KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH   Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage

Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 1  1858  page 84
HACKINGTON, OR ST. STEPHEN’S, CANTERBURY. COLLAR OF SS. 
   By Edward Foss, F.S.A

These webpages are designed to be viewed with the screen resolution set at 800 x 600 and text size at normal. HOW TO

only represented on his tomb, which he had erected during Henry's reign, with the collar of SS, but the chantry, also built by him, is profusely ornamented with the same collar, enclosing his monogram, J. B. He probably received the privilege of wearing it during Henry's visit to St. Edmundsbury, in 1433.1
   In all the instances where I have found a trace of the position of the parties, they evidently held some office connected with the Crown, or were otherwise attached to the reigning family, and were not mere knights. The weight of evidence clearly preponderates in favour of the hypothesis, that those only were entitled to wear this collar who were in some way connected with the royal household or service.
   On the accession of Edward IV., the Yorkist collar of roses and suns was of course adopted, and to its clasp the white lion of the House of Marche was commonly attached.


THE COUNTESS OF ESSEX.

   But the collar of SS was revived by Henry VII; and the frequent insurrections in that king's reign would have the natural effect of inducing his partisans to distinguish themselves by his emblem. The consequence was, that by degrees it was assumed by unprivileged persons; so that when eventually the two houses ceased
   Bury Wills (Canden Soc.), pp. 15-44, 233.

Previous Page       Back to Page listings       Next page      

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

Back the Contents page   Back to Arch. Cant. List   Back to Publications On-line  Back to Research Page  Back to Homepage

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society 26th September 2010

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details too research@kentarchaeology.org.uk