KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH    Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage


Victoria County History of Kent Vol. 3  1932       Political History of Kent - Page 286

from the Cinque Ports.74  Nine years later his cause was greatly strengthened for a time by the insult offered to the queen by Lady Badlesmere, who refused to receive her at Leeds Castle, on 13 October 1321, declaring that she could not venture to entertain anyone without her lord’s orders. The castle was manned by a competent garrison, and when the queen endeavoured to force an entrance six of her followers were slain. She called upon the king to avenge her, and popular sympathy was roused to a degree which produced an unexpectedly favourable response from the towns of the south-east to his summons for levies of horse and foot. The castle was besieged by an overwhelming force, and on 31 October was forced to surrender, many of the magnates who had assembled to assist the king subsequently marching with him to the west, where he occupied without resistance the strongholds of his enemies.75  Lord Badlesmere was taken prisoner at the battle of Boroughbridge, and conveyed to Canterbury to be hanged, his head being fixed on a pole at the Burgate in 1322.76
   Kentishmen took an active share in the French wars of the reign of Edward III. Not only did they supply large contingents of archers77  and a great proportion of the men who served in the navy,78  but Sandwich was the usual port of embarkation. That their burden was found a heavy one is shown by a petition of the men of Kent of 1347,79  when they pray that ‘on account of their guarding the sea, and the great prisage of victuals in their county, they may be discharged of all unreasonable fines for not finding men at arms, hoblers, and archers.’ In 1361 the king ordered the castle of Sheppey to be rebuilt. The work was done under the direction of William of Wykeham and was completed six years later, when the king paid a visit there of some days and made the town a free borough in honour of Philippa his queen, its name being altered to Queenborough.80 It was commanded in 1369 that divers parts of the isle of Thanet should be inclosed and fortified with mounds and ditches to prevent the landing of ships and boats, at the charge of those whose lands should be benefited by these defences, and similar directions were sent to all other maritime parts of the county in 1372.81
   In 1376 orders were issued to place beacons on the hills; 82  and in the following year similar orders were issued for erection of beacons at the Isle of Sheppey, Hoo, Cleve and Gravesend,83  for the defence of the county and the safety of the navy in the ports there.
   If the county had a heavy share in the responsibilities of home defence, it was also generously represented in Parliament, though at this time representation was apt to be regarded as much in the light of a burden as a privilege. The cost of living was terribly enhanced by the plague, the Black Death of 1349-50 being only the worst of many outbreaks at this time, as well as by causes connected with the war. Accordingly, the universal discontent produced by the Statute of Labourers (1351) was likely to be particularly strong in this county, which was roused to great bitterness by the preaching of John Ball, ‘the mad
   74  Ibid. 209.                                          75  Ibid i, 298, 9.
   76  Leland, Coll. 1,274 (1770).
   77  Hist. MSS. Corn. Rep. iv., App. 426.
   78  Rot. Parl. ii, 1086.                             79  Ibid. ii, 194a.
   80  Leland, op. cit., i, pt. ii, 579
   81  Rymer, Faed. vi, 623, 747, cited by Hasted, op. cit. iv, 295.
   82  Rymer, Faed. (Syllabus), 473.          83  Rot. Pan. iii, 386b.

Previous Page         Page 286          Next Page

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

To Political History page listings      To Contents Page     To Research      To Homepage

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society September 2006

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs.  Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details to research@kentarchaeology.org.uk