KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage


The Roman Pottery of Kent
by Dr Richard J. Pollard  -  Chapter 4  page 122
Doctoral thesis completed in 1982, published 1988

colour-coated ware type is confined to this century, the ‘ovolo-stamped’ hemispherical bowl (ibid., C58). A single sherd of this has been noted from a site just north of Richborough, from which has been recovered pottery of first- to fourth-century date (Cottington Lane, on the Isle of Thanet; information from N. Macpherson-Grant, pottery identification by the present author). Young published a single example of this type from the Churchill Hospital kiln site in Oxford (1977a, 162—3) within a third-century phase. Negative evidence from mid third-century contexts at Lullingstone (Meates et al. 1952, nos. 59—66; the room number has been changed from 15 to 10 for the definitive report, Meates 1979) and Maidstone Mount (unpublished) villas provides some support for the view that Oxfordshire fine wares were extremely rare, if present at all, in most of Kent before the late third century. However, it is clear from the Chalk ‘cellar’ assemblage that a variety of forms in red colour-coated ware was circulating in the final quarter of the century, including tall- necked bulbous beakers (Young 1977a, C27), ‘Drag. 38’ flanged hemispherical bowls (ibid., C51 and C109), painted-flange-rim segmental bowls (ibid., C48), and bead-rim hemispherical bowls (ibid., C55). Mortaria of samian ‘Drag. 45’ derivation (ibid., C97) may have also been used at this time. The Parchment ware bowl from Richborough is apparently a unique example of unequivocally third-century importation of this ware to Kent.
   Fine white-surfaced wares are generally uncommon in this century in Kent. Flagons would seem to have been used less than in the preceding centuries. The cupped ring-neck form (no. 161 here) may have lasted into the early decades of the third century, and such vessels usually have, a pale buff to white surface. Flange-neck flagons and flasks (nos. 167, 169—170), a more typically late second- to fourth-century form, occasionally have pale surfaces. The popularity of dark-surfaced flagons and flasks has been mentioned earlier in this section. White ware flasks with red 

paint zonal decoration, possibly from the Nene valley (Howe et al. 1980, no. 95), are represented on several sites in contexts of third- to fourth-century date, although in contrast with Nene Valley beakers and mortaria of this period, these occurrences are biased towards the Medway valley (Appendix 3). Other forms are occasionally found with white surfaces, including the carinated bowl in Oxfordshire Parchment ware (Bushe-Fox 1949, no. 460), and a ‘Drag. 38’ flanged hemispherical bowl in white-slipped fine oxidised ware (from a late second- to mid third-century deposit in Canterbury: unpublished).
   Fulford (1975a, 108—9) has suggested that ‘the demand for red slipped wares, and possibly all fine, slipped pottery decreased significantly in the third century in comparison with the second’. The basis for this proposition is the low incidence of such wares on British sites subsequent to the cessation of Central Gaulish samian production in the early third century. It is clear from the foregoing discussion that a variety of fine red ware bowls was in use in Kent in the third century, but the small body of quantified data on samian and other fine wares does seem to support Fulford’s hypothesis, at least with regard to red bowls. There is no indication of a synchronous decline in the circulation of slipped beakers, although the third-century sources supplying Kent differ to a large extent from those of the Antonine period. The Upchurch Marshes fine ware industry may have waned in the third century, due in part to competition from fine sandy burnished wares produced on the Cliffe peninsula, but possibly also to the slow encroachment of the sea upon the area of the marshes where potting is thought to have taken place (5.II.4). A late third-century resurgence in the production of fine pottery in Roman Britain is indicated by the development of the Oxfordshire and New Forest industries, and at a more local level perhaps also ‘streak-burnished’ ware in east Kent. Fulford (1975a, 109—11) links this to a general economic expansion connected with the large outlay of public money on projects such as the

Page 122

Page 121       Back to Chapter 4       Contents Page         Page 123

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back to Publications On-line               Back to Research Page            Back to Homepage                 

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society 2004

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk