|
fairly level, and including a productive
soil layer (W 101), had accumulated against the curtain,
which, on falling, had carried some of its chalk-bed with it,40a
and leaving the tail of it under the strata. Then, clearly
after some interval, but not long enough to damage the
rendering, the bulk of the platform was piled up as a low
mound with sloping sides, thus creating the channel or gulley
between it and the curtain. A thin clay-capping visible in κ
[k], λ [l], and
β [b], west, was added shortly before the demolition
of the Old Tower, and the solid yellow-brown capping after the
building of the Hall, marking the transition from Phase X to
Phase Y.
The Old Tower: external Conditions. The base of section
ϕ [f] showed that the inner face of the Tower was also
founded on a bed of chalk, but that the outer face did not
reach the same depth, and was apparently trench-built down to
a possibly natural bed, above which was an accumulation topped
by humus and almost certainly equivalent to the level basal
strata in β
[b] and λ [l]. Only above this is it well-rendered,
having been buried, almost to its top in the 'second
mounding', which comprises a variable accumulation of clay,
gravel and brick-earth, topped by the clay capping noticed in κ
[k], λ [l] and
β [b], and, over that, another flint and gravel surface,
all within the lifetime of the Tower. It appears, then, that
the Tower was founded after the fairly level strata had begun
to accumulate against the curtain (probably a short enough
time to treat them as consecutive), that a humus layer (W 101)
accumulated against both, and, after a moderate interval, the
second mounding buried the whole external face of the tower
but left the channel round the curtain. All wares associated
with these phases of building and mounding are treated as 'W',
and show no perceptible development. The first presumption,
that the Old Tower, on a very low motte, preceded the curtain
was disproved.
Interior Conditions of the Old Tower and its Yard. That
the Tower was not completely embedded in the second mounding
was evident from the attached walls under the solar undercroft
(bb, dd) and from the fact that all was demolished
except the south wall, protected by the mound. In fact, it had
a yard which formed the emplacement of the Hall and provided
its deep undercrofts, and the platform, though extensive on
the south, was reduced on the other sides to a mere inner ring
round this yard. Neither Tower nor yard can be fully recovered
in plan, but some indications are given by the section of β
[b] immediately west of the Hall, by the section of δ
[d] at the
north end of the solar undercroft, by the distribution of
rubble under the footings of the hall and by a point of
depression in section a just east of the
40a Fig. 4 here shows the saltire (greensand)
symbol; it should be crosses (chalk), and W101 on section λ
[l] should be taken as the horizontal layer included below, not
level with, the marking. |