|
to think, is slag of pre-Roman type, though it may have
been utilized by the Romans as road metal.12 For supplies
of lead, Kent had to rely on State mines elsewhere in Britain. A partly
used pig of lead, inscribed with the name of the Emperor Nerva, was found
at Richborough,13 though there is nothing to indicate
from which district it came.
A series of clay crucibles of various shapes and sizes, for
smelting, found in the Strood cemetery (see p. 169) are now in Maidstone
Museum; and, finally, we may mention a kiln which was found in 1929 under
the western alley of the medieval cloister at St. Augustine’s,
Canterbury,14 and which may possibly have been used for
bronze-smelting.
Bricks, and tiles for roofing, flooring, and wall
construction, must have been manufactured on a large scale. No definite
remains of tile kilns are recorded,15 but the Medway
valley and the coastal zone of North Kent, where the necessary brick-earth
and clay are located, were doubtless important centres. Bricks and tiles
were also made from Gault clay; and traces of a building of gault bricks
were recorded by Spurrell in Sharfleet Creek.16 A series
of box tiles, found in the Plaxtol villa, and now in Maidstone Museum, as
already recorded,16 a is stamped with the maker’s
advertising slogan in Latin.
A consideration of this coarse pottery naturally leads to the
subject of finer wares and their manufacture, and it will be convenient to
give a list of the remains of kilns found in Kent before proceeding to a
more detailed account of the sites in the Medway marshes that have been
regarded for many years past as potteries.
(1) The remains of a small pit, largely destroyed, were
excavated in the earthwork at Charlton by Mr. F. C. Elliston Erwood. It
was about 4 ft. in diameter, and sunk 1 ft. below the level of the
adjacent occupation floor, and the bottom was lined with blackened flints
embedded in burnt clay and mixed with fragments of burnt wood. The pit
seemed to have been lined with unburnt clay, and in it were a few lumps of
sandstone which had evidently been subjected to great heat, the surface
becoming partly glazed.17 Part of a clay bar
was also met with in the same excavations; it may perhaps be a furnace bar
from a pottery kiln, but similar bars are found in the Red Hills sites.
(2) Fragments of coarse, ill-fired, red pottery have
been found on Broomy (or Bromhey) Farm, Cooling, in the Hundred of Hoo. It
was at first thought that they were debris from a potter’s oven, but
subsequent investigation made it clear that they were fragments of briquetage
derived from a site analogous to those of the Red Hills of Essex.18
(3) A Roman pottery at Dymchurch is indicated on the map in
George Payne’s archaeological survey of Kent published in 1889, but no
reference is made to the discoveries. In 1846, mention was made of Roman
pottery
12 It occurs with La Tène
III pottery at Saxonbury Camp. Sussex Arch. Coll. lxxi, 228.
13 Richborough I, p. 42.
14 W. F. Grimes, Y Cymmrodor, xli,
72; above p. 74, no. 26.
15 There are several ‘Tile Fields,’ but
the tiles are more likely to be debris from buildings. Tiles have been
found in large quantities in the Thames off Northfleet, and there is
record of a doubtful kiln site at Margate. The discoveries at East
Farleigh (see Top. Index) may indicate tile-making.
16 Arch. Journ. xlii, 278.
16a See above, p. 123.
17 Journ. Brit. Arch. Assoc. N.S.
xxii, 161 ; for the village, see p. 101.
18 Rochester Naturalist, No. 131,
vol. vi, 105; Arch. Cant. xlii, Report, p. xlvi.
|