KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage

The Roman Pottery of Kent by Dr Richard J. Pollard  -  Chapter 4  page 62
Doctoral thesis completed in 1982, published 1988

not been pursued by the present author. Marsh's selective gazetteer (1978, 125-9) of 'compass-scribed' wares includes sites throughout Kent. His contention that London fine ware products, including the fine reduced wares, are generally unlikely to have been distributed much over 20 miles (32 km.) (ibid., 202) is supported by the evidence of the most frequently encountered product, mica-dusted ware, with six out of nine sites falling within a 30 km. radius of London (Fig. 21). Platter, cup, beaker and flagon forms in this ware have been found on Kent sites (Appendix 3), but not paterae or biconical strainers (Marsh 1978, Types 32 and 46, respectively). In general, identifiable London products are rare in Kent; the present author has seen no more than eight sherds from any one site of 'eggshell'/'marbled'/mica-dusted wares, Springhead containing that number of finds.
   Three other wares thought to have been manufactured to the north or west of London ought to be mentioned: cream ware 'ring-and-dot' beakers, 'Staines' lead-glazed ware, and 'LondonEssex' stamped wares. The first-named are globular vessels with short-everted rims and usually decoration of rings and dots 'en barbotine'. They have been discussed by Green (1978b), who suggests a date-range of Neronian-Flavian, and a source in the South Hertfordshire/North Middlesex area. They appear to have been common in London and to a lesser extent Verulamium, but rare elsewhere in south-east Britain: five sites are known in Kent, each comprising only a single sherd with the exception of Richborough (four sherds, Appendix 3 and Fig. 21). The lead-glazed wares of Roman Britain have been discussed by Arthur (1978); his 'south-east English' group includes globular beakers, 'imitation Dr. 30 beakers, Dr. 37 bowls' (ibid., 300) and pear-shaped flasks, in a grey to red-brown ware with white barbotine decoration, the whole covered by a translucent glaze usually appearing a medium green and yellow over the barbotine. Wasters from Staines suggest a source thereabouts for at least some of the group. 

Six find-spots are known in Kent, four of which are west of the Medway (Fig. 21 and Appendix 3). On the grounds of the distribution, a riverine traffic down the Thames was envisaged by Arthur (ibid.); the apparent scarcity of the ware at Richborough (one sherd only seen by the present author) suggests that beyond the mouth of the Thames the volume of this trade, as of that in other fine wares from the London area, was small in the extreme. A Flavian-Hadrianic date encompasses all dateable finds of this ware. The stamped wares of Rodwell's Group 2C, the only one of his 'London-Essex' groups (Rodwell 1978) known to have been found in Kent, are entirely confined to the western part of the county (Fig. 33; Rodwell 1978; Philp 1980). The fabric is fine, sandy, and usually oxidised, with bar- and ring-stamps; forms are predominantly carinated sub-cylindrical bowls, plus, possibly, hemispherical bowls (Rodwell 1978). Only seven sherds have been published from Kent and its bordering districts, three of which come from Springhead. The four sites - Springhead, West Wickham, Fawkham and Titsey - all fall within a 30 km. radius of London, but outliers to the south of the Thames are represented by two find-spots in Sussex (see Appendix 3). Rodwell (1978) has argued in favour of a source in the Hadham area of east Hertfordshire, but no wasters or kilns are known. The dating of the ware is also open to speculation, but an origin in the mid-Flavian period seems likely (ibid.), with a termination of production within the first half of the second century.
   The development of Romano-British fine ware industries in the Flavian period may be considered to have been the result of two processes: the economic progress of the province and the demise of competitors on the Continent. The former is fully discussed elsewhere (Pollard 1983a, 480-92); briefly, the taxation system was reformed during the Flavian period, possibly involving a switch from taxation in kind to taxation in cash, at least in the south-eastern half of

Page 62

Page 61     Back to Chapter 4     Contents Page         Page 63

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back to Publications On-line               Back to Research Page            Back to Homepage                 

This site is hosted by nVeracity      Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society 2004   
 

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give an accurate record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk