|
KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY -- RESEARCH Studying and sharing Kent's past Homepage |
Archaeologia Cantiana - Vol. 93 1977 page 41
|
Excavations on the Site of Leeds Priory. Part I - THE CHURCH By P. J. Tester, F.S.A. continued |
|
no. 4). They were situated at intervals coinciding with the buttresses of
the north aisle, and they appear to have been partly connected with a rich
and elaborate mural arcade, collapsed portions of which were found among
destruction debris in the cloister. Plate VB shows a reconstruction of one
of its heavily moulded and cusped arches with a marble capital which may
well have belonged to one of the smaller intermediate clustered shafts
supporting the arcade.3 By calculation it appears that there were
three of these arches to each of the bays defined by the larger bases. Those
bases were, however, plainly intended to support more than this arcade and
may indicate an intention to vault the north walk of the cloister. Whether
this was ever carried out is doubtful as no sections of vaulting ribs
occurred in the destruction debris. |
cloister opening towards the garth. Their most striking feature is the
occurrence of 'split cusps' - a motif employed in window tracery and
elsewhere in the late-thirteenth and early-fourteenth Lenturies. A close
parallel to the Leeds cusps occurs in the chancel windows of Chartham
church, seventeen miles to the east, which is known on documentary evidence
to have been in course of construction in 1294, and the fashion does not
appear to have extended much beyond the first quarter of the fourteenth
century. Two aumbries were situated in the south face of the aisle wall open towards the cloister; one close to the transept (Plate VA) and the other in the central bay, both no doubt intended to contain books for the use of the canons. Internally, they bore traces of plaster and their cills were of marble, rebated for the door. In the two eastern bays, at the foot of the aisle wall and below the cloister bench, were four shallow recesses, one of which is shown in Plate VA, containing human bones. No complete skeleton was represented, and the remains included part of the thin skull of a very young infant. Probably these bones came from burials disturbed in rebuilding and were carefully re-interred in specially prepared recesses at the base of the wall. 3 I am indebted to our Member, Mr A. Daniels, for this reconstruction. |
|
|
Page 41 (This page prepared for the Website by Ted Connell) |
||
Previous page Back to Page listings Next page
Back the Contents page Back to Arch. Cant. List Back to Publications On-line Back to Research Page Back to Homepage
|
This site is hosted
by nVeracity
Kent Archaeological Society is a registered
charity number 223382 |
This website is constructed by
enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to
gratefully received so
that we can amend our pages to give an accurate record as possible. Please
send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk