KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage

Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 94  1978  page 89
Excavations on the Site of Leeds Priory. Part 2 The Claustral Buildings and Other Remains  By P. J. Tester, continued.



Fig. 6  Tile Mosaic (¼)

cutting, I in. to 1.1 in. thick. over impression and is 1/32 in. thick, glaze is orange-yellow and details of the design are carefully handled. Well fired with a grey core.
   Both fragments are part of a sixteen-tile design. Similar examples have been recorded at Frittenden3 and also at New Romney, Appledore and probably at Maidstone (All Saints)4 and Higham Priory.5 It is likely that this group dates from c. 1360-90 and the distribution pattern suggests more than one centre of production.

Group III.
10. One fragment of tile, 0.7 in. thick, of a dull-red fabric with coarse grit temper and some large stone inclusions; steeply bevelled sides and no keying, the tile having been 
shaped by cutting and scored diagonally before firing to enable it to be broken into a triangular shape after. White slip has been applied over impression and is 1/32 in. thick. Glaze is bright orange-yellow, and the fragment is well fired with a grey core.
   This tile is difficult to parallel except for an identical example in Brookland church. Possibly it is an import from the Low Countries,6

   3 Arch. Cant., ix (1874), 203.
    4 J. Cave-Browne, A History of Maidstone (1890). 
   
5 Arch. Cant., lxxxii (1967), 143.
    6 J. B. Ward Perkins, 'Late Medieval Flemish inlaid Tiles in
           England', Antiq. Journ. xvii (1937), 442.

Page 89  (This page prepared for the Website by Ted Connell)                    

Previous page       Back to Page listings       Next page

Back the Contents page   Back to Arch. Cant. List   Back to Publications On-line  Back to Research Page  Back to Homepage

This site is hosted by nVeracity      Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society 2003     

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give an accurate record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk