KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage


The Roman Pottery of Kent
by Dr Richard J. Pollard  -  Chapter 4  page 91
Doctoral thesis completed in 1982, published 1988

remainder. Other forms present in grey sandy ware include lids and everted-rim storage jars of identical style to those in shelly ware. These storage jars are, however, much less common than their shelly counterparts, having been found on only four sites in the Thames estuary to the knowledge of the present author to a total of five vessels (Appendix 3, and Fig. 31).
   The range of vessels manufactured in BB2, burnished and plain reduced sandy wares in west Kent underwent considerable revision in the late second century. Evidence from both the northern military zone and from Southwark places the introduction of the quarter-round ‘cavetto’ everted rim form on BB2 jars (Gillam 1970, Types 143—4; Tyers and Marsh 1978, types IVH 5—7; nos. 181 and 183 here) in this period. A synchronous decline in the manufacture of decorated pie- and dog-dishes may be envisaged, excepting perhaps pie-dishes with oblique linear decoration (Gillam 1970, Type 310); certainly the evidence from occupation deposits of the first half of the third century favours the proposition that the former decorated forms were not produced after the first decade of that century (Gillam 1970). The bead-rim BB2 jar was also discarded around this time. The ubiquity of the plain pie-dish in late second to mid-third century contexts renders the presence or absence of the form from broadly second-century contexts a valuable indicator of date: assemblages from which the form is absent are almost certain to be pre-c. A.D. 180 in accumulation (cf. Gillam 1973, 60). It is primarily this phenomenon that enables the introduction of fine burnished ware tall-necked bulbous beakers (cf. no. 152 here), pear-shaped cavetto-rim folded jars (no. 192), flasks (no. 195), narrow-neck slim jars (e.g. no. 196) and necked jar-bowls with a wavy line on the lower neck (no. 194) to be placed with confidence in the late second or early third century rather than any earlier. The plain coarse ware everted-rim lid-seated jar (no. 201) was probably also a product of this period; the pear-shaped necked triangular-

roll-rim jar (nos. 197—9) may have featured in the ‘pre-plain pie-dish’ range of forms, but it was undoubtedly turned out in much larger numbers relative to other forms from the late second/early third century onwards (cf. Colchester: Hull 1963, Form 268; and Alice Holt: Lyne and Jefferies 1979, Class 3C). Heavy bead-rim storage jars (no. 202) were produced from the late second century onwards at Mucking (Jones and Rodwell 1973, Type S) but possibly not in Kent. An element of standardisation is apparent in the new fine-burnished range, for wavy lines and burnished zones were employed by the potters of the Cliffe peninsula on this ware almost to the complete exclusion of other motifs (at Higham, Pollard 1983b; and amongst the kiln waste from Cooling — unpublished). This style was also popular at Mucking, on necked jar-bowls (Jones and Rodwell 1973, Type K), narrow-neck slim jars (ibid., Type N), flasks (ibid., Type 0) bag beakers (ibid., Type R, no. 107) and even heavy roll-rim recurved-shoulder jars (ibid., Type S, no. 110, cf. no. 202 here) during the late second and third/early fourth centuries. Plain bag- and necked bulbous-beakers in fine grey ware may also have been produced at Cooling (unpublished), but are absent from Higham. Local variation in the production of these wares is detectable from the study of kiln site and occupation site material. Thus the combed-shoulder motif found at Joyden’s Wood (no. 193 here) has not been recorded by the present author on any other site in Kent or Essex. This form may, admittedly, be pre-Severan in date, but is almost certainly not earlier than mid-Antonine according to its on-site associations. The wavy line does not seem to have been present on this site, although the heavy abrasion of the material may have resulted in the loss of decoration. The use of diamond-rouletting (Jones and Rodwell 1973, e.g. no. 82) and roller-stamping (ibid., nos. 83 and 99) appears to have been confined to the Mucking area kilns so far as the lower Thames potteries are concerned, though roller-stamping is recorded on bag- and globular

Page 91

Page 90       Back to Chapter 4       Contents Page         Page 92

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back to Publications On-line               Back to Research Page            Back to Homepage                 

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society 2004

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk