|
KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY -- RESEARCH Studying and sharing Kent's past Homepage |
|
Archaeologia
Cantiana - Vol. 69 1955 page 36 |
|
Saxon burials.1 The quality of the decoration on
the Lyminge brooch ensures that it must take a high place artistically
amongst that group of objects which are usually cited as examples of
naturalistic animal ornament in the earliest Anglo-Saxon period.2
Chronologically the brooch must stand very early in this group for only
the "bearded beaks" have yielded to any degree of stylization.
This may well have been the sort of ornament which was being worn in Kent
(or on the Continent) at about the time when the earliest invaders were
making their penetrations in the west.3 The saucer brooches must also be comparatively early in date belonging to the earlier half of the sixth century A.D. That from grave 10 is the first applied saucer brooch to be found in Kent. Its association with the decorated penannular brooch suggests that the applied saucer brooch has a history at least as old as the cast and the star-fish decorative pattern is in fact an early feature of Saxon geometric design, possibly to be linked with late Roman ornament. The "S" shaped and radiate-head brooches are undoubtedly Frankish imports and the association of the radiate-head with the gold bracteate of Montelius group D shows that this type with lozenge-shaped foot-plate was being imported before A.D. 600. The small equal-armed brooches from grave 24 are unusual but their decoration in Style 1 places them in the second half of the sixth century A.D., as also the button brooch from grave 16. |
The square-headed and circular brooches from grave 44 probably represent
the latest deposit in the cemetery so far excavated. The circular
brooches fall into Leeds Class1 of Kentish circular brooches4
about the end of the sixth century A.D. and the two large square-heads
may be referred to the same date. The -U- shaped cells across the bow
of the brooch have already been discussed. The decoration of the
head-plate in Style I linked with this particular shaped cutting of the
stones would seem to confirm the above date for this grave. These two
brooches have so many individual characteristics that it would be
difficult to place them into any of the groups which are discussed by
Alberg.5 The truncated triangles surmounted by part-circles
are not a normal Kentish characteristic but the general disposition of
the garnet |
|
|
Page 36 (This page prepared for the Website by Christine Pantrey) |
||
Previous page Back to Page and Plate listings Next page
Back the Contents page Back to Arch. Cant. List Back to Publications On-line Back to Research Page Back to Homepage
|
This site is hosted
by nVeracity
Kent Archaeological Society is a registered
charity number 223382 |
This website is constructed by
enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to
gratefully received so
that we can amend our pages to give an accurate record as possible. Please
send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk