KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage

     Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 122  2002  page 137
Patrixbourne Church: Medieval Patronage, Fabric and History. By Mary Berg

   figure-of-eight pattern, the same motif runs throughout.
  The design is fairly simple with crossed branches or sticks
   in front of more foliage. Or could this be another version
   of a bound vine? There is nothing similar on the west
   portal at Rochester.

Fifth (innermost) order
The innermost archivolt with its stylised flat heads is
   described by Musset as ‘original’. Stone calls them ‘flat  
   straps on a thin roll, the final geometric and devitalised
   evolution of the beakheads’. Zarnecki disagrees and
   suggests that, although there are many examples of
   beakheads on Romanesque arches in England, these do
   not include Patrixbourne. The resolution no doubt lies in
   the definition used by each writer of ‘beakhead’ 58 The
   style is certainly reminiscent of beakheads, albeit it in a
   form that might be described today as ‘minimalist’.

Description of the supports and columns from the outer to the inner columns
Flat with small sundials used to mark mass times.
Round with capital with foliage decoration unlike the
   decoration on the upper part of the portal. The

   easternmost capital has a small beast mask in its centre
   licking two curls of foliage. This is a derivative of a
   well-known type that can be traced back to the late
   tenth century and which appears throughout
   Romanesque Europe.59
Round, broader than 2 or 4 and without a capital.
Round
Flat
The bases of the columns are fairly standard with three
   square bases and two columns on each except the one nearest the door.


BIBLIOGRAPHY
Boase, T. S. R., 1953, English Art 1000-1216, Oxford, p. 206.
Hasted, E., 1798, The History and Topographical Survey of the
   County of Kent,
Canterbury, p. 723.
Heales, A., 1898, The Records of Merton Priory, London.
Kahn, D., 1982, ‘Romanesque Sculpture in Kent’, unpublished
   PhD thesis, London University, pp. 122, 142-6, 156-60, 30 1-2.
Livett, G. M., 1909, ‘Architectural Notes on Patrixbourne Church,
   Archaeologia Cantiana, XXVIII, 307-9.
Musset, L., 1985, Angleterre romane, vol. 1, St Léger, pp. 2 18-19.
Newman, J., 1983, North East and East Kent, The Buildings of
   England, N. Pevsner (Gen. ed.).

Page 137     (This page was prepared for the website by Ted Connell)       

Previous Page      Back to Page Listings      Next Page     

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back to Arch. Cant. List      Back to Publications On-line     Back to Research Page     To Homepage

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society November 2004     

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk