
(but pointed inst-ea.cl of circular). These are joined by stone slabs (corresponding
to the small vawts in our example), o.nd thus form a flat, level
floor pierced by parallel slits, over which the seats were placed. :But no
fragment of construction remains above this 1loor to shen,. their real form.
The Latrine is joined to the corner of the JJor"toir des Novices, in the
same way as at Canterbury.
2 There were twelve of these arches originally, of which the easternmost
was destroyed when the Prior's entry was made.· The piers W, W, X, X,
still remain, and some other intermediate ones still existed in my memory.
88 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
the third Dormitory."' Gostling, who entirely misconceives
the construction Great Dormitory,also
mentiops the "Little ;" but I with that epithet i n the documents, I presume he
i t by the existence Great
Dortor, as we may more reasonably suppose that a
third Dormitory implies the existence o f two others.
the mention the aqueduct in Dormitory"
identifies that name with the Neeessarium, into
the fosse of which the rain-water from the roofs o f
the Convent and the waste o f the waterworks was
east end, as passe
Court
into the town ditch. T h e name is probably a cant
one,' perhaps derived from the habit o f dozing in the
recesses of this apartment, which may be inferred from
the duties watchman, namely, to examine a l l the sedilia at night,
lest any monk should be asleep there, in which case he
is enjoined not to disturb the sleeper rudely touching
make some l i t t l e noise may rouse him.'
"• . . . tune se aqueduct= tercio Dormitorio." (Chillenden's List, sect. 8.)
o. xxvii., the Dortor,) his there Donors, the monks. T h e great one, 15417, Dormitory; but he imagines i t to have been fitted with
court, cloister-fashion. T h i s ingenious device conceive, accepted present A f ter completing his
181), The the
toward Darter," i t necessary-Dormitory, minor canons. H e wrote, i t
after _Darter, as calls 3 The use of similar cant names for these conveniences is retained to the
present as, example, fourth court," in Cambridge; "number
six," Oxford; 7211.171er0 cent," Continent.
. " Circumitores quos alio nomine Circas ' vocant, juxta
88 THE CONVEN'l'UAL BUILDINGS OF THE
the tliird 1Jormit01:1."1 Gostling, who entirely misconceives
the construction of the Great Dormitory,2 also
mentions the" Little Dortor ;'' but as I have never met
with that epithet in the documc:nts, I pxesume he
inferred it by contrast, from the existence of a Great
Dortor, as we may ,tnore reasonably suppose that a
tMrd JJormitory implies the existence of two others.
But t1ie mention of the aqueduct in the "Third Dormitory"
identifies that name with the Necessa1ium, into
the fosse of which the rain-water from the roofs of
the Convent and the waste of the waterworks was
turned at the east end, as above mentioned, and pass~
ing out at the west was conveyed under the Green Cotu-t
into the town ditch. The name is probably a cant
one,3 perhaps derived from the habit of dozing in the
recesses of this apartment, which may be inferred from
one of the duties assigned by Lanfranc to the Circa, or
watchman, namely, to examine all the sedilia at night,
lest any monk should be asleep there, in which case he
is enjoined not to disturb the sleeper J.'udely by touching
him, but quietly to make some little noise or stir that
may rouse him.1.
1 " •••• ad caput tercii dormitorii et tune vertit se ad aqueductum in
tercio Dormitol'io." (Cbillenden's List, sect. 8.)
2 Gostling (c. :uvii., Of tke Dorto1•,) informs h is readers that thero were
two Dorto,·s, or lodgings for the monies. The great one, taken down in
1547, which he describes, is that which is now by common consent termed
the Dormitory; but he imagines it to have been fitted up within wit,h
galleries round a little coul't, cloister•fashioo. This ingenious device will
not, I conceive, be accepted in the present time. After completing his
description, he continues (p. 18lj, " 1'he range of high. building from the
Dark Entry to,vnrd the Larder-gate is part of the Little Dortr-..J' ~~--;~ -~--- ,.---.
---- .. -i-\f-J!":S'~-.. ' --;;-- V
l - UTTINO . .fo ..
Fig, 17.-NORTR END 01' THE OlIElOm DUlLDING.
chatnber above has two single-light windows, exactly
like one that remains in the wall of the second story
of the chambers above described, over the Innnnary
Cloister, and shews them all to belong to one work.
The wall over the double arch is ruined above, but
must have had similar windows in the second story.
In the east wall of the passage, between the double
arch and the south door of the P1·ior's Entry, are the lower
104 T H E CON VENTUAL BUILDINGS OP THE
parts of two large Perpendicular two-light transomed
windows, one of which appears in the sketch, their sills•
seven feet from the ground, and their width five feet in
the clear. T h e top of the window when complete rose
as high as the second floor of the ranges of chambers
already described. This is evidence that the building
on the other side was a lofty Hall, probably the Dining
Hall of the Camera Prioris mentioned in Winchelsey's
Statute, p. 95 above. I t was part of a range of buildings
that lined the eastern boundary o f the Prior's
Entry, extending from the south wall of the Infirmary
to the Green Court. The Hall may have reached south
to the side-aisle wall of the Infirmary, or may have had
chambers between its south end and that wall. T h e
north end was bounded by a pre-existing building (28,
Plate 3), of which sufficient traces remain to enable us
to fix the position and form of its "north gable wall, the
lower part of which was Norman, and retains on the
ground a Norman arch walled up. I t s north face
ranges with the wall o f the Necessarium. This building
was divided by floors.
The description of Chillenden's drain, already mentioned
in the history of the Sub-Priory, informs us that,
after crossing the Sub-Prior's Camera and the great Hall
of the Infirmary, it runs lengthwise alOng thePrior's private
Camera,' and so by the chamber under the Gloriet to the
head of the third Dormitory, and. so is turned into the
aqueduct in the third Dormitory. But Prior G-oldston, a
century afterwards, repairing the same drain, we Obtain
from the Obituary this part of its course, described as
passing from the Sub-Prior's Camera, along the mansion
of the Lord Prior, to the head of the third Dormitory.
The course of this great drain, which I have laid down
in my plans (Plates 2 and 3) by the help of Wilkes's
Per Cameraniprivatarn Prioris hi longitudino.'
2 P e r Mansionom Domith Prioris.'
104 THE CONVENTUA.L BUILDINGS OF THE
parts of two large Perpendicular two-light tl'ansomed
windows, one of which appears in the sketch, their sills -
seven feet from the ground, and their width five feet in
the clear. The top of the window when complete rose
as high as the second floor of the ranges of chambers
already described. This is evidence that the building
on the othe1· side was a lofty Hall, probably the Dining
Hall of the Camera Prioris mentioned in ,vinchelsey's
Statute, p. 95 above. It was part of a range of buildings
that lined the eastern boundary of the • Pd.or's
·Entry, extending from the south wall of the Infirmary
to the Green Court. The Hall may have 1·eached south
to the side-aisle wall of the Infirmary, or may have had
chambe1·s between its south end and that wall. The
north end was bounded by a pre-existing building (28,
Plate 3), of which sufficient traces remain to enable us
to fix the position and form of its ·north gable wall, the
lower part of which was Norman, and retains on the
ground a Norman arch walled up. Its no1·th face
ranges with the wall of the N ecessarium. Thi~ building
· was divided by floors.
The description of Chillenden's drain, already mentioned
in the history of the Sub-Priory, informs us that,
after crossing the Sub-Prior's Camera and the great Hall
of the Infirmary, it runs lengthwise along tltePrior's private
Oamera,1 and so by the chamber under the Gloriet to the
head of the third Dormitory, and so is turned into the
aqueduct in the third Dormitory. But Prior Goldston, a
century afterwards, repail'ing the same drain:, we obtain
from the Obituary this part of its course, described as
passing from the Sub-Prior's Camera, along the mansfon
of tke Lord Prior,2 to the head of the third Dormitory.
The course of this great drain, which I- have laid down
in my plans (Plates 2 and 3) by the help of Wilk.es's
1 ' Per Camerntn privatnm Prioris in longitudinc.'
2 ' Fer Mansionem Do'mini Prioris".'
MONASTERY OE CHRIST' CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 0 5
plan, shews that it passed, as described, across the Infirmary
of' drain in the Necessarium, or third Dormitory. Thus the
north end of the range of building, and the whole range
Mansion," Camera,"
that is to say, containing, in addition to chambers for
hospitality, his own private apartments and a study.
against which the Prior's mansion and the Cheker building
abutted, occupied by an enclosed appendage,
containing staircases and passages which gave access to
apartments of this complex and rambling edifice
(vide Fig. 5, r, s, t, g, and Fig. 6, J, K, L).
richly-north end the east alley of the Infirmary Cloister, open into this
enclosure. That on the left (W, Fig. 5) has, time out
of mind, borne the name of the Prior's Doorway, and is
a large and handsome one, decorated rich panel
spandrels, same
artist who made the new doorway of the Dark Entry in
I t passage connecting
north aisle Infirmary. A t the south-angle of that Hall is a circular vice now deprived of
steps, leading to the first and second floors. The
enabled him pass Hall right-hand door (V, Fig. 5) in the Infirmary
cloister is at the foot of a broad stone staircase, which,
right angles (at S, Fig. 6), reaches the door of
MONASTERY OF CHRIST. CHUltCH IN CANTERBURY. 105
plari, shews that it passed, as described, across the Infh·mary
and in front of this long range of building, turning
westward under the north chamber, and thus joining the
drain in the N ecessarium, or third Dormitory. Thus the
Gloriet is shewn to have been the upper chamber at the
north end of the range of building, and the whole range
to have been the "Prior's Mansion,'' or "Private Camera,''
that is to say, containing, in addition to chambeTs for
hospitality, his own private apartments and a study.
The west end of the north aisle of the Infirmary Hall,
against which the Prior's mansion and the Cheker building
abutted, was occupied by an enclosed appendage,
containing staircases and passages which gave access to
the apartments of th.is complex and rambling edifice
(vide Fig. 5, 1·, s, t, q, and Fig. 6, J, K, L).
Two richly-molded doorways, near the north end of
the east alley of the Infirmary Cloister, open into this
enclosure. That on the left (W, Fig. 6) has, time out
of mind, borne the name of the Prior's Doorway, and is
.a large and handsome one, decorated with rich panel
tracery in spandrels, manifestly the work of the same
artist who made the new doorway of the Dark Entry in
the great Cloister. It enters a short passage (q) on the
-ground, which meets a transverse passage (s, r) connecting
the ground-floor of the Prior's Mansion or Hall with
the north aisle of the Infirmary. At the south-west
.angle of that Hall is a circular vice (t), now deprived of
its steps, leading to the first and second floors. The
"Prior's Doorway." enabled him to pass from his entry
.or the Infirmary cloister straight to his Rall and garden,
or to the chambers above at the south end of that Hall,
and in the Cheker building.
The right-hand door (V, Fig. 5) in the In:firmru:y
cloister is at the foot of a b1·oad stone staircase, which,
ascending first in a direct flight, and then turning twice
at right angles (at· J, K, Fig. 6), reaches ·the door of
106 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF MEM
i t A turret, staircase,
Infirmary.
This turret contains a second vice, which
floor within the roof .of the building, and also to the
B y disposition stairs Cheker has staircase,
with door in the Infirmary leading only.' A l l arrangements are shewn the plans (Figs. 5 and 6).
attempt further
the works Hathbrande, and
Chillenden. I will merely add that the Obituary concludes
works, laudably
is called " Pavid Chamber," with two other chambers.
lastdescribed
mansion the Necessarium, which
entry was borrowed, and was apparently closed
by an archway with gates, ranging with the boundary
line of the court. B u t in the fifteenth century the entrance
I t therefore probable Cheher chamber counting-modern doorway staircase, between
and Infirmary, I1, level against gable
Library through P) that such ancient I t probably passage
Prior's chapel his chamber "—" de capella Prioris ad
"—mentioned repairs.
106 THE CON'VENTU.A.L BUILDINGS OF THE
the Cheker first floor, where it stops. A tuITet, with a
picturesque octagonal upper story, crowns this staircase,
rising through the roof of the old side aisle of the Infirmary.
This turret contains a second vice, which
begins on the second floor and leads upwards to a third
floor ·within the roof ·of the building, and also to the
top of the -turret. By this disposition of the stairs the
first floor of the Cheker building has a separate staircase,
with a door in the Infirmary cloister leading to
that floor only.1 All these arrangements are shewn in
the plans (Figs. 5 and 6).
So much of these buildings have been destroyed that
it would be a vain and useless task to attempt any further
identification of the various old and new chambers
recorded in the works of De Estria, Hathbrande, and
Chillenden. I will merely add that the Obituary concludes
Chillenden's works, by saying that he laudably
repaired the stone building next the Prior's Hall, which
is called " Pavid Chamber," with two other chambers.
The north end of the Prior's entry separates the last•
described mansion from the ·N ecessarium, from which
that entry was borrowed, and was apparently closed
by an archway with gates, ranging with the boundary
line of the court. But in the fifteer1th century the enti-
ance was faced by the addition of the projecting tower
1 It is therefore probable that the Cheker chamber or counting-house
on the first floor was separated from the guest chambers at the north end
of that floor by a transverse partition.
A modern doori-l'ay and staircase, placed in the Infirmary cloister between
the old Prior's doorways at the north end ancl. the central west door
of the Infu-mary, conducts to a passage or enclosed gallery (R, Fig. 6) on
the le,,el of the first floor, which is built against the inside of the gable
wall of the Infirmary, and leads to the present Library tlu:ough an ancient
Perpendicular doorway (F) which gave access to the Prior's Chapel.
This proves tbatsueh a passage existed before the Reformation, and led
from the ancient.stair-turret to the Chapel. It is probably the "passage
from the Prior's chapel to his chamber "-" via de capella Pr~orie ad
cameram suam "-mentioned under Chillenden's ,·epai:rs.
Olv CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 0 7
porch, (vide This the their corresponding corners, and in that angle is
placed a circular turret staircase, with doors at its base
into the one and the other. T h e porch has a rich
ribbed vault, a handsomely molded entrance arch, and
moldings the north wall o f the Necessarium, which forms the
south wall of the porch.
The gateway tower appears to be the work of Prior
Selling, recorded in the Obituary, where we find that
"built a certain tower contiguous to the Prior's
chamber termed the Gloriet, which tower, now lately
called the he built of stonework from the
foundations, decently ornamented its interior, covered
it with lead, and finished i t with glazed windows."1
in. question was the Dean's Study
in Gostling's time, a traditional name which completes
the identification of it with Selling's work.
3. New Lodging the buildings
exception are now only the Prior's chambers
by his successors the Deans.2 The present
is long, rambling edifice, extending about
struc-
Pr Sellyng, edificavit turrim quandam, camera3 Prioris vocataa
Gloriet contiguara. Quam opere lapideo a fundamentis erexit erectamgue decenter
ornavit ac fenestrisgue plate
I n the Anglia his' studiwn" for reading books when he had leisure. " Habuit etiarn
This
also brewhouse, Court.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CA.NTERJ3URY. 107
gateway, or rather pmch, which is known as the Prior's
Gate (vide Fig. 12). This touches the Gloriet building
at their corresponding corners, and in that angle is
placed a circular turret staircase, with doors at its base
into the one and the other. The porch has a rich
ribbed vault, a handsomely molded entrance arch, and
a low pointed arch with similar moldings inserted into
the north wall of the N ecessarium, which forms the
south wall of the porch.
The gateway towei· appears to be the work of Prior
Selling, recorded in the Obituary, where we find that
he " built a certain tower contiguous to the Prior's
chamber termed the Gloriet, which tower, now lately
called the Prior's Study, he built of stonework. from the
foundations, decently ornamented its interior, covered
it with lead, and finished it with glazed windows."1
The chamber in question was called the Dean's Stitdy
in Gostling's time, a traditional name which completes
the identification of it with Selling's work.
3. New Lodgin_q and Deanery.
We have now surveyed the remains of all the buildings
assigned to the Prior, with the exception of those
which are now the only part of the Prior's chambers
retained by his successors the Deans.2 The present
Deanery is a long, rambling edifice, extending about
180 feet, and exhibiting a patchwork of several struc-
1 P• Sell,;;n,g, 1472-94, edin.ca.vit tu.rrim quandam; camerre Prioris vocatre
La Glo1•iet contiguam. Quam quidem turrim modo studium Prioris
appellatum opere lo.pideo a fundamcntis erexit erectamque interius decenter
orna7it ao cum coopertura de plumbo fenestrisque vitreatis plene
consummavit. In the biography of Prior Crauden, in the' Anglia Sacra,'
·i. 649, we are told that in his· Priory buildings at Ely he had a private
" studium "· for reading books when he had leisure, "Habuit etiam
ibidem studium suum pro libris, quum sibi vacaverit, inspiciendis." Thie
passage shews that the word is used in its modern sense.
2 Excepting also the brewhouse, stables, etc., on the north side of the
Green Co1ll't. •
108 T i i h CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OP THE
ages, pierced modern windows,
and having modern roofs. I t s anomalous composition
be easily the elucidation of which have drawn block
below).1
But as the history of this particular structure can
to nature of its modern interior, I have indicated by capital
on principal subdivisions, without
windows.2
building by Percy at the beginning
by and Gostling,
We have seen that the Prior's lodgings were originally
two groups,---first the neighbourhood
of the buildings appropriated to the monastic
connected with his own private apartments, and
covered to his Chapel, grown the Camera Vet= Priori& as a nucleus. The second
under the name o f the Homors, is similarly
placed on and near the site of the Camera of the
1 This accuracy; for the object history and arrangement monastic
I the
partitions distributions the houses that were fitted walls after Dissolution, In describing the internal arrangements Deanery, I addition
private has also communicated me Rev. Prebendary Lincoln of recollections 9f the 108 THE CONVENTU.A.L BUILDINGS OF THE
tures, of different ages, pierced with modern windows,
and having modern roofs. Its anomalous corn position
will be easily accounted for by considering its history,
for the elucidation of which I have drawn the block
Plan (Fig. 18, page 110 below).1
But as the history of this pru:ticular structm·e can
scarcely be understood without referring to the general
.nature of its modern interior, I have indicated by capital
letters on the Plan the principal subdivisions, with
·out inserting modern doors and wi'ndows.2
The north part of the building shews the form of it,
before the alterations made by Dean Percy at the beginning
of this century, as far as can be gathered from
Gostling's view, the plans given by Hill and Gostling,
and the reminiscences of Mr. Gilbert.
We have seen that the Prior's lodgings were originally
included in two groups,-the first in the neighbourhood
of the buildings appropriated to the monastic
life, connect~d with his own private apartments, and
provided with covered ways to his Chapel; the Church,
and the Dormitories, this group having grown up from
_the Camera Vetus Prioris as a nucleus. The second
group, under the name of the Hom01·s, is similarly
placed on and near t4e site· of the Camera Nova of the
Norman drawing.
l This Plan has no pretensions to minute accuracy; fo1• the object of
this work is to illustrate the history and arrangei:μent of the monastic
buildings, and I have not in any case attempted to measure and plan · the
interior partitions and distributions of the houses that were fitted up
within the old walls after the Dissolution, to adapt them for family residences.
.
2 In describing the internal arrangements of the Deanery, I have to
.acknowledge the kind assistance of the Dean of Canterbury, who, in addi_
tion to much prh'ate information, has also communicated to me a letter
detailing the distribution of the apartments before the alterations of Dean
Percy, written by the Rev. G. Gilbert, Prebenda.ry of LiricoJn and Vicar
.of.Syston, near Grantham, whose recollections of the .Deanery date from
t.he year 1800.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 0 9
But the Obituary mentions a third set of buildings,
the work of Thomas Goldston, the last Prior but one
who i s recorded t o have " b u i l t and
completed a new, beautiful, and excellent edifice, commonly
called near the ancient house of
Prior called Le Gloriet.' I t contains chambers,
solars or upper chambers, and every appendage
requisite to complete such a mansion. I t is
also provided with a handsome porch towards the court."
This description, unlike the early notices, implies that
this great Hospitium, or Diversorium, was not a mere
repair of old structures, but an entirely new one for
I t These characteristics apply completely to the
which also faces the great gardens of the
Prior on the east side, and extends on the north to the
stables and offices, which at the Dissolution were separately
assigned to the Dean and Prebendaries. O n the
court.
I t was perfectly natural, therefore, that this portion
Prior's buildings should have been chosen by
the first Dean, Nicholas Wotton, as his residence. H e
held the Deanery for twenty-six years, to the reign of
Elizabeth, and was succeeded by Thomas Goodwyn, or
Godwyn, in 1556, was a married man, and was promoted
to the see of Bath and in 1584. B u t
Battely informs us2 that, in this Dean's time, the houses
belonging to the Deanery had been very much damaged
an. he them, the Novum quoque tedificium, vulgariter voeatura
juxta antiquam mansionem vocatam ?mills puichrum cosnaculis solarfis idem asdificium concernentibus, cum porticu versus
curl= et cum omni apparatu ad matron dicta) mansionis pertinente,
magnifice laudabiliter 2 P. MONA.STERY OF CHRIST OHUROH IN CANTERBURY. 109
But the Obituary mentions a third set of buildings,
the work of Thomas Goldston, the last Prior but one
(1495-1517), who is recorded to have "built and
completed a new, beautiful, and excellent edifice, commonly
called New Lodgyng, near the ancient house of
the Pri01· called Le Gloriet.1 It contains chambers,
dining-halls, solars or upper chambers, and every ap~
pendage requisite to .complete such a mansion. It is
also pro-vided with a handsome porch towards the court."
This description, unlike the eady notices, implies that
this great Hospitium, or IJiversorium, was not a mere
repair of old structUl'es, but an entirely new one for
hospitality alone. It faced the court, and was near the
Gloriet. These characteristics apply completely to the
Deanery, which also faces the great garde11s of the
Prior on the east side, and extends on the north to the
stables and offices, which at the Dissolution were sepa~
rately assigned to the Dean and Prebendaries. On the
west it appears as a complete mansion, commanding the
court.
It was perfectly natural, therefore, that this portion •
of the P1·ior's buildings should have been chosen by
the :first Dean, Nicholas Wotton, as his 1·esidence. He
held the Deanery for twenty-six years, to the· reign of
Elizabeth, and was succeeded by Thomas Goodwyn, or
Godwyn, in 1656, was a married man, and was promoted
to the see of Bath and Wells in 1584. But
Battely informs us2 that, in this Dean's time, the houses
belonging to the Deanery had been very much damaged
by an accidental fire, and be left them, and the house
1 Goldston, 1495-1517. Novum quoque mdifioium, vu.lgariter vocntum
New Lodgyng, juxto. antiquaxn Priorum mn.neionem vooatam Le Gloriet,
• satis pulchrum atque formosum, cum cameris, ccenaculie eolniis et cmteris
appendiciis idem rodificium concernentibus, cum porticu decenti versus
curiam et cum omni apparatu ad ornatnm d.ictro mansionis pertinente,
magnifies et la.udabiliter consummavit.
~ P .. 122, quoting a MS. of Somner.
T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
in Chartham belonging to the Deanery, so dilapidated
that, in the year following, he was threatened by the
Church sued, to put the same into repair. Hence, it is said, that he
rebuilt the Deanery. H i s name, and the date (1570),
recorded in stone on two heads of the house,' shewed,
in Gostling's time, when and by whom it was built.2
The view of the Deanery given by G-ostling represents
the main body as a mansion-house, the front of
which is surmounted as now by three triangular gables
in contact, and a high-pitched roofs O n the south, the
house abuts against the tower at the south-west angle,
as at present. Under the central gable is a porch, in
the form of a semi-octagon. Above this porch Mr.
Austin raised an oriel window in the days o f Dean
Lyall (1847 to 1857). The first floor is provided with a
row of uniform large sash-windows, nine in number, of
early came eighteenth cen-
F i g 1 8 . - B L O C K I ' L A N O r T H E D E A N E H Y.
Above this story the chamber appear,
in This main body of the House manifestly stands on the
2 Cheker serve as a house enough it.—Gostling,
140.
gables a parapet.
110 THE CONUNTU.A.L BUILDINGS OF THE
in Ohartham belonging to the Deane1·y, so dilapidated
that, in the year following, he was threatened by the
Chapter of this Church to be sned, unless he took care
to put the same into repair. Hence, it is said, that he
rebuilt the Deanery. His name, and the date (1570),
recorded in stone on two heads of the house,1 shewed,
in Gostling's time, when and by whom it was built.2
The view of the Deanery given by Gostling represents
the main body as a mansion-house, the front of
which is surmounted as now by three triangular gables
in contact, and a high-pitched roof. 3 On the south, the
house abuts against the tower at the south-west angle, as at present. Under the central gable is a porch, in
the form of a semi-octagon. Above this porch Mr.
Austin raised an oriel window in the days of Dean
Lyall (1847 to 1857). The first floor is provided with a
row of uniform large sash-windows, nine in number, of
the eal'ly form that came in with the eighteenth cen-
L
Fig. 18.-DLOOK PLAN 01' THB DEANERY.
tury. Above this story the chamber windows appear,
one each gable, as usual.
This main body of the House manifestly stands on the
1 Gostling, p. 150.
This Dean surrendered the Cheker building to serve as a. house for
one of the six preachers, he having houseroom e11ough without it.- Gostling,
p. 14..0.
3 The present gables are careful restorations of the ancient ones, which
had been at the end of the last century replaced by o. plain pnrapet.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 1 1
site of the long house in the Norman drawing labelled
Bath House and Chamber Camera).
Like that, its southern extremity is placed a little to
the south of the direction of the north wall of the
Necessarium, and it extends northwards to the middle
of the east side of the Green Court.
From the date of the rebuilding in 1570, no alterations
are recorded until the time of Dean Percy (c.
1820), who carried out changes by which the form and
north end the in the view presented to Gostling's work by Dean Cornwallis,
were altered with great loss of picturesque effect.
In the above-mentioned engraving, the west front from
the staircase window northward is left apparently in
the form given to it by Goldston. I t is in one story,
raised upon vaults, and terminated by a projecting
chamber (A) with buttresses, and provided with a twolight
transomed Perpendicular window. A circular
(b) that remains on the east side of the Prior's gateway, was
placed at the junction of A and B.
The Dean's work was undertaken for the purpose of
The original
one was situated at the southern part of the building
(in G), and the kitchens, with their appendages,
servants' offices and their sleeping-rooms, partly arranged
K, partly extended into the space L, being probably portions
Diningroom
staircase,
and pulling down the small terminal building A, with
some outbuildings beyond i t belonging to the stables,
obtained space for the erection of a set of new kitchens
and servants' offices suitable to modern convenience,
and contiguous to the new Dining-room.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 111
site of the long house in the Norman drawing labelled
House Chambe1: (Balneatorium et Camera).
Like that, its southern extremity is placed a little to
the south of the direction of the north wall of the
N ecessarium, and it extends northwards to the middle
of the east side of the Green Court.
Fxom the date of the rebuilding in 1570, no alterations
are recorded until the time of Dean Percy ( c.
1820), who carried out changes by which the form and
appearance of the north end of the west front, shewn
in the view presented to Gostling's work by Dean Cornwallis,
were altered with great loss of picturesque effect.
In the above .. mentioned engraving, the west front from
the staircase window northward is left apparently in
the form gi'1en to it by Goldston. It is in one story,
raised upon vaults, and terminated by a projecting
chamber (A) with buttresses, and provided with a twolight
transomed Perpendicular window. A circular
tower (b) with a newel stair, similar to that which still
remains on the east side of the Prior's gateway, was
placed at the junction of A and B. •
The Dean's work was undertaken for the purpose of
obtaining a more commodious dining-room. The oiiginal
one was situated at the southern part of the building
(in G ), and the kitchens, with their appendages,
servants' offices and their sleeping-rooms, partly ari-
anged in and about the south end of G and in K, and
pa1·tly extended into the space L, being probably p01·tiona
of the kitchen offices of the ancient Infirmary.
Dean Percy fitted up his new and handsome Diningl'oom
in the compartment B, beyond the great staixcase,
and by pulling down the small terminal building A, with
some outbuildings beyond it belonging to the stables,
obtained space for the erection of a set of new kitchens
and servants' offices suitable to modern convenience,
and contiguous_.to the new Di:ning-1·oom.
11 2 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
The compartments A and B had been, previously to
these changes, assigned to the Archbishop; but Dean
Percy transferred his Grace to the old Dining-room at
G. T h e present Dean has converted it into a Library,
no rooms being now reserved for the Archbishop.
is a long passage against east wall, occupying nearly half the width. I t is covered
is nearly four feet below the floor of the present Diningroom.
T h e remaining space under the floor to the
west wall is occupied by the Dean's cellars, which are
entered by a door (a) and steps downwards from the
garden at b.
The eastern or garden front of the Deanery is more
than western. A (q) projects
from the north end of the main body of the House.
connected
with the smaller Drawing-room. I n this towerroom
window belonged to the Cheker
.(vide Fig. substituted copy Caen stone This please happened ruins gardening, the destruction remains offices,
where, i f left, they would have told their tale of the
real use of these buildings), are now to be seen in impossible
• Returning the front, tower an oriel (p) stories, the lower one lighting the present Entrance
112 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
The compartments A and B had been, previously to:
these changes, assigned to the Archbishop ; but Dean
Percy transferred his Grace to the old Dining-room at
G. The present Dean has converted it into a Library,
no rooms being now 1·eserved for the Archbishop.
Under the floor of B is a long passage against the
east wall, occupying nearly half the width. It is covered
with a Norman waggon vault, the crown of which
i~ nearly four feet below the floor of the present Dining-
1·oom. The remaining space under the floor to the
west wall is occupied by the Dean's cellars, which are
entered by a door (c) and steps dowmYai:ds from the
garden at b.
The eastern or garden front of the Deanery is more
picturesque than the 'A'"estem. A square tower (q) projects
from the north end of the main body of the House.
On the first floor this tower contains a small room connected
with the smaller Drawing-room. In this towerroom
the late Mr. Austin inserted the fine old two-light
Perpendicular window which belonged to the Cheker
building {vi'de Fig. 16), and substituted in the wall of
that edifice the copy in 0aen stone which is now to be
seen. This was done to please Lady Harriet Bagot, the
wife of the Dean of that time, who happened to have a
taste for xuins in landscape gardening, according to the
fashion of that period, the effects of which may be seen
in many parts of the Deanery and other gardens, where
genuine old doorways, archways, and windows (obtained
by the destruction of the 1·emains of monastic offices,
where, if left, they would have told their tale of the
real use of these buildings), are now to be seen in impossible
positions, inserted into walls and corners, where
no buildings ever existed.
Returning now to the garden front, we find south of
the above-mentioned towe1· an original oriel (p) in two
stories, the lower one. lighting the present Entrance
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 1 3
Hall (F), the upper one belonging to the great Drawingroom
which extends on the first floor over E and F.
On this floor the space G is divided into two or more
narr,
ow structure (H) was built, apparently after the Dissolution,
entered on each through the side of the oriel and provides passage,
are opened access the rooms and chambers which now occupy the space G.
monastic period this space was undivided
partitions. A single light window, pointed,
without cusps, discovered some since the east wall of G, proving that this was at first an external
A n corner at the end n) ; another built by Mr. Austin is at the great tower (g) the east wall extends
along the compartment B, and is now garnished with
sash-windows. A t the north angle of B, an ancient
completes This
(r , t), in form with those of the Cheker, the work of De Estria.
windows the wall itself
supported by two buttresses (u, v), which do not belong
its structure, for the left-hand one partly
covers the window r.'
does lie in the same direction as wall of the Deanery-house, and evidently belonged to
an isolated building which appears to have occupied the
place of the building in the Norman drawing which
has no name attached to it, but is shewn by its low
side-wall to have been a barn, and is situated against
the corner where the old precinct wall is reflected at
right of the wall considering 1 This incorrectly VOL. V I I .
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 113
Hall (F), the upper one belonging to the great Drawingroom
which extends on the first floor over E and F.
On this ffool' the space G is divided into two or more
bed-rooms, but formed a single chamber originally.
Against the east wall of this part an additional nar-.
:i:ow sttucture (H) was built, apparently after the Dissolution,
which is in two stories, is entered on each floor
th1·bugh the side of the oriel (p), and provides a passage.
into which doors are opened to give separate access to
the rooms and chambers which now occupy the space G.
In the monastic period this space G was probably un-.
divided by partitions. A single light window, pointed,
and without cusps, was discovered some years since in
the east wall of G, proving that this was at :first an external
wall. An original corner tower is at the south
end (n); another built by Mr. Austin is at (o).
Beyond the great tower (q) the east wall extends
along the compartment B, and is now gai·nished with
sash-windows. . At the no1;th angle of B, an ancient
high wall completes the boundary of the garden. This
wall retains three single-light windows (1·, s, t), identical
in form with those of the Cheker, the work of De Estria.
These wind,qws are now walled up, and the wall itself
supported by two buttresses (u, v ), which do not belong
to its original structure, for the left-hand one partly
covers the window 1·.1
The wall does not lie in the same direction as the
wall of the Deanery-house, and evidently belonged to
an isolated building which appears to have occupied the
place of the building in the Norman drawing which
has no name attached to it, but is shewn by its low
side-wall to have been a barn, and is situated against
the· comer where the old precinct wall is reflected at
l'ight angles, exactly in the position and bearing of the
building of which the wall we are conside1ing formed
I This is incorreoLly drawn in the woodcut.
VOL. VII. I
11 4 T H P. CONVENTUAL BuniDINGS OF THE
the east side, and was also part of the old precinct wall
of the Convent.
The position o f this originally isolated piece in the
region appropriated to agricultural purposes, shews that
it was the great hay-barn, "magna grangia ad fenum,"
included in the list of De Estria's repairs and rebuilding,
1285 to 1290; and probably also alluded to in the sentence,
" Ye cornelofts and sellars under them adjoyning
to ye west end of his (the Prior's) great gardens," contained.
in the Dean's allotment. N o portions o f the
other three sides of this structure remain. O n part of
the inside face of the wall above described low offices
abut, and the remainder serves to enclose and conceal
from the Deanery garden, Dean Percy's kitchen yards
(at 1U), as formerly it did the stable yards. H i l l ' s plan
in 1680 shel,vs coarsely the oriel-shaped porch on the
west front of the Deanery, with the opposite oriel of
the east front, and also the central garden tower (q),
and the ancient wall o f De Estria's barn, which is
drawn with its proper deviation in bearing.
Wilkes letters the south part of the space G "y° D.
hall," the Dean's Hall, and indicates the lower flight of
a staircase in the position of the present one.
CHAPTER V I .
HOSPITATE AND PRIVATE BUILDINGS OF THE CELERER.
This group of buildings are placed in a narrow irregular
site, bounded on the south by the church, on the
west by the Palace grounds, on the east by the west
alley of the great Cloister, the Refectory, Kitchen court
and its offices, and on the north by the Green Court.
The principal buildings of this group are the Cellarium
or Celerer's Lodging, the .Aula Hospitum, Guest Hall or
Celerer's Hall, the gatehouse, termed "gate between the
Guest Hall and Kitchen" (" Porta inter Domum :Hos-
114 THE CONY.ENTUAL BUILDINGS OF TIDl
the east side, and was also part of the old precinct wall
of the Convent.
The position of this originally isolated piece in the
region appropriated to agricultural purposes, shews that
it was the great hay-barn, "magna grangia ad fenum,"
included in the list of De Estria's repairs and rebuilding,
1285 to 1290 ; and probably also alluded to in the sentence,
"Y0 cornelofts and sellars under them adjoyning
to y0 west end of his (the Prior's) great gardens," contained
in the Dean's allotment. No portions of the
other three sides of this structure remain. On part of
the inside face of the wall above described low offices
abut, and the remainder serves to enclose and conceal
from the Deanery garden, Dean Percy's kitchen yards
(at M), as formerly it did the stable yards. Hill's plan
in 1680 shews coarsely the oriel-shaped porch on the
west front of the Deanery, with the opposite oriel the east front, and also the central garden tower (q),
and the ancient wall of De Estria's barn, which is
dra,vn with its proper deviation in bearing.
Wilkes letters the south pru·t of the space G "'!I D.
hall," the Dean's Hall, and indicates the lower flight of
a staircase in the position of the present one.
CHAPTER VI.
HOSPITATE AND PRIVATE BUILDINGS OF THE CELERER,
This group of buildings are placed in a narrow irregular
site, bounded on the south by the church, on the
west by the Palace grounds, on the east by the west
alley of the great Cloister, .the Refectory, Kitchen court
and its offices, and on the north by the Green Court.
The principal buildings of this group are the Gellarilum
or Celerer's Lodging, the Aula Hospitwn, Guest Hall or
Celerer's Hall,'the gatehouse, termed "gate between the
Guest Hall and :Kitchen"(" Porta inter _Domum Hosc.
0
aud olisodd0
Fig. 19.
p
\
\
I Fig. 20. C
CLOISTER
I l
I I
I I
I I [ I CELERERS \
l'·l Kl
: I :
: I I
I I I
____ L! - ------ ----------: -----------------------
LODCI NC
·ro 20 F'EE.1
s
L
Opposite pngo I rn.
w
.J
!!!
ea:
:c
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 1 5
Pentise gate," and, finally,
the range of "Chambers for Hospitality" between the
Kitchen and Green court, The south and east sides of
Guest face long, narrow, irregular court,
which is bounded on the east by the wall of the Kitchen
and of the passage from that to the Refectory.
for termed the " Celerer's
Pilgrims seeking hospitality were conducted,
after entering the Court gate, into the long covered
was known as the " Pentise." I t led directly to the
gave admission to this and to all the other buildings above enumerated, which
will now proceed to examine order, beginning
Celerer's 1. The Celerer's Lodging, or Cellarium.
Celerer's This because this building was, as I have explained above
(p. 11), retained by the King at the dissolution of the
monastery, and afterwards transferred to the Archbishop.
And the boundary wall between the north end of the
site of this building and the Chapter ground is placed
exactly at the outer north-west angle of the Cloister
Nothing remains o f this edifice, the work of Prior
Chillenden, as already stated (at p. 44, above), except so
much of its eastern wall as belongs to the Cloister itself.
The subjoined Sketch (Fig. 19) and Plan (Fig, 20) will
enable the general arrangement of it to be understood,
and also the disposition of the passages to which the
three doors grouped together at the south end of the
gave entrance, The Sketch elevation the inner face of the wall, which is in a rough and
ruinous condition; the upper line shews the lower parts
2
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 115
pitum et Coquinam"), or " Pentise gate," and, finally,
the range of "Chambers for Hospitality" between the
Kitchen and Green court. The south and east sides of
the Guest Hall face a long, narrow, irregular court,
which is bounded on the east by the wall of the Kitchen
and of the pa.ssage from that to the Refectory.
This court, fo1· convenience, may be teTmed the" Oelerer's
court." Pilgrims seeking hospitality were conducted,
after entering the Court gate, into the long cove1·ed
alley which lined the west wall of the Green Court and
was known as the " Pentise." It led directly to the
Pentise gatehouse, which gave admission to this court
and to all the other buildings above enumerated, which
we will now proceed to examine in order, beginning
from the south with the " Celerer's Lodging."
1. T!ie Celerer's Lodgin,q, or Oellarium.
The building termed the Celerer's Lodging lined the
whole length of the west Cloister wall. This is certain,
because this building was, as I have explained above
(p. 11), retained by the King at the dissolution of the
monastery, and afterwards transferred to the Archbishop.
And the bounda1·y wall between the north end of the
site of this building and the Chapter grnund is placed
exactly at the outer north-west angle of the Cloister
wall.
Nothing remains of this edifice, the work of Pl'ior
Ohillenden) as aheady stated (at p. 44, above), except so
much of its eastern wall as belongs to the Cloister itself.
The subjoined Sketch (Fig. 19) and Plan (Fig. 20) will
enable the general arrangement-of it to be understood,
and also the disposition of the passages to which the
three dool's grouped together at the south end of the
Cloister gave en trance, The Sketch is an elevation of
the inner face of the wall) which is in a rough and
ruinous condition; the upper line shews the lower pa1·t&
I 2
11 6 T H E CONVENTUAL 33uniDI3GS OF THE
of windows Which were placed over the Cloister-are seen mortices the •
, A t the south 'end is the back of the doorway of the
the Becket his murder, Westminster Memorials Canterbury." The cloister face of Chillenden.'
But i t is remarkable that the rear-arch of this door,
therefore Archbishop
occasion.
account given by employment
doorway as W h e n Becket resolved to pass from his
to. attendants,—
They pass along usual passage...
through the orchard, to the western front of the church; but
finding court and orchard thronged with armed men, they turned
room conducted private door rarely used, and which led from the palace to the cloisters of
the monastery-. One of the monks ran before to force it, for
the key was lost. Suddenly the door flew open, as if of itself;
for two cellarmen of the monastery, whose lodgings were in
part building, . . . flew t o from the palace. . . . He passed along the northern and eastern
cloister, and thus reached the door of the transept."2
as party-between the Archbishop and
Convent was that time the west R) Celerer's Lodging, i t is evident that the Archbishop
must have had door that for example, in the he had an exclusive the 1 Page 66. ' 2 Gamier, 116 THE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF THE •
of .windows which were placed over the Cloister-roof.
Beneath them are seen the mortices in the wall which
carried the floor girders.
, At the south ·end is the back of the doorway of the
Cloister (B. in the Plan), through which Becket passed
on the morning of his murder, as the present Dean of
'\Vestminster has so ably demonstrated in his 'Historical
J.\!lemorials of Oanterbury.'1 The cloister face of this
doorway is richly molded, and is the work of Ohillenden.But
.it is re.mal'kable that the rear-arch of this door,
which is shewn in my elevation, is of Norman masonry,
and therefol'e the actual archway under which the A1·chbishop
passed upon that memorable occasion.
: _ The account given by the Dean of the employment
of this doorway on that morning, is as follows, slightly
abridged. :When Becket resolved to pass from his
palace to· the Cathedral, with his attendants,-
·" They first attempted to pass along the usual passage ...
through the orchard, to the western front of the church; but
finding court and orchard thronged with armed men, they turned
through a room which conducted to a private door that was
rarely used, and which led from the palace to the cloisters of
-the monastery. One -of the monks ran before to force it, for
the key was lost. Suddenly the door flew open, as if of itself;
for two cellarmen of the monastery, whose lodgings were in
that pa.rt of the bu:ilding, ... hearing the tumult, flew to the
cloister, drew back the bolt, and opened the door to .the party
'from the palace .... He passed along the northern and eastern
"cloister, and thus reached the door of the transept." 2
But as the party-wall between the Archbishop and
ponven t was at that time the west· wall (H R) of the
-Oelerer's Lodging, it is evident that the Archbishop
.'Jllust have had a door in that wall, foi· example, at S
•in the Plan, through which he had an . exclusive right
of passage, in order to ·reach "the Cloister-door B, which
Page 60; : 2 Gai·nicr, 71.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 11 7
was an entrance common to the Convent a,nd Arch,
bishop. A n d i t is probable the door S in the Archbishop's
wall was the one which the Cellarman unbolted;
and which was rarely used, for the door B. must have
been in constant use by the servants of the Convene-
The Cloister-wall we are examining has three large
doors, all the work of one period, yet all presenting
differences, either of form or moldings. B u t each of
these various characters can be found in some other of
the conventual doorways, and always in one that be
longs to the works of Chillenden. Thus, beginning from
the north, the Celerer's door at that end (B), and his
next door at the other end have segmental-pointed
arch-heads, enclosed within a square order of moldings,
and a square hoodmold.
The moldings of B have the same section as the
arch which opens to the Lavatory Chamber in Chilienden's
gallery. The moldings of D are cut from the
identical templet employed for the south-east door of
Chillenden's gallery. The design and moldings of the cen=
tral door of the three at the south end of the cloister,
those of west Infirmary Hall, but dimensions.F.
have pointed, continuous arches, a square
of molding and a square hoodmold. Another
copy of the same is fixed between the north transept, and
choir-. small door F, at the south end,
only border Perpendicular and
need not detain us.
From these examples,. and other similar ones which
these i t appears i t
I t when the taken from Chapter the
I have represented the
relation between the two arches.
2 Infirmary doorway, example, are
4 MONA.STERY OF ~ST CHURCH IN CANTERJ3URY, 117
:was an entrance common to the Convent and Archr
bishop. And it is probable the . door S in the Arch-.
bishop's wall was the one which the Cellarman unbolted;
and which was rarely used, for the door H must have
been in constant use by the servants -of the Convent.1
. The Cloister-wall we are examining has three large
doors, all the work of one period, yet all presenting
differences, either of form or moldings. But each of
these various characters can be found in some o_ther of
the conventual doorways, and always in one that be~
longs to the works of Chillenden. Thus, beginning from
the north, the Celerer's doo1: at that end {B), and his
next door at the othe1· end (D), have segmental-pointed
arch-heads, enclosed within a square order of moldings,
and a square hoodmold. •
The moldings of B have the same section as the
arch which opens to the Lavatory Chamber in Chillenden's
g·allery. The moldings of D are cut from the
identical ·templet employed for the south-east dooi· of
Chillenden's gallery. The design and moldings of the cen:.
tral door (E) of the three at the south end of .the cloister,
and those of the west door of the Infirmary Hall, are
identical, h1J.t with a slight difference in the dimensions.?
-Both have pointed, continuous arches, with a square
order of molding and a square hoodmold. Another
copy of the same is fixed between the north transep~ and
the choir.aisle. . The small door F, at the south end;
·has orily a single b©rder of Perpendicular molding, ·a~d
.need not detain us. • •
From these examples,. and othel' similar ones which
I have discovered in these .buildings, it appears that it
)
••
1 It was walled up when the site was taken. from· the Chapter at t.he
Dissolution. I have representea. the doorway as being open, to shew tlw
relation between the two 1u·~hes. • • • • • •
~ The Infu•mnry doorway and south transept door;\lo.y, ·for e:i.ample, 11.l'O
.both d. ft. 10 in. wide, and the cloister-door is 5 ft. 2 in. wide.
. . !
118 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
such as these doorways, that were placed together, but
copies of same designs other buildings of the same group, at a distance.
At present, the wall at the back of the three contiguous
doorways (D, E, presents a clean surface, and has
a paved platform to give access to them, for the middle
door is employed as an entrance to the Cloister from the
churchyard. The partitions, which originally divided
the space, as shewn in the Plan, have all disappeared.
The platform is 2 feet 6 inches above the Cloister pavement,
to which the descent is by steps. B u t the older
plans, taken before the old Norman tower of Lanfranc
was sacrificed, shew that the partition NI, which enclosed
passage Archbishop's remained with steps, as shewn in my Plan, in which I
have inserted the Norman tower, from Wild's accurate
the plan-of the Cathedral.
A partition must have been placed at N in the old
for otherwise the door at F would have been
superfluous. B u t with the partition that door supplies
nave 0.
I t will appear the account o f Archbishop's
below, covered pentise enabled
him, pass own apartments, dryshod, the
that to his cloister-E. This mode the perhaps,
murder I t {the cloister
and advanced along the southern side to the entrance
the as described graphic narrative
already 1
A Vide Historical and 3,
118 THE CON.VENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
was thought desirable to vary features of the same kind,
such as these doorways, that were placed together, but
that copies of the same designs might be employed in
other buildings of the same group, at a distance.
At present, the wall at the ha.ck of the three contiguous
doorways (D, E, F) presents a clean surface, and has
a paved platform to give access to. them, for the middle
door is employed as an entrance to the Cloister from the
churchyard. The partitions, which originally divided
the space, as shewn in the Plan, have all disappeared.
'l'he platform is 2 feet 6 inches above the Cloister pavement,
to which the descent is by steps. But the older
plans, taken before the old Norman tower of Lanfranc
sacrificed, sbew that the partition M, which enclosed
the north side of the passage to the Archbishop's door,
• remained with steps, as she\vn in my Plan, in which I
have inserted the Norman tower, from ,i\'ild's accurate
the plan·of the Cathedral.
A pa1-tition must have been placed at N in the old
time, for otherwise the door at F would have been
superfluous. But with the partition that door suppfo~s
the monks with access from the cloister to the nave of
the church, through the door at 0.
It wiH appear in the account of the .A1.'chbishop's
palace below, that a covered walk or pentise enabled
him. to pass from his own apartments, dryshod, to the
slype that led to his cloister-door, E. This mode of
gaining entrance to th~ church from the palace is, perhaps,
that which is alluded to in the history of Becket's
mui·der as the usual passage through the orchard to the
western front of the church. It was through this door
(E) that the knights forced their way into the cloister
and advanced along the southern side to the entrance
of the transept, as described in the graphic narrative
aheady quoted.1
• Vide 'Historiciu Memorials of Canterbury,' p. 62, lJ.Ild also Plate 8,
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 11 9
The girder-holes in the wall shew that there was, in
the middle of the range of buildings, a lofty apartment,
beneath. A t the north end the floor
divided the wall into two nearly equal heights. T h e
Cloister-door D, at the south end, probably opened to a
the doors to the ground-floor of the Celererts Lodgings.
rooms have lighted, i f windows looking into the Archbishop's ground. I n
Dart's plan, a wall is marked at L as well as at M, but
may have belonged to a temporary outhouse.
At I have indicated section octagonal
opening already described. B u t its termination on the
In the elevation, P p is the level of the cloister pavement;
q that of the accumulated ground behind it.
A is the plan of the stair-turret and passage to it, in
the thickness of the wall mentioned above (p.35). T h e
o f this retains the toothing of partition
wall at L (in the Plan). C is a thin wall built merely
Dissolution.
2. Chillenden's Guest Chambers.
To the Celerer's care was manifestly assigned, as their
position shews, the long range of chambers over the
Larder facing the Green Court, which is described in
§ as "New next to the convent kitchen, with a new larder below,"
the from the Larder gate to the .Pentise gate, with' the chambers
there called Heaven and Paradise." A s the Pentise
gate has two chambers, one above the other, exwhich
shews the Archbishop's Palace Gelerer's 1 An 398) li-even.
l.CONAST.ERY OF CHRIST CHUB.OH IN CANTERBURY. 119
The girder-holes in the wall shew _that thei·e was> in
the middle of the range of buildings, a lofty apartment,
with low rooms beneath. At the north end the :floor
divided the wall into two nearly equal heights. The
Cloister-door D, at the south end, probably opened to a
vestibule, L M, with a staircase for the upper floor and
dool'S to the ground-floor of the Celerer's Lodgings.
The rooms below must have been lighted, if at all, by
windows looking into the Archbishop's ground. In
Dart's plan, a wall is marked at L as well as at M, but
may have belonged to a temporary outhouse.
At C, I have indicated the section of the octagonal
opening already describecl. But its termination on the
west face of the wall is effectually stopped up.
In the elevation, Pp is the level of the cloister pavement;
Q q_ that of the accumulated ground behind it.
A is the plan of the stair-turret and passage to it, in
the thickness of the wall mentioned above (p.35). The
inside of this wall retains the toothing of a partition
wall at L (in the Plan). C is a thin wall J:)Uilt me1·ely
to separate the Convent and Palace lands at the Dissolution.
2. Chillenden,'s Guest Chanwers.
To the Celerer's care was manifestly assigned, as their
position shews, the long 1·ange of chambers over the
Lal'der facing the Green Court, which is described in
Chillenden's list, § 4, as" New chambers for hospitality
next to the convent kitchen, with a new laider below,"
and in the Distribution document as " the whole lodging
from the Latdm· ,c;ate to the .Pentise gate, with the chambers
there called Heaven and Paradise.''1 As"the Pentise
gate has two chambers, one above the· other, exwhich
shews the relative positions of th.e Archbishop's Palace and the
Oelerer's Lodging.
1 .A.n Obituary quoted by Gosling (p. 898) records, with the date 1397,
that W. Woghope made the chamber called Hevcn. •
120 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF TH14,
tended over the whole gatehouse, we may suppose the
upper one to have been called "Heaven," and the lower,
"Paradise."
Chillenden's building is on the south side o f the
gatehouse
(69, Plate 3), which it touches at the west end, to
Like
the "New Lodging" or Deanery, and the Cheker building,
floor, a first and a second floor. The chambers of the latter were
wholly contained in the roof. I t s front is now broken by
a projecting square turret, which is placed to the east of
its centre. The repairs now carrying on have shewn this
turret to be a structure of wood. and plaster, standing
on a base-story of brick, faced with flint chequer-work;
the whole being plainly an intrusion of late work to
provide an oriel for the great Drawing-room, which
about half the space between this tower
and the Pentise gatehouse, and is lined with wainscot
The so as supply gallery exercise
from one end of the house to the other, perhaps
sleeping chambers recesses on each I t s
tie-beams are the girders of the floor. I t s collar-beams
side braces, and the middle of floor ornamental molded wooden king-with
bases and capitals, sustaining a long continuous rail
the Each post has struts diverging
from. capital to the and to the main
rafters respectively. This framing is nearly same
,that house at °hurley Parker's
,‘ The roof we. now
,i s that o f Chillenden's Priorate
1390-1114 serve fix date roof.
Judging of 120 THE CONVENTU.A.L BUILDINGS OF THE
tended ovei- the whole gatehouse, we may suppose the
upper one to· have been called "Heaven," and the lowe1;,
"' Paradise."
Chil.lenden's building is on the south side of the
Green Court, extending from the Norman Pentise gatehouse
(69, Plate 3), which it touches at the west end, to
the Larder gateway arch, which joins its east end. Like
the "New Lodging" or Deanery, and the Cheker build~
ing, this structure consists of a ground -floor, fh-st floor,
and a second :floor. The chambers of the latter were
wholly contained in the roof. Its front is now broken by
a projecting square turret, which is p~aced to the east of
its centre. The repairs now carrying on have shewn this
turret to -be a structm·e of wood and plaster, standing
on a base-story of brick, faced with flint chequer-work;
the whole being plainly an intrusion of late work to
provide an oriel for the great Drawing-room, which
occupies about half of the space between this tower
and the Pentise gatehouse, and is lined with wainscot
panelling. The building has a high-pitched roof, framed
ornamentally, so as to supply an open gallery for exercise
from one encl of the house to the other, perhaps
with sleeping chambers or recesses on each side. Its
tie-beams are the girders of the floor. Its collar-beams
have side braces, and in the middle of the floor is a
series of ornamental molded wooden king-posts, with
bases and ca-pitals, sustaining a long continuous rail
under the collar-beams. • Each post has four struts di.
verging from. its capital to the rail and to the main
1·afters l'espectively. This framing is nearly the same
.as that of the l;l,ouse at Charney engraved in Pa:rker's
.' Glossary,' pl. 171. The date of the roof we. are now
considering, which is that of Ohillenden's Pd.orate
(13-90-1411 ); will serve to fix the elate of · the Charney
~00£ •
J ndging from the arrangement of. the Kitchen .offices
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHIJRCH I N CANTERB17RY. 1 2 1
descriptive the document as "new Guest Chambers, with a new
Larder below," i t may be inferred that the ground
floor was nearly occupied by the Larder and Kitchen.
offices.
• The first and second floors are now reached by a
wooden flight of stairs, contained in a wing added to the
building on its south side after the Dissolution, which
also supplies additional chambers. These stairs rise
from the Entrance Hall, which has a front door north-,
wards. B u t it is probable that the guests originally entered
gateh all Pentise Gate, and ascended by a vice or newel-staircase,
now destroyed, to the upper chambers, as explained
This house blocked up the north window of the Convent
Kitchen. A s this window was originally open, i t
follows that the original buildings which bounded the
north side of the Kitchen were of one story, if, indeed,
space were not an open court; for, as the Plan
3) shews, a wall s t i l l divides the lower
story into two halves, of which the western is equal in
length to the Kitchen, and the eastern was the ancient
name gate house preserving its
Plain headed Perpendicular windows mullions,
but length concealed garden of turret and encloses from
louse Whole Pentise Dissolution open the MONASTERY OF CHRIST CffiTIWH · IN CANTERBURY. 121
compared with the descriptive mention of this house in
the document as "new Guest Chambers, with a new
Larder below," it may be inferred that the ground
:floor was nearly occupied by the Larder and Kitcherl.
offices. •
• The first and second floors are now reached by a
wooden flight of stairs, contained in a wing added to th~
building on its south side after the Dissolution, which
also supplies additional chambers. These stairs rise
from the Enb'ance HaJI; which has a front door north.:.
wards. But it is probable that the guests originally entered
the building by the archway in the gatehall of the
Pentise Gate,-and ascended by a vice or newel-staircase,
now destroyed, to the upper chambers, as explained
·below. • •
This house blocked up the north window of the Convent
Kitchen. A$ this window was originally open, it
follows that the original buildings which bounded the
nor'th side of the Kitchen were of one story, if, indeed,
that space were not an open court; for, as the Plan
(Plate 3) shews, a stout wall still divides the lower
story into. two hahres, of which the western is equal in
length to the Kitchen, and the eastern was the ancient
Larder, because it gave name to the gate to which it is
contiguous.
The house itself now presents very nearly its ancient
external appearance, p1·eserving its roof, with many of i~s
plain square-beaded Perpendicular windows with mullions,
and four-centred doorways; but a great portion of
its length is concealed by the garden wall which now
springs from the side of the -turret and encloses f~·om
view more than half the western part of the l~ouse and
the whole of the Pentise and Pentise · gatehouse, which
before the Dissol~tion were o~en to t~e court.
122 T H i i CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
3. Pentise Gatehouse and Celerer's Hall.
The Pentise Gate, which presents itself next after
Chillenden's Chambers, is a Norman gatehouse, and offers
many points of great interest, which can only be understood
by comparing it with other structures of the same
kind, of which the Convent possesses two others in the
Norman Court Gate and the Christchurch Gate (94,
Plate 3) of the Cathedral Churchyard. This comparison
will be facilitated by previously examining the general
principles of arrangement of the gatehouses of
domestic architecture, which, like those we are considering,
are employed when the buildings are disposed
about courts or quadrangles.
consists two parts. First, the " Gateway " proper, which term
expresses the arch or arches within and against which
the gates themselves are hung, including the deep ornamental
moldings on the exterior, which usually project
considerably, forming a sheltered recess in front of the
gates. These decorations the gates
constitute the "portal" (portail, Fr.), which i f extended
becomes
the "gate hall," is the space between the back of the
This persons entering find themselves after passing
L i k e ordinary
dwelling-i t protects and governs the entrance
by gates, shelters the persons who are
court quadrangle, or preparing
The gate hall is usually covered with a vault and is
open court 122 THE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF THE
3. Pentt".se Gatehouse and Oele1·m•'s Hall.
The Pentise Gate, which presents itself next after
Chillenden's Chambers, is a Norman gatehouse, and offers
many points of great interest, which can only be understood
by comparing it with other structures of the same
kind, of which the Convent possesses two othei-s in the
Norman Court Gate and the Christchurch Gate (94,
Plate 3) of the Cathedral Churchyard. This comparison
will be facilitated by previously examining the general
principles of arrangement of the gatehouses of
domestic architecture, which, like those we are considering,
are employed when the buildings are disposed
about courts or quadrangles.
The entrance-passage through a gatehouse con~ists of
two parts. First, the " Gateway " prope1·, which te1·m
express.es the arch or arches within and against which
the gates themselves are hung, including the deep orna)
llental moldings on the exterior, which usually project
considerably, forming a sheltered recess in front of the
closed gates. These decorations exterior to the gates
constitute the "portal" (portail, Fr.), which if extended
so far outwards as to be covered with vaulting, becomes
a " porch."
The second part of a gatehouse, which may be termed
the "gate hall," is the space between the back of the
gates and the arch which is the boundary of the entrance
passage towards the court. This space is that in which
the persons entering find themselves after passing
through the gates. Like the entrance hall of an ordi;.
nary dwelling-house, it protects and governs the entrance
by its gates, and shelters the persons who are
seeking admission to the court or quadrangle, or preparing
to ,quit it.
The gate hall is usually covered with a vault and is
perfectly open to the court beyond, being bounded in
OF CHRIST onuRCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 2 3
that direction by an arch less in height than the vault and
in span than the breadth of the hall, only by such quantities
as may be required for its ornamental moldings and
piers. Such a hall manifestly requires no windows!
In the early gatehouses, of which the Court Gate and
Pentise as the opposite arch of the gate hall, and, like that, is
concentric I t s surface must to enable the doors to shut against it. B u t the doors
an arch must have been
square-headed and no higher than the impost of the
for i f been cut to the arch shape
above, the curved vault of the hall would have prevented
them. from folding against the side walls. The
semicircular space o f the arch above the doors may
therefore have been filled up by iron gratings, or by a
or flat arch, above. This
tympanums be
behind,
be recess constructed behind .and arched or vaulted over-generally
head opened, pass clear vault surface. This recess have termed "rear vault "2 of the door or window', for the same principle
windows.
A hall, doors at one end and
B u t in placed the 2 &Here VOWS= French; vide my Architectural Nomenclature
I MONASTERY OF CHRIST OHUIWH IN CANTEilJ3URY, 123
that direction by an arch less in height than the vault and
in span than the breadth of the hall, only by such quantities
as may be required for its ornamental moldings and
piers. Such a hall manifestly requirns no v\'indows.1
In the early gatehouses, of which the Com-t Gate and
;Fentise Gate are examples, the gateway arch is as high
as the opposite arch of the gate hall, and, like that, is
concent1·ic with the vault. Its inner sulface Jl?USt be flat,
to enable the doors to shut against it. But the doors
hung at the back of so high an arch must have been
squarn-headed and no higher than the impost of the
archway, for if they had been cut to the arch shape
above, the curved vault of the hall would hav.e prevented
them from folding against the side walls. The
semicircnlai· space of the arch above the doors may
therefo1·e have been filled up by iron gratings, or by a
transom or flat arch, with a tympanum above. This
accounts for the prevalence of tympanums in the early
doorways.
The tympanum was afterwards got rid of by making
the molded gateway arch so much lower than the vaults
within, that the top of the arch-shaped door should be
at or below the level of the springing of the vaults behind,
and thus it could be folded against the side walls
without interfering with them.
On the same principle, arched doorways in thick walls
have a wider and higher recess constructed behind the
.. doorway and arched or vaulted over-head, generally
with a segmental pointed arch, so arranged that the arch
-h?ad of the door, when opened, will pass clear of this
higher vault su1face. This 1·ecess I have termed the
"rear vault "2 of the door or window~ for the same principle
applies to windows .
.A. porch, like the gate hall is a chamber with doors at one end and
an open arch at the other. B~t they differ itr that the porch is placed in
front of ·tl\e doors and the gatehall behind them.
2 Arriere tJoussui·o in Frencli; vide my '.Axchitectural N omericlaturo '
(1844), in which I first developed the principle of its arrangement.
1 2 4 M E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
The entrance archway is always of sufficient width to
admit carriages, or large parties of pedestrians, horsemen,
of gates. For the admission of single persons a "wicket"
Is This term in a doorway pierced through one o f the great doors.
may be seen in daily gateway
doors of the Colleges in the Universities and other
buildings. B u t in later examples a small
doorway, termed "postern," is placed at the side of
great archway. This occurs the Christchurch
Gatehouse, at the entrance of the Cathedral Churchyard
at Canterbury (94, Plate 3), and was introduced also into
Court following manner, probably in the course of Chillenden's
:—The Norman gate-arch closed by which leaves its outer part and ornamental moldings
free, but divides the entrance into a small pointed arch
for a postern door, and a larger four-centred one, with
for use when required. T h e moldings these
insertcd. arches against original pier.
late Mr. Austin repaired the open Norman
archway gatehall by beneath
Chillenden's double western omitting the door and gates.
halls general have the building,
this porter's lodge finds its place within their
walls.
the gate hall, with ornamental windows, which are employed
to give architectural character to the entrance,
,persons 124 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
The entrance archway is· always of sufficient width to
admit carriages, or large parties of pedestrians, horse:
men, or processions, and is necessarily closed with a pair
of gates. For th.e admissi.on of single persons a ''wicket"
is provided. This term. is applied to a small door hinged
in a doorway pierced through one of the great doors.
-Such wickets may be seen in d~ily use in all the gateway
doors of the Colleges in the Universities and other
collegiate buildings. But in later examples a small
doorway, termed a "postern," is placed at the side of
the great archway. This occurs in the Christchurch
Gatehouse, at the entrance of the Cathedral Churchyard
at Cante1·bury (94, Plate 3), and was introduced also into
the Norman Comt Gate (Fig. 31, page 144, below) in the
following manner, probably in the course of Chillenden's
repairs :-The Norman ·gate-a1·ch was closed by a wall,
which .leaves its outer part and ornamental rnoldings
free, but divides the e~trance into a small pointed arch
for a postern door, and a larger four-centred. one, with
gates for use when required. The moldings of these
inse1-ted a-rches abut against the ancient piers without
contracting the original opening, except by the central
-pier . .
. . The late Mr. Austin repaired the open Norman
eastern arch v1•ay of the Court gatehall by erecting beneath
it a copy of Ohillenden's double western arches,
omitting the door and gates. •
Gate halls in general have a door in the side wall,
which opens to a lateral chamber occupied by the porter.
As gatehouses generally form part of a range of building,
this porter's lodge :finds its place within their
walls. •
One or two stories of chambers may be placed above
•the gate hall, with ornamental windows, which are employed
to give architecturnl character to the entrance,
.and may serve to watch the persons_ who seek admission
OF CHRIST CHUR,CH I N CANTERBURY. 1 2 5
proceedings courts of the establishment. B u t these chambers above
gate hall are generally purposes below, part of the suites of rooms the ranges of buildings
of which the gatehouse forms a part. The gate hall
coincides in level with the ground story. The chamber
above i t is ordinarily raised more or less than the first floor of the adjacent buildings, but not
more than can be accommodated by a few steps.
Gate the Celerer's
Hall to which it is attached.
Documents quoted by Sommer' shew that this gate
1382, the Gate next Hall, " Porta interior juxta Aulam Hospitum," and had
a chamber near it, appropriated to the "Keeper of the
W e gate, acquired Pentise gate, the ambulatory,
built by Prior Chillenden to connect i t with the
Court Gate.
The No.rrnan remains of the Celerer's Hall are scanty,
I n its plan delineated
in block, but in Plate 3 in detail.
The east wall of the lower story remains entire, as
well as the lower part of the return walls, or gables, at
By document, 1382, Convent a donation
office o f the the Servant and Steward Guesten Hall), with the Chamber belonging Keeper. " • • • . Custodia. porta interioris juxta Hospitii servienti
sue, custodis."—Somner, 111, Hall, Green • In o f under the Celerer (App. p. 36, xxxv.) the following occur: " Senescallus aula) hospitum ; Janitor
porta) auk); garcio ejus ; Janitor portm exterioris curio; Janitor porta)
cimiterii ; Hostiarius daustri garcio ejus."
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY, 125
or observe the proceedings of those who are within the
courts of the establishment. But these chambers above
the gate ha1~ are generally employed for pUl'poses not
connected with the entrance or exit below, and form a
part of the suites of rooms in the ranges of buildings
of yvhich the gatehouse forms a part. The gate hall
coincides in level with the ground story. The cha.mber
floor above it is ordinarily raised more or less higher
than· the first floor of the adjacent buildings, but not
more than can be accommodated by a few steps.
We may now turn to the Pentise Gafe and the Celerer's
Hall to which it is attached.
Documents quoted by Somner1 shew that this gate
was, in 1382, called tb,e Inner Gate next the Guesten
. ;Hall, "Pol'ta interior juxta Aulam Hospitum," and had
~ chamber near it, appropriated to the " Keeper of the
Inner gate." We have seen that this inner gat~, at the
time of the Dissolution, had acquired the name of the
Pentise gate, from the long Pentise, or wooden ambulatory,
built. by P1·ior Chillenden to connect it with the
Court Gate .
. The N o·rman remains of the Celerer' s Hall are scanty,
but extremely interesting. In Plate 2 its plan is delineated
in block, but in Plate 3 in detail.
The east wall of the lower story remains entire, as
well as the lower part of the return walls, or gables, at
the south and north ends, by which the dimensions may
1 :By this docllIIlent, dated 1882, the Prior and Convent make 11 dona,.
tion of the ojfice o.f Keeper of tM inner gate to tlte Servant and Esquire
.(of the Stcwo.rd of the Gueaten Ho.11), 1uitl1 tlu, Okamlm· belo:nging•to the
said .Keeper. " .... Oustodir.e.p01'taJ into1·i01'is jnxta Aulam ]fospitii servienti
et armigero suo, cum camera dicti custodis."-Somner, pp. 111, 112.
The Norman drawing being unknown to Somner, he erroneously supposes
the name Aula Hospitum to mean the North Rall, next to the GJ.'een Court
Gate. • In a list of officers under the Celerer (App. Somner, p. 86, no.
mv.) the following occur: - "Senescallus aulre hospitum; Janitor
portal aulm; garcio ojus; Janitor portre erlerioris curiro; Janitor portm
cimitexii; Host.iariua claustri ; ,gru:cio ejus."' :
126 T I T F . CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OP THE
be obtained. According to my measurements, the outer
the walls at the south end 22 feet 6 inches. The outer
of east decorated a plain Norman arcade of nine arches, resting on pilasters,
order, edge-and hoodmold. The pilasters also have edge-shafts and
vide 24, square A arch,
portal of Pentise Gatehouse, of feet span
and 8 feet deep, abuts against its eastern face, which is
of the is a plain, strong pier. T h e arch is of a single order,
with a plain impost mold, and is the "Inner Gate next
the Guesten Hall" above mentioned, but in the Norman
drawing. is inscribed, " Porta inter Domum Hospitum et
Coquinam." The drawing, however, merely represents
and preposterously exaggerated i n size
with respect to the other buildings.' The archway and
Celerer's Hall.'
eastern arch continued
and pierced arched
(6, Fig. 21), which led behind the Convent
The stated above, p. was taken down and rebuilt,
was, in its latter form, forty-seven feet square internally.
The gave ' 'Measured be 2 20 give details 126 THE CONVENTU.A.L BUILDINGS OF THE
be obtained. According to my measurements, the outer
length of the building is 120 feet, the distance between
the walls at the south end 22 feet 6 inches. The outer
face of its east wall is decorated at the basement with
a plain Norman arcade of nine arches, resting on pilasters,
each arch of a single order, with an edge-bowtell
and hoodmold. · The pilasters also have edge-shafts and
simple flower capitals (vide Figs. 21, 23, 24, 30).
At the north-east angle is a square turret, containing
a spiral staircase (9, 10, Fig. 21). A plain circular ai-ch,
the portal of the Pentise Gatehouse, of 12 feet span
and 8 _feet deep, abuts against its easte1·n face, which is
of the same breadth; the eastern abutment of this arch
is a plain, strong pier. The arch is of a single order,
with a plain impost mold, and is the "Inner Gate next
the Guesten Hall " above mentioned, but in the Norman
drawing. is inscribed, "Porta inter Domum Hospitum et
Coquinam.'' The drawing, however, merely represents
an immense pair of square doors, like those of a modern
coach-house, and preposterously exaggerated in size
with respect to the other buildings.1 The archway and
the stair-turret are apparently of one piece of work with
the Celeret's Hall.2
The eastern abutment wall of the arch is continued
southwards, and is pierced by a Norman zigzag al'ched
doorway (6, Fig. 21), which led behind the Convent
Kitchen to the Larder and offices. The Norman Kitchen
(as stated above, p. 37) was taken down and rebuilt,
probably on a larger scale, between 1338 and 1370, and
was, in its latter form, forty-seven feet square inte1·nally.
"The great Norman Portal gave a direct entrance to the
Celerer's Court, as my plan (Plate 3) shews.
•
1 Measured by the scale of the church, they would be 85 feet wide and
45 feet high.
• 2 Figs. 21 to 30 giT'e complete plans and details of this Gatehouse and
its connection with the adjacent buildings.
•
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERE17RY. 1 2 7
The passage is continued southward under two severies
of later Norman vaulting covering the Gate Hall, of
which the above-mentioned archway is the Portal (Fig.
21), and the transverse arch (2, 8) that terminates these
,
OELERElit&
COU IV?
O l i z t 7 , 4 C O U R T
PLAN B
Fig. 21.
tOTeliEN
SS
?„„1„,,T 2 pSEET
FIRST FLOOR
PL/NS OF THE l'ENTISE GATEHOUSE. F i g . 22.
35
4
24
severies to the south carries a Norman wall (as shewn
in Fig. 30), which indicates that the vaulting had a
chamber constructed above i t which, together with it,
formed described
Remains Norman this chamber, which had a central window, exist above
the great portal, but are concealed by the subsequent
timber front, and will be described below. T h e remainder
of the wall of the Celerer's Hall, or Domus
flospiturn, is ornamented with the arcade already described.
MONASTERY OF OHRIST CHlffiClI IN O.A.NTER'BURY. 127
The passage is continued southward under two severies
of later Nor man vaulting covering the Gate Hall, of
which the above-mentioned archway is the Portal (Fig.
21), and the transverse arch (2, 3) that terminates these
0111;1;N
...
9,, , ,I, I I ,
1P 30,FEET 111 "' co11F!r I z 0
0
F' . :! ... Cl) 0 I J1I ,,
"· I t3
GROUND PLAN FIRST FLOOR
BI
Fig. 21. PLA,.~S OF TltE l'ENTISE OATJU!OUBB, Fig. 22.
seve1·ies to the south carries a Norman wall (as shewn
in Fig. 30), which indicates that the vaulting had a
chamber constructed above it which, together with it,
fo1·med a complete Gatehouse, of the ordinary form described
above. Remains of the Norman north wall of
this chamber, which had a central window, exist above
the great portal, but are concealed by the subsequent
timber front, and will be described below. The remainder
of the wall of the Cele1·er's Hall, 01· Domus
Hospitum, is ornamented with the arcade already de-
~cribE;i_d. • • •
128 T H 14, CONVENTIZIL BITILDINGS OF THE
closer examination passage or gatehall shews that the transverse ribs and
groined vaulting, although Norman, were added some.
time after the portal archway and the side wall of the:
Celerer's Hall had been finished. T h e lateral arcades
and pilasters of the two vaulted severies on the west
side of the passage are exactly the same as those of the
remainder of the wall (vide Fig. 30). T h e two broad,
transverse ribs of these vaults are supported on stone
imposts, inserted into the wall immediately above the
imposts of the arcade, and projecting over them, like
corbels, to carry the first voussoirs (vide Fig. 24). T h e
groins are set up upon inserted corbels (Fig. 23), or
start from blocks sunk into the walls,-,--evidently some
time after the arcades and deep entrance portal were
completed.
Fig. 23.-MSERTgD COILBEL AND 'VAULT AT 311, Fig. The east side of the vaulted passage is bounded partly
128 THE CONVENTUA.L BTJII,DINGS OF THE
A closer examination of the vaults of the .entrance
passage or gatehall shews that the transverse ribs and
groined vaulting, although Norman, were added some·
time after the portal .archway and the side wall of the:
Celerer's Hall had been :finished. The lateral arcades
and pilasters of the two vaulted se·veries on the west
side of the passage are exactly the same as those of the
remainder of the wall (vide Fig. 30). The two broad,
transverse ribs of these vaults are supported on stone
imposts, inserted into the wall immediately above the
imposts of the arcade, and projecting over them, like
corbels, to cru:ry the first voussoirs ( vide Fig. 24 ). The
groins are set up upon inserted corbels (Fig. 23), or
start from blocks sunk into the walls,-_ evidently some
time afte1· the arcades and deep entrance portal were
completed.
Fig. 23,-INS~I\T.ED Coll.DEL AND 'VA1JLT AT M, Fig, 24.
The east side of the vaulted passage is bounded partly
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 2 9
by the wall of the Kitchen offices, with the abovementioned
Norman 21), by the wall at the angle of the Norman Kitchen, which
afterwards and received the buttresses-, of' which the lower parts (15,
16, Fig. 21).remain.
• -But these malls are not parallel to .the west- wall of
'.MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN OANT.ERBURY. ]29
.D. l:
.a.: Ia:
w
Ill
l:
< · :z:
u
.J
l'1
Cl)
Q
< a:
~
.0. .
r .
a....:.
< 111
VI
I-
... z
111
Q.
.J
i5 a::
0
ll.
.....I
< :I
I
.I.l.l
< 0
0 z
:,
0 . a:
",._
0 .:
> 1'I
..I
:;
.. .".' .z. ~
=:: ~
by the wall of the Kitchen offices, with· the abovementioned
Nol'man zigzag arch (6, Fig. 21);-' and partly
by the wall at the angle of the Norman Kitchen, which
was afte{·wards employed for the later Kitchen, and-then
i·eceived the buttresses-, of which the ·lower parts (15,
16, Fig: 21}.remain. • • •
·-But these- :walls al'e ·not parallel to . the west-w.all of
VOL. VII.
lC
130 • T H E CONVEXTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
the passage and not in the same direction, as Fig. shews. A lso the transverse arch (4, 5) of the intruded
necessarily obliquely across the passage,
resting on a corbel-stone inserted above the abacus of
the arcade at 4, and directed so as to clear, at the east •
impost, the Norman doorway at 5. T h e second transverse
arch (2, 3), which completes the vaulted passage, .
rests in the same way upon the impost (2) and on an
(. These facts shew that the Celerer's Hall, when first
stood completely free o f the Kitchen, as the
delineates them. The the stair-turret as now, but merely carried a pair of gates hinged against
its southern face, which may therefore have been squareheaded,
as in the Norman drawing, which represents
wicket and the gable above the gates. T h e conversion
chamber
over a vaulted Gate Hall, was an afterwork, but yet
in the Norman time, and carried out in the manner described
above.
The zigzag arch mentioned above supplies a passage
Hall, also Gate Hall to Chillenden's Chambers (18) ; and on the
opposite side of that Hall, a doorway (11., Fig. 21), now
Celerer's Guesten Hall, as this building is now generally called.
The Porter's Lodge may have been fitted up either on ;
the east Or west side of the Gate Hall,—that is, either
in the enclosed space within, the zigzag arch or in the
sub vaults.
But the door to the subvaults gave access to the spiral
staircase or vice contained i n the square turret at the
north-east Hall., This originally
door in angle of, 130 · · • THE C0NVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF TID:
the passage and not in the same direction, as Fig. 21
shews. Also the tl'ansverse arch ( 4, 5) of the intruded •
vault is necessa1ily built obliquely across the passage, .
1·esting on a corbel-stone inserted above the abacus of
the al'Cade at 4, and directed so as to clear, at the east .
impost, the Norman doorway at 5. The second transverse
arch (2, 3), which completes the vaulted passage, .
·rests in the same way upon the impost (2) and on an
inserted corbel in the wall of the kitchen (at 3).
. These facts shew that the Celerer's Hall, when first
built, stood completely free of the Kitchen, as the
Norman drawing delineates them. The deep Gateway
or Portal joined the stair-tu1·Tet of the Celerer's Hall,
as now, but merely carried a pair of gates hinged against
its southern face, which may therefore have been squareheaqed,
as in the Norman drawing, which represents
their south aspect, as is evident from the position of the
wicket and the gable above the gates. The con version
of this into a complete Gatehouse, with an upper chamber
over a vaulted Gate Hall, was an afterwork, but yet
.in the Norman time, and carried out in the manner de- .
·scribed above.
The zigzag arch mentioned above supplies a passage ,
from the Kitchen to the Gate Hall, and also from the
.
Gate Hall to Chi.llenden's Chambers (18); and on the
opposite side of that Hall, ·a doorway (11, Fig. 21), now 1
walled up, led to the subvaults of the Celerei-'s Hall, or
Guesten Hall, as this building is now generally called. ,
The Porter's Lodge may have been fitted up either on ;
the east 01· west-side of the Gate Hall,-that is, either
in the enclosed_.space within the zigzag arch or in the
subvaults. .
But the door to the subvaults gave access to the spiral
staircase or vice contained in the square turret at the
.iiol'th-east angle of the · Guest Hall. . This vice was originil.
lly entered by a door ~ the 3:-ngle of. the subvaults
MONASTERY OF . CHRIST CHURCH I N . CANTERBURY. 1 3 1
(10, Fig. 21), which was walled up when the site of that
Hall passed into the King's hands and subsequently to
the Archbishop at the Dissolution.'
The turret itself is distinguished by a Peculiar caprice
of construction of which I know no other example, and
will therefore endeavour to explain. The view of this
turret in Fig. 29 shews two
curved projections from its
north face, which appear to
be the outsides of niches or
blind oriels. Thei r real nature
i s shewn by the plan
and section annexed (Figs.
25 and 26), in which minor
details are omitted. The tur- Fig. 25.
ret i n this section i s supposed
to be cut by a trans- , D SECTION
verse vertical plane passing
through the centre o f the
circular stair-well in the direction
N S. The eastern half
of the turret walls are removed,
as shewn by the shading
o f the plan; b u t the
steps themselves of this eastern
half remain undisturbed.
The plan shews that the
turret is bounded externally
by flat surfaces on the west,
east, and south sides; but
on the north side i t bulges
out with a cylindrical surface
with L w a l i s . r e e r
Fig. 26.
PLAN
I Access to the bottom of these stairs was afterwards obtained by
breaking a door into the turret from the Portal arCh (at 9). B u t this was.
done long after the Gatehouse had merged into the Prebendal House.
K2
MONASTERY OF . CHRIST CHlJlWH IN . CA.NTERDURY. 131
(10, Fig. 21), which was walled np when the site of that
Hall passed into the King's hands and subsequently to
the Archbishop at the Dissolution.1
The tlll'ret itself is distingttished by a peculiar caprice
of construction of which I know no other example, and
will therefore endeavour to explain. The view of this
turret in Fig. 29 shews two
curved projections from its
north face, which appear to
be the outsides of niches or
blind oriels. Their real nature
is shewn by the plan
and section annexed (Figs.
25 and 26 ), in which minor E
details are omitted. The tur- Fig. 26.
1·et in this section is supposed
to be cut by a transverse
vertical plane passing
through the cent.re of the
circular stair-well in the direction
s . . The eastern half
of the turret walls are removed,
as shewn by the shading
of the plan; but the
steps themselves of this eastSECTION
C
ern half remain undisturbed. ----+"'1-s.i:::;..,_-l~--
The plan shews that the
tuuet is bounded externally
by flat surfaces on the west,
east, and south sides; but
on the north side it bulges
out with a cylindrical smface
concentric with the stair-well,
e
E e
'
Fig. 26.
·-N PLAN
11.wn.us.ne.,.
1 Access to the bottom of these stofrs was afterwards obtained by
breaking a door into the turret from the J.>ortal arch. (at 9). But this was.
done long nfler the Gatehouao had merged into the Prebendal House. •
K 2
132 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
which might have been carried up continuously to the
but are interrupted by flat surfaces and
faces The be understood by following the course of a person entering
the tower at the bottom by a door at the southwest
H e and with his face to the east, and proceed upwards to
B, C, D, and E in succession. When passing the side
semidome clear the head of a tall man; but the flat surface D G
on the opposite side to the person at C, does not offer
to his passage. Similarly the passenger
when at D is received in the shallow niche D H, and
when he reaches the upper landing is completely clear
the flat I t difficult reason for the introduction of this device.
base vice,
level floor another
doorway 24, 22), by which was
Ascending come
doorway extremity,
Before platform
small chamber over the Portal, which the
drawing represents a roof, apparently
constructed of timber-work.
Re-entering the vice and ascending it we arrive at another
or
formed in the thickness of the north gable
Guest only ruined
the floors and 132 THE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF THE
which might have been carried up continuously to the
top, . but are interrupted by flat smfaces at G D and
H K, the inner faces of ·which coincide with the dotted
line d e · of the plan. The effect of this construction will
be understood by following the course of a person entering
the tower at the bottom by a door at the southwest
corner. He would begin the ascent with the step
c and with his face to the east, and proceed upwards to·
B, C, D, and E in succession. When passing the side
B F, the semidome F G of the niche is high enough to
clear the head of a tall man; but the flat surface D G
merely serves to support the ends of the steps, and being
on the opposite side to the person at C, does not offer
obstruction to his passage. Similarly the passenger
when at D is received in the shallow niche D H, and
when he reaches the upper landing is completely clear
of the flat wall K H. It is difficult to discover the
reason for the introduction of this device.
Above the original doorway at the base of this vice,
and at the level of the floor of the Guest Hall, is another
doorway (24, Fig. 22), by which that Hall was
reached from below. Ascending a little higher we come.
to a third dool'way (25), which opens on the floor of the
Paradise chamber over the Gate Hall at its north extremity,
which lies over the deep portal. Before the vaulted
Gate Hall was added, this doorway merely led to a platform
or a small chamber over the Portal, which the
Norman drawing represent~ with a gabled roof, appa~
rently constructed of timber-work.
Re-entering the vice and ascending it we arrive at another
doorway, which opened westward into a gallery 01·
passage formed in the thickness of the nOl'th gable
wall of the Guest Hall, of which only a small ruined
portion remains, as shewn in Fig. 29.
·The two doorways above described as opening from the
vice to the. -floors of the Guest Hall and chamber over
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 3 3
communication
two apartments. I t probable,
withdrawing-to the Guest Hall from the
When built the east Pentise Gatehouse,
height was TOM above i t the manner described
Ch. VII. sect. 1). The pointed door of communication
the residing reach the Guest Hall through this withdrawing-room
thus suite of chambers. Similarly a door of communication
floor was made new upper Heaven-the gatehouse,
from which a door led to the upper landing of the vice
Fig. 25), and thus downwards to the Guest became We must now return to the description of the Celerer's
I t been basement
wall is ornamented with an arcade, of which the
arches absorbed
the Gate Hall. Beyond these, space of the Celerer's Court, the arcade is continued in
series along east southwards,
narrower succeeded doorway
3), beyond more arches terminate
doorway adorned sculptured work, and dilapidated; but more condition was described by Somner, writing before the
year 1640, as, "A fair door, over which is cut in the
the resemblance of the
On. Saviour ;" MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH lN CANTERBURY. 13.3
the Gate Hall, respectively, provided an easy communication
between these two apartments. It" appears ·pro"
bable, therefore, that the latter may have been employed
as a withdrawing-room to the Guest Hall from the
beginning. When Chillenden's Chambers were built.in
contact with the east wall of this Pentise Gatehouse,
the height of this withdrawing-room was reduced, and
a second room built above it in the manner described
below (Oh. VII. sect. 1). - The pointed door of communication
from the first floor of that building was then
made to enable the Guests residing in the Chambers to
1·each the Guest Hall through this withdrawing-1·oom
(then named Paradise), which thus became part of the
suite of chambers. Similarly a door of communication
from the roof-floor of Chillenden's building was made to
the new upper or Heaven-chamber of the gatehouse,
from which a door led to the upper landing of the vice
(E, Fig. 25), and thus downwards to the Guest Hall.
These chambers thus became naturally included in the
House of the seventh Prebendary at the Dissolution.
We must now retU1·n to the description of the Oelerer's
Hall or Guest Hall. It has been shewn that the basement
wall is ornamented with an arcade, of which the
two arches next to the Norman Gateway arch were absorbed
in the Gate Hall. Beyond these, in the open
space of the Celerer's Colll't, the arcade is continued in
a series of six equal arches along the east wall southwards,
a seventh nanower arch is succeeded by a do01·way
(68, Plate 3), beyond which two more arches terminate
the series.
This ·doorway is adorned with sculptu1·ed work, now
patched and dilapidated ; but when in a more perfect
condition was described by Somner, writing · before the
year 1640, as, HA fair door, over which is cut in the
stonework the resemblance of the Holy Ghost, in the
Dove's form, descending on our Saviour;· and under his
134 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE.
feet the statue of an 'Archbishop (haply the Founder)
in. pontificals.'!' When Somn_er wrote, perfect, but was in the hands of the Archbishop.
Hooked stone corbels' are fixed in the wall above the
arcade and door, and shew that a roofed ambulatory
was provided for the shelter of persons passing from the
Court gate to this ornamental entrance doorway through
The western or inner face .of this wall has, at its
southern extremity, two recessed arches o f carefully
finished Norman masonry within, corresponding with
two last arches without. T h e thin walls which
close them now contain windows of pointed form. T h e
southern gable is, with the exception of the bases and
parts the piers and a piece o f work of old, fragments, employed merely to make good
the party-wall between the Cathedral precincts and the
Archbishop's land. B u t the lower parts of the piers
shew that this end wall was provided within with finished
arches, like western face side-Also appearance
between I t be inferred from these particulars that this south portion
o f the building corresponding to the doors and
arches was a vestibule of considerable height.
But the remainder of the inner face of this wall appears
to have received a series o f vaults, forming the
usual substructure of monastic buildings, and sustaining
the floor of the. Hall.. The springing of these vaults
is easily seen at the north end, against the stair-turret'
(Fig. 29) ; and above, en the level o f the first floor,
2 in 3 In a accumulation earth been raised
against concealing remains Projecting piers when, plans and
,made in 134 . THE CONVENTU'AL BUILDINGS OF THE. •
feet the statue of au Archbishop (haply the Fomide1J·
in his poutificals.''.1 When Somner '\-note, this hall was
pe1fect, but was in the hands of the Ar chbishop.
Hooked stone corbels2 are fixed in the wall above the
arcade and door, and shew that a roofed ambulatory
was provided for the shelter of persons passing from the
Court gate to this ornamental entrance doorway through
the Pentise Gate.
The western or inner face .of this wall .has, at its
southern extremity, two recessed arches of carefully
finished N Ol'man masonry within, c01-responding with
the t,vo last arches without. The thin walls which
close them now contain windows of pointed form. The
southern gable is, with the exception of the bases and
lower parts of tlie piers and walls, a piece of patch
work of old fragments, employed merely to make good
the party~wall between the Cathedral p1·ecincts and the
Archbishop's land. But the lower parts of the piers
shew that this end wall was provided within with finished
Norman arches, like those of the western face of the
side~wall. Also these Norman arches exhibit no appear•
ance of the springing of vaults betw~en them. It must
be inferred from these particulars that this south portion
of the building corresponding to the doors and
arches was a vestibule of considerable height.
But the remainde1· of the inner face of this wall ap
·pea1·s to have received a series of vaults, forming the
usual substtucture of monastic buildings, and sustaining
the floor of the. Hall.. The spr~nging of these vaults
is easily seen at the north encl, against the stair-turret8
(Fig. 29); and above, on the level of the first :floor,
1 Somner, p. 110.
. .
~ One of these is shewn above the arcade 10. Fig. 80.
~ In late years a. great acc~mulation of garden-ear~h has bee~ 1·ai~e~
aaainst.the west or inner face of this north end, concenhng and obliterating
the remains of p1·~jecting piers which were visible when my plaus o.nd
•sketches were mlido'in· 1847.
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 3 5
doorway gave entrance to from the turret-stairs. Along the middle of the wall
this springing is obliterated by a facing of flints applied;
to repair i t in modern times. From these indications
we may infer that the above-mentioned south vestibule
contained a flight of steps, conducting the guests who
entered the building through the ornamental door from
the Celerer's Court to the floor of the Hall.
observed, end convenient proximity to the Convent Butteries and Celr
beneath the great Refectory or Frater and
also, at its other extremity, is in communication with
the Convent Kitchen.
The south-east angle of the Celerer's Hall is opposite
to the, north-west angle o f the ,Refectory, and
angles are connected by segmental arch,
about 26 feet span. and 4 feet wide, of molded bricks.
arch lies the direction end-Hall, and meets the Refectory diagonally between its
The upper the arch nearly
corresponds to the Refectory, having
I t have.
carried covered passage to
1
I n (vide south-east Court, and Locutorium extend, one along the back-of the
passage, other along the butteries.
This cloister is drawn as plan 'shows, enclose a separate garden between
i t and, the Cloister-wall. H e tells i t an a chimney i t often been for purpose; 'MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN C.ANTE~URY, 135
the doorway remains which gave · entrance· to the Hall
from the tmret-stairs. Along the middle of the wall
this springing is obliterated by a facing of flints applied.
to repair it in modern times. From these indications
we may infer that the above-mentioned south vestibule
contained a flight of steps, conducting the guests who
entered the building thrnugh the ornamental door from
the Celerer's Court to the floor of the Hall.
This Hall, it will be observed, is, at its south encl in
convenient proximity to the Convent Butteries and Uel~
lerage, beneath the great Refectory or Frate1·; ancl
also, at its other extremity, is in communication with
the Convent Kitchen.
The south-east angle of the Celerer's Hall is opposite
to the, north-west angle of the Refectory, and.
these two angles axe connected by a segmental · arch,
about 26 feet span and 4 feet wide, of molded bricks.
This arch lies in the direction of the ~ml-wall of the
Hall, and meets the Refectory diagonally between its
corner buttresses. The upper line of -the arch nearly
conesponds to the floor of the Celerer's Hall, and also
to the level of the old floor of the ll.efectory, both having
been raised upon subvaults. It may therefore have_
ca.rried a covered passage for direct access from one t~
the other.1
• In the Norman drawing (vide Plates 1 and 2), a short
cloistered alley is formed in the south-east angle of the
Celerer's Court, and is labelled " Locu torium ;" its two
branches extend, the one along the back-wall of the
Kitchen passage, the other along the- wall of the butteries.
This cloisteris .drawn with simple arches resting
. .
1 In Gostling's time, this arch was backed on the south side by a wall
which, ns Wilkes's plan -shews, served to enclose n separate garden between
it and the great Cloister-wall- He tells us it was an alcove, so
much like a. chimney that it was often looked upon as having bean built
fo1• that purpose ; but he gives various reasons ·against this opinion, without
venturing to supply one of his own.
•
136 T u R CONVENTUAL BUILDING-S OF THE
on isolated pillars, and has been described above, under
the head of "Refectory and Kitchen Court." (Ch. IV.
sect. 3.)
CHAP. V I I .
COURT.
The Pentise.
This was a roofed alley, built against the west boundary
Green contact the Porter's
Lodge of the Court Gate at its north end, and with the
front wall of the Pentise Gatehouse at its south end, so
as to provide a sheltered passage from the city entrance
Convent that which, as have
seen, is the portal of the Celerer's domain.
I t is a wooden structure of the simplest form, but
unmistakably medimval in character. T h e Court wall
its western boundary; its eastern is dwarf capped with a course of masonry, upon which rests a
wooden sill. T h e height of this wall above the ground
is diminished by the great accumulation of soil, to about
two feet at its southern end, but must originally have
stood between four and five feet above the surface. The
width of the alley between the two walls is eight feet.
The dwarf wall carries a wooden colonnade of plain
chamfered posts, framed into the sill below (Fig. 24);
sustaining a long plate or rail above, corresponding to a
one on the wall Court. The roof pointed one, eaves discharging into the Convent Court on one side and the Archbishop's
Ground on the other. T h e height o f the
wooden colonnade from the top o f the dwarf wall to
the top of the upper plate is six feet.
The framing of the roof ,consists o f principal and
intermediate trusses. The principal trusses (Fig. 28) are
placed at intervals of twelve feet, from centre to centre,
136 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
on isolated pillars, and has been desci·ibed above, under
the head of "Refectory and Kitchen Court." (Oh. IV.
sect. 3.)
CHAP, VII.
GREEN COURT.
1. Tlie Pentise.
This was a roofed alley, built against the west boundary
wall of the Green Court, in contact with the Porter's
Lodge ·of the Court Gate at its north end, and with the
front wall of the Pentise Gatehouse at its south end, so
as to provide a sheltered· passage from the city entrance
of the Convent to that Gatehouse, which, as we have
seen, is the portal of the Cele1·er's domain.
It is a wooden structure of the simplest form, but
unmistakably medireval in characte1·. The Court wall
is its western boundary; its eastern is a dwarf wall,
capped with a · course of masom·y, upon which rests a
wooden sill: The height of this wall above the ground
is diminished by the ·great accumulation of soil, to about
two feet at .its southern end, but must originally have
stood between four and five feet above the SUl'face. The·
width of the alley between the two walls is eight feet.
The dwarf wall carries a wooden colonnade of plain
chamfered posts, framed into the sill below (Fig. 24);
sustaining a long plate or rail above, corresponding to a
similar one on the wall of the Court. The l'OOf is a
high pointed one, with eaves dischai-ging its rainwater
into the Convent Court on one side and the Archbishop's
Ground on the other. The height of the
wooden colonnade from the top of the dwarf wall to
the top of the upper plate is six feet. •
. The framing of the roof _consists of principal and
intermediate trusses. The principal trusses (Fig. 28) are
placed at intervals of twelve feet, from centre to centre,
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 3 7
dividing the length. of the Pentise into severies, and are
as :—
tie-the end, and into the similar plate or rail which is carried
the middle, and is supported by two braces, curved below,
so as to form portions of a semicircle struck from
F i g . 2 7 . - B L E I r AT I O N O F F O R T E G A B L E O N T H E
LINE C Fig. F i g . 2 8 . --SECTION O F PENTISE
F E, Fig. 21.
centre, which has a radius o f four feet. These
braced tie-beams firmly connect the open colonnade of
the Pentise with the wall of the Court. The truss iS
slighter above for
the support of the covering materials of the roof. This
slighter frame consists of two rafters, connected, a
pair of intersecting braces, and framed to the tie-beam.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST OHURCK .u"f CANTERBURY. j37
dividing the length of the Pentise into severie·s, and are
constructed as follows :-
.A tie-beam is framed into the wall plate at its west
end, and into the similar plate or rail which is carried
by the posts: at its east end, the tie is slightly raised in
the middle, and is supported by two braces, curved below,
so as to form portions of a semicircle struck from
Fig. 27 ,-ELJIV.A.TION O.P NOm'li 0.ADLB ON THE
C D, Fig. 21.
l•'ig. 28,-SEC'l'ION OF PBNTISB
AT F E, Fig. 21.
a centre, which has a radius of four feet. These
braced tie-beams ffrmly connect the open colonnade of
the Pentise with the wall of the ·Court. The truss is
completed by a slighter frame above the tie-beam, fol'
the support of the covering materials of the roof. This
slighter frame consists of two rafters, connected by a
pair of intersecting braces, and framed to the tie-beam.
138 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
trusses are exactly this
slighter frame, but the feet of their rafters are framed
to the *plate and as they tie-trusses are placed between each Every over a post of the colonnade, which is made rather
stouter the intermediate posts. B u t there relation trusses,
there principal post as 24) and plan T h e actual roofcovering
the Pentise the
Pentise condition,
shew the north Gatehouse, which up to the end of the fourteenth century
completely masked by the addition of the timber building
24) advance Norman second floor placed over the original
chamber, overhangs timber
below at E. T h e whole second
covered long roof, projecting
eaves (shewn 29 30). Thus the venerable
was present
century
The exact construction and
connected
ancient Pentise, shewn by (Fig. 24), and the lower part of the timber
Pentise is abruptly short it, is esigned such a to
extremity. The extended wall
138 THE CONVENTUA.L DUILDINGS OF THE
The intermediate trusses are exactly similar to this •
slighter frame, but the ~eet of their rafters are framed .
to the :wall plate and rail, as they have no tie-beam.
Six intermediate trusses are placed · between each pair
of principal trusses. Every principal truss rests directly
over a post of the colonnade, which is made i·ather
stoute1· than the intermediate posts. But there is no
1·elation between the latter and the intermediate trusses,
for there are six of these trusses and three of the posts
between each principal post and truss, as the elevation
(Fig. 24) and plan (Fig. 21) shew. The actual roofcovering
is omitted altogether in the sketches.
To understand the junction of the Pentise with the
P entise Gatehouse, we must examine its present condition,
which will shew us that the north front of that
Gatehouse, which up to the end of the fourteenth century
was entirely visible from the Green Court, became
completely masked by the addition of the timber building
now standing, the front (E, D, C, Fig. 24) of which
is not only six feet in ad'!ance of the Norman wall (B),
but has a second :floor (L, E) placed over the original
Gatehouse chamber, which floor overhangs the timber
front below at E. The whole length of this second
floor is covered with a long roof, finished with projecting
eaves (shewn in Figs. 29 and 30). Thus the venerable
stone Norman Gatehouse was converted to its present
aspect, which resembles a picturesque fifteenth century
grange of studwork. The exact construction and
manner in which this additional structure is connected
with the ancient masonry and Pentise, is shewn by the
section (Fig. 24 ), and the lower part of the. timber
frame of the front is shewn in elevation (Fig. 27).
• The Pentise is abruptly cut short to receive it, and
the form of the frame is d,esigned in such a way as to
support its truncated exti·emity. The floor of the ancient
·
upper chamber is extended beyond the face of the wall
Opposite page 139.
F i g . 3 0 . - - T r m O F T H E SOUTH G A B L E O F T H E F E M M E GATEHOUSE, W I T H REMAINS O F T H E K I T C H E N .
Opposite page 139.
-
_-::::::=- -
- _:.~
_...._; ..
-.-•,, ... ,
_:--::_ ~
---.----~vt.-: .
Fig. 30.-VIEW OF THE SOUTX GAJJLE OF TllE l'BN'l'ISB GA.TEHOUSE, l'l'ITX RIDUINS OF TIIB Krl'CUK.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 3 9
to meet this timber frame, by which i t is Supported at
(Fig. 24); and thus a small closet, feet by
five, is obtained, which at present has two sash windows
in front.
t..L1
'y 1 1 4
..ii.;C:—.-4.41;1*.`
4. W T i
ILLIE. DEL.
F i g . 2 9 .- V I E W O r T H E r E N T I S E GATEHOUSE, P R O M T H E NORTH-WEST,
I N T H E PALACE GROUNDS.
Before these changes this upper chamber was much
and had probably open B u t removed, order second-chamber.
The Norman north and south gables of this chamber
.ruthlessly sustained by gable, brackets below.
original wall :first-floor chamber remains undisturbed, excepting
that the sill wall of the window has been pulled down
:MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 139
to meet this timber frame, by which it is supported at
D .(Fig. 24); and thus a small closet, thirteen feet by
five, is obtained, which at present has two sash windows
in front.
-
~
2L:
?:...
I
Fig. 29,-VXEW OP TllE PBl\'l'ISE GATEHOUSE, PRO)! TllE NORTU-WEST1
IN THE PALJI.OB GltoUNDS.
Befote these changes this upper chamber was much
·higher and had probably an open roof. But this was
now removed, in order to gain a second.floor chamber.
The Norman north and south gables of this chamber
were 1·uthlessly cut down to the level of this floor, which
is sustained by them and carried outwards, resting on
the top of the timber frame, and projecting beyond it, so
.as to form an overhanging gable, with brackets beloiv:.
The lower part of the 01·iginal Norman north wall of
this first-floor chamber i·emai:i:ts undisturbed, excepting
that the sill wall of the window has been pulled down
1 4 0 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF TILE
to convert i t into a doorway, the lower part of the
shafts mutilated, and the arch-head of the window, indicated
by dotted lines in Fig. 27, entirely destroyed.
That the Pentise, when first constructed, was carried
up to the wall of the Gatehouse, is manifest from the
following considerations. We have seen that the Pentise
into severies, twelve by principal posts and roof-trusses. Now, the southernmost
of these principal frames (A, Fig. 24) is fixed at
(C D) house against which the Pentise now terminates, and
post (is only from this
frame. Thus the last severy of the Pentise is abruptly
truncated in its length in a manner that could not have
been the work of the original builders. B u t referring
to the Plan (Fig, 21), in which 22, are two principal
severy, seen that the distance of from the face of the
Norman arch is precisely sufficient to contain another
severy. I t may concluded, the
masonry, terminated manner
the lines Fig. and. 21). The was the face line of the Norman portal, dividing the
two halves, for the the open The
last principal post (B, Fig. 24) stood at the end of the
roof carried on
Norman and turret, indeed
the western half of it still does (Fig. 29). Thus,
Gatehouse, its ornamental
portakwas I t must be inferred that. the.order in which the works
considering namely,Chillenden's cham-
,bers, .
14 0 THI!J CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
to convert it into a doorway, the lower part of the
shafts mutilated, and the arch-head· of the window, indicated
by dotted lines in J?ig. 27, entirely destroyed.
That the Pentise, when first constructed, was carried
up to the wall of the Gatehouse, is manifest from the
following considerations. VVe have seen that the Pentise
is divided in~o equal seveTies, each twelve feet in length,
by principal posts and roof-trusses. Now, the southernmost
of these principal frames ( A, Fig. 24) is :fixed at
seven feet only from the framed front (0 D) of the wooden
house against which the Pentise now terminates, and
the last intermediate post (F) is only a foot from this
frame. Thus the last severy of the Pentise is abruptly
truncated in its length in a manner that could not have
been the work of the original builders. But 1·efening
to the Plan (Fig. 21 ), in which 22, 23 arn two principal
trusses of the Pentise roof, including one severy, it will
be seen that the distance of 22 from the face of the
Norman arch is precisely sufficient to contain another
such severy. It may be concluded, therefore, that the
Pentise when first set up was simply carried up to the
face of the masonry, and te1·minated there, in the manner
shewn by the dotted lines in the Section (F_ig. 24)
and Plan (Fig. 21 ). The dwarf wall ·was continued up
to the face line of the Norman portal, dividing the
archway into two halves, fo1· the persons entering from
the Pentise or .from the open Court respectively. The
l ast principal post (B, Fig. 24) stood at the end of the
dwarf wall, and the toof of the Pentise was canied on
to join the face of the Norman wall and turret, as indeed
the western half of it still does (:Fig. ·29). Thus,
the gable wall of the Gatehouse, with its ornamental
.Norman window over the portal•,. was not hidden at first.
It must be inferred that the··orcler in which the works
:we are con,side1ing (namely,..Ch.illenden's range of cham,
b.ers1 the long Pentise, and the substitution of the ParaMONASTERY
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 4 1
dise and Heaven chambers for the single Norman
carried following
:—
The Pentise was first built and brought up complete
to the Norman face of the Pentise gatehouse, at that
time unaltered.
Next Chillenden's range of chambers was taken in
hand, and i t became manifest that additional space
might be obtained by cutting down the north and south
walls of the Norman chamber (perhaps ruinous) to the
level of the upper floor or roof of Chillenden's building,
so as to allow of this floor being extended over the
chamber below. A t the same time the porch and projecting
elongations of the two new chambers above i t
were constructed, by which the Pentise was truncated
below became a porch i n front portal arch, which received the passengers from the
the present state end employed various domestic
The space by the porch, shorn height by accumulation ground, scullery,—masonic methods does assuredly deserve,
but which, after all, may be preferable to a
damaging restoration. The Turret Vice has become the
mentioned.
distance from the Norman Pentise
is about two hundred and forty feet, which, as each
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTER:BURY. 141
dise and Heaven chambel's for the single Norman
chamber of the Gatehouse) were carried on in the following
order :-
The Pentise was first built and brought up complete
to the Norman face of the Pentise gatehouse, at that
time unaltered.
Next Chillenden's range of chambers was taken in
hand, and it became manifest that additional space
might be obtained by cutting down the north and south
walls of the Norman cham her ( perhaps ruinous) to the
level of the upper floor 01· roof of Chillenden's building,
so as to allow of this floor being extended over the
chamber below. At the same time the porch and projecting
elongations of the two new chambers abov~ it
wel'e constructed, by which the Pentise was truncated
in the awkward manner described above.
After the erection of the projecting timber front, the
space below became a porch in front of the Norman
portal arch, which received the passengers from the
Pentise or the court as before.
In the present state of the House, the south end of
the Pentise is employed as a shed for various domestic
offices. The space occupied by the vaulted Gatehall, its
portal, and the p01·ch, shorn of about three feet of its
original height by the accumulation of the ground, is
now closed at both ends, and converted into a servants'
hall and scullery,-a fate which so valuable and ancient
an example of masonic methods does assuredly not dese1
·ve, but which, after all, may be preferable to a
damaging restoration. The Turret Vice has become the
back staircase to the chambers above, being entered from
the servants' hall by the breach in the wall already mentioned.
The distance from the Norman face of the · Pentise
Gatehouse to the south side of the Norman Court Gate
is about b.vo hundred and forty feet, which, as e.ach
142 L I B CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
severy o f the Pentise occupies twelve feet, would give
all. The mode Chillenden's Celerer's a new passage Gatehouse
of the Curia and a repair of that Gatehouse."
destruction of the upper story of that edifice, but the
jamb of a Perpendicular window, close to the south
gable of the gatehouse (Fig. 30; and 35, Fig. 22), remains.
The "repair of the Court Gatehouse" applies to the upper
story and the inserted gateway arches described below.
2. Court Gatehouse.
In the course of our survey we have now passed in
and order through every o f precinct,
the end of the Green
T h e along us to the (p. 124 above), beyond the apparently least commenced Fig. specimen
of a pure Norman gatehouse, but has unfortunately
original chamber, rebuilt by Chillenden..
The east and west faces o f the Gatehouse in the
portion are flat, no projecting buttresses
turrets. T h e portal or simple
semicircle, twO orders shafts carrying narrow sculptured moldings. The flat
aule eelerarii via Port= ejuedem porte." . •
142 . . THE CONv.ENTUAL JJUILDINGS OF l'HE
severy of the Pentise occupies twelve feet, "vould give
twenty severies in all.. The exact mocle of its junction
with the latter Gatehouse is described below.
• In Chillenden 's List ( sect. 23) we find, under the head
of Repairs in the Curia or Green Court, "Certain repairs
of the Celerer's Hall, with a rtew passage to the Gatehouse
of the Curia and a repair of that Gatehouse."1
His repairs of the Celerer's Hall have vanished with the
destruction of the upper story of that edifice, but the
jamb of a Perpendicular window, close to the south
gable of the gatehouse (Fig. 30; and 35, Fig. 22), remains.
The "new passage" is plainly the Pentise, and the
" repair of the Court Gatehouse" applies to the upper
story and the inserted gateway arches described below.
• 2. Cou1·t Gatehouse.
In the course of our survey we have now passed in
detail and order th1·ough evei-y part of the precinct,
excepting the north · encl 9f the west side of the G1·een
Court, and its north side. The Pentise along the west
side has led us to the Court Gatehouse, already partly
described (p. 124 above), beyond which is the North
Hall, appa1·ently erected, or at least commenced at the
same time with it.
The "Court Gate" (plan, Fig-. 31) is.an excellent spe•
cimen of a pure Norman gatehouse, but has unfortu•·
nately lost its oxiginal upper cbambex, that having been
rebuilt by Chillenden.
The east and west faces of the Gatehouse in the
Norman portion are fiat, and have no prnjecting buttresses
or turrets. The portal or gateway is a simple
semicii-cle, ornamented in front by two shallow orcJers of
shafts carrying narrow sculptured moldings. The fiat
1 "Quodammodo reparatio nule celero.rii cum nova via. ad Portam Curie,.
et reparatio ejusdem porte.'' .
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 4 3
spandrel of the arch on each side has a shallow, archheaded
pannel and a circular panne', bordered with
zigzag.' The soffit of the gateway arch plain deep. T h e Gate Hall is vaulted with a plain waggon
plain, transverse
The outer walls of Chillenden's upper chamber are
plain, and it has at the west end a high perpendicular
window of two lights, with a transom, and at the east a
lights—restoration, the old one. I t s roof timbers consist of plain tie-beams,
with curved braces below at each end in the usual
This chamber was originally reached by a staircase from
the floor of the North Hall, which still remains.
building of Perpendicular date, on the south side, as
Plan entered by pointed
doorway (D) from the Gate Hall. I t s eastern wall (C)
retains portion south wall. This exhibits
a fragment of Perpendicular molding, apparently
These remains are enclosed
1 I n Norman circular gables north-west Chapter House, Brewhouse and Granary, where we find arch or flanked pannels The Gatehouse
drawn window three circular now remaining, been s The seven The span the two seventeen The 'the Christchurch Gatehouse,
one fifteen feet nineteen The the Abbaye
aux Caen, (Vide Pugba's Normandy?)
:MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 143
spandrel of the arch on each side has a shallow, archheaded
pannel and a circular pannel, bordered with
zigzag.1 The soffi.t of the gateway arch is plain and
deep.!~ 'The Gate Hall is vaulted with a plain waggon
vault, divided into two severies by a plain, broad, transverse
rib, springing from pilasters of the same dimensions.
The outer walls of Chillenden's upper chamber are
plain, ancl it has at the west end a high perpendicular
window of two lights, with a trnnsom, anrl at the east a
low window of six lights-a restoration, apparently, of
the old one. Its roof timbers consist of plain tie-beams,
with cm;ved braces below at each end in the usual
manner, carrying a flat roof slightly raised in the middle.
This chamber was originally reached by a staircase from
the floor of the North Hall, which still l'emains.
The Porter's Lodge of the Court Gate was a subsidiary
building of Perpendicular date, on the south side, as
shewn in the Plan (Fig. 31), and entered by a pointed
doorway (D) from the Gate Hall. Its eastern wall (C)
1·etains a small portion of the south wall. This exhibits
a fragment of Perpendicular molding, apparently
belonging to a doorway. These remains are enclosed
t In the N 01·man drawing circuln.r openings are shewn in the gables or
the north-west transept of the Chapter House, the Dormitory, and the
J3rewhouse and Granary, where we .find an arch headed slit 02• pannel,
flanJred by two circular pannels or openings. The pediment of the Gate.
house we are considering is drawn with a two-light window and th1·ee of
these ch-cular pannels, which, although in all these cases simply delineated
as round black spots, are in all probability intended for such pannels as
those now remaining, which may have been originally openings to light
the spandrels of the vault within.
2 The entire depth of the portal is seven feet six inches, of which five
feet three inches is plain soffit. The span of the arch is but tvro feet less
than the width of the Gate Hall behind it, which is seventeen feet eight
inches. The entire length of this gatehouse from ·east to west is thirty-six
feet; the lengths of the Pentise Gatehouse and of the Ohristehurch Gatehouse,
thirty-one feet and twenty-seven feet, and the breadth of their halls,
:fifteen feet; and nineteen feet. The deep, plain, waggon vaulted portals
of the two Norman gates assimilate them to the Gatehouse of the Abba.ye
auX Dames at Cuen, founded by Lanfranc. (Vide.:Pugin's 'Normandy.')
144 T H iq CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OP THE
in the house now assigned to the Auditor. Somner's
Note to the 6th Stall in the Distribution Document
Appendix,' No, us under Gate, southwards, was not only a door opening into the
Fig. 31.--3LAR OF COURT GATE, ETC.
.then Porter's Lodge, but also another door (E) opening
into that long entry or Pentise. Thi s doorway still
remained when I drew the plan Fig. 31, and was only
lately removed. I t was a pointed arch, with a single
those inserted. The Porter's Lodge was removed to the north side, as
till lately, in 1550.
North Hall or A la Nova.
The Norman entrance gateway which we have considered
144 • THE CONVENTU.A.L BUILDINGS OF THE
in the house now assigned to the Auditor. Somner's
Note to the 6th Stall in the Distribution Document
(' Appendix,' No .. VIII.), tells us that under the Court
Gate, southwards, was not only a door opening into the
Fig. 31.-l'LA.N' 01' COUltT GA.Tll7 ETC •
. then Pol'ter's Lodge; but also another door (E) opening
into that long entry or Pentise. This doorway still
remained when I drew the plan Fig. 31, and was only
lately removed. It was a • pointed arch, with a single
hollow molding, like those of the inserted gate-arches.
The Porter's Lodge was removed to the north side, as
till lately, in 1550. •
3. North., Hctll m· Ll.ula Nova.
The Norman entrance gateway which we have consi-:
dered above appears to have been built at the same time
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 4 5
the extended northward, the
This Hall is labelled " Aula Nova" in the Norman
drawing, and termed the _Mg g in the Distribution
described as room.es ye ye whole garden with the vaults and towne wall."
I t is termed the North in a charter of Henry VI.
(Somner, 112), and "the Gate"
amongst the works of Prior De Estria in 1290, who
repaired it.
Somner, not having seen the Norman drawing, was misled.
into applying the name " Domus Hospitum" in the
Chapter Documents to this building, and on his authority
Gostling retained it, although he wrote after the publication
of that drawing, which he frequently mentions.
being raised upon a vaulted substructure, and
by The
was plain transverse arches
and groins. The entire length of the building, when
my north, and about one hundred and. forty-six internally;
breadth externally forty-feet, and internally
thirty-The substructure
a the east.
By and measuring of this edifice, I found the number o f its transverse
severies nine,' my supposes bare no real wall 153, MONASTERY OF CHRIST OHURCH IN CANTE.Rl3URY. 145.
with the long Hall that extended northward from the
Gate Tower to the ancient boundary line of the Convent.
This Hall is labelled "Aula Nova" in the Norman
d1·awing, and termed the Hog_q Hall in the Distribution
Document, 1546, in which it is described as " ye whole
Lodging that Mr. Crosse had beneath and above with all
manner of roomes within y0 gate, called ye Hogg Hall,
the whole garden with the vaults and towne wall."
It is termed the ·N01·tli Hall in a charter of Henry VI.
(Somner, 112), and" the great Hall next the Court Gate"
amongst the works of Prior De Est1·ia in 1290, who
repaired it.
Somner, not having seen the Norman drawing, was misled
into a.pplying the name " Domus Hospitum" in the
Chapter Documents to this building, and on his authority
Gostling retained it, although he wrote after the publication
of that drawing, which he frequently mentions.
• The Hall itself was a genuine specimen of the Norman
form, being raised upon a vaulted substructure, and
having access to its floor by an external staircase. The
substructure was vaulted with plain transverse arches
and groins. The entire length of the building, when
complete, was one hundred and fifty-four feet, according
to my measurement, from the south outer corner to the
no1-th, and about one hundred and forty-six internally;
its b1·eadth externally forty-two feet, and internally
thh:ty-six feet. The form of the vaults of the substructure
shewed that the Hall above must have consisted of
a body twenty-five feet broad, with a single side-aisle on
the east.
By planning and measuring the scattered fragments
of this edifice, I found the number of its transverse
-sevel'ies or compartments to have been nine,1 as my Plan
1 Gostling supposes the number to have been ten, but had evidently
taken no measurements to determine :the renl facts. The buttresses against
the west side of the wrul were built in 1566 (pp. 158, 157, 159).
VOL. VII.
L
146 T H 141 CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
shews. The body of the Hall was on the west side, and
the vaults beneath it in two ranges sustained by a row
of cylindrical Norman pillars, placed along the middle'
of its length. The substructure of its side aisle was but
nine feet wide, and the wall that divided the aisle from
substructure an arcade squareedged,
plain Norman arches, resting on square piers.
The southern compartment was till lately occupied by.
porter, and preserves that portion vaulted
substructure. I t is now used as a schoolroom.
the wall, the
Norman gateway and the great Hall, retains the respond
separated body the Hall from its single side-aisle.' I f their piers rested
on those of the vault below, there would have been
pier arches. B u t piers wall o f the house, behind the Norman staircase, is
externally, and apparently its original position;
and this pier stands nearly over the middle of the
subvault arch. This shews that there were only eight
The Norman,
or Early English style.2 The archspring, of which
a The buildrig
of lath and plaster in 1843, engraved in Summerly's
Handbook' (p. 106). Subsequently the late Mr. Austin
Norman façade above arches, ancient called Eastbridge Hospital, Street,
the
expense of 4d., one side-arches, on crypt. This appears shew 2 height archspring shafts,
.octagonal one and inches in 146 THE CONVENTU.A.L BUILDINGS OF . THE
shews. The body of the Hall was on the west side, alid
the vaults beneath it in two ranges sustained by a row
of cylindrical Norman pillars, placed along the middle·
of its length. The substructure· of its side aisle was but
nine feet wide, and the wall that divided the aisle from
the body of the substructure was an arcade of square-.
edged, plain Norman arches, resting on square piers.
The southern compartment was till lately occupied by
the porter, and preserves that portion of the vaulted
• substructure. It is now used as a schoolroom.
On the first-floor the wall; which is common to the
Norman gateway and the great Hall, retains the respond
of · the row of pier arches which sepaTated the body of
the Hall from its single side~aisle.1 If their piers rested
on those of the vault below, there would have been
nine pier arches. But one of the piers built into the
wall of the house, behind · the Norman staircase, is
visible externally, and apparently in its original position
; and this pier stands nearly over the middle of the
subvault arch. This shews that there were only eight
pier arches. The pier and respond are of very late Norman,
or Early English 13tyle.2 The archspring, of which
-a fragment remains above, shews the pier arches to have
been of a single order, with plain chamfered edges.
; • The superstructure of the Porter's lodge was a buildng
of lath and plaster in 1843, engraved in 'Summedy's
Handbook' (p. 106 ) . . Subsequently the late :Mr. Austin
raised a modern Norman fa~ade of stone above the old
arches; which still remains.
1. The ancient building called Eastbridge Hospital, in High Street,
founded to give every pilgrim a night's lodging and entertainment at th~
eicpense ot 4d., consists of a Hall with one side-aisle and a row of pier
·arches,.the whole standing 011 a ci-ypt. This appears to sbew that the
construction was usual for lodging poor pilgrims.
• Their 'hei"'ht from pavement to arohspring seven feet six, with shnfls,
-octagono.l.in ine a.nd cylindrical in .the other, four feet ten high, and one
foot eight inches'in diameter.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY' . 1 4 7
Norman and. example
highly engraved.'
I t Storer's
view of this Norman staircase in 1813 (pl. 10), exhibits
a portion Hall, time employed as the Registry, which retained
Norman substructure large Early This window has a richly molded pointed
on shaft, cylindrical base,
and capital as usual. The opening square-headed, and the tympanum above its transom
has a sunk circular pannel, with Early English moldingsl
containing ornamental sketch, which unfortunately contains little more
than half the breadth of the window. I t may be supposed
the whole east front of the building, and were introduced
arches But it is not improbable that this Aula Nova, although
shown as finished the Norman drawing,
carried time,
that the great of 1174, concentrating erection
superstructure to the first years He ninth prebendary, was fitted up for his use by floors and
afterwards became that Auditor; but was disagreeably and con-
1 Ancient Storer's Cathedrals,' pl. '145. Felix 'P. L2
MONA.Sl'ERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY, 147
• The N ol'man staircase which projects from the fourth
severy on the south is a unique and beautiful example
of highly enriched Norman, and has been often engraved.1
It has fortunately escaped destruction hitherto. Storer's
view of this Norman staircase in 1813 (pl. 10), exhibits
on the south side a portion of the wall of the Hall, at
that time employed as the Registry, which retained
above the Norman substructure a lal'ge Early English
window. This window has a richly molded pointed
arch-head of one order on shaft, with cylindrical base,
plinth, and capital as usual. The window opening is
square-headed, and the tympanum above its tmnsom
has a sunk circular pannel, with Early English moldings,
c<;>ntaining an ornamental device, obscurely indicated in
.the sketch, which unfortunately contains little more
than half the breadth of the window. It may be supposed
that windows of this pattern were employed along
the whole east fropt of the building, and were introduced
when the new superstructure with the above-mentioned
pointed · arches was erected.
But it is not improbable that this Aula Nova, although
shewn as a finished building in the Norman drawing,
was not completely carried. up to its roof at that time,
and that the great fire of 117 4, by concentrating all
building works upon the church, postponed the e1·ection
of the superstructure of the Aula to the first years of
the Early English style.
Gostling, who was born about the year 1696, informs us
that the north part of this Hall was pulled down in 1730.
He says that "this portion, which was the house of the
ninth prebendary, was fitted up for his use by floors and
partitions, and afterwards by exchange became that of
the Auditor; but was disagreeably situated and con-
•
1 Carter's 'Ancient Architecture.' Storer's 'Cathedrals,' vol. i. pL 10.
Turner's .'Domestic Architecture,' p. 42. Rickman's 'Gothic Architecture,'
6th edit. p. 145. Felix. Summerly, •Handbook of Canterbury,' 1843, p. 108.
L2
148 T . 1 1 . 8 CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
trived, and was given up to the Dean and Chapter in
I t about forty broad, and was taken down with the vaults
under i t , and other chambers and offices, and the
materials sold."1 A s Gostling knew the building and
witnessed its demolition, we may accept his description
•of a and much some
of our parish churches, having one-third of its breadth
arches which were continued for the length o f the whole
building, and are to be seen in what remains of it."'
"The porter of the Green Court Gate," he continues,
"had his Lodge on the south side of the gate, but was
removed to the opposite side of it" 3 (Sotnner's note to
the 6th Stall in the Distribution Document' informs
removal Appendix,' Three
of the vaults the breadth of the building are taken up
Lodge, and three to them to the Almonry or Mint Yard."
These passages, written contemporary' the
body single aisle extended from one
end of the Hall to the other.
Hall has discovered,
except that it was employed in the middle ages
for the Steward's courts at B u t as close the entrance gate
the monastic buildings and the church, declared
my i t intended
accommodate the was erected i n the twelfth century, when, as
Hudson Turner 6 us,, Great Hall, ' G o s t l i n g , 156. 2 153. 3 pia., 4 Domestic Architecture, p. 2.
148 ·• THE CONVENTUAL :BUILDINGS OF THE •
trived, and was given up to the Dean and Chapter in
that year. It was between fifty and sixty feet long, and
about forty broad, and was taken down with the vaults
under it; and other chambers and offices, nnd the
materials sold."1 As Gostling knew the building and
witnessed its· demolition, we may accept his description.
of it as " a very large and lofty room, much like some
of our parish churches, having one-third of its breadth .
parted by pillars and archtls of stone (like a side-aisle),
,which were continued for the length ·of the whole
building, and are to be seen in what remains of it."2
"The porter of the Green Court Gate," he continues,
"had his Lodge on the south side of the gate, but was
1·emoved to the opposite side of it"(Somner's note to
the 6th Stall in the 'Distribution Document' informs
us of this wmoval in 1550, 'Appendix,' No. 8). Three
·of the vaults the breadth of the building are taken up
by this Lodge, and the three next to them by a way
to the Almonry or Mint Yard."
Th~se passages, written by a contemporary of the
alteration, are valuable for the observation that the plan
of a body with a single aisle was extended from one
·end of the Hall to the other. •
The purpose of · this Hall. has never been exactly discovered,
except that it was employed in the middle ages
fo1· holding the Steward's courts at intervals of three
weeks. But placed as it is close to the entrance gate
and at .the most remote corner of the precinct from the
·monastic buildings and the church, I have already declared
my opinion, in Chap. III. above, that it was intended
to accommodate the lowest class of pilgrims or
persons who craved hospitality.
• It was erected in the twelfth centuxy, when, as
l:}:uds9n Turn.er4 informs us,. "the .Gr~at :flall, generally
l Gostlfog, p. 155.· 2 Ibid., p. 158. 8 Ibid., p. 154.
. • • ~ Domestio Architecture, p. 2.
MONASTERY OP CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 4 9
on the ground-floor, was sometimes over a lower story
which was half in the ground, and was adapted in great
mansions to accommodate the owner and his numerous
followers and servants: They not took their in
the hall, but also slept in it on the floor." Such being the
manners of the early centuries, it appears that a plain
Hall was enough to • supply all the requirements o f
lodging and sleeping of the lower orders, at least, of the
pilgrims. Lenoir ('Architecture Monastique,' t. ii. p. 397),
describing the distributions of food and alms to the poor,
relates that in the lesser monasteries they were made in
an outer court or in a chamber appropriated to the purpose
and termed the Almonry ; but that in the great
abbeys a special house, called the "house of the pilgrims
and paupers," was built close to the principal entrance
of the monastery. Referring to the plan of S. Gall (vide
Archl. Journal, vol. v.), he contrasts the sleeping-chambers
of the Hospitium for travellers of the higher classes,
each of which is furnished with several beds, with the
unfurnished Dormitory of the poor pilgrims, in which
he infers that they slept on the floor upon straw.
4. Brewhouse, Bakehouse, and Stables.
The north boundary of the Green Court retains an
oblong range o f building, with a high pitched roof,
which has a gatehouse, projecting from its face near its
east end. The passage under this gatehouse divides the
building into two unequal parts. B u t the gatehouse
furnishes an entrance to the stable yards and servants'
offices behind, . which are concealed from ,view hy the
range of buildings we are considering, which manifestly
occupy the site of the buildings in the Norman drawing.
• I n that we see • a long edifice divided by a wall- into
two parts, and standing on the north side of the Court,
at a distance of about seventy feet from the old precinct
wall and one hundred feet from the city wall.
MONA.STERY OF CHRIS~ CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 149
on the ground-floor, was sometimes over a lower story
which was half in the ground, and was adapted in great
mansions to accommodate the owner and his numerous
followers and servants : They not only toolc thefr meals in
the hall, but also slept in it on the floor." Such being the
manners of the early centuries, it appears that a plain
Hall was enough to· supply all the requirements of
lodging and sleeping of the lower orders, at least, of the
pilgrims. Lenoir(' Architecture Monastique,' t. ii. p. 3 97),
describing the distributions of food and alms to the poor,
relates that in the lesser monasteries they were made in
an outer court or in a chamber appropriated to the purpose
and termed the Almonry ; but that in the great
abbeys a special house, called the" house of the pilgrims
and paupers," was built close to the principal entrance
of the monastery. Referring to the plan of S. Gall (vide
.Archl. Journa,l, vol. v.), he contrasts the sleeping-chambers
of the Hospitium for travellers of the higher classes,
each of which is furnished with several beds, with the
unfurnished Dormitory of the poor pilgrims, in which
he infers that they slept on the floor upon straw.
4. Brewliouse, Bakehouse, and Stables.
The. north boundary of the Green Court retains an
oblong range of building, with a high pitched roof,
which has a gatehouse, projecting from its face near its
east end. 'fhe passage under this gatehouse divides the
building into two unequal parts. But the gatehouse
furnishes an entrance to the stable yards and servants'
offices behind,. which are concealed from .view ~y the
l'ange of buildings.we are considering, which manifestly
occupy the site of the buildings• in- the Norman drawing.
• In ·that we see· a long edifice ·divided by a wall· into
. two parts, and standing on the north side of_ the Court,
at a distance of about seventy feet from the old precinct
wall and one hundred feet fro':ll the city wall.
150 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
western portion labelled BRACINUNI, Brewhouse;
the eastern is the PISTRINUNI, or Bakehouse.
interval, GRANARIUNI,
The space between this Granary and the Bakehouse
.filled Forrens Gate. The Brewhouse and Bakehouse
Dissolution.
assigned as "all and the Bakehouse, These the Granarium.
entries the documents that belong to this
:—
1 2 8 5 to 1290. Magna grangia a d fenum.
New Buildings . G r e a t Barn for hay.
and Repairs. 1 3 0 1 . Novum stabulum Thesaurarii cum solario
et parvo granario. N e w Stable
for the Treasurer, with upper chamber
and small Granary.
Novara granarium i n bracino. N e w
Granary in the Brewhouse or Malt-
• h o u s e .
1317. Pro novo bracino granar', Ca-
• m i n o , &c. F o r the new Brewhouse
c.
In Chillenden.'s Repairs Curia," "Reparacio domus . . . sartrina
. . . Novum grana-Nov-um stabulum
Prioris . . . . Novum orrium pro feno Prioris."
is to say,—repair Brewhouse, for Prior's The Pistrinum does appear building Gateway
Domus 150 THE CONYENTUAL llUILDINGS OF THE
The weste1n portion is labelled BRACINUM, or Brew..house;
the eastern is the PISTRINUM, or Bakehouse.
Next to these, with a small interval, is the GRAN.ARIUM,
or Granary, ranging in front with the others.
The space between this Granary and the Bakehouse
is that which is now filled by the tower gateway, termed
the Forrens Gate. The Bmwhouse and Bakehouse
retained these functions at the time of the Dissolution.
For this range was assigned to the Dean, and described
as" all the Brewhouse and the Bakehouse, and all other
houses unto the Dean's Stable, and the Gatehouse there
next to his stables." These Stables were on the site of
the Norman Granai·ium.
The entries in the documents that belong to this
region are as follows :-
De Estria,
New Buildings
and .Repairs.
1285 to 1290. Magna grangia ad fenum.
Great Barn for hay.
1801. Novum stabulum. Thesaurarii cum solaria
et parvo granario. New Stable
for the Treasurer, with upper chamber
and small GTanary.
1308. Novum granarium in bracino. New
Granary in the Brewhouse or Malt.
house.
1817. Pro ndvo bracino cum gra,nar', et ca-mino,
&c. For the new Brewhouse
. and Granary, with chimney, &c.
In Chillenden's list, under "Repairs in the Curia,'' are
found-
1390 to 1411. "Reparacio domns bracini .... Nova sartrinit
.. . . Novum. grana.rium . . . . Novum stabulum
Prioris . . . . Novum orriurn pro feno Prioris." .
That is to say,-1·epair of the Brewhouse, new Tailor's
• Shop, new Granary, new Stable for the Prior, new Barn
• fo1· the P110i·'s ·hay. The Pistrinu~ does not appear in
these entries; but the whole building west of the -Gate~
way is included in the term " Domus bracini."
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 5 1
The arChitectural character of this range fully bears
I t s Decorated
whole, repairs. The east ancient " granarium”)
The
Bracinum retains the projecting porch, which is an admirable
I subjoin a sketch (Fig. 32). Being in a decayed con-
11111
-----,41.1
' b ! O l Oft qi-I
II I M O
i I I I i t i t •
OM N W o f " . . \ ‘ '
onsork' V \A.
IftliMirei V * s
% —
— I i t8A
1 1 \ AY
F i g . 32.-POECH OP THE BEAOINUM.
i t partly between
gateway square Perpendicular
windows are inserted, the one with two lights,
the MONASTERY OF OBRIST ORUlWH IN CANTJmilURY. 151
The architectural character of this range fully bears
out the above documentary quotations. Its style is Der
corated on the whole, but has Perpendicular insertions
and repairs. The east part (the ancient" granarium.")
beyond the gateway has no architectural character. The
Bracinum retains the projecting porch, which is an ad~
mirable dated specimen of De Estria's style, and of which
I subjoin a sketch (Fig. 32). Being in a decayed con-
~
Fig. 32.-PORCll OP Tl:Ul DD.AOINVM.
dition, it has been during the last year partly restored
Four buttresses are in front of this portion, and ·betwee1:1
the last and the projecting ·gateway two square Perpen.
dicular windows are inserted, the one with two ·light$,
the other of a single light, foliated, but not of -the same
width as the other.
152 T I M , CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
The Gatehouse termed " the Forrens Gate" has a wide
section as those at the west end, and a small pointed
postern arch at the side. I t s Gate Hall is not vaulted.
Above is a chamber with an ordinary square small Perpendicular
The space between the Brewhouse and Stable buildings
and the city bears the Forrens.
But this term is confined in Wilkes's plan to the tower
ye forrins.'
ALMONRY AND SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCHYARD.
Almonry or Mint Yard have been demolished in the
alterations, make room more complete and
convenient edifices for the King's School. They had
history architecture the
I n my I outlines
buildings, history
The founded Henry the Eighth, and located in the buildings
Yard, was afterwards
transferred stood
on its south side. I t s site is at 84 (Plate 3).
Free School, for the city chiefly, and was on the righthand,
from
defined .Efearne's Robert probably
tower Hasied which
is
on was boundary,
to the jurisdiction of the Church 573, 575).
152 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
The Gatehouse te1·med" the Forrens Gate" has a wide
four-centred arch, with continuous moldings of the same
section as those at the west end, and a small pointed
postern arch at the side. Its Gate Hall is not vaulted.
Above is a chamber with an ordinary squarn small Perpendicular
window of two lights.
The space between the Brewhouse and Stable buildings
and the city wall beru·s the name of the Forrens.
But this term is confined in Wilkes's plan to the tow~r
in the city wall behind these buildings, which he labels
'1 /01'-J•ins. 1 ..
CHAP. VIII.
ALMON.RY AND SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCHYARD.
The whole of the ancient buildings that occupied the
Almonry or Mint Yard have been demolished in the
late alterations, to make room for more complete and
convenient edifices for the King's School. They had
been so often altered that they presented no features in
illustration either of the history of architectur~ or the
monastic economy. In my plan I have retained the outlines
of these buildings, and beg to refer for their history
to the well-known authorities. The King's School,
founded by Henry the Eighth, and located in the buildings
on the east side of the Mint Y ai·d, wa.s afterwards
transfel'red to the Chapel of the Almonry, which stood
on its south side. Its site is at 84 (Plate 3 ).
But the old schoolhouse before the Dissolution was a
Free School, for the city chiefly, and was on the rig·hthand,
just within the gate which divided the outer fro~
. .
1 The word is defined in the Glossaries to mean a necessary house (vide
Hearne'e 'Robert of Glocester's Chronicle,' 1724, p. 650), which was probably
true for the t.ower in question. But Hasted derives the term, ':hie~
is now applied to the whole stable-yard, from the fact that that region xs
on the part of the site which anciently was outside the Convent boundo.t·y,
and therefore "foreign" to' thejurisdicti~n·oftlie Ohw·oh (pp. 673,676),
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 5 3
the inner cemetery (at 98, Plate 3). There was a passage
to i t from Street,' below..
After the removal of the school to the Mint Yard it was
fitted up as a new plumbery, as Gostling informs us
135).
The Plumbarium, or plumbers' workshop, is twice
mentioned in the documents; first in De Estria's list
works,—" old, plumbarium,
with hood and chimney ;" and secondly, in.
Chillenden's list (1390-1411),—" New sacristy in the
cemitery, with a new plurabarium." I t s locality is indicated
in the Distribution document, by which the ninth
is to have " Coks lodging, with the
Plum,ery the School's garden," the hill being the base o f the
Campanile in the Norman drawing.'
IX. 3), is the site of the ninth Prebendary's house. Lead is so
employed about the great churches and
convent roofs, window glazing, water
pipes Plumbarium, The last building which remains to be mentioned is
Christ Church the directly across "I t the advantage contemporary inscription,
fixing its date at A.D. 1517, in the time of Prior
Goldston II. I t is much loftier than the Norman gateways,
having two stories of chambers above its hall, and
the angles front. I t entered gateway 1 Vide other, up he a late clone pulled (Ian., p.6.)
MONASTERY OF OB:RIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 153
the inner cemetery (at 98, Plate 3). There was a passage
to it from Burgate Street,1 of which more below:
After the removal of the school to the Mint Yard it was
fitted up as a new plumbery, as Gostling informs us
(p. 135 ).
The Plu·mbariurn, or plumbers' workshop, is twice
mentioned in the documents; :fhst in De Estria's list
(1285-90) of works,-" New chamber in the 014 plumbarium,
with hood and chimney;" and secondly, in
Chillenden's list (1390-1411),-" New sacristy in the
cemitery, with a new plumbarium." Its loqality is indicated
in the Distribution document, by which the ninth
prebendary is to have ." Mr. Coks lodging, with the
Plumer!} and close and gardens impaled upon the hill, to
the School's garden," the hill being the base of the
Campanile in the Norman drawing.2
The Plumbarium was therefore at IX. (Fig. 3), which
is the site of the ninth Prebendary's house. Lead is so
plentifully employed about the great churches and
offices of a convent for the roofs, window glazing, water
channels, and pipes that a Plurnbariuni was a necessity,
although very rarely mentioned in monastic records.
The last building which 1·emains to be mentioned is
Chl'ist Chlll'ch Gatehouse (94), the principal entrance to
the Precinct from the city, leading directly across the
churchyard, or "exterior cemitery," to the south porch of
the nave. It is a noble specimen of the Perpendicular
period, with the advantage of a contemporary inscription,
· fixing its date at .A..D. 1517, in the time of Prior
Goldston II. It is much loftier than the Norman gateways,
having two sto1·ies of chambers above its halJ, and
towers at the angles of its front. It is ente.red • by a
wide gateway arch, flanked by a postern doorway.
1 Vide Somner, p. 105.
• 2 This Campanile, in one shape or other, existed up to Leland's time,
for ho tells us it is "now ajate elene pulled down." (Itin., vol. vi., f. 3,
P· 6.)
154 • T H E CONVENTUAL nUILDINGS OF THE
Its Gate Hall differs from the Norman gateways by
square, I t with a ribbed O n west side, close to the postern, is a door which leads to a
in is -with Somner shews that this gate replaced a more ancient one on the
spot, i t stands opposite that But ancient
of. Battely (p. 89), the charters called the
cemetery, street 'Church, Corn to gate. The
of Garlingl gateway,
which was called Michael's Gate, leading
St. Michael's Street ?) to St. Michael's
in the south cross aisle of the church. T h e last
Characteristic of the passage seems to identify it with
which remains 97 my plan (Plate 3),
This be the passage Somner us, SchOol.
The oldest cemetery gate from the town, as shewn in
the Norman drawing, stood in the line of the original
near the spot marked 99 Plate 3 (which
corresponds. porta •terii" in Plate 2), about one hundred and ' feet
I t to find Somner information
position. the now forgotten. inhabitants,—Alderman
Nicholson, Alderman Garling, Edge, 154 . THE CONVENTUAL .BUILDINGS OF THE
Its Gate Hall differs from the Norman gateways by
its plan, which is a square, nineteen feet across. It is
covered with • a: ribbed vault in two severies. On the
west side, close to the postern, is a door which leads to a
vice in the turret, and ia the same wall, near the north
corner, lS a niche in the wall with a seat. Somner (p.105)
sbews that this gate replaced a more ancient one on the
same spot, because it stands opposite a dwelling-house
which in 1257 is recorded to have stood opposite to the
·Church Gate of that period. But he mentions a more ancient
gate, standing higher up, somewhat near Burgate, a
good part of" which in his time was remaining, but built
up into part of a dwelling-house. Battely alludes to this
gate (p. 89), which in the old charters was called the
old gate of the cemetei·y, and informs us that anciently
there was a direct passage or street open from the east
end of St. Andrew's ChuTCh, through the Coin Market
and Butter Market, directly leading to this gate. The
house of Alderman Garling1 was built in this old gateway,
which was called· St. Michael's Gate, as leading
from St. Michael's Street (Burgate 1) to St. Michael's
Chapel in the south cross aisle of the church. The last
characteristic of the passage seems to identify it with
that which still remains at 97 in my plan (Plate 3),
and points directly to this south transept. This appears
to be the passage which, as Somner tells us, led to the
old School.
The· oldest cemetery gate from the town, as shewn in
the Norman drawin·g, stood in• the line of the original
Precinct, near the spet marked 99 in Plate 3 (which
corresponds to the position of the Norman "porta cime-
. tedi" in Plate 2), about one hundl'ed and· forty feet
" . . ,
1 It is amusing to :find Somn.er and Battely describing, for the informa•
tion of posterity, the position of the gates, by referring them to the street
. houses under thenowforgotten. names of the then inhabitants,-.A.ldorman
. Nicholson,. ~de~n Gar+ing, Mr. Fjdge, etc.
•
1110NASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 5 5
that an open the
same manner as the Green Court Gate was, until the
approached narrow between
the Almonry Chapel and Palace wall.
gateway and outer remained in the position (Plate 3) given to i t in the
Norman drawing until the first half of the present century,
the old Convent garden wall at 2. I t is simply a stone
massive piers. I t has an opening feet wide, and a total depth of eight feet. I t s west and
pair order of moldings. The passage through it is splayed,
is to hang the
gates. B u t i f they were really hung there they must
straight-rising higher than impost of the arch, for the passage has a plain waggon
The Norman drawing probability,
this very gate, gives a pair of doors with ornamental
hinges and fitting the arch-I f doors must outwards
like those of a coach-house.
Storer Portfolio,' iii.,1824) i t was moved the A t this period the gables had
assumed the Jacobean form made up curved lines
I t s that CHAP. I X . •
ARCHBISHOP'S PALACE.
my (Plate positions
of the few fragments of the Archbishop's Pa-
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY, 155
north of the line of Burgate Street, and must have been
approached from that street by an open lane, in the
same manner as the Green Court Gate was, until the
last alterations, approached by a narrow lane between
the Alrnonry Chapel and Palace wall.
The gateway between the inner and outer cemetery
remained in the position (Plate 3) given to it in the
Norman drawing until the first half of the present century,
when it was taken down and rebuilt in the line of
the old Convent garden wall at 2. It is simply a stone
archway, with massive piers. It has an opening ten
feet wide, an.d a total depth of eight feet. Its west and
east faces have a pail- of slender shafts, bearing a single
order of moldings. The passage through it is splayed,
widening eastward, and there is a rebate to hang the
gates. But if they we1·e really hung there they must
have been straight-headed, not rising higher than the
impost of the arch, for the passage has a plain waggon
vault. The Norman dxawing representing, in all probability,
this very gate, gives a pair of doors with ornan:
iental hinges and .fitting the arch-head. If this be a
true representation, these doors must have opened (?Ut-
wards like those of a coach-house.
The gateway is crowned with a pediment, or triangular
gable. Storer (' Portfolio,' v. iii., 1824) gives a sketch of
this archway before it was moved from its old position,
viewed from the east. At this period the gables had
assum~d the Jacobean form made up of curved lines
and angles. Its Norman decoration is of the same kind
• as that- of the Green Court Gate.
'
OHAP. IX. ·
AR.CHBISHOI?'S PA.LACE.
· In my general plan (Plate 3) I have inserted the positions
of the few fragments of the A:rchbishop's Pa1
5 6 L W ! , CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
lace that remain. I t will be seen that a great hall
side courtyard, and I t Early which justify the tradition that the original Palace was
Langton. N e x t
gateway to this courtyard, and of a larger building
88), the purpose unknown. The distribution
of the space on the south of the Hall is not
The south buildings
(90, 91) containing some of the apartments that constituted
the habitable part Palace. They are as architectural
Palace itself burnt accidentally, with its
appended buildings, and left in ruin until Archbishop
See, 1559. He Hall and Palace, but when the Puritans came into
power the whole was pulled down or converted into
tenements, which have been ever since leased out io
tenants. The whole site now belongs to the Dean and
Chapter. The site of the Celerer's Hall (70, 71, 64, 63)
garden, and form part of the boundary. T h e site o f the
Lodgings (57, 58, is as storeplace
writing i n 1769 (Antiq., vol.. ill. p. 4), says
right-angled parallelogram, north
and south sides measuring eighty-three feet, its east and
I t some the bounding walls, being demolished;
side still standing, two
same, probably designed beaufets or side-
156 THE CONVENTUAL ~UILDINGS OF THE
lace that remain. It will be seen that a great hall
occupied the south side of a large courtyard, and was
entered, as usual, by a projecting porch (89), which still
remains. It has moldings of the B!:1,rly English period,
which justify the tradition that the original Palace was
partly built by Archbishop Hubert or Langton. Next
to the street is or was ( at 87) the remains of an entrance
gateway to this courtyard, and of a larger building
( at 88), of which the purpose is unknown. The dis•
tribution of the space on the south of the Hall is not
altogether unknown. The Hall extended nearly to the
Convent wall eastward, and on the south are buildings
(90, 91) containing some of the apartments that constituted
the habitable part of the Palace. They are of
late style, and of little or no value, either as architectural
or for historical studies.
The Palace itself was burnt accidentally, with its
appended buildings, and left in ruin until Archbishop
Parker came to the See, in ~559. He rebuilt the Great
Hall and Palace, but when the Puritans came into
power the whole was pulled down or converted into
tenements, which have been ever since leased out to
tenants. The whole site now belongs to the Dean and
Chapter. The site of the Celerer's Hall (70, 71, 64, 63)
lies within a garden, of which its eastern and southern
walls form part of the boundary. The site of the
Celerer's Lodgings (57, 58, 61, 62) is used as a storeplace
for old materials.
•
Grose, Wl'iting in 1769 (.A.ntiq., vol.. iii. p. 4), says
"The hall was a 1·ight-angled parallelog1·am, its no1-th
and south sides measuring eighty-three feet, its east and
west sixty-eight feet. It is new a garden, the roof, and
even some of the bounding walls, ~eing demolished;
that on the east side is stir! standing, wherein are two •
Gothic canopies of Sussex marble, supported by pillars
of the satne, prob~bly designed for beaufets or sideMONASTERY
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 5 7
boards, the tops of which, growing ruinous, have been'
in part taken down. Along this side runs a terrace
on fragments one upon
the other, like billets on a woodstack. . . The traces
of the original north wall are still visible."
Gostling, a contemporary of Grose, states (p. 129)
on the outer side of east wall the hall
just described were the remains of a cloister of five
arches, eleven feet wide. According to the same authority,
communication between the Palace and the Churchyard
was cut off by a high embattled wall, extending to
the Arundel Steeple (N), until a door was broken through
in the seventeenth century. H e also mentions a lofty
house opposite the west door of the cloister, connected
by a noble gallery with the Great Hall. This house,
built or repaired by Archbishop Parker, retained traces
of a sheltered way to the west door of the cloister, by
palace church, without being incommoded by bad weather
The possibly alluded above document from Reg. 12 in the Archives, which is a
repairs necessary for the Palace the
century. I t enumeration
of the various apartments therein, and the
documents framed. I t drawn
-up t o determine the amount o f dilapidations when
Archbishop Islip succeeded Ufford i n 1349, whose
administrators were sentenced t o pay the sum o f
£1101 5s. 2d., as Battely relates (p. The apartments
enumerated are the Great Hall, the Chapel, the
small chamber of the Lord Archbishop, the Great
M0N.A.STERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 157
boards, the tops of which, growing ruinous, have been·
in pa1t taken down. .Along this side Tuns a terrace
raised on fragments of marble pillars, piled one upon
the other, like billets on a woodstack. . . . The traces
of the original north wall a1·e still visible."
. Gostling, a contemporary of Grose, states (p. 129)
that on the outer side of the east wall of the hall
just described were the remains of a cloister of five
arches, eleven feet wide. According to the same authority,
communication between the Palace and the Churchyard
was cut off by a high embattled wall, extending to
the Amndel Steeple (N), until a dool' was broken through
in the seventeenth century. He also mentions a lofty
·house opposite the west door of the cloister, connected
by a noble gallery with the Great Hall. This house,
built or repafred by Archbishop Parker, retained traces
of a sheltered way to the west door of the cloister, by
which the Archbishop might go from his palace to the
church, without being incommoded by bad weather
(Gostling, p. 131). The house and appendages (90, 91)
are possibly parts of those alluded to in the above description.
•
In the Appendix (No. 7) I have given an unpublished
·aocument from Reg. 12 in the Archives, which is a
report of the repairs necessary for the Palace in the
middle of the fourteenth century. It contains an enumeration
of the various apartments therein, and the
repairs they needed, which serves to elucidate the mode
in which such documents were framed. It was drawn
up to determine the amount of dilapidations when
Archbishop Islip succeeded Ufford in 1349; whose
administrators were sentenced to pay the sum of
£1101 5s. 2d., as Battely i-elates (p. 72). The apart•
ments enumerated are the Great Hall, the Chapel, the
small chamber of the Lord Archbishop, the Great
·Chamber, the kitchen for that chamber, the great house
1 5 8 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
called the Hall of St. Thomas next the Lord's Chamber,
the chamber next the Great Hall, two other chambers
between the Great Hall and Great Chamber, the Great
Kitchen, the Great Gate, with Stables.
Views of the ruins of portions of the Palace are given
in several works on Canterbury,—e.g., Grose, Antiq.
vol. iii. p. 4; Storer, pl. 8; and Woolnoth.
CHAPTER X .
WATERWORKS.
The details of the system of water distribution given
in the Norman drawings have not been examined by
any writer, as far as I know. They have always appeared
to me to offer a most valuable record of the
state of hydraulic practice in the twelfth century, and a
monument of the care with which the monks studied
practical science, and applied their knowledge for the
benefit of their own health and comfort and of mankind
in general. I shall now therefore endeavour to trace
the entire system as well as my knowledge of the site
and buildings will enable me to do it.
In describing the receptacles of the water in the
system, it will be convenient to employ the word "tank"
as a general term for a fixed vessel into which water is
supplied by a feed-pipe, the opening of which is sufficiently
above the highest level at which the water is
required to stand, which water is kept from overflowing
by a waste-pipe, the opening of which coincides with
that level. The water is drawn from the tank for use
from one or more apertures at or near the bottom of it.
Laver is the English term for the Lavatorium of the
monks, and I confine i t to express the large tank of
ornamental form, from which the water either spouts
continually at certain points of its circumference or is
drawn off by means o f several metallic cocks. T h e
158 THE CONVENTUA.L BUILDINGS OF THE
called the Hall of St. Thomas next the Lord's Chamber,
the chamber next the Great Hall, two other chambers
between the Great Hall and Great Chamber, the Great
Kitchen, the G.reat Gate, with Stables.
Views of the ruins of portions of the Palace are given
in several works on Canterbury,-e. g .• Grose, Antiq.
vol. iii. p. 4; Storer, pl. 8 ; and 11V oolnoth.
CHAPTER X.
WATERWORKS.
The details of the system of water distribution given
in the Norman dJ:awings have not been examined by
any writer, as far as I know. They have always appeared
to me to offer a most valuable record of the
stare of hydraulic practice in the twelfth century, and a
monument of the care with which the monks studied
practical science, and applied their knowledge for the
benefit of then: own health and comfort and of mankind
in general. I shall now therefore endeavour to trace
the entil'e system as well as my knowledge of the site
and buildings will enable l:Ile to do it.
In describing the receptacles of the water in the
system, it will be convenient to employ the wo1·d "tarzlc"
as a general term for a fixed vessel into which water is
supplied by a Jeea-pipe, the opening of which is sufficiently
above the highest level at which the water is
required to stand, which water is kept from overflowing
by a waste-pipe, the opening of which coincides with
that level. The water is drawn from the tank for use
from one or mote apertures at or near the bottom of it.
Laver is the English term for the Lavatorium of the
monks, and I confine it to express the large tank of
ornamental form, from which the water either spouts
continually at certain points of its circumference or is
drawn. off by means of sevel'al metallic cocks. The
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 5 9
Lavatorium used in the applied Chillenden's tank the middle of the south side of the Infirmary cloister,
I n Norman the
fons is applied to the circular another circular belonging the Prior. A second circular tank for the Prior is
cupa, and the great fish-a "tank," have given,
is termed cloister garths of the churches were furnished
with wells, which at first were placed i n the
centre of them, but in later ages against the front of
middle ablutions,
and covered roof or vault, sustained on
Lenoir gives plans Batalha and Montreal and elsewhere
311 et seq.), and. Leduc (art. p. the
Infirmary
cloister and outer cemetery are therefore the
original provisions for water before the hydraulic sys
tern constructed, inscription on former
retained reserve, serve happened fail require
repair. The in the cemetery was,the use inhabitants city, stone cistern or tank shewn the side both the Norman drawings, the course of the
its source same manner, so as to shew the two
same artist. I n MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 159
word Lavatoriu1n is not used in: the Norman drawing,
but is applied in Chillenden's list to the great tank. in
the middle of the south side of the Infirmary cloister,
miscalled the Baptistery. In the Norman drawing the
word Jons is applied to the circular tank in the outer
churchyard, and to another circular tank belonging to
the Prior. A second circular tank for the Prior is
termed cupa, a tub; ancl the great fish-pond, which is
also a" tank," according to the definition I have given,
is termed piscina.
The cloister garths of the early churches were furnished
with wells, which at first were placed in the
centre of them, but in later ages against the front of
the cloister alleys, either in the middle or at one of the
corners, for the greater convenience of the monks' ablutions,
and covered with a roof or vault, sustained on
open arches. Lenoir gives plans and drawings of such
arrangements at Batalha and Montreal and elsewhere
(p. 311 et seq.), and. Leduc (art. 'Lavabo,' p. 171) the
plans of two which project from the centre of the alley,
namely, at Thoronet and Fontenay.
The wells shewn in the Norman drawing in the Infirmary
cloister and outer cemetery are therefore the
original provisions for water before the hydraulic sys.:.
tem was consti·ucted, and, as the inscription on the former
shews, were retained in reserve, to serve when the
new sources happened to fail or their machinery to re~
quire repafr. The well in the cemetery was. probably
meant for the use of the inhabitants of the city, and
the stone cistern or tank shewn by the side of it in
the drawing, which is supplied by the hydraulic system,
was constructed for the same purpose.
In both the Norman drawings, the course of the
water from its source to the city wall is represented in
,exactly the same manner, so as to shew that the two
are the work of the same artist. In my engraving of
160 T H E CONVENTUAL EITILDINGS OF THE
smaller 33), have reference, and applied the same respectively position of the tanks in the Plan, Plate 2. The source
indicated by a circle which is a circular
conduit-house (B), into which the water is conducted.
I t leaves i t a is covered by I n to the city wall, it passes, in succession, through five reservoirs,
settling-they now termed. Each
these (lettered is oblong, placed
transversely to the general course of the pipes. Each
length of pipe leaves its reservoir at the east end of
the side, and enters the next at the west end of its side.
The employment of such tanks is in accordance with
the practice of the ancients, as recorded by Vitruvius
(1. viii. c. 6), who informs us that, in constructing cisterns
to receive rain or other water, their method was
water was to pass, so that the sediment might remain in
series, the become
it The from the conduit to C and D is inscribed campus, and
a representation growing corn. From passes vineyard the conventional
representation of vines; and from E to F is an
Pornerium) growing trees. The last settling-
A n bridge water, was conducted to the monastery
distributed different
places by tanks or cisterns there fixed, else places pipes 'main-
.pipes underground, from the upper ends of which i t
issued.
160 THE C0NVENTU.il BUILDINGS OF THE
the smalle1· drawing (Fig. 33), I have introduced letters
of reference, and applied the same respectively to the
position of the tanks in the Plan, Plate 2. The source
is indicated by a circle (A), near which is a circular
conduit-house (B), into which the water is conducted.
It leaves it by a pipe, which is covered by a circular
pierced plate, to exclude gross impurities. In its passage
to the city wall, it passes, in succession,. through five reservoirs,
or settling-tanks, as they are now termed. Each
of these (lettered from C to G) is oblong, and placed
transversely to the general course of the pipes. Each
length of pipe leaves its reservoil' at the east end of
the side, and enters the next at the west end of its side.
'Ihe employment of such tanks is in accordance with
the practice of the ancienra, as recorded by Vitruvius
(l. viii c. 6), who informs us that, in constructing cisterns
to receive rain or other water, their method was
to make several, one after the other, through which the
water was to pass, so that the sediment might remain in
those at the beginning of the series, and the water become
clear by the time it arrived at the last. The course
from the conduit to C and D is inscribed campus, and
has a representation of growing corn. From D to E
it passes through a vineyard (vinea), with the ·conventional
representation of vines; and from· E to Fis an
orchard (Pomeriu1n) with growing trees. The last settling-
tank (G) is placed against one of the towers of the
city wall. An edifice resembling a b1idge is built over
the city moat, probably to protect the pipe from injury.
The water, which was conducted to the monastery
.from its source as described, was disti·ibuted to the different
places that required it, either by filling certain
tanks or ciste1ns there fixed, or else by providing at
those places short vertical pipes soldered to the "mainpipes
underground, from the upper ends of which it
·issued. •
Opposite M.
F i g . 3 3 . - - I t E D I M E D FACSIMILE O F T H E S M A L L NORMAN D R AW I N G O F T H E WATERWORKS. ( S c a l e , o n e - h a l f o f t h e o r i g i n a l . )
,'
• !
!~
~ A.
1 \ l \
~
i
! :
f
,i
i I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
) . I
I
I
I
,I
B.
~ --- ~
\ -------------------------~⇒ -
i l. 1
! ~l11lb1 !, 4',;,,,_,(f
L.
'
·~·
c--=""'=~~.-~"""ijl lj, .Y...:...·---\ __ )
♦#
♦•
Opposite page 161.
Fig. 33.-11.lIDUCBD FACSntlLE OF THE SMALL NOlillAN DRAWu"IG OF THE WATERWORKS- (Seale, one-half of the original.)
MONASTERY O F CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 6 1
But it will observed in drawings, that at every
such place where the water is to be drawn off for use,
first sight resembles pin with a round head stuck into that part. F o r example,
end of each pipe terminates a
circle than the diameter of the appears
to be intended to represent the end of the pipe
horizontally; the p i n projects radially outwards
from the centre of this circle. I t must indicate.
contrivance opening and pipe at
B u t stopcock
was a well-known device even to the Romans,
being mentioned and described by Vitruvius, who wrote
beginning Christian era, name epistomium,' we may infer that this pin-like contrivance
is a rude symbol of a metallic cock, like those now in.
I n Lavatories these symbols may represent
small metal spouts radiating from the ornamental tank
or basins, and delivering small continuous streams.
system are considering, the having
precinct conveyed i n succession through a series tanks
fixed at a distance from each other, and each at a lower
than preceding, different monastery.
T h e whole o f the water is poured into the
first tank by the main-pipe from the springs, from,
i t i t
a sufficient supply.
This first waste-pipe descending to the ground is carried
below surface the second rises, upper end same level as second waste-parallel t o the feedpipe,
shorter, rises iUi
the next tank of the series to act as its feed-pipe, and.
Vitruvius, 1. ix. c. 10, anal. x. c. 13.
VOL. ATM
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH 1N CANTERl3tm.Y. lul
.But it w1l1 be obse1-ved in the drawings, that at every
such place where the water is to be drawn off for use,
there is an appendage which at first sight resembles a
pin with a round head stuck into that part. For ex.:
ample, the end of each vertical pipe terminates in a
cixcle larger than the diameter of the pipe, which ap-:
pears to be intended to represent the end of the pipe
turned horizontally; the pin projects radially outwards
from the centre of this circle. It must indicate.
some contrivance for opening and closing the pipe at
pleasure, like a plug, spigot, or cock. But as the stopcock.
was a well-known device even to the Romans,
being mentioned and described by Vitruvius, who wrote
at the beginning of the Christian era, by the name of
epistdmium,1 we may infer that this pin-like contrivance
is a rude symbol of a metallic cock, like those now in.
use. In the Lavato1ies these symbols may i-epresent
small metal spouts rndiating from the ornamental tank
or basins, and delivering small continuous streams.
In the system we are considering, the water having
entered the pl'ecinct of the Convent, as above described,
is conveyed in succession through a series of tanks
fixed at a distance from each other, and each at a lower
level than the preceding, in different parts of the mo.,
nastery. The whole of the water is poured into the
first tank by the main-pipe from the sp1·ings, from:
which tank it issues through a waste-pipe, leaving in it
a sufficient supply.
This first waste-pipe descending to the ground is carried
below the sutface to the second tank, into which
it l'ises, acting as the feed-pipe to that tank, and having
its upper end at the same level as its other branch.
Similarly, a second waste-pipe, parallel to the. fee~pipe,
but shorte1·, descends to the ground, and _nses 1-!l
the next tank of the series to act as its feed-pipe, and
1 Vitruvius, 1. ix. c. 10, aDd I. :s:. c. 18.
VOL. VII. M
162 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
The pours into the sewers of the Convent.
by a horizontal pipe buried underground, with an upright
branch at each end, one of which is its own wastepipe,
and the other end the feed-pipe of the next tank.
In the drawing, each upright branch terminates with
head, pipe, may indicate
a funnel-shaped termination, or a bend downwards
or horizontal, to facilitate the exit and entrance of the
water.' I t follows also that each tank of the series has
a pair of these upright branches, rising close together,
of which one is its own feed-pipe, and the other its own
Waste-pipe.
In the small drawing (Fig. 33) these pipes are clearly
shewn. The first pair is at H, the supply-pipe being
the highest; the waste-pipe descends, and its horizontal
branch is bent vertically at I, rising to about the same
height as the branch at the other end; the succeeding
vertical branches of the series grow shorter and shorter
in succession, so as to shew that the draughtsman understood
the principle, although he was not drawing to
scale. The same general diminution in height of these
vertical branches is observed in the large drawing.
We may now trace the course of the water in detail
through the whole establishment.
The water from the conduit-house, after passing
through the five settling-tanks, enters the precincts southward
by a main-pipe, which is carried underground,
through the Prior's gateway (43) and under the Infirmary
kitchen (9), to the great primary Laver (H) in the In
firmary cloister, at which the monks performed ablu-
,
' In two places of the small drawing, at S and T, a feed-pipe is seen
sideways, which has its delivering-end bent at right angles into a hori,
Yontal direction. I n the large drawing the first of these pipes is shown
with the circular bead, and the second bent downwards.
162 . THE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF THE
so on. • The last tank of the series polus its waste water
into the sewers of the Convent.
. Thus each tank in the series is connected to the next
by a horizontal pipe buried underground, with an upright
branch at each end, one of which is its own wastepipe,
and the other end the feed-pipe of the next tank.
In the drawing, each upright branch terminates with
a circular head, larger than the pipe, which may indi-·
eate a funnel-shaped termination, or a bend downwards
or horizontal, to facilitate the exit and entrance of the
water.1 It follows also that each tank of the series has
a pair of these upright branches, rising close together,
of which one is its own feed-pipe, and the other its own
\.vaste-pipe.
In the small drawing (Fig. 33) these pipes are clearly
shewn. The first pair is at H, the supply-pipe being
the highest; the waste-pipe descends, and its horizontal
branch is bent vertically at I, rising to about the same
height as the branch at the other end; the succeeding
yertic.al branches of the series grow shorter and shorter
in succession, so as to shew that the draughtsman understood
the principle, although he was not drawing. to·
scale. The same general diminution in height of these
verticaL branches is observed in the large drawing.
We may now trace the course of the·water in detail
through the whole establishment.
. The water from the ·conduit-house,· after passing
through the five settling-tanks, enters thepi·ecincts southward
by a main-pipe, which is carried underground,
through the Prior's gateway { 43) and under the Inffrmary
kitchen (9), to the great primary Laver (H) in the In~
firmary cloister, at which the monks .performed ablu-
, •1 In two places of the smnll dra.wit:ig, at S and T, a feed-pipe is seen
1;1ideways, which has its delivering-end ·bent at right angles into a hori~
iiontal ·direction. In the large drawing the first of these pipes is shewn
with the circular head, and the. second bent downw111·ds;
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 6 8
passage chair:
this Laver a second pipe (II I) conveys i t westward
to the Laver (I) in front of the Refectory. The
tank which there receives i t is elevated on a
central pillar, evidently to give the water which passes
i t to the other receptacles' a sufficient head.
central shevvn Fig. 33.
: From pipe the third:
Laver in front of the Infirmary. B u t this pipe, in
passage eastward underground, throws branch
9u 13) northward, after leaving the Laver
(I), and another branch (n L) southward (under the
Layer (FI). The course
main-we have the (K). From K, a pipe ( I ( proceeds
under the south aisle of Infirmary cemetery great fish-`(piscina) M. The carried
a pipe (M N) to the Prior's tank (fons) (N),
whence pipe supplies the Prior's watertub
(0). Lastly, Necessarium infirmorum (8), in-:
scription little its issue from i t great from after pass.
ing Necessarium, underground
Green finally its into the town ditch at ,
Returning to the two. lateral branches, We the
direct Of 'main-n, passing sbuthward under and:,reappearing
in at w h e r e
the cistern L), Ions. vimeterio _Laicorun4
au:2 -
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN C.A:NTERBURY. 16$
tions in their passage from the Dormitory to the choir~
From this Laver a second pipe (HI) conveys it west
·ward to the Laver (I) in front of the Refectory. The
small tank which there receives it is elevated on a
central pillar, evidently to give the water which passes
from it to the other receptacles· a sufficient head.
This central pillar is not shewn in the small drawing,
Fig. 33.
From this tank, a pipe (I K) delivers it to the third:
Laver (K), in front of the Infirmary. But this pipe, in
its passage eastward underground,· thro,vs off a branch
(m P) northward, immediately after leaving the Laver
(I), and another branch (n L) southward (under the
church) before it passes the first Laver (H). The coUI·se
of these branches will be described after completing the
·
description of the main-pipes, which "\-ve hnve followed
to the Laver (K). From K, a pipe (k M) • proceeds
eastward under the south aisle of the Infirmary Hall,
and across the interior cemetery to the great fish-pond
'(pisoina) at 1\1.. The waste water of the Piscina is car•
ried by a pipe (MN) to the Prior1s tank (/ons) (N),
from whence a pipe. (N 0) supplies the Prior's water•
thb (cupa) (0). Lastly, the waste water of the latter is
carried under the Necessari:um lnfirmo1"Um (8), as the inscription
on the drawing informs us.
• A little beyond its issue from that building it joins
at w the g-reat drain described below, which collects the
rain water ffom the conventual buildings, and afte1· passing
under the great N ecessarium, proceeds unde1·grounci
across the Green Court, and :finally empties its contents
into the town ditch at z. •
~ Returning. to ' the two lateral brfUlChes, -ive' find the
second, which left the direct course of the ·main~pipes
at n, paii"sing southward und.et the church, and· reappearing
in the outer cemetery or churchyard at ·L,:where it
supplies the cistern (L ), or font$. in cimeterio Laie,otum;
; ' • • .ll{. 2 ; . .
1 6 4 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
which appears to have been placed there for the convenience
of the town.
Frona this cistern the water was not drawn by stopcocks,
for nothing of the kind is shewn in the Sketch.
But a stone pedestal is fixed on the west side of the
margin to enable the water to be taken out by dipping
the pail into it; thus avoiding the chance of careless or
mischievous people leaving the cock running. B y the
side of this cistern is the ancient well which i t was
intended to supersede. This is provided with the simple
old device of a lever handle, supported in the middle in.
the fork of a high pole, and having a bucket at one
end hanging by a chain, and a balancing stone tied to
the other. The cistern we are considering empties its
waste water by a pipe (L IV1') into the great Piscina, the
drainage of which has been already explained.
Returning to the branch which quits the main-pipes
at m, close to the Lavatory of the Refectory, we find
its course led through all the domestic offices of the
monastery, supplying them with water by means o f
stand-pipes closed by stop-cocks, which are not given to
the primary pipes already surveyed.
The branch leaving mi is carried across the north
alley of the cloister (a), through the vestibule of the
Refectory (b), thence along the scullery (e) or passage
to the kitchen (d), through the latter and across the
larder (e) and Green Court to the bakehouse (f) and
brewhouse (g, Ii), whence, turning westward in its course,
it proceeds across the great sewer (le) to the Lavatory
(P), under the Norman porch of the north hall. T h e
drainage of the latter necessarily conveys the remaining
waste o f the branch we have traced into the great
sewer and town ditch.
The letters a to lc in the above description in brackets
indicate the points where the stand-pipes are placed to
supply the offices along the course of the branch-pipe
we are describing.
164 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
which appears to have been placed there for the convenience
of ihe town.
• Fi·om this cistern the water was not drawn by stopcocks,
for nothing· of the kind is shewn in the Sketch.
:But a stone pedestal is fixed on the west side of the
margin to enable the wate1· to be taken out by dipping
the pail into it; thus avoiding the chance of careless or
mischievous people leaving the cock running. By the
side of this cistern is the ancient well which it was
intended to supersede. This is provided with the simple
old device of a lever handle, supported in the middle in
the fork of a high pole, and having a bucket at one
end hanging by a chain, and a balancing stone tied to
the other. The cistern we are considering empties its
waste water by a pipe (L M') into the great Piscina, the
drainage of which has beeu already explained.
Returning to the branch which quits the main-pipes
at rn, close to the Lavatory of the Refectory, we :find
its course led through all the domestic offices of the
monastery, supplying them with water by means of
stand-pipes closed by stop-cocks, which are not given to
the primary pipes ah-eady surveyed.
• The branch leaving m is carried across the north
alley of the cloister (a), through the vestibule of the
Refectory (b), thence along the scullery (c) or passage
to the kitchen ( d), through the latter and across the
larder ( e) and Green Court to the bakehouse (/) and
brew house (g, h ), whence, turning westward in its course,
it proceeds across the great sewer (k) to the Lavatory
(P), under the Nor,.:nan po_rch of the north hall. The
cb:ainage of the latter necessarily conveys the 1·emaining
waste of the branch we have traced into the great
sewer and town ditch.
. The letters a to le in the above description in brackets
indicate the points where the stand-pipes are placed to
~upply the offices along th~ course of the branch-pipe:
we a1·e describing.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 6 5
biewhouse
building, the pipe in question throws off a branch at qt,
which proceeds directly to the Bath House (Balneatorium,),
and under it to the Prior's water ( c a ) into which i t pours its waste by terminating in a vertical
stand-pipe, the open end of which is bent horizontally
the tub. A standpipe
1) branch-following from to another, i t will be observed that at the angle of
every where i t is turned branch springs from the terminates with a stopcock close to the nearest draingutter.
These are Purgatorium, are plainly intended to l e t off the water from the
order to clean i t sediment flushing,
or purging it as the name implies. These purge-•also supply-settlingtanks.
In the Rites of Durham' (p. 70) we are informed
that—
" W i t h i n against a Layer Combditt Monncks .ther hands and faces at, being maid in forme round, covered
with lead, and all of marble, saving the verie uttermost walls;
the walls you may about the Laver
of marble, having many litle cunditts or spouts of brasse, with
xxiiij cockes about y t . "
The conduit thus described stood in the centre of the
garth, payment,construction
in the Cathedral records shew that i t was built in
l i t lead, and was still at sixteenth. Tide Dunelin. Script ores Tres, published Surtees Society,
1839, occexliii. (Raines's Durham,' M:ON.ASTERY OF CHRIST CHUROH IN C.ANTERBURY. il.6.5'
But in its passage from the kitchen to the b1:ewhouse
building, the pipe in question throws off. a branch at n,
which proceeds directly to the Bath House (Balneato1'
iurn), and under it to the Prio1·'s water tub (cuj>a) (0)
into which it pours its waste by terminating in a· vertical
stand-pipe, the open end of which is bent hoi·i•
zontally and a little downward over the tub. A standpipe
(l) with a stopcock is fixed on this branch-pipe in
the interior of the .Bath House.
In following the course of the water from one tank
to another, it will be observed· that at the angle of
eve1·y pipe whe1·e it is turned vertically to feed a tank,
a short, horizontal branch springs from the angle, and
te1·minates ·with a stopcock close to the nearest chaingutter.
'These branches are labelled Pur,qatorium, and
are plainly intended to let off the water from the
pipe, in orde:r to clean it from sediment by flushing,
or purging it as the name implies. These purge-pipes
·are also fixed at the supply-end of each of the settlingtanks.
In the 'Rites of Durham' (p. 70) we are informed
that-
• "Within the Cloyster garth, over against the Frater House
dour, was a fair Laver or Oorvnditt for the Monncks to washe
·the1• hands and faces at, being maid in forme round, covered
with lead, and all of marble, saving the verie uttermost walls;
within the which ,valls you may walke round about the L(Jll)G'I'
of marble, having many litle cunditts or spouts of brasse, with
:xxiiij cockes of brass, rownd abo11t yt."1
The conduit thus described stood in the centre of the
cloister-gal'th, and the bills of payment.for its construction
in the Cathedral records shew that it was built in
1432.2
1 It had in it seven windows; and in the top of it a dovecot, covered with
lend, u.nd wne sLill standing nt the end of the sixteenth century.
.
2 Vido Hist. Dunelm. Soripfo1·cs Tres, published by Surtees Society,
1889, p. cccoxliii. . (Raines's 'Durho.m,' 12mo, p. 89.)
166 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF This as -exactly
Lavers The mo,-
nasteries, described and figured by Lenoir and Leduc, re.,
semble those of our Norman drawing, but are destitute
of any apparent provision for stopping the supply. They
run continually, like the modern drinking-fountains and
public conduits. I n the sketch of a cloister fountain at
Montreale Lenoir, a basin of the same form as those
employed at Canterbury, namely, circular, with a margin
indented into the roseate plan, is supplied with a constant
stream, which spouts from several holes in the
capital of a high central pillar. The water thus sup--
plied to the basin runs over in small streams between
the roses, where the margin is indented for the purpose,
and flows down into a plain opening in the pavement
below, in the middle of which the central pillar has its
foundation. A monastic lavabo at Fontenay, given by
Leduc, is on the same principle of constant supply, filling
a circular tank on the level of a man's waist, which
:also delivers small streanas at equidistant points of its
circumference which fall into a tank on the pavement.;
The Laver, or Lavatorium, of a monastery is for the
purpose of furnishing the monks with the means o f
washing their hands or performing other ablutions before
meals, and is defined by Leduc to be "a cistern of
'stone or marble pouring forth streams of water from a
number of small orifices pierced in its side, which fall
into a lower basin on the floor." The monks standing
around it, in their passage to the Refectory, can thus
wash each at his own stream, without mutual pollution
of the water, which is carried away by a drain-pipe from
the lower basin.
In the later examples, the cloister lavatory was made
in the form of a long trough, like a horse-trough, with
Water supplied, at one end and running out at the
166 . '.('H,E ·CONVENTUAr., ;BUILDINGS OF THE
•
Tliis description, as far as it goes, corresponds · exactly
to the Lavers:of the Norman drawing.
• The fountains of the middle ages in towns and mo1-
11asteries, described and figured by Lenoir and Leduc, re:-
semhle those of om Norman drawing, but are destitute
of any apparent provision for stopping the supply. They
run continually, like-the modern drinking-fountains and
publ~c . conduits. In the sketch of a cloister fountain at
Montreale by Lenoir, a basin of the same form as those
employed.·at Canterbury, namely, circular, with a margin
indented into the roseate plan, is supplied with a con:stant
stream, which spouts from several boles in the
.capital of a high central· pillar. 'l'he water thus sup:•
plied to the basin runs over in small streams between
the roses, where the margin is indented for the purpose,
and flows down into a plain opening in the pavement
below, in the middle of which the central pilla1· has its
foundation. · A monastic Lavabo at Fontenay, given by
Leduc, is on the same principle of constant supply, filLw
ing a circular tank on the le.vel of a man's waist, which
:also delivers small iitl·earb.s at equidistant points of its
circumference which fall into a tank on the pavement. :
The Laver, or Lavatoriwn, of a monastery is for the
pU11)0Se of furnishing the monks with the means of
washing their hands or performing other ablutions before
meals, and is defined by Leduc to be " a cistern of
• stone or marble pouring forth streams of watei- from a
number of small orifices pierced in its side, which fall
into a lower basin on the floor." The monks standing
a1·ound it, in .thefr passage to the Refectory, can thus
wash each at his own stream, without mutual pollution
of the water, which is carried away by a drain-pipe from
the lower basin.
· In the later examples, the cloister lavatory was made
in the form of ;:t long trough, Hke a horse-trough, with
'watei· sup.plied. ·at one end and running ·out at the
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 6 . 7
other. Probably,- a long horizontal pipe" was fixed at
with openings,
which jets ablutions
or other uses. Such lavatories were either placed in
_enclosures projecting from the front o f the cloisterarcades
into the cloister-garth, as at Canterbury and
arches sunk back-the alley near the Refectory door, as at Norwich, Peterborough,
The Norman drawing of the Laver in front of the
resembles those represented Lenoir and
more closely pOssibly because
it was the only one intended expressly fbr washing
before meals. I t has a circular octafoil basin near
the ground; in the centre of this is a high ornamental
carries The angular projections. The supply-pipe and waste-pipe
up through the pillar into the small basin. I n
this fountain the angular projections must have been
the like those that proceed from the capital of the pillar at
and the curved metallic spouts that
turning their mouths downwards.
the provided the pin-appendage in. foil
supposed represent when the stream water required ablutions A s is delivering an uninterrupted flow, the lower
must have been provided with a waste-the drawing, to -off the superfluous
the upper basin; or
rather from MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY, .16.7
other. Probably; a long horizontal pipe· was fixed at
the back of the trough, furnished with.a series of openings,
through whi.ch jets of water issued for ablutions
or other uses. Such lavatories were either placed in
.enclosures projecting from the front of the cloisterarcades
into the cloister-garth, as at Cante1·bury and
Gloucester, or within arches snnk in the back-wall of
the alley nea1· the .Refectory door, as at Norwich, Peter•
borough, Westminster, and Worcester.
The Norman drawing of the Laver in front of the
Refectory resembles those represented by Lenoir and
Leduc much more closely than the others, possibly because
it was the only one intended expressly fo1· washing
before meals. It has a cii-cular octafoil basin near
the ground; in the centre of this is a high ornamental
pillar which cro:ries a smaller basin. The margin of the
latter is indented, with four semicircles alternating with
angular proj ections. The supply-pipe and waste-pipe
pass up thrnugh the pillar into the small basin. In
this fountain the angular projections· must have been
spouts supplying continual streams into t.he lower basin,
.like those that proceed from the capital of the pillar at
Montreale, and from the curved metallic spouts that
rise through the water of the upper basin at Fontenay,
turning their mouths downwards.
But the.lower octafoil basin of our Norman Lavatory
is provided with the piu~like appendage in each foil
which I have supposed to 1·epresent a metal cock, to be
opened when the stream of water was required by a
monk for his abh1tions or for other uses. .A.s the upper
.basin is delivering an uninter_rupted_ :flow, the lower
basin must have been provided . with a waste-pipe,
omitted in the drawing, to ·carry off the superfluous
water which fell continually from the upper basin ; or
rnther with a circular tank on the pavement, to receive
this water, and also that which dropped from. the cocks
168 T H E 'CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
when opened for ablutions or otherwise, this tank being
provided with a drain to convey the waste t o the
Cloister-gutter, not shewn in the drawing. But the drawing
contains a gutter or sewer in the neighbourhood
of each tank, which would serve the purpose, although
connection All the Lavers must have served to supply portable
water vessels, as pails and pitchers, which were filled
Between the well of the Infirmary cloister and the
the Infirmary, with is planted above the course of the water-pipe which is
proceeding to supply that Laver. T h e column is labelled
:—" When the (from the aqueduct) is deficient, water may be raised
well, being this supply all the offices." ("Colunzna in quanz dual ague
defieiente hauriri aqua de Puteo adnzinistrabitur
The the pipe I K, from proceeds the branch
rn P, which through offices and supplies
them by stand--Water poured into this
to a sufficient to give i t a proper head
issue from any one of these whose
may be turned, and also run into the Prior's
water tub.
As the well itself stands between the two great
water required for that would be
immediately it. A n d for the Refectory
Laver, the stand-pipe in the Cloister close to it might
Gutters and Sewers.
The great Norman drawing represents the provisions
rain-168 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
when opened for ablutions or otherwise, this tank being
prnvided with a drain to convey the waste to the
Cloister-gutter, not shewn in the drawing. But the draw•
ing contains a gutter or sewer in the neighbourhood
of each tank, which would serve the purpose, although
the connection between them is omitted.
All the Lavers must have served to supply portable
-water vessels, as pails and pitchers, which were filled
from the cocks.
Between the well of the Infirmary cloister and the
Laver of the Infirmary, a column with a large capital
is planted above the course of the water-pipe which is
proceeding to supply that Laver. The column is la
·belled with the inscription :-" \iVhen the water-supply
(from the aqueduct) is deficient, water may be raised
from the well, and being poured into this column will
supply all the offices.'' (" Oolumnet in quam ductu aque
deficiente potest haurfri ag_ua d-e Puteo et administrabitu1·
omnibus officinis.") The capital of the pillar is evidently
a funnel, and the pillar itself a great stand-pipe, planted
upon the pipe I K, from which proceeds the . branch
m P, which is carried through all the offices and supplies
them by stand-pipes. , vater poured into this
pillar to a sufficient height to give it a proper head
would issue from any one of these stand-pipes whose
cock may • be turned, and also run into the Prior's
,vater tub. •
A.s the well itself stands between the two great
Lavers, the water required for that locality would be
derived immediately from it. And for the Refectory
Laver, the stand.pipe (a) in the Cloister close to it might
serve as a substitute.
Gutters anil, Sewers.
The great Norman chawing represents the pl'ovisions
made for collecting and carrying off the rnin-water. from
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 6 9
the roofs of the great Cloister and the north side of the
.church. The had of and also a channel extended from the middle of the west
to opposite These cistern opposite
the door of the passage or Locutory that led from
the great Cloister to the Infirmary cloister. The legend
'attached to this cistern is," Small well (Puteo/us) before
rain-conveyed from all sides by the canal or gutter which is
carried all round the Cloister. F r o m this well the
passage the Infirmary Hall, and when the gutter comes opposite
to the crypt door i t is turned out of the road to the
right."
The Drawing shews this deviation -very clearly; the
gutter is turned so as to pass on the south of the Infirmary
cloister, at the part where the Prior's Chapel
was afterwards built. I t then proceeds under the subvaults
Infirmary Hall, joining the channel described above,
p. 163, which proceeds from the Prior's water-tub, and
across the Green to the town ditch. I t s
junction with the Prior's channel is concealed the
buildings But there remain two pieces of documentary evidence
channels and sewers.
The first, in the list of Chillenden's works (Appendix,
No. VI.), relates to the repair of the whole ancient line
of gutters from the great Cloister to the third Dormitory
or Necessarium, between 1390 and 1411. The second,
in the description of Prior Goldston's works (in the
Obituary, note x.), describes a new rain channel which
he made round the south and east sides of the church,
:MONASTERY OF. CHRIST CHURCH. lN C.ANTERBURY. 169
-the roofs of the great Cloister and the north side qf the
·chw:ch. The Cloister-garth had an open gutter round
its outer border, which caught the drippings its eaves,
and also a channel extended from the midclle of the west
side t~ the middle of the opposit~ side. These channels
tended downwards to a small (underground) ciste_rn opposite
the door of the passage or Loautorg that led from
.the great Cloister to the Infirmary cloister. The legend
·attached to this cistern is,·" Small well (Puteolus) before
the door of the Locutory, into which the rain-water is
conveyed from all sides by the canal or gutter which is
carried all round the Cloister. From this well the
gutter is carried along the passage which leads towards
the Infirmary Hall, and when the gutter comes opposite
to the crypt door it is turned out of the road to the
l'ight."
The Drawing shews this deviation very clearly; the
.gutter is turned so as to pass on the south of the Infirmary
cloister, at the part where the Prior's Chapel
was afterwards built. It then proceeds under the subvaults
of the Vestiarium, and turns northward under the
Infirmary Hall, joining the channel described above,
·p. 163, which proceeds from the Prior's water-tub, and
passes across the Green Court to the town ditch;. Its
junction with the Prior's channel is concealed by the
buildjngs in the Norman drawing.
But there remain two pieces of documentary evi~
dence for the elucidation of the course of the rain-water
channels and sewers. •
The first, in the list of Chillenden's works ( Appendix,
No. VI.), relates to the repair of the whole ancient line
of gutters from the great Cloister to the third Dormit01·y
or Necessarium, between 1390 and 1411. . The second,
in the desc1iption of Prior Goldston's works (in the
Obituary, note x.), describes a new rain: channel which
he made round .the south and east sides of the church,
1 7 0 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
i t to the old channel had been repaired
where passes Subprior's camera. I translations these
parallel PRIOR OHILLENDEN.
1390-amended which i s conducted
the way which leads
Infirmary.
First the end of the Chapterhouse
straight on the outside
Subprior's
camera.
across camera and across the great
the Thei Prior's private
And PRIOR GOLDSTON.
outside church,
the south and close
cement,
vaulted carry of
of
whole crypt of
and the adjacent
the
of the
aqueduct is extended
from the south door city..
It foundations,
up t o the Subprior's
camera,
and i s finally conducted
the mansion o f the
170 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
and joined it to the· old channel which had been re
·paired by Chillenden, at the point whei-e it passes under
.the Suhpriol''s ·came't'a. I subjoin tl'anslations of these
.documents in two parnllel columns.
PmoR CB:ILLENDEN:
(1890-1411.)
Repaired and amended the
gutter which is conducted
along the way which leads
• from the Cloister to the Infirmary.
First by that way straight
to the end of the Chapterhouse
outside.
Then straight on the outside
of the Prior's Chapel on
• the south side as far as the Sub
·pri,or' s catrne'T'a.
Then a.cross the Subprior's
camera. and across the great
_Hall of j;he Infirmary.
The;n along the Prier's private
camera.
' .A.nd so by the camera under
the gloriet.
PRIOR GOLDSTON.
(1495-1517.)
Constructed a subterranean
aqueduct outside the church,
on the south side, and close
to it, with bricks and cement,
va.ulted and firmly constructed,
to carry off the inundations et
rain-water which, for want proper channels, were wont to
inundate the whole crypt of
the Virgin and the adjacent
chapels, and greatly hinder tb_e
·access of the pilgrims to the
glorious Virgin.
.
This aqueduct is extended
in length from the road which
• leads from the south door of
the church towards the city ..
It passes through the church
cemetery close to its foundations,
and up to the Subp1
·io1->s came11·a,,
ana . is- finally conducted
from the Subprior's camera
along the ma.nsion of t~e
Lord Prior.
•
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 7 1
to the the third t o the head third
it Dornai.tory.3-
third ruined, was now repaired expenses, and leaded
for the most
part.
Lastly, i n Wilkes's plan o f the waterworks t h e
course of this ancient rain-gutter and sewer, at that
time (A.D. 1668) still in use, as it is at present, is plainly
delineated in exact accordance with the documentary
.descriptions just quoted. I t is by the help of this plan
that I have inserted the gutters in my Plans (Plates 2
and 3).
The greatest apparent deviation in the Norman plan
from the real line o f the sewers is produced by the
mode in which the course of the great sewer across the
Green Court is drawn. I t is evident from the whole
scheme of the water supply, and from the documents
and Wilkes's plan, that this sewer was conducted
through the fosse of the great Necessarium to cleanse
it. Wilkes's plan places i t in that position, and I have
laid i t down accordingly. B u t to understand its posi-
Extra quoque Ecclesiam aqueductum subterraneam satis onerosum ex
parts australi props Ecelesiam ex lateribus et caamento opere testudiuario
Ermissime constructam ad pluviarum inundationes commode reelpiendas
satis pruclenter as provide construxit ; gum quidem pluviarum
exnberantia totam Virginia Criptarn cum creteris Capellis adjacentibus ex
defectu aquceductus nonnunquam operuerat ; sicque aditum satis diffi.
eilem ad Virginem gloriosam causa devotionis visitandam omnibus illuc
confinentibus omnino exhibuit. Q u i quidem aqumductus distenditur in
longum b, via gum ducit ab hostio Ecclesis3 xneridionali versus civitatem
per ccemeterium Ecclesiaa prope fundamenta ejusdem usque ad cameram
Su.bprioris et a camera Subprioris per mansionem Domini Prioris usque
ad caput tertii Domitorii finaliter protenditur atque traducitur. (Obit.
Aug. Sac. p, 147.)
MONASTERY OF ·CHRIST CHU.ROH IN C,AlfrERBURY. 171
Then to th.e head of th~ third to the head of the third
Dormitory, and so it turns into Dor.mitory.1
the aqueduct in the third Dormitory.
•
This gutter, old, wasted, and
TUined, was now repaired at
great expenses, and leaded
under ground for the most
pa.rt . .
Lastly, in Wilkes's plan of the waterworks the
course of this ancient 1·ain-gutter and sewer, at that
time (.A.1668) still in use, as it is at present, is plainly
e convinced that the juxtapositions .of the buildings are in gene-•
ral duly shewn, which is all. that was required to explain the'
course and ramifications of the waterpipes a.nd sewers from one
monastic office to another. .Also that the liberties taken with
the relative magnitudes are due to the necessity of delineating
the mechanism of the system on a sufficient scale for distinctn.
ess. Thus the so-called Baptistery. is made of equal width to
the gable of the transept behind it, whereas it has in reality
but half that width; and the Lavatory Tower in the Great
Cloister is equally magnified. In fact, the representation is the
~ork of an engineer, and not of an architect, and therefore.
principally useful for its ample details of the. method of water
supply to monasteries or towns in the twelfth century. :But it
also gives most valuable incidental evidence of the genera.l
di'stt-ibution of 'the Convent by the inscriptions attached to th~
buildings.
: ·1n !l~sc;I,i.bj.ng:_t~ ~~wi.ng,_ ~ome .miter~. di.splay.their wit by
ridiculing the method of delineation. Gostling tells . us . of
I
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 8 1
Eadwyn penmanship;
little honour draughtsman,
plan, prospect; and
i t shows plainly that (meaning Canterbury) is the
Church and. known a D r. Hiles " I t master ;"2 observation
applies the
first develop° true principles of perspective drawing and.
century)
mathematicians No. H.
concerning Source Works.
From and 9(Archives.
aei gratia Cantuarie Archiepiscopus Anglornm prinaas
amico IV. et hallimoto
sahatem. Sciatis conces-
Sisse n.ostra pro animabus omnium
predecessoruna nostrorum Dilectis filiis nostris con-.
ventui ecclesie elemosinam, unani Acram paludis usque ad arabilem terram
valle apud horfalde ubi fontes erumpunt et d.efluunt
comm melius liberius possint et stagna sua enaendare et utilius custo dire. Idcirco
(pod perp,etuo permaneat Cantuariensi
illa. Testibus cancellario Sa'i Willelmo Johanne de TilebUria at Hugon.° et Petro scriptore et Gisleberto camerario at Roberto
pincerna •Willelrno aliis.
Apud. A.D. 1138, counterseal.)
Archbishop T. must or Thomas b.
Becket Bishop 1182) ; hence 1 Gostling, V e t , Mon.
MONASTERY OF CH.RIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. :181
Ead.wyn that, "however proud he might be of his penmanship~
the drawing does very little honour to his skill as a draughtsma.
n, for it is neither a plan., an upright, nor a prospect; an~
yet it shews plainly that this (meaning Canterbury) is the
.Ohurch and Precinct he would have drawn, had he kno'wn how
to execute a. design." 1 Dr. Milles says, "It is indeed easy to
perceive that Eadwin was no master of perspective ;"2 an observation
which a.pplies equally to the early painters up to the
time of Raffaelle, for the excellent reason that the :first attempt
to develope the true principles of perspective eh-a.wing and
projection was made only about the end of the fifteenth century;
and that the subject has employed the talents of the greatest
mathematician!! from that time to our own.
No. II.
Grants concerrvimg the Water S01wce and Worlcs .
Fro)l\ original in Box, o.nd Copy Reg. G. g· (p. 82, pencil), Chapter Arollivcs.
T. dei gratia ·OaJJ.tuarie Archiepiscopus Anglorum primas
Venerabili fratri et amico W.. Roffensi _Episcopo et Toti hallimoto
de Sancto Martino sa.lutem. Sciatis nos dedisse et concessisse
in perpetuum pro salute nostra et pro animabus omnium
predecessorum nostrorum Dilectis filiis nostris priori et con~
:ventu.i ecolesie nostre in ·elemosinam. et perpetuam possessionem
paulo plus quam una.Il'.i ..A.cram paludis usque ad. arabilem terra.
m in valle apud horfalde ubi fontes orumpnnt et defluunt
usque ad stagna eornm ut melius et hberins possint fontes suos
curare et. sta.gna sua emendare et uti.lius custodire. Idcirco
volumus et precipimus. quod perp.etuo permanea.t ecclesie Cantuariensi
palus ill&. Testibus Philippo cancella,rio et Johanne de
Sar et Willelmo de Ver et Johall-ne de Tileburia et Hugone de
Gant et Petro scriptore et. Gisleberto camerario et Roberto
J?incerna et Willelmo dispensatore et multis a.his.'
Apud lamhedam.
(Dated .A.,D. _1188, in modern hand.)
(With seal and countersea.l.) :
[The .Archbishop T, must be either Theobald (1139-1162) or-Thoml\B !l.
:Becket (1162-1174), and the Bisllop W., Walter (1148-1182); hence the
1 Gostling, p. 148. V~t. Mon,
182 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
charter is placed between 1148 and 1174. But as Wibert constructed the
aqueduct between 1153 and 1167, or if, when Subprior, a few years earlier,
it is probable that the charter was given by Archbishop Theobald.]
71, Archives.
fid.elibus presentes Thomas
Conventus Sancti Cantuarie salutem -domino. Noveritis Quod
aqueductum Christo Conventus
Vcclesie Cantuariensis poraarium transeuntem
Salvunt illesum quatenus operarios suos necesse fu.erit eundera
aqueductum emen.dendum nostram
habere ingressmn egressum. °oncoming the Conduits at Christchurch. B y Mr. Somner.
monke Edward 2d tinie, late remaining Sir Simond
thus :—
1167. Cost an de bone Caunterbirie, Cil les ordina fist elm flue hors de la cite, sus terre :—
the yeare 1167. This yeare died Wibert mother church Canterbury,
of October. The same roan. appointed
caused made the Court of the Priory, taketh source city, wch Now in the Cottonian collection, Brit. 111fus. Claud. c. 6 fol. 166.
Somner, p, 141, makes a short record of Wibert's services, referring to
this memorandum in Sir Simon D'Ewes's Library.
182 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
But ll!ld ll67, Copy Reg. 5, from original Chapter .Archives.
Omnibus Christi fidelibus presentes literas inspecturis Thomas
prior & Conventus Sancti gregorii Cantuarie salutem in
domino. N o-v-eritis nos concessisse et bona fide promisisse Quod
aqueductnm dilectorum nobis in Christo Prioris et Conventus
~cclesie Christi Cantuariensis per pomarium nostrum transeuntem
Salvum et illesum quatenus in nobis est conservabimus
et permittemus operarios suos quociens necesse fuerit ad eundem
aqueductum. emendendu.m per Curiam et portam nosti-am
liberum ha.be-re ingressum et egressum.. &c. &c.
27 July. 1227.
(Fine seal of the Convent.)
No. III.
Ooncerning the Conduits at OM,ist1;hurch. By M1·. Swinm·.
In an ancient French manuscript, written by a rnonke of ye
place in Edward 2d time, now or late remaining in Sir Simond
de Ewes1 his Library, fol. 134 b, I read thus:-
Anno 116 7. Cest a,n morust de bone memorie Wibert
le Priur de la mere eglise de Oaunterbirie, la v. kalend de
Octobre. Oil les conduts de euwe en tuz lea offices dediens
la Court de la Priurie ordina. et £.st fere. et si prent surce
eel euw sa une liwe hors de la cite, ki tut suz terre par
pypes de plum a sa eglise fist venir.
In English thus :~
In the yea.re 1167. This yeare died Wibert of good
memory, the Prior of the mother church of Canterbury,
the vth of the kalends of October. The same man appointed
& caused to be ma.de the conduits of water in all
the offices within the Court of the Priory, and that water
ta.keth its source about a mile out of the ci~, wcu wholly
1 the Cottonian collection, :Brit. Mus. Claud. c. 6 fol. 166.
a ehort record of Wiberi's services, r efe1·1'ing memo1-anduJI1 Librury.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. . 1 8 3
under the ground by pipes of lead he caused to come urte
his belonging same cathedrall, now in ye Earle of Arundell's Library, bearing
title, "Registrum sive Martyrologiu.m ecclesize xpi Cantuariaa,"
:—
bonze memorize H i c
inter multa bona opera pee fecit isti ecclesive aqueductum
cam stagnis et lavatoriis et piscinis suis fieri fecit, quam
fere milliario ab urbe intra curiam, et sic per
omn.es curiae officinas, In English thus :—
This man, among many other
good works weh he did for this church, caused to be made
the watercourse with its ponds, conduits, and fish pools;
weh water he marvellously brought almost a mile from the
city into the court, & so through all the offices o f the
same court.
Wiim Somner.
No. IV.
Extract from C. (‘ Concilia,'
vol. ii. p. 246).
refectorium comedentibus.
. . . . Item monachi de cater° omn.es in conspectu communi
secularium tam in dauso interiori, quam exteriori, domu.s vestraa
a carnium esu, exceptis locis inferius annotatis, abstineant ;
scilicet quod solum in naensa magistri in hafirraitorio, et caraeris
infirmorum, in deport°, et camera prioris, ant in aula hospitum,
cum ad hoc rite licentiati extiterint, yescantur carnibus ad sui
recreationem idoneam 'v-el ad. solatium aliorum. E t h o consideret prwsidens iii licen.tha taliter concedenda. I t e m quia
et raensa magistri, ub eriorem fratrum recreationena
et non ad sal victus diminutionem conceditur, statuimus
ordinando, ut cum ova eisdem in deport') vol mensa magistri
MONASTERY OF OBRIST CIIlJRCH IN CANTERBURY. 18·3
under the ground by pipes of lead he caused to come urtc
bis church.
Another old manuscript in Latine, sometime belonging to the
same cathedrall, now in ye Ea.rle of .A.rundell's Library, bearing
this title, "Registrum sive Martyrologium. ecclesire :xpi Ca.ntua.
rire," fol. 41 a, to the same purpose speake thus :-
v. kal. octob. obiit bonre memorire Wibertus Prior. Hie
inter multa. bona opera. qure fecit isti ecclesire a.queductum
cum stagnis et lavatoriis et piscinis suis £eri fecit, quam
aquam fare millia.rio ab urbe intra curiam, et sic per
omnes ipsius curire offi.cinas, mirabiliter transduxit.
In English thus :-
On the vth of the kalends of October, Wibert of good
memory, the Prior, died. This man, among many other
good works wch he did for this church, caused to be made
the watercourse with its ponds, conduits, and fish pools;
w01' water he marvellously brought almost·a :mile from the
city into the court, & so through all the offices of the
same court.
Extracted from the MSS. aforesaid by me,
Wilhn Somner.
No. IV.
B,vf1ractfrom Winchelsey's Statutes, e. vii. (< Wilkins's Ooncilia,'
vol. ii. p . 246).
De extra refectorium. comedentibus .
. . . , Item monachi de cretero omnes in conspeotu comm.uni
secularium ta.m in clauso interiori, quam ex.teriori, domu.s vestrre
a carnium esu, exceptis locis inferius annotatis, abstineant;
scilicet quod solum in ll'.lensa magistri in infirmitorio, et cameris
infirmorum, in deporto, et camera prioris, a.ut in aula hospitum,
cum ad hoe rite licentiati e:xtiterint, yescantur carnibus ad sui
recrea.tionem idonea.m vel ad. solatinm a.liorum. Et hrec duo caute
consideret prresidens in. licencia. taliter concedenda.. Item quia
deporti solatium, et mensa. magistri,ad uberiorem £ra.trum recrea.tionem
et; non ad sni victus diminutionem conceditn.r, statnimus
ordinando~ ut cum ova, eisdem in deporto vel mensa magistri
184 T H E ' C O N V E N T E A L BUHAANGS OF THE
ministrantur, eu-ndem ovorum numerum habeant, quern de
con.suetudine essent . . . certis temporibus reficiuntur magnam singulis accedant, ne tune temporis, prout solent, fabulis vacent otiosis,
se implicent I t e m vol causa ut supra in infirmitorio, comedentes, statim post prandium
vol claustram,
lecturat vol scriptur a n t regula3
con.vertant : alioquin I t e m , quia eo, recusant,—
ita hoc contin.git, quod tantummodo 'c-el quatuor fratres, qui sunt in deporto, missa3 de beata Maria
consuetudine
ecclesiaa approbata deberent,—hujusmodi turbationis materiam, niagister infirmarice d i e
prout moris est, prwmuniat octo fratres tantum,
quana utriusque chori prout sunt priores, quod deportum suum recipiant, s i voluerint
sequente. E t si aliquis ipsorum recusaverit, ipso septimana3 miss m tertia, miss a3 eceteris no propter suam recusationera minuatur solennitas
A b excipimus subpriorem,
naajorem duos capellanos pro
casibus contingentibus, qui non poterunt provideri, [Subjoined is the statute against the commission of nuisances,
:—
I t e m prmeipimus virtute obedientia3, pans, suspensionis
singulis no in.gressum
infirmaria3seu cameras vol aliis screare vol a spumam excutere, ant
quicquam abominabile ibidem emitter° quoque modo
preasumant, illue appareat, ox pluriuna inhon.esto save esse factum.]
184 THE ·CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF THE
ministra.ntur, eundem ovorum. numerum habeant, quem de
consuetudine assent in refectorio habituri. ...... Item qui in
deporto certis temporibus reficinntur ad omnes processiones,
tertiam solennem magna.m missam, et vesperas, sin.gnlis diebus
acced.ant, ne tune temporis, prout solent, fabulis vacent otiosis,
vel · lasciviis se implicant inhonestis. Item in deporto, vel ex
causa ut supra in infirmitorio, comedentes, statim post prandium
semel, si velint, bibentes, recedant ad chorum vel claustrum,
lecturre vel scripturre aut repetitioni servitii vel regulre
se converta~t: alioquin graviter puniantur. Item, quia pro
deporto murmur inter fratres frequenter resonat pro eo, quod
aliquando viginti fratres in una die deportum suum recusant,ita
quod ex hoe frequenter contingit, quod tantummodo tres
vel quatuor fratres, qui aunt in deporto, missre de beata Maria
intersunt, ubi octo fratres de deporto singulis diebus de consuetudine
ecclesire approbata interesse deberent,-ad abolendam
hujusmodi turbationis materiam, magister innrmarire die
dominica, prout moris est, prremuniat octo fratres tantum,
tam inferioris quam. superioris utriusque chori prout in ordine
sunt priores, quod deportum suum recipia:iit, si voluerint
in septimana sequente. Et si aliquis ipsorum octo deportum
suum rf:)cusaverit, ipse nihilominus sic recusans singulis diebus
illius septimanre missre de beata Maria, et feria tertia missre de
beato Thoma, teneatur interesse cum creteris qui sunt in eodem
deporto, ne propter suam recusation.em minuatur solennitas
ipsarum missarum. .A.b ista vero generalitate excipimus subpriorem,
majorem cellerarium, et duos capellanos prioris, pro
variis casibus continge:ntibus., qui non poterunt provideri, ac
etiam seniores, qui magno tempore non perceperunt deportum.
[S-ubjovned is the statute agwinst the corn-mission of nuis.ances,
(p. 247) :- • :
• Item prrecipimus in virtute obeclientire, ac sub poona suspensionis
injungimus singulis monachis, ne in lavatoriis ad ingres.
sum infirmarire seu ca.merre prioris, vel etiam alibi situatis, sive in
locis aJiis juxta ea, screare vel a. naso spumam excutere, aut
aliud quicqua.m abominabile ibidem emittere quoque modo
prresuma.nt, ita quod illnc accedentibus apl)areat, prout ex gestu
plurium inhonesto srepe didicimus ease factum.J
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 8 5
List Works PriOr Estria.—_Register I., mi., fol. 212.
Chapter .3funiments, Canterbury?,
B.—To facilitate reference to this items are
numbered order.]
curia, tenapore Prioris2
vestimentis aliis ornamentis Ecclesiasticis dOmibus edificandis et reparandis infra ambitum Ecclesie
per Prioris.
Ab ann.o nonagesintum..
.(1.) Camera magna cum (2.) Camera minor
's
Camera longa, (4.) • (5.) Camera Caraino.4
Magna ad (7.) piscirta.
' (8;) Cisterna scolam novitioru.m. (9.) Studiura (10.) Reparacio aule 23011.: 16s.
Anno Nova Camera Prioris emu G-ardroba, pictura,.et aliaru.m Camerarum.
3611.; 18s. 6d.
Anno Novum Ecclesia. 3 0 1 i .
13.) Nova Tb.esaurarium. 1 0 1 1 .
Anno Novara Gablum altar° 1311.: 12s.
I This Galba ,2 1285-131, Zdes etiam irLfra mono;
• sterium sumptuosas fundavit et plurimas dirutas reparavit : Obituary. Aug. Sac. 111.
3 Canine, 3 and The capella, caminoin these passages,
5 "Camera," interlineation in a later hand.
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH ·m CANTERBURY, 185
No. V.
_Li,st of the Worlcs .of P7ior De Estiria,.-Register I., a--i.,Jol. 212.
Okapter :Muniments, Oanterlw/ry.1,
[N.B.-To facilitate reference to this List, ,the itelll.S a.re
numbered. in oraer.]
• Nova opera in ecclesia et in curia, tempore Henrici Prioris·9
Pro vestimentis et aliis oi:namentis Epclesiasticis in Ecclesia,
·et domibus edificandis et reparandis infra ambitum Ecclesie
et Curie pei- 37 annos, tempore Henrici P1·ioris .
.A.b anno Domini 1285 usque ad annum nonagesimum.
·(l.) Camera magna Prioris cum. pictura. (2.) Camera, minor
·cum Capella et novo Camino.3
(3.) Oameralonga cum novo Camino. (4.) Camera ad scaccarium
cum diversorio ibidem.
(5.) Camera nova in veteri plumbario cum Capella et Oamino.4'
(6.) Magna grangia ad: fenum. (7.) Cisterna in piscina.
(8;) Oisterna juxta sco1am novitiorum. (9.) Studium Prioris:
.(1.0.) Reparaoio magne ~ule juxta portam Curie.
230 li. : 16 s .
.A.nno 1291.
(11.) Nova CameraPrioris plumbata, cum Gardroba, Camino,
Celatura, pictura, _et pavimento aliarum Camera.rum.
.A.nno 1292.
(12.) Novum Orlogium magnum in Ecclesia..
(18.) Nova turris5 ultra Thesa.urarium.
.A.nno 1294.
36 lL : 18 s. 6d .
30li.
lOH .
(14.) Novum Ga.blum Ecclesie ultra altare Sancti Gregorii.
13 li. : 12 s.
1 This is copied in Bib. Cott. Galbo. E. 14 f.103, and printed by Dart in
-his Appendix
iii. .
2 1285-lSSl, Henry De Estria, Prior, " 1Ede8 etio.m novas inrra. monasterium.
et extra sumptuosas funda.vit et plurima.s dirutaa reparavit: "
Obitual'y. A.ng. So.c. 141. •
8 Cnmno, MS.
3 ll-Dd 4 The word capslla, coupled with camino·in these two passages,
appears to mean the chimney hood, and not a chapel.
6
" Camera," inrerlineation
1 8.6 . T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF WYE
Nova panetria et nova coquina plumbata i n Camera
Prioris. 1 3 18 s.
Anno 1295.
Pavimentum nova Gaola. 4 2 li. : 2 d.
(17.) Decem neve schoppe lapidee in Burgate. 4 0 li. : 6 d.
Anne Novum stabulum Thesaurarii cum solario e t parvo
granario. 7 1 1 . : 8 s.
Anno 1303.
Novum 8 1 1 . : 5 s. : 10 d..
Anno 1304 et quinto.
(20.) Reparacio tocius chori cum tribus novis ostiis, et 310V0
pulpit°, et (21) reparacio Capituli cum dnobus novis gabulis.
839 : 7 s. : 8 d.
Anno 1314.
(22.) Pro corona Sancti Thome a-uro et argent°, et lapidibus
preciosis ornanda. 1 1 5 1 1 . : 12 s.
(23.) Item, pro nova cresta a-area feretri Sancti Thome facienda.
7 1 1 . : 10 s.
Anno 1316.
Quinque Campane, quarum 1. que i n
quo t r e s alio n.ovo longo versus north, i. ponderat 2400 ii.; alia, 2200 et tercia, 2000 li.
sonituna quo 7001i. dim.
2361i : 13 s. : 6 d., carpentrio
Anno 1317.
26.) NovamClocarium versus 61 ii.: 8 9 0 1 1 . : Item, campa-ne n.ove quarum
prima ponderat 1460 li., secunda ponderat 1210 ii., et tercia
1124 Ii. Precium 661i. d. sine carpenterio fer-
.ramento.
Item, campane quo
ponderant 27501i. Precium 1011. : Anno query weight?
THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
(15.) Nova pa.netria. et nova coquina plumbata in Camera.
Prioris. 13 li. : 18 s.
Anno 1295.
(16.) Pavimen.tum Claustri, et nova. Gaols..
Anno 1298.
42 li.: 2 cl.
(17.) Decem nove schoppe lapidee in Burga.ta. 40 li.: 6 d.
Anno 1301.
(18.) Novmn
granario .
.Anno 1808.
stabulum Thesaura.rii cum solario et pa.rvo
7 li. : 8 s.
(19.) Novum Granarium in Bracino.
Anno 1304 et quinto.
8 li. : 5s. : 10 d.
(20.) Reparacio tocius chori cum tribu.s uovis ostiis, et novo
pulpito, et (21) reparacio Capituli cum duobus novis gabulis.
839 li : 7 s. : 8 d.
Anno 1314.
(22.) Pro corona Sancti Thome auro et argento et lapidibus
preciosis ornanda, 115 li.: 12 s.
(23.) Item, pro nova cresta. a.urea feretri Sancti Thome fa ..
cienda, 7li.: 10 s.
Anno 1316.
(24.) Quinque Campana, quarum. i. que vocatur Thomas in
magno clocario, que ponderat viij li.1 ; tres alie in novo clocario
longo versus north, quarum i. ponderat 2400 Ji, ; alia, 2200 li. ;
et tercia, 2000 li.
. Item, i. Campana ad sonitum Capituli que ponderat 700 Ii. et
dim.
Precium quinque campanarum. 236 li: 13 s. : 6 d., sine car~
pentrio et ferramento.
• .Anno 1317.
(25.) NovumClocarium longum versus north. 61 li.: 5 s. : 3 d.
Item, pro plumbo et plumbario. 90 li.: 12 s. 2 d.
(26.) Item, tres campane nove in clocario sub angto, qua.rum
prim.a ponderat 1460 li., secunda ponderat 1210 li., et tercia.
ponderat 1124 li. Precium 65 li. : 9 a. sine carpentel'io et ferra.
mento. •
• • (27.) I tem, 3 earn.pane nove minores in eodem clocario, que
pondera.nt 2750 li. Precium 10 li. : 18 s.
•
Anno 1317 et 18.
1 Thus written,-query 8000 lb. weightP
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 8 7
Pro faciendis. 3 2 1 i . 7 Item, pro bracino cum novo granario Camino
aiiis doraibus C-ariam, ann.os 14411. :s.
• I n Pro vestinaentis cum nova tabula magni altaris. 1 4 7 1 i . : 14 S.
totalis aliis ornaraentis
edificandis repaxandis
ambit= annos
2 1 8 4 1 1 . : entitled, Nova Opera tenapore estates monastery, during
£3739. I t items; adjacent good
Works Prior (A.% 1411'.
163, Chapter Leland. faded. I n Itinerary' (says, Thomas Chillendene, alias Ohislesdene, was
Builder that Christes ehirche.
He Church. He Chapitre
Conduit Prior's Chaumbre, Brew the Esclaeker, Ynne yri Streate of Oantorbyri. And Waulles moste Circuite, the Waulle Abbaye."
which so as discover
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH 1N CANTERnURY. 187
(28.) Pro novis studiis facienclis. 32 ~i. : 9 s. : ~ d.
(29.) Item, pro novo bracino cum novo granar10 et Oammo
et aliis domibus infra Ouriam, per duos annos predictos.
144,li.: 16 S;
· In diversis annis.
(30.) Pro novis vestimentis et aliis ornamentis Ecclesiasticis,
cum nova tabula magni altaris, 147li.: 14s.
Summa totalis pro vestimentis et aliis ornamentis
Ecclesiasticis in ecclesia, et domibus edifi.candis et reparan.
dis infra ambit-um Ecclesie et curie, per 37 anuos
tempore Henrici Prioris. 2184li.: 18 s. : 8 d.
Then follows a long list entitled, " Nova Opera in Maneriis
tempore Henrici Prioris," giving the details of his expenditure
upon the buildings, etc., on the estates of the monastery, du-
1·ing 37 years, amounting to £3739. 4s. 6d. It contains many
curious items ; but as not relating to the fabric of the Church
of Canterbury or adjacent buildings, this enumeration of good
deeds is not here inserted.
No. VI.
List of the Wm-lcs of P1·ior Ohillenden (A.D. 1390-14,11'.
Roll C, 166, Oha~ter Muniments, Canterbury.
[When Leland visited Canterbury, c. 1540, the architectural
reputation of this Prior had not faded from the memory of the
inhabitants of his structures. In his 'I~erary' (vi. f. 3, p. 5)
he says, " Prior Thomas Ghillendooe, alias Oliislesdene, was
the greatest J3uilde1• of a Prior that ever was in Olvi·istes chi1·che.-
Re was a great Setter forth of the new building of the Body of
the Church. Re builded of new, the goodly Cloistre, the Ohapitre
House, the new Conduit of Water, the Prior's . Ohaumbre, the
Prior's Chapelle, the great Dormitorie and the Frater, the Bake
House, the J3rew House, the Escheker, the faire Yn.ne yn the
High Streate of Oanto1·byi·i. And also made the W aulles of
:moste of al the Circuite, beside th.e Towne W aulle of the Enclosure
of the .A..bbaye." .
; . The following Roll, w:hich. I was so fortunate as to discover
188 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
company my Albert apparently
a complete list of this Prior's works, and has escaped
the notice of all previous writers. I have numbered the paragraphs
to facilitate reference.]
, Nova Opera Reparaciones et adquisita tempore Thome Chyllynden.
e Prioris Beclesie Xpi Cantuariensis.
(1) Navis ecclesie Cantuariensis cum apparatu, gradus et pulpiti
ibidem cum stacione crucis, et nova capella beate Virginis
in eadem navi. Item (2), novura altare cum Tabula argentea &
deaurata, cum apparatu altar= sanctoru-m Elphegi& Dun stani et
una ymagine beate virginis cum corona aurea et geramis, MD/
iiirangtis argenteis & deauratis et cipho aureo precioso cum gemmis
in manu virginis pro corpore x i inaponendo; ascenden.do et
descenden do quum placet. Item (3), i i i r altaria made duo ex um,
parte chori et duo ex altera de novo depicta. Item (4), dealbaeio
tocius ecclesie .cum nova camera parvorum sacristarum et capella
subtus SanctiAndree. Item (5), una camera privata et plumbata
juxta vestiarium. I t e m (6), pavimentum ex parte Chori boriali
de novo factum. Item (7), via de Eeclesia ad Dormitoriu.m cum.
reparacione lavatorii ibidem, et subtus nova rastura plumbata.
Item (8), clausura vie ex utraque parte de claustro usque ad
cameram Prioris, at via de camera prioris usque ad curiana de
novo facta et plumbata. E t emendacio gutteri de claustro ducentis
se in. via que ducit de claustro ad infirraariam prirao in via
eadera directe usque ad fin.em capitu1i exterius, Dein.de directe
extra capellam Prioris ex parte australi usqtie ad Cameram Stipprioris,
Delude transverse per Cameral]. Supprioris at transverse
magnam aulam infirmitorii, Delude per Cameram privatam PniL
oris in longitudine et sic per Camerana subtus le gloriety Deinde
ad caput tercij dormitorii at tune vertit se ad aqueductum in tercio
dormitorio : hoc gutterum fuit antiquura devastatum et perditum
tarnen reparatura cummagnis expensis at plumbatum in terra
in magna parte. I t e m (9), reparacio dormitorii cum novo tecto
plumbato et novis Fenestris at pluribus lectis.. I t e m (10), teetum
Dorn2itorii privatum cum novis fenestris. Item (11), lectum
Prioris cum novo studio et aula superius. et Garderoba quasi de
120V0 constructa & plumbata. I t e m (12), via de cap ella Prioris
ad Cam.eram suam de novo selata et reparata cum novis
fenestris at , novo °amino. I t e m (13)3 nova camera subtus
188 • THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
in searching the documents of the Chapter some fifteen years
ago, in company with my friend .Albert Way, contains apparently
a complete list of this Prior's works, and has escaped
the notice of all previous writers. I have numbered the paragraphs
to facilitate refe1·ence.] •
. Nova Opera Reparaciones et a.dquisita tempore Thome Chyllyndene
Prioris Ecclesie Xpi Cantuariensis.
( l) Na vis ecclesie Cantuariensis cum apparatu, gradus et pulpiti
ibidem cum stacione crucis, et nova capella beate Virginia
;in eadem navi. Item (2), novum altare oum Tabula argentea &
deaurata, cum apparatu altarum sanctorum Elphegi & Dunstani et
una ymagine beate virginis cum corona aurea et gemmis, cum
iiijO•angtis argenteis&deauratiset cipho aureo precioso cum gemmis
in. ma.nu virginis pro corpore xpi imponendo; ascendendo et
descendendo quum placet. Item (3), iiij0• altaria unde duo ex una,
parte chori et duo ex: altera de novo depicta. Item (4), dealbacio
tocius ecclesie ·cum nova camera parvorum sacristarum et capella
subtus Sancti.A.ndree. Item (5), una camera privata et plumbata
juxta vestiarium. Item (6), pavim.entum ex parte Chori boriali
de novo factum. Item (7), via de Eoolesia ad Dorm.itorium cum
reparacione lavatorii ibidem, et subtus nova rastura plumbata.
Item (8), clausura vie ex utraque parte de claustro usque ad
cameram Prioris. et via de ·camera prioris· usque ad curiam de
novq facta et plulllbata. Et emendacio gutteri de claustro ducentis
se in via que ducit de cla.ustro ad infirmariam pri.mo in via
eadem directe usque ad :finem capituJi exterius, Deinde directe
extra capellam Prioris ex pa.rte australi usqtie ad Cameram Supptj.
oris, Deinde transverse perCameram Supprioris et transverse
magnam aulam infirmitorii, Deinde per Oameram priva.tam P1-i.:
pris in. longitudine et sic per Cameram su.btns le gloriet,. Deinde
?,d caput tercij dormitorii et tune vertit se ad aqueductum inter.,
cio dormitorio: hoe gutterum fuit ant'iquum devastatum et perdi.:.
tum tamen reparatum oummagnis expensiset plumbatum in terra
in magna pa.rte. Item (9), reparacio dormitorii cum novo tecto
plumbato et novis Fenestris et pluribus leotis.. Item (l 0), teetum
Dormitorii privatmn cum novis fenestris. Item (11}, }ectum
·Prioris cum novo studio et aula superius, et Ga11deroba quasi de
no:vo constructa & plumbata. Item (12), via de capella Prior-is
ad Cameram suam de novo selata • et reparata cum novis
fenestri.s et . no:vo camino. Item ( 13), nova cal'.!lera subtus
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N 'CANTERBURY. 1 8 9
constructs cum novo teetd e t cooperto cum
Item camera Gamins) balnio'
Item camera privata via eandem plunabata. Item (pro Deporto, cum,
celario. Item coquille alia hon.esta quatuor
Firmaria. Item Meisteroraers majori parte toto. Item conapletum. Item Domus completa.
2d), Refectorii cum veteri plunabo foderis
plurabi additis. Item (22), nova camera Celerarii cum
23) Quoda,modo reparatio aule celerarii cum nova via ad
Portam curie reparacio Item 24), camere
juxta coquinam conventus lardario
°amino supra coquinana. Item (26), Item. domms necessarlis
suis. nova sartrina. Item (novu.m novum Item orrium
pro feno Prioris. I t e m (81), clausura murorum de Northegate
cum fair plumbatis. I t e m
32),ciraiterii domibus Margate.
(33), nova sacristaria in Cimiterio cum nova plumbaria.
Item (34), hospicium in vocatum Chekere de novo
totaliter Oxonia mania
sent de novo constructa mina opera reparaciones various Libri seripti et adquisiti tempore ejusdem Thome
.Prioris.]
in the Obituary (Aug. Sacra., 143), evidently
illustrates the manner i n which such accounts were
formed :—
T.Chillinden,Por.—C1austrain Doinum Capitularem,
Magnum Dornaitorium cura not-a via Ecclesiain, & doraura rasturee fieri fecit• •
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH lN "CANTERBURY. 189
totaliter constructa. cum novo tecto et cooperto cum
plumbo. Item (14), alia ea.mere. inferius cum ca.mino et balnio:
honesto. Item (15), superius nova ca.tnera priva.ta cum via. ad
ea.ndem plumbata. Item (16), novus locus pro Deporto, cum.
subtus cela.rio. Item (17), coquine et a1ia. honesta. pro qua.~or
cameris in Firmaria.. Item (18), reparacio de Meisteromers pro
llltl,jori pa.rte in tofio. Item (19), novum opus in claustro adhuc
non completum. Item (20), nova Domas capitularii complet.a. ..
Item (2.1), tectura Refectorii cum veteri plumbo et xij foderis.
novi plumbi adcli.tis. Item (22), nova cam.era. Celerarii cum
nova scola monachorum.
Reparaciones in Curia.
(28) Quodamodo reparatio au1e cele1·arii. cum. uova via ad
P.orta.m curie & repal'a.cio ejusdem porte. Item (24,), nove eamere
pro hospitio ju:x:ta coqu.inam conve7?-tus cum novo la~daTio
subtus, et novo camino supra coquinam. Item (25), reparacio
domus bracini. Item (26), domus in officio celerarii pro necessa~
riis sui.s. Item (27), novasartrina. Item {28), novum granarium.
Item (29), novu.m. stabulum · Prioris. Item. (30), novum orrium
pl'O feno Prioris. Item (31), clausura murorum de N ortbegate
usqua ad quenegate cum iiij0r Turribus plumbatis. Item
(82), reparacio porte cimiterii cum ij do mi bus sacriste in Btll'gate.
Item (33), :nova sacristaria :in Oimiterio cum nova. plumba1·ia. •
Item. (34,), hospicium in. villa, vocatum le Chekere de novo
totalite1· constructum. Oxonia. exceptis aula et ij cameris omnia
edificia sunt de novo constr-μcta una cum capella.
[Then follow opera and 'l'epcvrcwiones at the various Manors,
closing with Irib1'i scripti et ad,q_uisit;i, tempore ejusdem Thome·
.:P1-io-ris .]
The following more concise notice of the works of this Prior,
given in the Obituary (.A..ng. Sa.era, p. 143), has evidently
been abridged from the above Roll, and the comparison of the
two illustrates the manner in which such accounts were
form.eel:-.
• J. Oll!illinde-n,Prior.-Olaustrw:n. quoque,Domum. Capitula.rem,
Magnum. Dormitorillnl cum nova, viA versus Eccle.siam, & subtus
domum rasturre de novo :fieri fecit, ·
190 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
Certa etiam asdificia intra ambitum Curim consistentia, viz.
Sartrinum, Gran.arium, Stabulumque Prioris, & muros cum torribus
ejusdern Curia3, domosque qua,mplures necessarias longo
tempore dirutas, de novo fecit & emendavit.
A/dem quoque lapideam juxta aulam Prioris quo vocatur
Pavid Cham.ber, cum duabus aliis cameris, lectumque Prioris in
Dormitorio cum. Studio & aliis domibus ann.exis, laudabiliter
reparavit. I n eleemosynaria verb aularo. Presbyteroruro. & aulam
pueroru.m cum aliis diversis 03dificiis de novo construxit.
No. VII.
Report of the Dilapidation's of the Archbishop's Palace, c. 1348,
from, the Register of the Letters of Prior Robert (Hathbrande).
Reg. 12 of the Chapter Archives, fol. 76 b. (Hitherto unpublished.)
Memorandum quod magna aula in palacio domini archiepiscopi
indiget magna reparacione viz. in gutteris coopertura fenestris
vitris et ligneis hostiis atque muris. I t e m Capella indiget reparacione
in celatura. I t e m camera domini parva indiget reparacione
viz. in fenestris hostiis & coopertura. I t e m magna
camera indiget majori reparacione quia manes fenestrm
sunt fractee & pars muri ejusd.em. I t e m coquina pro cadent
camera reparari non potest nisi de novo totaliter construatur.
Item dorous magna que vocatur aula beati Thome juxta cameram
domini est adoo ruinosa, quoil sine nova constructione
reparari non potest. I t e m camera juxta magnam aulam indiget
reparacione in coopertura. I t e m alie due camere inter
magnam aulam & roagnam cameram situate sunt adeo ruinose
quod reparari non possunt sine con.structione facienda de novo.
Item magna coquina indiget coopertura. I t e m magna porta
cum stablis indiget magna reparacione viz, in coopertura hostiis
atque muris. I t e m multi sunt alii defectus in predict° palacio
viz, in porticibus gradibus et aliis diversis partibus quos ad.
presens nescio ennumerare.
Ex Reg. literarum Dni Rob ps.
[This document is not dated, but those before it have dates 1338, 1341,
1344, and after it, 22 E. 3, 1348. The Prior was Robert Hathbrande (from
1338 to 1370). Archbishop Stratford died 1348, and was succeeded by
Ufford, who died before he was consecrated, 1.349, and by 13radwardin,
190 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
• Certa etiam redi-6.cia intra ambitum Curire consistentia, viz.
Sartrinum, Granarium, Stabulumque Prioris, & muros cum turribus
ejusdem Curire, domosque quamplures necessarias longo
tempore dirutas, de novo fecit & emendavit.
1Edem quoque lapideam juxta au.lam Prioris que vocatur
Pavid Chamber, cum duabus aliis cameris, lectumque Prioris in
Dormitorio cum Studio & aliis domibus anne:ris, laudabiliter
-r.eparavit. In eleemosyruzrria vero aulam Presbyterorum & aulam.
puerorum cum aliis diversis redificiis de novo constru:x:it.
No. VII.
Repo1·t of the Dilapidations of the IH"chbisliop's Palace, c. 1348,
from the Register of the Lett6'rs of Pri01· Robm·t (Fiathbrnnda) .
Reg. 12 of the Chapter Archives, fol. 76 b. (Hitherto unpublished.)
Memorandum quod magna aula in palacio domini archiepiscopi
indiget magna reparacione viz. in gutteris coopertura fenestris
vitris et ligneis hostiis atque muris. Item Capella indiget reparacione
in celatura. Item camera domini parva indiget reparacione
viz. in fenestris hostiis & coopertura. Item magna •
camera indiget ma.jori reparacione quia omnes fenestrre
sunt fractre & pars muri ejusdem. Item coquina pro eadem
camera reparari non potest nisi de novo totaliter construatur.
Item. domus magna que vocatur aula beati Thome juxta cameram
domini est adeo ruinosa, quod sine nova constructione.
reparari non potest. Item camera juxta magna111 aulam indiget
reparacione in coopertura. Item alie due camere inter
magnam au.lam & ma.gnam camera.m situate sunt adeo ruinose
quod reparari non possunt sine constructione facienda de novo.
Item magna coquina indiget coopertura. Item magna porta
cum stablis indiget magna reparacione v;iz. in coopertura hostiis
atqne muris. Item multi sunt alii defectus in predicto palacio
viz. in porticibus gradibus et aliis diversis partibus quos ad
presens nescio ennumerare.
• Ex: Reg. literarum D»i Roo :p8,
[This document is not dated, but those before it have dates 1338, 1341,
1-344, and after it, 22 E. 8, 1348. The Prior was Robert Hathbrande (from
r338 to 1370). Archbishop Stratford died 1348, and was succeeded by
Ufford, who died before he was .consecrated,_ 1349, and by Bradwardin,
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 9 1
and succeeded who the administrators
17fford for value B1101.58. 2d., sentenced The dilapidation; was
from as was Inford No. VIII.
I referred preceding pages name "Distribution
a most valuable o f connection between
monastic on and Prebendal
Chapter were constructed
of their ruins, on the other. I t been employed it, and gives copy document History 8vo History Canterbury,'
H e observes it on the demise brethren,
consent chapter, others order ascertain these continued.
some queen Elizabeth's accession; since I n document he has
Somner's notes, and placed the descriptions of stall S The reprint (win Sonaner's own preserved
unpublished, but which give most interesting and
curious information concerning mode transformation
dwellinghouses
and gardens was carried out. M y own notes are
(R. margin each allotment brackets added the number which is • to i t by
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CIDJRCR IN CANT.ElIDT.mY. 191 .
who also died 1349, 11,nd was succeeded by Islip, wh.o sued the administrators
of Uffot·d for dilapidations to the v:alue of £1101. 5s. 2d.,. which sum
the latter was sentenced to pay (Batteley, 72). The above document is
connected with this matter, and recites the dilapidation ; the survey w-ns
made at the desire of the Archbishop, as appears from. a previous entry,
but ns it is not dated the name of the Archbishop in question is uncertain,
but wo.s probably Ufford himself.]
No. VIII.
[The following document, which I have refe1Ted to repeatedly
in the preceding pages under the name of the « DistJ.i.bution
Document," is a. most valuable link of connection between
the monastic buildings, on the one hand, and the Prebendal
houses with other Chapter buildings which were constructed
out of their rums, on the other. It has been employed by
Somner, who first transcribed it, and by Battely a.nd Gostling.
Hasted gives a copy of this document in his ' History of
Kent,' fol., vol. iv. p. 570; and again, in his 8vo' History of Canterbury,'
1801, vol. i. p. 497. He observes that "the frequent
changes which appear by it to have been made between some of
the prebendaries of those lodgings, at first allotted to them, and
then again to others on the demise of any of their bt:ethren,
some with the consent of the chapte>:, and others by 01·der of
the visitor, make it very difficult to ascertain to which stall they
in reality belonged, and these changes seem to have continued
till some time after queen Eliz;abeth's accession; since which
the lodgings have remained fixed to the prebendaries, according
to their respective stalls." In printing the document he has
omitted Somner's notes, and placed the descriptions of the
allotments in the order of the numbers of the stalls to which
they were given in his time. The present reprint is from my
own literal transcript of Somner's own manuscript, p>:esel'ved
in the Chapter archives, and is accompanied by his own notes,
hitherto unpublished, but which give most interesting and
o_urious information concerning the mode in which the transf,
ormation of the conventual buildings into a group of dwellinghouses
and gardens was carried out. My own notes are
marked (R. W.), and in the margin of each allotment I have
in brackets added the number which is • attached to it by
Hasted, with the letter H. to indicate my authority.]
192 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
• T h e Distribution Document.
The division and distribution of houses (or Lodgings) to and
ye begunn.e ye Ann.o The Deanes F i r s t from ye Chapell doore next ye Dortor to
lodging, h a v e ye ye Cheker
wth all manner of Chambers therenuto belonging,
both new and old; lately appartaining
to Prior there, With Ye come lofts
and sellars under them, adioyning to ye west
end of his great gardens. A n d alsoe all ye
brewhouse separate now from Mr. Parkehurst
lodging, and ye bake-house, and all other
• h o u s e s as the whole lodging lately ordeyned
for ye Mr of ye choristers unto ye Deanes
stable. A n d ye gatehouse there next to his
s t a b l e s : • alsoe ye great barna next ye stables,
and ye twoe stables lately called ye Prior's
stables, and ye sumptery stable wth ye Carter's
hall. A n d division to be made betwene
Mr Dr Itidleies garden directly from
Mr Deanes gate. A n d to stop up ye walke
upon y8 wall. A n d Mr Deane to have ye
whole roome from ye barne with ye towne•
wall and tower unto Dr. Ridleies orchard
pale. A n d a way to be reserved for Mr
Deane to ye Posterne gate. A n d ye garden
• b e f o r e his hall doore with ye wine sellar.1
1 . First to have vault called Bishop Becket's
t o m b e under our Ladies chapell. The house
c a l l e d his bakehouse, his kitchen, hall, par-
l o r , buttery, the south side of ye old chapell,
ye chancell there, with all manner of build-
'By next yeare this That
3;e great bee downe wth y° stuff° to
builded certaine lodgings for y° Pety and and other
office to them by r discretion of y° Prebendaries and the
years a "That ye should be taken"
downs from ye great, 111° to have twos foder, everye
have l92 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDmGs OF THE
The Distnilnition Doc1i1nent.
The division and distribution of houses (or Lodgings) to and
amongst y0 Deane prebendaries and preachers of Christchurch,
Canterbury, by decree of Chapter, begunne November 25 and
continued to y0 29th of the same. Anno Dni. 1546, wth Notes.
The Deanes
lodging.
The Bp. of
Dovor, Dr.
Thorntons
Lodging.
First from ye Chapell doore next y0 Dortor to
have y" chapell wth y> Closet, the old Oheker
wth all manner of Chambers thereunto belonging,
· both • new a.nd old ; lately appartaining
to ye Prior there, with y0 corne lofts
and sellars under them, adioyning to y0 west·
end of his great gardens. And alsoe all y0
brew house separate now from Mr. Parkehurst
lodging, and ye bake~house, and all other
houses as the whole lodging lately ordeyned
for ye M' of y0 choristers unto y0 Deanes.
stable. And y• gatehouse there next to his
stables: aJ.soe ye great barne next ye stables,
and ye twoe stables lately called y0 Prior's
stables, and ye sumptery stable wth ye Carter's
hall. And a division to be made betwene
Mr Dr Ridleies garden directly from
Mr Deanes gate. And to stop up y0 walke
upon y0 wall. And Mr Deane to have y0
whole roome from ye barne with y0 towne •
wall and tower unto Dr. Ridleies orchard
pale. And a way to be reserved for Mr
Deane to y0 Posterne gate. And y0 garden
before his ha11 doore with y0 wine sellar.1
1. First to have ye vault called Bishop Beoket's
tombe under our Ladies cha.pell. The house
called his bakehouse, his kitchen, hall, parlor,
buttery, the south side of y0 old cha.pell,
ye cha.ncell there, with all m~nner of build-
1 By decree of chapter 1547, the next yeare after this Division, "That
y• great Dortor shall bee taken dow1=1e and w1h y• stnifo thereof coming to.
be builded certaine lodgings for y• J>ety canons and Vicars, and other
houses of office to them by y• discretion of y• Prebendnries ;" and the
yen.re following by o. like Decree, ''That of ye leade that should be taken·
downe from y• gi-eat· Dortor, M' Deane t-0 ha.ve twoe foder, and everye
Prebend to liave one foder:"
•
MONASTERY OP CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 193
yere made, his courts before
his doore and kitchen, with ye garden
and therein,
next ye And
ye Mr along
ye Deanes garden.1
Mr Sentle- 2 . have ye
f f e r m a r y —y egarden on ye North
s i d e ; the old table Hall with ye kitchin, buttery,
ye ye end ye the little garden there, and ye stable next
Mr ye Mr 3 . yo With his larder y e doure, wth all ye wall roome, tower,
H.) t o w n e ye whole
from Mr. Deanes wall against ye
late ye The
ye ye Dr. Ridleyes 4 . ye and y e chamber Willm Wyndcheps being
(5. H.) a n n e x e d ye ye Homors,1
wth a l l manner houses there above and
his farre
ye chamber as garden diredly departeth. A n d division there
be made crosse ye ye wall lyeth. A n d all ye back garden to Mr.
garden, with ye towne wall, the
also ye Stable next the bakehouse.
I yeare to W ye Mr Miles ye now Mr ye next. M r Parkhurst ye next hedged. M r and
ye Mr Mr Hunt
all ye vacant roome from M' Parkhurst; garden to 'ye santuarie wall. Mr Golson
and Mr,ye roome Mr Ridly Miles ye wall. A l l ye '
VII. 0
OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBUUY. 193
gers Lodging.
(2. H.)
ings by him yere made, his courts before
his hall doore and kitchen, with ye garden
before his gallery and his old garden in the
sanctuarie, with his orchard and tower therein,
and ye stable next to ye middle gate. And
ye hay house next Mr Seinligers stable a.long
ye Deanes garden.1
2. First, he to have ye North side or Isle of y0
ffermary chapell, wth ye garden on ye North
side; the old table Hall with ye kitchiu, buttery,
ye chamber called Gonnissons chamber,
and y• Lodging at y• upper end of y• hall,
the little garden the.re, and y• stable next
Mr Deanes stable with y~ little barne.
Mr Park- 3. He to have y0 kitchen with his larder next
hurst's Lodging. ye doure, wth all y• wall roome, tower,
( 4. H.) towne wall, garden to ye stables, the whole
DrRidleyes
Lodging.
(5. H.)
lodging from Mr. Deanes wall aga.inst y•
well late made in the brewhouse, y0 kitchen
before named pertaining to his lodging. The
stable next y• garden wth y• hay house thereunto
belonging.
4. He to have all y• chambers and house from
y• chamber now Wilhn vVyndcheps being
annexed unto y• lodging named y• Hom01·s,1
w1h all manner houses there above and
under, joyning to his garden, and soe far1·e
crosse ye great . chamber as his ga1·den wall
direQtly departeth. And a division there
to be made crosse y• chamber as y0 garden
wall lyeth. And all ye back garden to M.r_
Deanes garden, with ye towne wall, . the
tower lately in ye tenure of Mr Daniel, And
also y0 Stable next the bakehouse. •
1 By decree of chapter 1545 the yea:re before this division, the Common
garden was divided into 12 parts, viz. to M• Thornden, Menyl and Daniell'
to have and keepe y• upper garden. M• Milles Y" next garden now_hedged,
M• Ridley y• next. M•·Parkburst y• nerl J1edged. M• Seintleger and
Devenish y• next twoe gardens hedged and paled. M• Glasier and M• Hunt
aU y• M• Parkhurst toy• M'.• Golson
a,nd M• .Nevill y• vacant ·roome from M• Rielly and Milles gardens to
y• foresaid wall, .All y~ great · allies to be paled, &c. • •
VOL. VII. 0
194 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OE THE
Mr Mennys 5 . He t o have ye other part o f ye foresaid
Lodging. g r e a t chamber in ye homers,' the rooms un-
(6. H.) d e r n e a t h , with ye gallery and garden and.
his old chamber, with all manner of chambers,
sellars and roomes there enclosed, and
ye stable next ye forge barne and ye hay
house betwixt ye barne and ye BP of Dovor.
Mr Glaziers 6 . He to have ye whole Lodging from ye 'Larder
Lodging. g a t e to ye Pentise gate,2 with ye chambers
(7. H.) t h e r e called Heaven and Paradise; a n d
soe through ye Prater, and t o ye cloister.
And a l l ye Frater t o ye Dortor wall, ye
common kitchens with all manner houses
sellars and lofts. T h e lead timber and freestone
of ye frater take downe for ye Treasure
of ye church! and ye stable next Mr D r
Ridleyes.
1 Following a copy of this decree before I had a sight of the originall,
I have in my Survey written i t Honors.* A n d truely as i t is in ye
originall Homors, I know not what i t may signifie or whence the name
should come But have guessed att the derivation of that other name of
Honors in yo same treatise.
2 Soo called from a long entry or passage, vaulted over comming to i t
from the Court gate, or (as wee now more commonly call it) the Porter's
gate: where, under the gate southward, was not only a door opening into
the then Porter's Lodge, a. 1650 altered and made on the other side of the
gate as now it is, but alsoe another doore opening into that long entry,
pentice, or passage of old, serving for carriage and recarriage to and from
the Cellarer's Hall, the common Hall also and Kitchin ; but afterwards,
within the memorie of some yet alive, used by the grammar Schollars for
their passage to and from church.
3 This kitchen with ye other roomes about it as superfluous was ye same
yeare with y° Frater by Chapter decree ordered to be taken downe in
these words, "Item, ye common kitchen to be taken downe with other
superfluous houses there, and all ye stuffe to be carried away and Mr Glasier
to have ye roome ; with ye long seller under ye frater."
4 What here you see allotted to ye company in common was shortly
after given and graunted from them to Air Bob G-oldson in the order of
this division ye 8th Prebendary, in particular, by what meanes .36 to what
intent shall be skewed at large in treating of that Prebendall house.
* The expression my Survey shows that the writer of this transcript
was Mr. Somner, in whose Survey of the Antiquities,' etc., p. 106 (Bat,
tely's edition), the " Honors " are discussed. ( R . W.)
194 THE CONVENTOAL BUILDINGS OF THE
MrMennys
Lodging.
(6. H.)
Mr Glasiers
Lodging.
(7. H.)
5. He to have ye other pa.rt of ye foresaid
great chamber in y" lwmo1·s, 1 the rooms underneath,
with y" gallery and garden and.
his old chamber, with all manner of chambers,
sella.rs and roomes there enclosed, and
ye stable next ye forge barne and y• hay
house betwixt y" barne and y• BP of Dovor.
6. Re to have y0 whole Lodging from ye Larder
gate to y" Pentise gate,2 with y0 chambers
there called Heaven and Paradise ; and
soe through y• Frater, and to y• cloister.
And all y• Frater to y• Dortor wall, y0
common kitchen8 with all manner houses
sellars and lofts. The lead timber and freestone
of ye frater take downe for y0 Treasure
of y" church'!. and y0 stable next yr Dr
Ridleyes.
1 Following a copy of this decree before I had a sight of the originall,
I have iu my Su1·vey writt.en it Honors.')(; And truely as it is in y•
originall Homors, I know not what it may signifi.e or whence the name
should come But have guessed att the derivation of that other name of
Honors in y0 same treatise.
2 Soe called from a long entry or passage, vaulted over comming to it
from the Court gate, or (as wee now more commonly call it) the Porter's
gate: where, under the gate southward, was not only a door opening into
the then Porter's Lodge, a.0 1550 altered and made on the other side of the
gate as now it is, but alsoe another doore opening into tho.t long ent1-y,
pentice, or passage of old, serving for carriage and recarriage to and from
the CellareJ•'s Hall, the common Hall also and Kitchin ; but afterwards,
within the memorie of some yet alive, used by the gra.=ar Schollars for
their passage to and from church.
3 This kitchen with y• other roomes about it as superfluous was y• same
yea.re with y• Frater by Chapter decree ordered to be taken downe in
these words, "Item, y• common kitchen to be taken downe with othe1•
superfluous houses there, and all y• stuffe to be carried away and M• Glasier
to have y• roome; with y• long seller under y• frater."
4 What here you see allotted to y• ~ompany in common was sbort1y
after given and graunted from them to M• Rob Goldson in the order of
this division y• 8'h .Prebendary, in particular, by what meanes & to what
int.ent shall be shewed at large in treating of that Prebendall house,
* The expression my SurTJey shews that the writer of this transcript
was Mr. Somner, in whose ' Survey of the Antiquities,' etc., p. 106 (Bat.
tely's edition), the " Honors" are discussed, (R. W.)
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 9 5
Mr Miles 7 .
Mr Gold- 8 .
son's 3. 9 .
(8. H.)3
Mr De 1 0 .
venishs Lodgings.
Kee to have ye whole lodging with the
next ye Pentise in ye court with
ye ye court gate. A n d
ye ye lately ye Treasurers
ye 1
flee have twoe lodgings late Mr Mr ye to ye tenements. A n d to have ye
Mr 2
Hoe have Mr Coks Lodging the
and close and gardens impaled
ye ye flee ye Mr Crosse
and ye ye whole garden, with the vaults and
tavvne Provided yt Mr Mules have house soe convenient as he
ye 1 a° Mr 1VIilles lodging
ye ye Canterbs
ye 2 decree Chapter a. ye house Prebend's
Mr a chapel!, taken
ye sold."
In June 1547. The Chapter make the following decree, "Item, yt at
Protector letters, ye M"ea Chapter hath granted Mr Bobt ye and and r late ffrater house and tenn pounds, other
y° ye same taken ye ffrater,
and as as shall be Vice
And ye Mr all ye ye convenient
new Prebends house, and convey cary rubbish Prater."
I1Y Dr Jackson, inhabiteth.
name Bishop of Caithness,
Itobt Steward, eleventh; Mr Ponet, eighth.—Battely, p. 1.28, etc.
T h e other names i n list coincide with Battely's list and
Hasted's 2
MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CAN'£ERBURY. 195
Mt Milles
Lodging.
(10. H.)
M1 Goldson's
Lodging.
(8. H.)
M1 Nevills
Lodging.
(8. H.)8
MrDevenishs
Lodgings.
(9. H.)
7. Hee to have y0 whole lodging with the •
garden next ye Pentise in y0 court with
y0 whole lodging over y., com·t gate. And
y0 stable with y0 hay house lately y0 Treasurers
store house adjoyning neere y0 bakehouse.
1 •
8. Hee to have twoe lodgings late M• Harles
(Searles, H.) and Mr Brookes with ye roomes
square to y0 tenements. And to have y0
stable that :Mr Devenish lately had.2
9. Hee to have Mt Coks Lodging with the
Plumery and close and gardens impaled
upon y0 hill to y0 schoole garden.
10. Hee to have y0 whole lodging that M• Orosse
had, beneath and above, with all manner of
Roomes within y0 gate called y0 Hogg Hall.
The whole garden, with the vaults and
town.a wall. Provided yt M• Milles have a
wood house soe convenient for him as he
now hath, els to keepe y0 same.
By decree of Chapter a• 1547, "Item, M• Milles to have unto his lodging
y• part of y• gallery from his house to the end of my Lord of Cante1·b•
bakehouse & soe into y• Court.
A decree of Chopter n• 1569, "That y• roofe of a house ( once a Prebend's
Lodging) neere M• Deanes kitchen, Item, of n. chapell, to be token
downe & y• lead of it sold.''
In June 1547, The Chapter make the following decree, " I tem, yt ot
the Sight of the Ld .Prot.ector his lette1'8, tendring y• Kings M"" pleasure,
the Ohapter bath grant.ed that M• Robt Goldson shall have allowed to him
for y• lead, stone, timber, a.nd other things sold nnd otherwise spent lately
of y• la.ta ffrater house six score and tenn pounds, and as much other
timber for y• timber of y• sn.me as is spent and ta.ken from y• said ffi:ater,
o.nd shall have ns much Iron ns abnll he thought meete for him by the Vice
Deane and Treasurer. Andy• said M• Goldson to have ally• iron, glasse,
timber, and stone now left of y• same frater unsold, soe as he build a con•
venient new Prebends house, and convey and ca.ry away the l'Ubbiah of
the same Frater."
Hereupon this ]',.fr Goldson forthwith built and sett up that which at
present D• J ackson, as his successor, now inhobiteth.
3 His no.me is in the list of the twelfth Prebend; the :Bishop ofCaithness,
lfobt Steward, eleventh; M• Ponet, eighth.-.Battely, P· 128, etc.
1703. The other names in the list coincide with Battely's list and
Ho.sted's numbers.
o2
196 T H E CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
Ponetts 1 1 . f l e e t o have f e other lodging called Ho=
Lodging. m o n wth ye gallery a t t ye doore above and.
(11. H.) b e n e a t h . A n d ye chapel above and under,
and ye orchard inclosed w i t h stone walls
next ye street square with his lodging. A n d
ye stable with ye hay house late Mr Daniel's.
And licence t o b u i l d a . gallery O f ten.n.e
yards upon ye Bishop o f Dovors garden
wall there.
L o : o f 1 2 . He t o have ye lodging in ye late long hall'
Cathnes f r o m M r Deanes lodging t o ye Bishop o i
Lodging. D o v o r s lodging with a l l manner houses and
(12. H.) v a u l t s late i n ye tenure of Mr Ar thur Sentleger.
A n d a way through ye G-imews2 t o
bring i n wood. A n d ye stable between.e
Mr. Ponitt and Mr. Parkhurst.
1 In ye yeare 1545, the yeare before this division, a decree was made in
Chapter "That y° long hall should be pulled downe with speed."
This gymewes (or guimawes) is a French word signyfying a place of
Wild Mallowes Sr such a place is this, wayed into by a doore in ye dark
entry under the east end of the Deanes Chapel ... this is now noe Prebends
house but belongs to Dr Jackson by lease from the Church.
No. I X .
EXPLANATION OF PLATES 1, '2, 3. F i g . 33 A N D Fig. 8.
, Roman capitals, from A to P, are reserved for the source and tanks of
the waterworks, in accordance with those introduced into the copy of the -
small Norman drawing (fig. 33). B u t the scale of the plan we are now
considering necessarily excludes the source and tanks outside the city
wall, from A to F, and leaves only the tank G, which was fixed close to it.
Tanks under tkeir debrent necntes.
G Tank outside the city wall.
H First Lavatory, erroneously termed the Baptistery.
I Second Lavatory, in the great Cloister.
K Third Lavatory, opposite to the Infirmary door. Between these two
lavatories is the well (14) and the 'great stand-pipe (13).
L Cistern (or fbns) in the outer cemetery, for the use of the townsfolk,
near which is a second well..
M P i s c i n a , or Fishpond.
N the Prior's cistern (fens).
0 the Prior's water-tub (cupa).
P the Lavatory under the North Hall (Aula Nova
196
Mr Po:tietts
Lodging.
(ll. H.)
Lo: of
Ca.thnes
Lodging.
(12. H.)
TllE CONVENTU.AL BUILDINGS OF THE
11. Hee to have y0 other lodging called Ho.:
mors wth y0 gallery att ye doore above and
beneath. And ye chapel above and under.,
and ye orchard inclose4 with stone walls
next ye street .square with his lodging. And
ye stable with y0 hay house late Mr Daniells.
And licence to build a . gallery of tenne
yards upon y8 Bi.shop of Dovors garden
wall there.
12. Re to have y• lodging in ye late long hall 1
from Mr Deanes lodging to y0 Bishop or
Dovors lodging with all manner houses and
vaults late in y0 tenure of Mr .Arthur Sentleger.
.And a way through ye Gimews!! to
bring in wood. And y0 stable betweene
Mr. Ponitt and Mr. Parkhurst.
1 In y• yea.re 1545, the yeare before.this division, a decree was made in
Chapter" That y• long hall should be pulled downe with speed."
2 This gymewes (or guima.wes) is a. French word eignyfying a. place of
Wild Mallowes & such ·a place is this, wayed "into by a doore in y• dark
entry under the east end of the Deanes Chapel . .. this is now noe Prebends
house but belonga to D• J a.ckson-. by leas~ from the Church.
No. IX.
EXPLANATION OF PLATES 1, .2, a: Fig. 38 _A.ND Fig. 8.
. Roman capitals, from .A. to P, are reserved for the source and tanks of
the wate-rworks, in acoordance with those introduced into the copy of the •
small No=an drawing (fig. SS). J3ut the scale of the plan we are now
considering necessarily excludes the source and tanks outside the ·city
wall, from A. to F, and leaves only the tank G, which was .fixed close to it.
Tanlcs wnder tltcir different 001nes.
"G Tank outside the city woll. • •
H First Lavatory, ei.:roneously term~d the Baptisterr,
I Second Lavatory, m the great Cloister. .
K Third Lo.va.tory, op~site to . the Infirmary door.. 13e~een these two
lavatodes is the well (14) and the great'stand•p1pe (13). ·
L Cistern (or Jons) _in the outer cemetery, for the use of the townsfolk,
• near which is a second well . .
M M.'. Piscina, or Fishpond.
·N tl;i.e :Prior's cistern (fons). •
0 the Prior's water-tub (cupa). -. •
P the Lavatory under the North Hall (Aula Nova).
COANI?:11Cld WA N 1-21fr
1VRVS C V R 1 C
1 I I
11•11111111111111111111111•11111111•1•111111101111011 111111111111111111111111111=11111011111111111111•N TER COVRV(Y) chin-Kris 11111IMMIHNINI );1 COVIV/07 CV' /E
—11 —Li
V T a T
KORMAN (D.RA.W ING --,2..(c-sQ.,@ OF T H E - - PRIORY OF CHRIST- CHURCH, CANTERBURY, WITH ITS SYSTEM OF WATERWORKS,
made c.A.D. 1165. and. subsequently inserted into the Great Psalter of Eadwin,
now preserved in the Library of Trinity Colege, Cambridge. iu.A•ta44,„„ tlw(yal:mai tlyaNCilLo, 4Sc), Aik,foonzawa4wov 4 tivettylinkiat4.
S I - 1 11 N 0 I A
Li tY` Castle 5t Loxid.0
Pt. I. PT I.
_J
z
0
+
\...-_I_ 1
PL I. PT I.
I I
NOR.K~N ~R'JtWING
~Of THE ~
PRIORY OF CHRIST- CHURCH, CANTERBURY, WITH ITS SYSTEM OF WATERWORKS.
a
made c.A.D. ll65, and subsequently inserted into the Great Psalter of Eadwin,
nowpreserved in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge.
~,fwmi&w ~ ½ ~'.tftllto. ,,tt..A ~ , ~~~of ~w. ~l
-..
.) -, N 0 7 I
u
,,f,a~fr 71! ~~
1M; R~:
0
/\ rf;
121)9 1.4 I /Le
II I I11111
7I -1I1 1fr T11 -r1-11- 7II
Ca .ell àJirmort' A \ w /45,71 Airavax..(su
911 I n i MErilell 11.11116!
Im1.1oI1111.11111 ii1O11N111N11O 111M11M111O11M/111M1111111211111111111•1111111111111111111m11e1 l111111111111M11a.1il1mMilla i- i n I a i O ni e 111111111111111111111 1111111111.11111111 Mill fall is I k orivivii
( 0
cc.
apl s• iIf AWCOURRICRIASIMINSINIU U.S, ff
low I I I 11111*WILI/M119.1.1.-611
inplortmeeNtimmor NI
1 L rI von AIIL •1w1 n4oo, Awrw1 own 0 w-4a vm •r ipurrairsitsaarmaewlm 1a.m1arairstraraststwamordrimarramm/ 1 1 1 1 yr/ r .0414111,1110151' 70212M7111202111.111211501141rINIWIMEIV
fONS IN ITE/10 a1Cor
1um11it1111111111111.11111111111110k
11111II1MMO62N41T11SMIZMIIIRIMrOitNriNai.1W113a1p0e6.1•.
gtirripik11m.-4411a11l1o.11w7-\ wnrrlmagisimrauinLimffeigirw. 11°
ig 1ir1g10#4 4-roofk
CaPla
p is
V6-7-
ife f BA R v
\fi \nt
P
CCSSA RI Vm
linmmialtr rSinWimIL11ix13!1w17i e11,1v1i1r1o1NmMyWsVzIeRsIPonMs.2iz0e7r\ NIMibmINwIWzo. AwVi x\yWwOerWam DINTVSWIN 11111/11111111V 1•111:WiNvNI*1110.0'
WA jr71 r 'WM Er OM TA WAS VA PIEY
F4AYVII 4
PREPZINT1(0117/
Pl. P T. 2
"
® ~
" :s s,.,
::s
_J
~ €.Cl.SS AR I vm
------------- ----- -------
4,5 qt3EN1ITG4TE
st,
•
nan==== Main, Ifpe.
Secondary Pipes.
D r a i n , and Waste Pipes.
Latin, names on, the origined, drawing or translations
of them, are in Roman, atritale,
Conjectural, or modern, names ibr epee idwre the.
drawing contains none are in, Ratios.
SURVEYED. MEASURED & DRAWN BY PROP! R . WILLIS .
C1611110214 CEUESIE. CADTTMIR
PLAN OF THE BUILDINGS
P ,• Dof OtheRY
at the
PERIOD OF THE NORMAN DRAWING,
1100
as indicated. by the existing remains.
The Waterwmits are inserted on the authority
of that drawing.
ne.
Site of t.ke
tmon.ry
4(0' 5 0
Seale of Feet
PL. 2
TC1211.'
Kel Bros Iith Castle St Holborn
'' ' ' I
I
' l I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
1
I
1
I ' ' I
I
'l
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
,lo~
Q_l.'ll.~IN~TI!
' \ ',
'
--==.,.----= Mocin- .P,pt.
',
' '
'
----Serrn
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 9 7
circle opposite h door, in-passage Kitchen,
d f It Brewhouse.
k 1 the eastern Stillicidia i n the From t conducts Great (16), Vestiarium (10),
surplus passes great
Bathhouse.
From tv proceeds to Necessarium
at x, below surfaCe a.
great 1).
names and places, Capituum,
Herbarium, Refectorium, explanatory sentences. A l l these are
original, preserving
and letters and lines. I n the old
drawing the Vetusta Monumenta,' liberties
a added above right-hand i f
intended The contractions inscription were expanded, aspects changed, give
either aspect west, that may be read twisting, I n south, according aspect elevation over, upon respective building, written in the expanded The
shew in Latin .Tnscm:ptions upon the 1orma22, drawing.
fishpond
Laics' of the Hall.
L Eons cimeterio Laicormn.
Hie influit Cimeterii, Hie acinam alam do-.
mus infirmorum. -
:MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 197'
Stand-pipes, denoted by a small ci?-cle on the plan lines of the water-pipes.
a opposite the Refectory door, in the north alley of the cloister.
b within the Refectory iioor, in the vestibule.
. •
c in·the Jlll,Ssn.ge between Refectory and Kitchen.
in .the Kitchen.
e in the Larder.
in the Bakehouse.
g, lt in the :BrewhoUBe.
le in the Court.
l in the Bath house.
m junction of pipes in the north alley of the great cloister.
n, :p junctions of pipes in the court.
• •
g, r rain-water pipes in the angles of t-he north-en.stern transept, termed
" Stilliddia" in the Norman drawing. From them the water runs
through gratings at s, t respectively, into the long underground drain
which conducts the rain-water from the Great Cloister through the
Dark Entry or Locutorium at and so under the Vestinrium Infirmary Hall, and Kitchen (9), to w, where it is joined by the pipe
which conveys away the surplus water that passes from the great
piscina through the Prior's tanks N and 0, and that from the Bathhouse.
From w the drain proceeds t-0 the east end of the N ecessariwn
n.t .To, and, passing under the range of sedilia, emerges at y, and
is conducted northwards below the surface of the court to the city
wall, where it opens into the Town ditch at z.
Original Inscriptions upon the 91·eat Norman drawing (Plate . These are either simply the names of buildings and places, as Capituum,
Herbarium, Refectorium, or e:,:pl,anatory sentences. All these are
given in my facsimile exactly as they are 'placed in the original, preserving
all the contractions and forms of the letters and lines. In the old
engraving of this drawing in the 'Vetusta Monumenta,' great liberties
were taken with these inscriptions.
Thus, a Title was added above the south or right-hand margin, as if
the engraver intended that for the top of the plan. The contractions of
the inscriptions were expanded, and their aspects cba~ged, so as to give
them either a north aspect or a west, ·that they may be read without
twisting the book. In the drawing the inscriptions face east, west, north,
or south, nccording to the aspect of the elevation to which they belong.
Each name is written over, under, or upon its respective building, with
one exception, namely, the Locutorium in the Celerer's Court, which word
is w1·itten under the base line of the arcade, 'but i11- tlie opposite aspect.
The sentences are expanded and translated in the following list. The
figures of reference ehew their position iii the places of the plan, Plate 2,
that correspond to those they held 'in the Norman drawing.
•
Latin Insci~ptions 'll(lJ'a-ii tlte .Nor-ma1i dramng.
L Fons in · ci~eterio Laicorum. •
1. Rio infl.uit in piscinam de fonte
Cimeteri~ exterioris.
•
2. Hie intrat nq,lam. in alam domus
iufirmorum. • • • •
Translation.
Cistern in the Laics' cemetery.
Here the water flows into the fMipond
from the cistern in the outer
or ~cs' cemetery.
•
Here the water passes into the aisle
• of the Infirmary 'Hti.11. . .
198 T H E CONVENTUAL EITUAHNGS OF THE
hic exit i n piscinam de
eldem Hic piscina NONA Camera Prioris et fons
ejus.
Porta chniterii juxta Capellam.
Cupa de quam fluit aqua necessarium infirmorum.
Necessarium Coquina Vestiarium.
Hostium Cripte.
12. Via quo ducit ad domum Infir-
1110T11.111.
Columna quam ague
deftciente, aqua
puteo et administrabitur
omnibus Puteus.
Puteolus ante hostium Loontorii
conikunt pluviales qui Claustri est, dirigitur ductus per
Infirmorum,
contra
Hostium Fenestra Hostium Fenestra fercula administrantur.
Fenestra per quam ejiciuntur
Camera piseis 23. Postica Aulam Novara.
here comes i t quits the fishpond, and
gasses from which the water flows
Infirmary
Crypt.
Passage Infirmary-.
into which, when the
of source Locutory
the rain-delivered.
gutters are fixed
turned
and conducted
passage
Infirmary This it and continues i t s course
where the portions are
fish washed.
Kitchen.
The following references in Plate indicate places not explained in the
drawing.
northwards by the covered
Hall.
2298.' } Doors' from Loeutory Butteries Celerer's 198 THE CONVENTUAL BUILDINGS OF THE
3. Et hie exit in piscinam de
e1dem ala.
4. Hie exit de piscina in fontem
Prioris.
5. Nova Camera Prioris et fons
6. Peojrut sa .c •u m·t er .n. J•U Xt . a Ca pe1 1a m.
7. Cupa de quam fl.mt aqua sub
necessa.rium infumorum.
8. N eceasarium Infirmorum.
9. Coquina Infirmorum.
10. V estiariu.m.
11. Hostium Cri~te.
12. Via que duc1t ad domum Infirmorum.
13. Columna in quam ductu aque
deficiente, potest hauriri aqua.
de J?Uteo et administrabitur
ommbus officinis.
14. Puteus.
15. Puteolus ante hostium Locu- •
torii ad quod confl.uunt aque
plu.viales per canalem qu.i per
circuitum Claustri est, a quo
puteolo dirigitul' ductus pel'
viam que ducit ad domum Infirmorum,
et deveniens contl'a
hostium cripte flectitur extra
viam ad dextram.
16. Hostium Locutorii.
17. Feneatra ferrea.
18. Hostium ferreum.
19. Fenestr11. ubi fercula administrantur.
20. Fenestra per quam ejiciuntur
scutelle ad lavandum.
21. Camera ubi piscis lavatur.
22. Porta inter Domum Hospitum
et Coquinam.
28. Postica juxta .A.ulam N ovam.
And here comes out of that aisle,
and enters the fishpond.
Here it quits the fishpond, and
~>asses to the Prior's cistern.
Prior's new camera and cistern.
Cemetery gate near the Chapel.
Tub from which the water flows
under the necessarium of the Infirmary
(8).
Kitchen of the Infirmary.
Vestiary or Treasury (substructure
of).
Door of the Crypt,
Pa.ssn-ge which leads (from the great
cloister) to the Infirmary.
Stand-pipe into which, when the
waters of the source fail, water
raised from the well (14) may be
poured, and it will be distributed
to all the offices.
Well.
Small cistern (under the pavement?)
before the door (16) of the Locutory
; the rain-water delivered
into the gutt-ers which are bed
round the Cloister garth is turrred
into this cistern, and conducted
in a drain-pipe under the pasi:age
which leads to the Infirmary-Hall.
Tl1is pipe, when it comes opposite
to the crypt door, is turned to the
right, and continues its eou1·se
outside the passage.
Door of the Locutory.
Iron grated window.
Iron door.
Window where the portions are
served out.
Window through which the platters
are tossed out for washing.
Chamber in which :fish is wnshe~U©)~Y & A~t!Hl fBsQ~[t{l@fS w>AILACEQ
co111bined with the.
PREBENDAL HOUSES & OTHER STRUCTURES
e.rt'<'te.cl on th.t> site subsequent to t11e dissolution.
~ Suhs6
m
E-1
~
1-l 2
/>
~
o_
u
A
14
0
R
I
T h e
..... ---· ...... ·,
I '"o '\
of'
i
\ J.'isci,
--\ ..
\ _ ~-..
1'1'
G A T
H O tr S E S
0 a, k s
~~~~-~---r·---~- V
~====t v'
6 -- Il
.l>
e "' n, 7 ----._
e ,-..
0 J,
G
~
q, ,-..
ci e
<'c
"l,
.,..
i
-a 8
-?-
e -L . ~ - '
PALACl:
C O l f R T
I
I
1~ l~ 1·- •• - ---- • I
I I ~
L . 87P ~
86 J
/
i
OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY. 1 9 9
30, 31. Passage N.32. W. 34. passage 35) leads Kitchen Court.
35. doorway of that Sheds 37. Ancient Slype transept
Lanfranc s This 16),
38. 39. Stone enable Gateway skews along boundary impressed name
43. Entrance-Postern Site Queningate.
PLATE 3.
.Plan th,e the the present century.
parts block-Cathedral; Roman numerals the prebendal
gardens, as Elizabeth; and Arabic
Cathedral.
The B Tower Tower d.
E South-east I? North-east turret, South-H Chapel North-west K Central Angel M South • Western P List References to the .Plan of the In are included in brackets and marked N ; thus (61 Plan are Original gateway between exterior and interior
Cemeteries.
Present MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY. 199
80, 81. Passage from the Palace to the Great Cloister.
30. Door to Palace grounds.
81. Door to Cloister at N.W. corner.
82. Door from the Cloister to the Palace grounds at S.W. corner.
33. Door from Cloister to N. transept.
.
84. Door from the Cloister to the p11Ssage (34, 36) under the Refectory,
which lends to the Kitchen Court and Green Cou.rt.
85. North doorwa.y oftbat passage.
36. Sheds in the Herbarium built against the wall of the Dormitory.
87 . .Ancient Slvpe or Locutory between the Chapter House and t1·ansept
of Lanf1·anc's church. '.!'his was superseded by the Locutory (at 16),
which leads direct to the Infirmary cloister.
88. Purgatorium or scouring-pipe to the supply-pipe of the cistern L, in
the outer cemetery.
89. Do. for the cistern itself.
40. Stone block by the side of the cistern, to enable pails to be dipped
into it.
41. Gateway between the exterior and interior Cemeteries.
42. The Norman drawing shews a row of trees alon~ the boundury wall,
which are evidently "the Oaks" which have unpressed their no.me
on that part of the Precinct.
48. Entrance-gates to the Prior's grounds and Infirmary offices.
44. Postern in the wall of the Precinct.
45. Site of Q,ueningate.
PLA.TE 8.
P lan of tke Remains of tlie Buildings in tke p1•es- cmg eao ot er 4.-8 and 49
6. First-floor plan of tl1e snme buildings J between •
7. Elevation of ea.rt ~f the south side of the Infirmary cloister opp. 60
8. Present cond1tion of the Hagios.copic chamber from without 69
9. Section of that c'bamber ·1 72
10. Plan of that chnmber .
G?•eat, seconil, and, thil,•d IJo'l'mitory (or Necessai-iitm).
11. Junction of the Necessarium with the great Dormitory . . 83
12. Plan of the second aud third Dormitories and adjacent buildings
. . . , . . . opposite 85
13. Section of second and third-Dormitory opposite 87
14. Subvaults of third Dormitory . 86
16. Arched recesses of second Dormitory 91
16. View of the Oheker building, with the Norman east alley of the
IofirrPari cloister, and the remains of the " Camera, vetus
P ·rioris' . . . . . . . . . opposite 101
17. Double archway in the Prior's entry (at 0, Fi". 12), carrying the
north wall of the Cheker building O
• 103
18. Block J>llln of the "New Lodgyng," the present Deanery . . 110
19. Elevation of the inside face of the wall . . }
20. Plan of the Celerer's Lodging at the west side of the opposite 115
great Cloister . . . . . . .
Pentise Gatelwuse and appenil,ages.
21. Ground plan of the Pentise Gatehouse
22. First floor of the Pentise Gatehouse • J 127
28, Inserted corbel and vault . . • . . . . . 128
24. Longitudinal section of the northern part of the gatehouse and
upper chambers (from A to B), Fig. 21, shewing the elevation
of the Pentise and construction of the wooden north gable,
added in front of tho original Norman portal at the end of the
fourteenth century . . . 129
25. Section of the Oriel vice-turret 1 l 3l
26. Plan of the Oriel vice-turret . • . . . . J
27. Elevation of north gable of the Pentise Gatehouse, on the line
0, D, Fig. 21, witli the frame of the added wooden gable. The
206 MONASTERY OF CHRIST CHURCH I N CANTERBURY.
Fig. P a g e
plastered . . . . 137
Section . . . . . Pentise Gatehouse, Palace shewing 25, . . . . . . . . . . .139
South Gatehouse, . . . opposite Plan appendages, scale
. . . . . 144
Porch of the Bracinum," 161
33. Facsimile Waterworks, . . . . opposite 161
Nos. scale original, and, that, divided into two
Plan Norman Plan present Priory 206 MONASTERY O.F CHRIST CHURCH IN CANTERBURY,
Fig. Pago
p1ast.ered front (D, E, Fig. 24) of that gable and its windows
are, in the drawing, supposed to be removed in order to shew
the remains of the Norman window behind it . . . . 187
28. Section of the Pentise at F, E, Fig. 21 . . . . . 137
29. Pentiae Gat.ehouse, viewed from the Palnce ground, showing the
long roof and northern extremity of the Heaven chamber, with
the oriel-like projections of the vice-turret (Figs. 26, 26) of the
Gatehouse . . . . . . . . . . l39
30. South gable and open archway of the Pentise Ga.tehoUBe, with the
remains of the Convent kitchen . . . . opposite 139
31. Plan of the Court Gatehouse and appendages, on the same scale
as that of the Pentise gatehouse, Fig. 21 . . . . . 144,
32. Porch of'the " Braoinum,'' on the north side of the Green Court 151
83. Facsimile of the smaller Norman drawing of the W at.erworks, on
a scale of half the original . . . . . opposite 161
Plate 1. Nos. 1 and 2. Facsimile of the great Norman drawing, on
the scale of the original, and, like that, divided into two
sheets.
Plate 2. Plan of the buildings of the Priory of Christchurch at the
period of the Nor man drawing.
Plate 3. Plan of the present century remains of the buildings of
the Prio1y and Archbishop's Palace.