Archaeologia Cantiana - Vol. 35 1921 page 13
Printing error, the text on page 11 is duplicated on page 12
found by this means, confirming our suspicions, and it was
then regretted that the absence of an urn was not observed in Group VI.
and similar precautions taken in that in stance.
from its position and depth, that it may also have been part of a burial
Previous page Back to Page listings Next page
For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society click here
Back the Contents page Back to Arch. Cant. List Back to Publications On-line Back to Research Page Back to Homepage
Kent Archaeological Society is a registered
charity number 223382
This website is constructed by
enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to
gratefully received so
that we can amend our pages to give an accurate record as possible. Please send details too email@example.com