KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage

Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 73 - 1959  pages 121
Late-Continued Demesne Farming at Otford. By F. R. H. Du Boulay, M.A., F.R.Hist.S. Continued

oats and legumes in some unpredictable combination, occasionally under barley alone. Although there are one or two years when the field was wholly blank, it was, in recorded years, rarely cropped over less than 60 to 80 acres. But East Field was the exception. North Field was in operation over the whole period, yet after 1322 never more than about 40 of its supposed 154 acres were sown; during the later middle ages some 20 to 40 acres of its surface were generally sown with blocks of wheat, spring barley and, occasionally, oats. In 1432 it was specified that 26a in the south of the field were under wheat, 18a in the northern part under barley. 1 Roughly the same things could be said of the Combe, though this was cropped a little more fully. The big field in Shoreham was quite fully cropped till 1391, after which no record of cropping exists at all. Other fields seem only occasionally and marginally cropped, though a demesne field at Milton was considerably used in the fifteenth century.
If, as is apparent, the demesne arable was increasingly under-exploited from the mid-fourteenth century onwards, what was happening to it? The evidence is fragmentary, but there may be two or three complementary explanations. Small portions of the demesne fields were being let off to tenants by court-roll, for rent.2 Also, some demesne land, like some tenant-land, was going out of cultivation for lack of people willing or able to cultivate it.Finally, it is possible that some of the demesne went out of cultivation

because the soil was not good and was easily abandoned during a period of economic recession.4 The leasing process is visible in a small way at least by the early years of the fifteenth century. Decayed rents and land left in the lord’s hand are more apparent in the second quarter of the fifteenth century. But they are also concurrent processes.
This tale of diminishing tillage is only one aspect of the archbishop’s demesne economy at Otford. It is necessary to look briefly at the proceeds and expenses of demesne farming.
   1 L.R. 860.
  
2 E.g., in 1404-5 the assized rents are swollen by a number of "new" rents (not necessarily new that year), including is. 4½d. from William and John, sons of Adam Sweyneslond, for 2a. 3r. lying in North Field and the Combe, let to them by court roll, and 4 dayworks by the sheepfold let to Adam Sweyneslond and his heirs forever for 4d. and the service of supplying lime to Otford manor whenever necessary (L.R., 839).
  
3 E.g., in 1437-8 some 23a. of demesne land in Shoreham was let to various persons at 8d. an acre. But all other demesne lands and pastures there brought in nothing for lack of a conductor, and were occupied by the lord’s sheep (L.R., 863).
  
4 There seems to be an analogy in an Inquisition post mortem (vol. xi, no. 363), where an estate in Ickham is described in 1362 as consisting of" a capital messuage and 120 acres of arable, dry and sandy, of which 80 acres may be sown every year, but this year only 31 acres are sown, and of these 8 acres are sown with beans, peas and vetches."

Page 121 

Previous Page     Back to Page Listings    Next page

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back to Contents Page    Back to Arch. Cant. List   Back to Publications On-line  Back to Research Page  To Homepage

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society July 2004     

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk