KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH    Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage


Victoria County History of Kent Vol. 3  1932       Political History of Kent - Page 285

his support and Montfort was obliged to withdraw to London.67  In spite of the influence of the Earl of Gloucester as lord of the castle of  Tonbridge and other great estates in the county, and the solid opposition of the Cinque Ports, the king’s army marched through Kent, spoiling the lands not only of foes but of others who had remained neutral.68
   The lands of those who were against the king at the siege were taken into the king’s hands.69  The property of the unfortunate men who had been impressed to serve at the siege of Rochester and to man the castle of Dover was at the same time confiscated and in some cases the men were hanged. Many citizens of London who had property in the county were also dispossessed whether they had taken part in the rebellion or not. Earl Warenne encamped his army about his castle of Lewes, where on 14 May 1264 the disastrous battle was fought.70  Kent was again overrun by the baronial party, and the lands already taken by the royalists were again seized. The secession of the Earl of Gloucester from Montfort’s party early in 1265 gave the royalists in the county some relief. His castle of Tonbridge was betrayed to Simon de Montfort the younger and Sir John de la Haye by Roger de Forte, one of its garrison. After the battle, Dover was committed to Henry de Montfort, and Prince Edward was kept a prisoner there. Montfort was joined by his mother the Countess of Leicester, and they held out for a time after the battle of Evesham, surrendering finally to Edward on 28 October 1265.
   Even after the defeat and death of Montfort at Evesham, the Cinque Ports still held out against the king (except Dover, which Prince Edward captured after a siege in 1265) ;71 and when deprivation of their estates drove the vanquished and disinherited party into revolt, Simon, the son of the dead earl, joined himself to the ports. The frays constantly occurring between the Cinque Ports mariners and those of Normandy involved Edward I in disputes with the French king, who summoned him to answer for their piracy in January 1294. The English seamen, who had won a complete victory over the French in an engagement in the Channel on 15 May 1293, defied Edward’s threats of punishment and attempts to procure redress, and these frays continued until the outbreak of the French war, when the task of aiding in the defence of the coast devolved upon the Cinque Ports. In the attempted invasion of England by the French, Dover was sacked and burnt in 1295 by the French admiral, Matthew of Montmorenci ;72 an insult which the English avenged by burning Cherbourg.
   In 1312, the Earl of Gloucester was put in charge 73 of Kent, Surrey and Sussex by the baronial party, and in the same year Edward II visited Dover, where he strengthened the fortifications of the castle and took oaths of fealty
   67 For the original material regarding the condition of Kent at this time see Cal. Pat. 1258-66 and Cal. Inq. Misc. I, Nos. 719 to 768 and 1024.
   68 Henry captured Tonbridge Castle on May 1, and later appealed in vain to the Cinque Ports for a naval force to attack London (Blaauw, Barons’ War, 133).
   69 Cal. Pat. 1258-66, p. 3 15-6.
   70  The day after the battle, Prince Edward and the king of the Romans were surrendered as hostages to the Earl of Montfort, and were confined in Dover Castle. Rishanger, Chron. (Rolls Ser.), 30.
   71 This capture was the more important that Richard and Amaury de Montfort, who had sailed from Dover to enlist foreign mercenaries, had intended to land there. Green, History of the English People, i, 317. Rishanger, op. cit. 47.
   72  Ibid 150.
   73  Chron. Edw. I and Edw. II (Rolls Ser.), i, 203.

Previous Page         Page 285          Next Page

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

To Political History page listings      To Contents Page     To Research      To Homepage

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society September 2006

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs.  Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details to research@kentarchaeology.org.uk