KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage


The Roman Pottery of Kent
by Dr Richard J. Pollard  -  Chapter 4  page 83
Doctoral thesis completed in 1982, published 1988

and the early third century (Peacock 1977c, 159), but there is no evidence of importation to Kent prior to the late second century. Colour-coated flagons were produced at Colchester in the period under review; these are described below.
   Limited production of mica-dusted wares occurred at Colchester and Canterbury, probably in both cases in the later second century. The forms produced at the former city include bag-beakers (Hull 1963, Form 391) and flagons with knobbed handles, some of which have tube-spouts (Hull 1963, Forms 361 and 362; cf. no. 78 here). These have occasionally been found in Kent (Appendix 3). A kiln associated with mica-dusted ‘face-mask’ jars (cf. no. 72 here, in orange-buff ‘Canterbury’ ware) has been recorded on the south side of Canterbury (Jenkins 1956b), but no details are available (cf. Swan 1984, 391, Whitehall Road).
   The range of forms produced in fine grey wares underwent some significant changes in the second quarter of the second century. Biconical beakers and jars, segmental and hemispherical bowls, and campanulate cups were all discontinued; with the abandonment of the biconical forms the last vestiges of what could loosely be described as a ‘Gallo-Belgic’ influence disappeared, production of butt-beakers and pedestal jars having been terminated by the Trajanic period. It is interesting to note that both biconical and butt-beaker forms are thought to have continued as part of the Oxfordshire grey ware range throughout the second century (Young 1977a, Types R25—6 and 29), as were carinated, hemispherical and campanulate derivatives of samian forms Drag. 29/30, 37 and 27 in reduced oxidised wares (ibid., Types R64 and 0.42, R68 and 0.45, and R62, respectively). Flanged hemispherical and bead-rim ‘Drag. 18’ straight-sided bowls in both reduced and oxidised Oxfordshire wares are, however, generally confined to the late first-early second century (ibid., Types 0.39 and R70, and R60, respectively). Further work needs to be done on the Oxfordshire wares in order to refine their

dating, if this is possible. The contrast between the rural setting of the Oxfordshire industry and the location of the Upchurch industry close to a major inter-provincial trade route (the Thames estuary) with trade links with the civitas capital and the Classis Britannica, is striking; the possibility that these differences of location influenced the dissemination of fashion developments is raised by this apparent conservatism on the part of the potters of the former industry.
   Beakers were by far the most important class of vessel, quantitatively, produced by the fine grey ware suppliers to Kent in the Hadrianic-Severan period. The dominant form is the ‘poppyhead’ beaker; strictly speaking this term should be confined to vessels with an everted rim, paralleling the poppy seed-head in form (nos. 145 and 150 here; cf. Tyers 1978, 61). However, the common association of vessels of this form with a decoration of panels of barbotine ‘comb-applied’ dots has often led to other beakers with this motif being given the name of ‘poppyhead’ including cornice rim and bead-rim types (e.g. no. 144). The dot-panel motif appears to be mainly of second-century date, vessels of the third century being either plain or rouletted (no. 150), the latter variations being introduced in the late second century. The typological development of these beakers has been investigated in depth by Tyers (1978); later vessels tend to be of narrower, more elliptical, shape, often with taller rims than their more globular predecessors of the early- to mid-second century. The form apparently continued well into the third century (see below) in Kent at least. Bag-shaped vessels occur throughout the period. Several plain vessels from the Ospringe cemetery (Whiting et a!. 1931, e.g. no. 125) are smaller than is usual for the form, suggesting that they were especially produced as votive pieces; their size, and plainness, could have reduced production costs in terms of raw materials and labour time, rendering them cheaper to acquire than larger, decorated vessels designed for

Page 83

Page 82       Back to Chapter 4       Contents Page         Page 84

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back to Publications On-line               Back to Research Page            Back to Homepage                 

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society 2004

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk