KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage

     Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 122  2002  page 126
Patrixbourne Church: Medieval Patronage, Fabric and History. By Mary Berg

   Like the west portal at Rochester, Patrixbourne’s south portal has five orders of voussoirs, though each is different in character and there is also a decorated hood mould, unlike Rochester’s which is plain. The ornamentation of the Patrixbourne hood mould, described by Stone as ‘new dog-tooth’, is difficult to parallel locally.29  The west portals at Rochester and St Margaret’s at Cliffe, and the south portal at Barfreston, have nothing comparable. The voussoirs immediately below the hood mould contain twenty-three motifs, twenty-one of which are framed in foliage. The lowest figure on the western side is a grotesque without foliage and the block is half as wide again as the others, which are roughly equal in size. The grotesque is a griffin with the head of a woman or child wearing a bonnet. All but one of the medallion-style motifs are arranged in pairs, each with a similar pattern of foliage in mirror image. Some medallions have been restored and some sculpture appears not to fit into a pattern. The central figures in each pair generally alternate between heads and birds and most of the heads seem to be of men with longish hair and beards.
(See Appendix 1.)
  
The portal is of a uniform and familiar style with foliage and grotesques as recurrent themes, with the possible exception of the Agnus Dei. Most writers, like Zarnecki, who have commented in any detail on the sculpture have drawn parallels with examples in western and central

France, and most have also seen similarities with the west door at Rochester. However, Stone believes that the tympanum and lintel of the Patrixbourne door bears ‘little relation to the new French influence’. Musset suggests that the same team of sculptors was active at Patrixbourne and Barfreston but a comparison of the Patrixbourne, Barfreston and Rochester doors seems to support Kahn’s view that there is a much closer relationship between Patrixbourne and Rochester than Patrixbourne and Barfreston. First, the sculpture at Barfreston in general is more delicate and there is greater use of foliage than at either Rochester or Patrixbourne. Second, the voussoir motifs are quite different with signs of the zodiac and labours of the year forming a coherent programme at Barfreston. Finally, although all three tympana feature Christ in Majesty and angels, the style of the Barfreston figures on the voussoirs is rounder and fuller than the others.
   Musset writes that the south portal is a long way from the austere geometric style, but that is not the case of the priest’s door in the south chancel (Plate V). The voussoirs over the narrow door and the lintels are carved with geometric patterns. Only the capitals on the single round column on each side have non-geometric patterns, and these are not figurative but scalloped capitals with what seems to be

Page 126     (This page was prepared for the website by Ted Connell)       

Previous Page      Back to Page Listings      Next Page     

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back to Arch. Cant. List      Back to Publications On-line     Back to Research Page     To Homepage

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society November 2004     

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk