KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage


The Roman Pottery of Kent
by Dr Richard J. Pollard  -  Chapter 4  page 142
Doctoral thesis completed in 1982, published 1988

slightly earlier in date (Fulford 1977a). British finds may all be of fourth-century date, but there are as yet insufficient closely-dateable finds from Kent to enable refinement of this dating to be attempted. Argonne ware is widespread in Kent (Fig. 51), with a possible bias towards eastern sites; it is also found with some frequency in Essex, the London area, and central southern Britain (Fulford 1977a). The pale oxidised ‘marbled’ slip ‘a l’eponge’ ware probably from the Poitiers region (Fig. 61) has, in Britain, mostly been recorded in Hampshire and along the Channel coast, with secondary concentrations in the lower Severn and east Kent/lower Thames regions (Fulford 1977a; Galliou et al. 1980, fig. 2; Fig. 51 here). In Britain the forms are confined to hemispherical bowls with deep flanges, and biconical bead-nm bowls (Fulford 1977a), but beakers are known on the Continent (Galliou et al. 1980, fig. 4). Again, only a general fourth-century date can be applied. A handful of sherds are known from Kent, and this is the only import for which a western Gaulish origin can be surmised.
   Fine wares of this period of German derivation are extremely rare, but include mottled-slip pitchers and two-handled flagons (4.IV.1) of third- to fourth-century date (Bird 1981, 1982a; Bird and Williams 1983) and possibly brown colour-coated flagons with white paint decoration, found at Canterbury (Blockley and Day forthcoming) and paralleled at Oudenburg in Flanders (Mertens and van Impe 1971, Grave 128, P1. XLV, no. la; Grave 141, P1. XLVII, no. 3). A fine buff-fabric red-slipped ware with ‘cut-glass’ incised decoration is represented by sherds in fourth-century contexts at Canterbury (Blockley and Day forthcoming) and Richborough (unpublished, Pit 303). The form and source are uncertain, but a bead-everted rim ovoid beaker with an identical fabric and decoration has been published from Oudenburg (Mertens and van Impe 1971, Grave 93, P1. XXIX, no. 1). The fine white rouletted beakers described above (4.IV.1; no. 215 here) may also have been in use in the fourth century, providing further 

evidence of cross-Channel trade in fine wares (cf. Fulford 1977a).
   One ware that has not been described up till now in the present volume is ‘African Red Slip’. A synthesis of this ware in Britain has recently been published (Bird 1977), in which it has been shown that occurrences date from the later first to the late fourth or early fifth century. Bird has proposed that these vessels ‘are likely to have entered with their owners, probably traders, or craftsmen’ (ibid., 272). To her catalogue may be added a foot-ring base with internal grooving of the body from the Chalk ‘cellar’ (unpublished, layer 8), in a sandy orange fabric with orange-red semi-matt slip, and a sherd from Canterbury (Bird 1982a); both of these may be of late third- or fourth-century date.
   The range of flagons in colour-coated ware has been described above. Flagons and flasks generally seem to have been uncommon in the south-east in the fourth century, and most are in dark- or red-surfaced wares, sometimes painted or rouletted. Apart from the colour-coated wares, these include fine grey and fine sandy grey-slip wares plus Alice Holt neutral-slip sandy grey ware (see the following two sections). It has been observed that there is a greater percentage of pewter and glass vessels against pottery in the second half than in the first half of the fourth century in the Winchester Lankhills cemetery (Clarke 1979), and this increasing availability of non-ceramic vessels may have had repercussions for the fine pottery industries of Roman Britain. Fulford (1975a, 134) has observed that decorated beakers and closed forms in New Forest colour-coated ware tend to decline before red slipped bowls, and Howe et al. (1980, 8) have proposed a marked decrease in the production of beakers in the Nene valley. However, the flagons of the Nene Valley and Alice Holt industries, and both flagons and beakers from the Oxfordshire kilns, show no such trends. There is insufficient evidence from funerary contexts in

Page 142

Page 141       Back to Chapter 4       Contents Page         Page 143

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back to Publications On-line               Back to Research Page            Back to Homepage                 

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society 2004

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk