|
Victoria
County History of Kent Vol. 3
1932 - Romano-British
Kent - Introduction - Page 8
|
types is that sometimes called the Corridor type
(fig. 3). This type is used alike for small and for fairly large houses,
and is found as far away on the Continent as the Saalburg on the Taunus,
the extreme limit of the Romano-German frontier. It is distinguished by
a straight row or range of rooms with a corridor or verandah running
along them. Generally, some larger room projects at one end; sometimes
rooms project at both ends, forming wings, and the resulting plans have some resemblance to those of many modern |

Fig. 3 Corridor House
|
|
cricket
pavilions. More elaborate, but hardly less common in the country
districts, is the so-called Courtyard type (fig. 4), which also occurs
freely in northern Gaul, and often reaches a very great size. In this
essentially rural type, three ranges of rooms fronted by corridors stand
round three sides of a large rectangular unroofed courtyard, which is
entered by a gateway in the middle of the fourth side. Other Courtyard
houses, built compactly round three or four sides of a small rectangular
yard or garden, represent in reality a somewhat different tradition.
They are an urban type, and are derived from the ‘peristyle’
town-houses of Italy and the Mediterranean provinces.2 There
are also simpler types of building, of which two possess consistency
enough to be classified. In one of these we find a small oblong
structure with dwelling-rooms at one end, and barns or sheds at the
other. In the other, which we may call our fourth type, the living-rooms
stand at the two ends of a similar rectangle, with a small yard between
them (fig. 24, p. 107).
Not infrequently in the country two or three of these types
are used together to make up the equivalent of one large house. At
Brading, for instance (fig. 5), three detached structures stand
round a large yard. In the centre is a
luxuriously fitted corridor house (rooms i—xii), |
|

Fig 4 Courtyard House
|
obviously meant for the master and his family. On the
left is a ruder structure, perhaps of the fourth type, intended in part
for residence, and perhaps occupied by servants (rooms xiv—xxx). On
the right, a third block (rooms xxxii-xxxv) may have contained barns or
stables, and a structure beyond this (xxxvi) may be a detached bath -
house |
|
2 Compare
Schwalb, Römische Villa bei Pola, plate 3; Fondation Piot, iii,
177-226 ; Gsell, Revue Africaine. xxxviii, 230, and Monuments
de l’Algerie, ii, 18, 19; Déche1ette, Bibracte, p.
40. For an important fresh survey of Romano-British house-plans, see R.
G. Collingwood, The Archaeology of Roman Britain (1930), p. 113. |
Previous Page
Page 8 Next Page
For details about the advantages of membership of the Kent
Archaeological Society click
here
Back to Introduction
Back to Contents Page
Back to
Research Back
to Homepage
Kent Archaeological
Society is a registered charity number 223382
© Kent Archaeological Society May 2006
This website is constructed by
enthusiastic amateurs. Any errors noticed by other researchers will be
to gratefully received so
that we can amend our pages to give as accurate a record as possible.
Please send details to research@kentarchaeology.org.uk
|