KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage

Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 94  1978  page 79

Excavations on the Site of Leeds Priory. Part 2 The Claustral Buildings
 and Other Remains
 
By P. J. Tester continued

states that it is the only known example of such a ‘beak-head’ in Kent (Fig. 1).
   Professor Zarnecki has examined photographs of the chapter house carvings and in his expert opinion they date from c. 1160. He makes comparison with the chapter house at Rochester (c. 1150—60), but whereas the spurs on the bases there are pointed, those at Leeds are foliated and of greater interest.
   The trefoiled scrolls with binding ties on an abacus (Fig. 3, no. 6) are matched by work on the lavatory tower in the monastic buildings of Canterbury Cathedral, ascribed to Prior Wibert between 1153 and 1167.
   The walls on either side of the entrance survived to a height of 2 ft. 6 in. and if the doorway had been flanked by the two openings usually found in that position, their cills could not have been less than that height above the cloister floor.
   Only a small part of the interior was fully excavated, mainly in the area of the destroyed apse. No burials were encountered but a small patch of tiles slightly below the estimated floor level could have formed the floor of a grave of the type found by Mr. A. C. Harrison in the medieval St. Mary’s Hospital at Strood (Arch. Cant., lxxxiv, 1969, 146). There were signs of later disturbance and pieces of coal covered a late floor level, from which it is concluded 

that the chapter house was used for the storage of that  material in post-Dissolution times. No evidence survived of a bench against the inside of the walls as frequently occurred in chapter houses.
   Consideration has been given to the possibility that the chapter house was extended eastwards in the later Middle Ages and provided with a square end in place of the apse, as might be inferred from the plan. Constructional evidence and the stratification — particularly the high level of the base of the extended north wall — does not, however, accord with such an interpretation.

The East Range
The side walls of the dormitory range were traced at several points but the interior of the building could not be uncovered due to the presence of a plantation of poplar trees in the area. At this point the ground rises steeply on the side of the valley towards the east and drops away southward beyond the limit of the range shown on the plan where the foundations vanished completely so that we were unable to discover the original length of the range nor the situation of the reredorter which should have been sited in that direction. The east wall of the range was seen to butt against a wall lying east—west, in line with the south side of the chapter house although of separate construction.

Page 79 

Previous page       Back to Page listings      Next page

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society click here

Back the Contents page To Arch. Cant. List To Publications On-line To Research Page To Homepage

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society 2003