KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY  -- RESEARCH    Studying and sharing Kent's past      Homepage


Victoria County History of Kent Vol. 3  1932       Political History of Kent - Page 284

The French agreed to lay down their arms, and were escorted through royalist Kent to Dover, whence they took ship for France.61
   Hubert de Burgh’s close connection with the county continued throughout the minority of the young king, who owed so much to his faithful service. In addition to holding the shrievalty, he had the custody of Tonbridge Castle, became governor of Rochester Castle, and on 11 February 1227 was made Earl of Kent, when the castle and port of Dover, with the revenues of the haven, the castles of Rochester and Canterbury, and a fee of 1,000 marks per annum for their custody, were granted him for life.62  In the early part of the reign of Henry III he was the most powerful man in England; but he had numerous enemies, and he was deprived of his castles and honours in 1232. Restored two years later, they were again taken away in 1239; but he was once more reconciled to the king, and died in 1243 in full possession. Neither of his sons appears, however, to have borne the title of Earl of Kent.63
   As the baronial opposition to Henry III took shape, the Earl of Leicester’s chief supporter in Kent was at first Richard de Clare. The custody of the castle of Dover was granted by the council of fifteen in 1258 to another of his most important associates, the Justiciar, Hugh Bigod ;64  but when the breach between the Earls of Gloucester and Leicester was followed in 1261 by the king’s temporary recovery of his position, Bigod was expelled. The abandonment of the Provisions of Oxford 65 made it imperative that Leicester and Gloucester should arrange their feud, but the enmity was only in abeyance when Gloucester died in 1262 and was succeeded by his son, then a minor and Montfort’s devoted disciple. In 1263 Dover was once more placed in the hands of the baronial party, and Richard de Grey was put in possession. Henry twice attempted in person to gain admission (December 1263, and January 1264), but Grey refused to admit him.66
   Among the first to repudiate the Mise of Amiens in 1264 were the men of the Cinque Ports, and the resistance in the south was organized by Montfort himself, who, to open up communication with his allies in the Cinque Ports, marched with a large following of Londoners to Rochester. The castle was held for the king by Earl Warenne, who thus blocked the passage of the Dover road. The town was captured and the castle besieged in April 1264. The besiegers were largely drawn from Kent, and men were impressed for their services and the manning of Dover Castle under authority from the young Earl of Gloucester, by Sir Roger de Leyburn, warden of the Cinque Ports and keeper of the county, and Sir John de la Haye, his lieutenant and successor, who had charge of the coast to prevent the landing of the forces collected by queen Eleanor in Flanders. The wall of the castle was sapped by Richard Lambard of Bostall in Plumstead in the county and the outer bailey stormed. Warenne was on the point of surrendering, when the royalists came from Nottingham to
   61  Ibid. 225.                                              62 Ann. Mon. (Rolls Ser.), iii, 102.
   63   Ibid. i, 86, 112, 130; iii, 138; Cal. Pat. 1225—32, p. 496.
   64  On the landing of Richard, king of the Romans, 27 Jan. 1259-60, the oath tendered by the barons was administered to him at Canterbury by Richard de Clare at the reception there by the king and archbishop. He had at first refused to take it, but the barons armed against him, assembled the ships of the Cinque Ports, and would not allow him to land at Dover until he promised to do so. The king had gone to sea to meet him. Matth. Paris, Chron. Maj. (Rolls Ser.), V. 733.
  
65  Rishanger, Chron. (Rolls Ser.), 10. In 1261 the king visited Dover Castle and gave it into the custody of Walrond.
   66 Gervase of Cant. (Rolls Ser.), I I, 222-3, 232.

Previous Page         Page 284          Next Page

For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent Archaeological Society   click here

To Political History page listings      To Contents Page     To Research      To Homepage

Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society September 2006

This website is constructed by enthusiastic amateurs.  Any errors noticed by other researchers will be to gratefully received so
 that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible. Please send details to research@kentarchaeology.org.uk